FreeCash - the first casino that has a winners-only policy!

[DreamerJ]

If guys from the buterin’s team don’t consider this standard a standard doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist and can’t be used for smart contracts

you’re contradicting yourself. let them use whatever they want. if a project is being built on the Ethereum project, why not use the ancestor of all the other standards - ERC-20?..

because it is an outdated standard. Let’s see it it changes in future. However I am doubting

outdated in what sense? maybe you meant one of the older ones? old doesn’t mean bad

[pactiond]

A congressman from the states is rooting for forbidding ICO because he believes that token production harms national economy. He commented positively on the technology though. Other congress representatives state that crypto must be left alone and prosper. I can see that there are arguments as to opinions in this aspect and i it’s unclear to which outcome this will lead us all.

what’s unclear? the american government knows what they’re doing, they thing about people and don’t want regular people to fall for such money-wasting opportunities.

I personally doubt that they’ll really do something about it; they may regulate it, but not forbid. I don’t really get how tokens can harm the economy, ICO it’s still an investment in prospects.

they seem to not really know what to do with all of that. senators probably just want to understand whether they’ll get some profit eventually or not…

but they can’t do that

ohh reaaaalllyyyy…

that’s why i said that they simply don’t know what to do with all of that.

[HappStoreW]

A congressman from the states is rooting for forbidding ICO because he believes that token production harms national economy. He commented positively on the technology though. Other congress representatives state that crypto must be left alone and prosper. I can see that there are arguments as to opinions in this aspect and i it’s unclear to which outcome this will lead us all.

what’s unclear? the american government knows what they’re doing, they thing about people and don’t want regular people to fall for such money-wasting opportunities.

I personally doubt that they’ll really do something about it; they may regulate it, but not forbid. I don’t really get how tokens can harm the economy, ICO it’s still an investment in prospects.

they seem to not really know what to do with all of that. senators probably just want to understand whether they’ll get some profit eventually or not…

but they can’t do that

ohh reaaaalllyyyy…

that’s why i said that they simply don’t know what to do with all of that.

I don’t agree completely. there are icos that can work on the US market if they’re allowed by the valuable assets agency. i mean there are working under the US jurisdiction.

[beheper]

A congressman from the states is rooting for forbidding ICO because he believes that token production harms national economy. He commented positively on the technology though. Other congress representatives state that crypto must be left alone and prosper. I can see that there are arguments as to opinions in this aspect and i it’s unclear to which outcome this will lead us all.

what’s unclear? the american government knows what they’re doing, they thing about people and don’t want regular people to fall for such money-wasting opportunities.

I personally doubt that they’ll really do something about it; they may regulate it, but not forbid. I don’t really get how tokens can harm the economy, ICO it’s still an investment in prospects.

they seem to not really know what to do with all of that. senators probably just want to understand whether they’ll get some profit eventually or not…

but they can’t do that

ohh reaaaalllyyyy…

that’s why i said that they simply don’t know what to do with all of that.

I don’t agree completely. there are icos that can work on the US market if they’re allowed by the valuable assets agency. i mean there are working under the US jurisdiction.

everything seems very complicated there. the projects initiall ygathere icos without the americans and only then they must get alicense to enter their market

[dhaemp64]

A congressman from the states is rooting for forbidding ICO because he believes that token production harms national economy. He commented positively on the technology though. Other congress representatives state that crypto must be left alone and prosper. I can see that there are arguments as to opinions in this aspect and i it’s unclear to which outcome this will lead us all.

what’s unclear? the american government knows what they’re doing, they thing about people and don’t want regular people to fall for such money-wasting opportunities.

I personally doubt that they’ll really do something about it; they may regulate it, but not forbid. I don’t really get how tokens can harm the economy, ICO it’s still an investment in prospects.

they seem to not really know what to do with all of that. senators probably just want to understand whether they’ll get some profit eventually or not…

but they can’t do that

ohh reaaaalllyyyy…

that’s why i said that they simply don’t know what to do with all of that.

I don’t agree completely. there are icos that can work on the US market if they’re allowed by the valuable assets agency. i mean there are working under the US jurisdiction.

everything seems very complicated there. the projects initiall ygathere icos without the americans and only then they must get alicense to enter their market

greeeedy people wants to get money from all around the globe)))

[Urakeavan]

It is best to keep your tokens after ISO in order to sell them in the future at a bargain price, so you can save the price of tokens. Bounty hunters sell tokens immediately after they appear on the stock exchange, and just the token costs nothing

[libope]

If guys from the buterin’s team don’t consider this standard a standard doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist and can’t be used for smart contracts

you’re contradicting yourself. let them use whatever they want. if a project is being built on the Ethereum project, why not use the ancestor of all the other standards - ERC-20?..

because it is an outdated standard. Let’s see it it changes in future. However I am doubting

outdated in what sense? maybe you meant one of the older ones? old doesn’t mean bad

there’s no point in arguing with you

[pactiond]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(

well i’m practicing) guys, excuse us for flooding so much, good luck in your professional beginnings

[Tamandrac]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

[HappStoreW]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

[dhaemp64]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

[beheper]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

[libope]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

you should risk, you won’t lose that much in any case, you can go with 100 bucks if you want

[JohnYDillinger]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

you should risk, you won’t lose that much in any case, you can go with 100 bucks if you want

ahah, seems like on of the project organizers is writing this

[GucciGangClub]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(

well i’m practicing) guys, excuse us for flooding so much, good luck in your professional beginnings

thank you very much and good luck to you as well))

[Xtonyonyack]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

you should risk, you won’t lose that much in any case, you can go with 100 bucks if you want

ahah, seems like on of the project organizers is writing this

yyeeeaaahhh, they’ll surely become amazingly rich due to your hundred

[DreamerJ]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(

I think that participation is the only thing that matters here in crypt, because there are quite a lot of people that just complain but have never even tried ..

[Zebash!]

Hey all! We have been super busy behind the scenes.

We have successfully closed our 'Angel Round' and now putting efforts into building the platform.

We will also be obtaining a license that allows us to operate in some of our key target territories.

We agree with what you are saying to a certain extent. ICO's do not always deliver as promised, so we are approaching our raise in a more traditional way. Therefore, we will not raise money until we have firstly built the platform, then secondly onboarded at least 100 k players.

Anyone interested in signing up should head over to our website www.freeca.sh and sign up for the whitelist!

We will of course continue to update you on our progress!

Adam and the Freecash team!

[Zebash!]

i’m not working in this project and i’m strictly objectively interested in it. i’m not tryna make you invest in it. i just realize that it has qutie a good potential to compensate  risky investments.

I can confirm they don't work for us. Also, we will not raise money until we have build the platform, launched and onboarded 100k players.

[Zebash!]

https://medium.com/@adam_72715/the-death-of-the-ico-535763685d9d

Check the latest article...