the website of the Daily Mail, a newspaper my school teacher disparagingly called a tabloid, will have more idea on what Bitcoin is. I think it's a positive news overall.
I'm not so sure about that. We're years ahead now, and the media still doesn't know what they are talking about. The most we can expect from them picking up Bitcoin related news is more drama and fud.
They are the first to report about every bit of negativity, but don't want to put any effort in rectifying fake news articles like we have seen about Goldman Sachs recently. They want to see blood on the streets because that sells.
Yeah, I guess my school teacher was right then. ) But I still think that
any news is better than
no news. It's one of the first rules of marketing, if I'm not mistaken, "Make Yourself Known." If people heard about something they can then research for themselves and form an opinion. But they wouldn't do it if they never heard about the subject.
Although I wouldn't call Roger Ver "Bitcoin Jesus". Idk, is that true? Do people really call him that? I thought Bitcoin Jesus was Andreas M. Antonopoulos.
Title that the media came up with but no one uses in reality. Roger can't even decide for himself what Bitcoin is anymore. One moment it's Bitcoin Core BTC, then Bitcoin BTC, then Bitcoin BCH, then BTC version of Bitcoin, and so forth.
Thanks for the clarification! I googled images for "Bitcoin Jesus" and was shocked that indeed there were many pictures of Roger Ver popping up. But after reading your post I did more research and now I think that even though Roger could earn the nickname for his early advocacy for Bitcoin, today it is used mostly sarcastically.