[TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks!

[Agbe]

(~)

Members who support newbies (September 2022)

	User name	Current rank [1]	Quantity of newbies who received merit
58)	fillippone	Legendary	1 newbie

Total supported in September 2022: 159 newbies (by 83 members)

Thank you for the update.
Well, I must say I am quite disappointed by this result.
I hoped to climb the ladder a little bit given the effort I am putting in helping low ranking users with my thread:

[Merit] Share your best posts/threads with Fillippone to be merit assessed

I must thy harder then!

My Brothers from another Countries. I give you all respect. Thanks for helping others in the forum.
When I first joined the forum it was Ratimov that was helping newbies and other ranks but later he stopped from the thread he created for that purpose, though he is still helping from other boards. That is why when I saw his name on list I was not surprised. Later this year, The Pharmacist also join him with a massive approach to help lower rank members every month then fillippone follow up the good work. One thing I like fillippone is that, he always challenge himself to take the first position or among top 5 in the forum. I believed he was a FIRST CLASS student in his University days.
I believed you guys. Let us see the next table. Best wish to all charitable merit sources

[1714300835]

1714300835

[1714300835]

1714300835

[saxydev]

So 20k users received at least 1 merit in 4 years.. That's an average of less than 1.5 new members per day that have been rewarded. That's low, that's very low; there is just the problem with the merit busters, merit should be given away, way, way more than it is now.

The users joining number has to be way higher! Interested to see how many users registered in the last 4 years and have at least 1 post. If the ratio is more than 3 to 1 on new members posting vs new members posts merited, there is a fundamental problem which may need to be solved. Maybe, perhaps with the merit received when a certain number of activity is reached.

Just saying..

[BlackHatCoiner]

So 20k users received at least 1 merit in 4 years.. That's an average of less than 1.5 new members per day that have been rewarded.

Taken the fact that most users here are either shitposters or failed AIs, this number is such a decent one.

The users joining number has to be way higher!

And the users who have actually something interested to share should be quite greater as well. But they aren't.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Don't be discouraged @Fillippone; you and @The Pharmacist both do a lot to assist low-ranking members like myself in rising in the ranks.

I only gave you 3 merits in total, and though your statement is kind of a general one I have to wonder--also in general--how many alt accounts I'm helping to rank up with my post history reviews.  I'm not against that per se, but it's something that's crossed my mind.  Quite a few of the members who've asked me for help have had very similar writing styles and the vast majority of them post mainly in the Gambling section.

I'm glad I raised my standards for merits recently, else I'd probably be helping the exact opposite types of members I'd intended to when I first made my standing offer.  Nothing against you, Zaguru12.  Maybe if you had 4 digits after "Zaguru" I might cock an eyebrow, but for now I'll keep my radar on low sensitivity settings.

[saxydev]

So 20k users received at least 1 merit in 4 years.. That's an average of less than 1.5 new members per day that have been rewarded. That's low, that's very low; there is just the problem with the merit busters, merit should be given away, way, way more than it is now.

IMO you made poor conclusion since those 20K user only count newbie and a newbie can receive merit more than once from multiple users. I'd suggest you to see list of recent merit sent[1] and dashboard made by DdmrDdmr
[2] to gain different perspective.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=recent
[2] https://public.tableau.com/views/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/MeritSendersReceivers?:language=en-US&:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

Not necessarily, we speak about the new members that join and stay arround. And for some reason the stats are terrible, if you put an average of how many users advance to the first rank, which is jr member, 20k users in 4 years is almost nothing. See cracked.io stats for example.

@BlackHatCoiner

But new member should be more welcomed when they are starting their activity here, when they receive appreciation, they stay. As I see it, as a new member, same users posting everywhere, the new members posting in several threads about discussions (don't have the posts appreciated at all), but one line posts from old members receive the "merit", it's more like, I will suck your c*ck and I expect you to do the same.

Plus all the drama about what is sent and to whom is sent, I saw threads about 5 merits sent and the user was marked as an abuser.

Let's not forget about all the spam with the gambling signatures, you see them everywhere, they are reading only the OP and 2-3 messages ignoring the entire thread..and they still get paid.

[ABCbits]

--snip--

Not necessarily, we speak about the new members that join and stay arround. And for some reason the stats are terrible, if you put an average of how many users advance to the first rank, which is jr member, 20k users in 4 years is almost nothing.

I get your point, although i'm not sure the stats is that terrible. After all, 78%/2.7 million account either have no post or banned (according to BPIP[1]).

See cracked.io stats for example.

I found their statistic[2], but didn't find anything about "new members that join and stay around".

[1] https://bpip.org/
[2] https://cracked.io/statistics.php

[BlackHatCoiner]

But new member should be more welcomed when they are starting their activity here, when they receive appreciation, they stay.

In threads of my interest (Economics, Dev & Tech, Bitcoin Discussion) I encourage newbies who choose to start a new topic, and either have an important question to make, or an idea on behalf of them, or just an interesting project they're working on. But, I agree that I should try more.

As I see it, as a new member, same users posting everywhere, the new members posting in several threads about discussions (don't have the posts appreciated at all)

These same users are posting everywhere, because apparently, they're encouraged to do so. It's clear that some are a treasure for the community, and that's why they get most of the merits. As for newbies, I strongly disagree that their posts aren't appreciated. Point me at newbies who did share something helpful, interesting, funny, or just entertaining, and didn't get recognized.

Plus all the drama about what is sent and to whom is sent, I saw threads about 5 merits sent and the user was marked as an abuser.

You're talking about the fundamentally flawed capsule thing? I didn't do any drama. It had just drawn my attention that NotATether, who's a respectable member in technical stuff, found this clear fraud somewhat useful.

[fillippone]

Don't be discouraged @Fillippone; you and @The Pharmacist both do a lot to assist low-ranking members like myself in rising in the ranks.

I only gave you 3 merits in total, and though your statement is kind of a general one I have to wonder--also in general--how many alt accounts I'm helping to rank up with my post history reviews.  I'm not against that per se, but it's something that's crossed my mind.  Quite a few of the members who've asked me for help have had very similar writing styles and the vast majority of them post mainly in the Gambling section.

I'm glad I raised my standards for merits recently, else I'd probably be helping the exact opposite types of members I'd intended to when I first made my standing offer.  Nothing against you, Zaguru12.  Maybe if you had 4 digits after "Zaguru" I might cock an eyebrow, but for now I'll keep my radar on low sensitivity settings.

I think nobody can blame you if you merit a post of a n alt-account of a poster who will alter leverage their new rank to do something negative for the community.
Raising the standard is a difficult balance between helping newbie post, who might haven't got to a good standard (yet) and avoiding disgraceful future situations.

This is the art of being a good merit source, and it is not questionable by others.

[aysg76]

I think nobody can blame you if you merit a post of a n alt-account of a poster who will alter leverage their new rank to do something negative for the community.
Raising the standard is a difficult balance between helping newbie post, who might haven't got to a good standard (yet) and avoiding disgraceful future situations.

This is the art of being a good merit source, and it is not questionable by others.

Exactly when you as a merit source are handing out merits to different accounts you can't check for alt account and only sees if the post quality is good or not and if you find it useful or sharing some relevant contents then you give merits to them.

Speaking about @The Pharmacist then you help lot of members to rank up and have said to PM you for monthly post review so there would generally be lot of members taking this opportunity and asking you to do the same so the only thing you can do is to look at post history so don't blame yourself on this fact and what they will gain with those merits if they get caught? Nothing but your merits were gone to the quality post only so keep up your work .

If we seek about @fillippone then you are helping out many members with your thread and handed out over 4k merits and going beyond your usual merit TX and sending 1,2 or more to different posts to various members so it's not at all possible to check beforehand if they are alt account or not and only focus on post quality of the members only so this is approach we can follow if we are distributing merits at big pace.

[fillippone]

If we seek about @fillippone then you are helping out many members with your thread and handed out over 4k merits and going beyond your usual merit TX and sending 1,2 or more to different posts to various members so it's not at all possible to check beforehand if they are alt account or not and only focus on post quality of the members only so this is approach we can follow if we are distributing merits at big pace.

The only possibility is to evolve to a fully fledged AI, like other users have already done. But I am an old-fashioned flesh and bone Merit Source.

[Zaguru12]

Don't be discouraged @Fillippone; you and @The Pharmacist both do a lot to assist low-ranking members like myself in rising in the ranks.

I only gave you 3 merits in total, and though your statement is kind of a general one I have to wonder--also in general--how many alt accounts I'm helping to rank up with my post history reviews.  I'm not against that per se, but it's something that's crossed my mind.  Quite a few of the members who've asked me for help have had very similar writing styles and the vast majority of them post mainly in the Gambling section.

I'm glad I raised my standards for merits recently, else I'd probably be helping the exact opposite types of members I'd intended to when I first made my standing offer.  Nothing against you, Zaguru12.  Maybe if you had 4 digits after "Zaguru" I might cock an eyebrow, but for now I'll keep my radar on low sensitivity settings.

Actually the 3 merits had came generous from you because I haven't PM yet for a post review. I have been skeptical about it because I feel I don't have the standard of a quality poster yet but I am surely working on it. I don't want to ruin my chances just yet since it might get me been in your ignore list, but I will certainly PM even though I scared to do it now

For the number (12) I hope I haven't gotten on the wrong side of you because of it. Believe me when I say I just have special connection with it and I just love to attach it to my name.

[Welsh]

Raising the standard is a difficult balance between helping newbie post, who might haven't got to a good standard (yet) and avoiding disgraceful future situations.

This is the art of being a good merit source, and it is not questionable by others.

Raising the standard is all well, and good, but we don't want it to be so difficult that no one ever ranks up. That's why having merit sources with different views is essential in my opinion. You don't want to standardise the way users give merit, of course having a sort of standard so it doesn't dip low is good, but I think we've already pretty much established that, and the merit system has done a fantastic job at what it was implemented to do.

Ultimately, it's theymos who decides on the standard, since they'll remove merit sources if they aren't in line with their vision. However, I don't think there's been too many recent merit sources removed? Plus, some removals may have not been for quality issues.

[fillippone]

Ultimately, it's theymos who decides on the standard, since they'll remove merit sources if they aren't in line with their vision. However, I don't think there's been too many recent merit sources removed? Plus, some removals may have not been for quality issues.

I think the Merit sources situation is pretty static: I just checked and I can't see difference in the last few month.

Apart from that, I fully agree with you: the important thing is making your Merit Source trickle down in the forum.

[aysg76]

The only possibility is to evolve to a fully fledged AI, like other users have already done. But I am an old-fashioned flesh and bone Merit Source.

That would be option but the traditional way is also better approach and you have opened up a thread or say been appointed as Merit source to help low rank members grow but overall it should be based on the quality of their post and we have to check that aspect before meriting the user and on your level it's hard as if we are reviewing lot of posts on a daily basis.This way you could analyse the post and see if you personally find it useful and merit worthy or not.

This approach I believe is better with your traditional way only and not depending on AI completely to hand out the merits and check for these aspects.

Raising the standard is all well, and good, but we don't want it to be so difficult that no one ever ranks up. That's why having merit sources with different views is essential in my opinion. You don't want to standardise the way users give merit, of course having a sort of standard so it doesn't dip low is good, but I think we've already pretty much established that, and the merit system has done a fantastic job at what it was implemented to do.

Exactly the merit sources have different approach of giving out merits and they have their own style like some give out more while some stick to 1-2 at most so we see they all have their own meriting standards and this was necessary to appoint different members so it's well distributed on the forum.They can set some rules like giving out merits according to post content and not setting high or say strict policy that it's hard for members to rank up.But we see different sources helping members based on their post.

I think the Merit sources situation is pretty static: I just checked and I can't see difference in the last few month.

I also think that the situation is same from many time and think there were some request to appoint new sources or remove some inactive one's who have not handed out any merits or very less merits in their board not helping members to rank up but still there are 110 at the current only.Yes if @theymos find out not suitable he can make changes to it anytime.

[Welsh]

Exactly the merit sources have different approach of giving out merits and they have their own style like some give out more while some stick to 1-2 at most so we see they all have their own meriting standards and this was necessary to appoint different members so it's well distributed on the forum.They can set some rules like giving out merits according to post content and not setting high or say strict policy that it's hard for members to rank up.But we see different sources helping members based on their post.

Not just the amount they send either, it's their process of thought when rewarding merit. Some users only merit the upmost of quality, while others actually look to reward newbies looking to contribute. There's usually a bit of a difference between a user that's been here years, and those that have recently signed up. So, sometimes those new users don't get rewarded nearly as much, since the community has come to expect a certain standard when posting.

Which in the most part is brilliant, but it does mean it's a lot more difficult to rank up. I personally like rewarding users that ask some decent questions, and give the impression they're actually trying to learn rather than just fishing for merit.

[JayJuanGee]

...... So, sometimes those new users don't get rewarded nearly as much, since the community has come to expect a certain standard when posting.

Which in the most part is brilliant, but it does mean it's a lot more difficult to rank up. I personally like rewarding users that ask some decent questions, and give the impression they're actually trying to learn rather than just fishing for merit.

Probably any of us can be moody sometimes too, and we might not even conform with our own standards, if we happen to believe that we have some kinds of consistent practices (standards) in the way that we send out smerits over time.

Sometimes I look at a post, and I think to myself.. This post is so damned stupid and incoherent, but the person seems to be genuinely posting from his/her own experiences and seems to be a real person.. So at that point, I might start to consider that I am using a "this is a real person" standard who is trying.. .. and whether s/he is trying to learn from others, learn from oneself or just trying to communicate an idea (but not very well), gives me some sense that there is hope that his person might be capable of getting better at posting.. and that might be enough to get me to send an smerit - again depending on my mood.. because if I read a bunch of similar posts, then I might lose my patience, and therefore the posts that I read earlier in my session got lucky to receive some smerits and the ones who I read later, I had no more patience, so there is a kind of luck that might sometimes be involved.

So what is my presumption? that the person is a person who seems to be trying.. and there is some kind of substance to what they are communicating, even if I don't completely understand it in its present state of arrangement (did they use google translate, or did they actually type out those quasi-incoherent words that have a few gems of some ideas contained therein?).. and for me it is not necessarily about "trying to learn" from other members in the forum, but the fact that when people post from their personal experiences, they sometimes will end up learning more about themselves and even learn how to present themselves better, and even if their motives for posting had happened to have been totally selfish in their attempt to ONLY help themselves, they may also may sometimes end up providing benefits to other members who might be able to relate to their having had gone through the process of fleshing out their ideas.. as incoherent as parts of them might have been.

I go back and read some of my posts, too.. and sometimes, I will say to myself, what is that person trying to say?  And, it's my own post.  Some people will tell me (suggest to me).. "maybe you should go back and edit your presentation a bit, so that members can understand what you are saying?"  And sometimes, my response will be "who cares if they understand or not? I feel better for having had written the post, whether anyone else understands it or not."

Don't get me wrong.  I am not trying to promote mediocrity, shit posting or ongoing patterns of laziness in terms of posting drivel, but sometimes "ain't nobody got time for editing their own posts," and sometimes the post still might be deserving of a merit and sometimes some of the later posts from the same member will become better because, s/he had gone through an earlier process to sort out some of his/her ideas in an earlier "draft" post.

Also, there are some members who hold themselves to really high standards, and we cannot really blame them for their ongoing consistently clear and grammatically correct posts.... .. so for sure, sometimes posts will receive merits merely because the ideas are presented very well, even when the ideas might not be very good.

[Welsh]

Sometimes I look at a post, and I think to myself.

Absolutely, we have different standards each day, and when it comes to something like the merit system it doesn't matter all that much, in fact it can actually be a good thing. There's no set standards, and therefore you want a little more variation. Don't think there's also natural variation in what gets posted every month. Some months we'll have good post, after good post, but other months it'll be what I'd call a dry month. So, naturally you'll be wanting to expend your merit source allocation since you're encouraged to do so, therefore those dry months will likely see lower quality posts being rewards when compared to the higher quality months.

Also, hell yeah some times I look at my posts, and think I've made a right mess of things there. Grammar, general presentation or just being concise enough (which is something I've always struggled with) so I definitely don't expect anyone to be absolutely perfect with their posts. At the end of the day, it's a discussion forum, not a language efficiency test.

[Coin-1]

These are the monthly statistics for October 2022 below.

Members who support newbies (October 2022)

	User name	Current rank [1]	Quantity of newbies who received merit
1)	xandry	Legendary	11 newbies
2)	NotATether	Legendary	9 newbies
3)	ETFbitcoin	Legendary	9 newbies
4)	JayJuanGee	Legendary	9 newbies
5)	vapourminer	Legendary	9 newbies
6)	mole0815	Legendary	7 newbies
7)	dkbit98	Legendary	5 newbies
8)	ThemePen	Full Member	4 newbies
9)	bitmover	Legendary	4 newbies
10)	o_e_l_e_o	Legendary	4 newbies
11)	nutildah	Legendary	4 newbies
12)	LoyceV	Legendary	4 newbies
13)	klarki	Legendary	4 newbies
14)	philipma1957	Legendary	4 newbies
15)	n0nce	Legendary	3 newbies
16)	fillippone	Legendary	3 newbies
17)	BitMaxz	Legendary	3 newbies
18)	hugeblack	Legendary	3 newbies
19)	joker_josue	Legendary	2 newbies
20)	BitcoinBarrel	Legendary	2 newbies
21)	Kavelj22	Hero Member	2 newbies
22)	CryptopreneurBrainboss	Legendary	2 newbies
23)	DdmrDdmr	Legendary	2 newbies
24)	Bthd	Legendary	2 newbies
25)	Vispilio	Legendary	2 newbies
26)	NeuroticFish	Legendary	2 newbies
27)	tomos81	Hero Member	2 newbies
28)	nc50lc	Legendary	2 newbies
29)	roslinpl	Legendary	2 newbies
30)	TryNinja	Legendary	2 newbies
31)	Cheating killer	Jr. Member	1 newbie
32)	davidspitzer	Hero Member	1 newbie
33)	Iroh	Member	1 newbie
34)	VSYS Host	Member	1 newbie
35)	nubcake_MeoW_	Member	1 newbie
36)	EarnOnVictor	Full Member	1 newbie
37)	citb0in	Full Member	1 newbie
38)	Next-door	Jr. Member	1 newbie
39)	Jatiluhung	Full Member	1 newbie
40)	mRTHroo	Member	1 newbie
41)	romeitaly	Full Member	1 newbie
42)	Sandra_hakeem	Sr. Member	1 newbie
43)	nikolaspaolo	Full Member	1 newbie
44)	cryptobadshah	Member	1 newbie
45)	MrCryptHodl	Hero Member	1 newbie
46)	Shussainshah	Member	1 newbie
47)	MK-74	Hero Member	1 newbie
48)	spyrosc200	Member	1 newbie
49)	PawGo	Legendary	1 newbie
50)	Liquidoptions	Sr. Member	1 newbie
51)	BlackHatCoiner	Legendary	1 newbie
52)	Lorokan	Member	1 newbie
53)	Charles-Tim	Legendary	1 newbie
54)	FatFork	Legendary	1 newbie
55)	neha11	Jr. Member	1 newbie
56)	dnp	Full Member	1 newbie
57)	miniZ	Member	1 newbie
58)	omone1	Member	1 newbie
59)	Bitcoin_Arena	Legendary	1 newbie
60)	Pmalek	Legendary	1 newbie
61)	Prova123	Sr. Member	1 newbie
62)	cabron	Hero Member	1 newbie
63)	Zebedee23	Legendary	1 newbie
64)	coldice	Hero Member	1 newbie
65)	The Cryptovator	Legendary	1 newbie
66)	mikeywith	Legendary	1 newbie
67)	Ultegra134	Hero Member	1 newbie
68)	defriadi	Full Member	1 newbie
69)	Husna QA	Legendary	1 newbie
70)	cryptosize	Member	1 newbie
71)	JanEmil	Hero Member	1 newbie
72)	Saint-loup	Legendary	1 newbie
73)	aoluain	Legendary	1 newbie
74)	Wind_FURY	Legendary	1 newbie
75)	PX-Z	Sr. Member	1 newbie
76)	darkangel11	Legendary	1 newbie
77)	paxmao	Legendary	1 newbie
78)	ItsCrafty	Full Member	1 newbie
79)	LFC_Bitcoin	Legendary	1 newbie
80)	owlcatz	Legendary	1 newbie
81)	jackg	Legendary	1 newbie
82)	2girls	Sr. Member	1 newbie
83)	panjul07	Legendary	1 newbie
84)	elma	Hero Member	1 newbie
85)	Lucius	Legendary	1 newbie
86)	mjglqw	Legendary	1 newbie
87)	kryptqnick	Legendary	1 newbie
88)	EFS	Legendary	1 newbie
89)	Cyrus	Legendary	1 newbie
90)	Hhampuz	Legendary	1 newbie
91)	theymos	Legendary	1 newbie

Total supported in October 2022: 184 newbies (by 91 members)

[Coin-1]

These are the monthly statistics for November 2022 below.

Members who support newbies (November 2022)

	User name	Current rank [1]	Quantity of newbies who received merit
1)	mole0815	Legendary	11 newbies
2)	JayJuanGee	Legendary	10 newbies
3)	xandry	Legendary	10 newbies
4)	fillippone	Legendary	6 newbies
5)	dkbit98	Legendary	5 newbies
6)	ETFbitcoin	Legendary	5 newbies
7)	LoyceV	Legendary	5 newbies
8)	Pmalek	Legendary	4 newbies
9)	bitmover	Legendary	4 newbies
10)	OmegaStarScream	Legendary	4 newbies
11)	klarki	Legendary	4 newbies
12)	BitcoinBarrel	Legendary	3 newbies
13)	DdmrDdmr	Legendary	3 newbies
14)	o_e_l_e_o	Legendary	3 newbies
15)	nutildah	Legendary	3 newbies
16)	Welsh	Legendary	3 newbies
17)	Lucius	Legendary	3 newbies
18)	philipma1957	Legendary	3 newbies
19)	ThemePen	Full Member	2 newbies
20)	NotATether	Legendary	2 newbies
21)	Royse777	Legendary	2 newbies
22)	Julien_Olynpic	Legendary	2 newbies
23)	NotFuzzyWarm	Legendary	2 newbies
24)	icopress	Legendary	2 newbies
25)	vapourminer	Legendary	2 newbies
26)	rendravolt	Hero Member	1 newbie
27)	TOXIC-ZY	Jr. Member	1 newbie
28)	EarnOnVictor	Full Member	1 newbie
29)	citb0in	Sr. Member	1 newbie
30)	Lida93	Full Member	1 newbie
31)	Pancharick	Full Member	1 newbie
32)	Juwel580	Jr. Member	1 newbie
33)	Kathleenn	Jr. Member	1 newbie
34)	Outhue	Full Member	1 newbie
35)	Silence Scream	Sr. Member	1 newbie
36)	Ifunanyawinner	Jr. Member	1 newbie
37)	Lord Sir Bitcoin	Member	1 newbie
38)	Cryptogreatdane	Full Member	1 newbie
39)	kinkajou	Jr. Member	1 newbie
40)	n0nce	Legendary	1 newbie
41)	dlightag	Member	1 newbie
42)	Rollbit Razer	Member	1 newbie
43)	sbercoin.one	Member	1 newbie
44)	ZAINmalik75	Full Member	1 newbie
45)	foncho86	Jr. Member	1 newbie
46)	betnomi	Full Member	1 newbie
47)	BlackHatCoiner	Legendary	1 newbie
48)	Priya Chowdhury	Jr. Member	1 newbie
49)	bullrun2020bro	Legendary	1 newbie
50)	Unsoldier	Hero Member	1 newbie
51)	BTMBitcoinVN	Member	1 newbie
52)	_oh_no_stop_this_	Member	1 newbie
53)	Blowon	Hero Member	1 newbie
54)	worldofcoins	Sr. Member	1 newbie
55)	MoparMiningLLC	Legendary	1 newbie
56)	Little Mouse	Legendary	1 newbie
57)	GrosWesh	Legendary	1 newbie
58)	sportsbet.io	Legendary	1 newbie
59)	slaman29	Legendary	1 newbie
60)	suzanne5223	Hero Member	1 newbie
61)	Vispilio	Legendary	1 newbie
62)	goldkingcoiner	Legendary	1 newbie
63)	Fivestar4everMVP	Hero Member	1 newbie
64)	HmmMAA	Hero Member	1 newbie
65)	palle11	Sr. Member	1 newbie
66)	coin-investor	Hero Member	1 newbie
67)	fortunecrypto	Legendary	1 newbie
68)	samson	Legendary	1 newbie
69)	MinoRaiola	Legendary	1 newbie
70)	bbc.reporter	Legendary	1 newbie
71)	Ludmilla_rose1995	Full Member	1 newbie
72)	Branko	Sr. Member	1 newbie
73)	Goran_	Legendary	1 newbie
74)	Ucy	Sr. Member	1 newbie
75)	Lafu	Legendary	1 newbie
76)	LFC_Bitcoin	Legendary	1 newbie
77)	NeuroticFish	Legendary	1 newbie
78)	Buchi-88	Legendary	1 newbie
79)	elma	Hero Member	1 newbie
80)	nc50lc	Legendary	1 newbie
81)	Mpamaegbu	Legendary	1 newbie
82)	TwitchySeal	Legendary	1 newbie
83)	hugeblack	Legendary	1 newbie
84)	Loganota	Hero Member	1 newbie
85)	yahoo62278	Legendary	1 newbie
86)	Cyrus	Legendary	1 newbie

Total supported in November 2022: 164 newbies (by 86 members)

[Coin-1]

These are the monthly statistics for December 2022 below.

Members who support newbies (December 2022)

	User name	Current rank [1]	Quantity of newbies who received merit
1)	GazetaBitcoin	Legendary	14 newbies
2)	mole0815	Legendary	10 newbies
3)	ETFbitcoin	Legendary	9 newbies
4)	klarki	Legendary	9 newbies
5)	LoyceV	Legendary	8 newbies
6)	NotATether	Legendary	7 newbies
7)	xandry	Legendary	7 newbies
8)	o_e_l_e_o	Legendary	6 newbies
9)	hugeblack	Legendary	6 newbies
10)	vapourminer	Legendary	6 newbies
11)	dkbit98	Legendary	5 newbies
12)	DdmrDdmr	Legendary	5 newbies
13)	bitmover	Legendary	4 newbies
14)	JayJuanGee	Legendary	4 newbies
15)	Sayeds56	Hero Member	3 newbies
16)	lovesmayfamilis	Legendary	3 newbies
17)	shahzadafzal	Legendary	3 newbies
18)	OgNasty	Legendary	3 newbies
19)	pooya87	Legendary	3 newbies
20)	fennic	Member	2 newbies
21)	ThemePen	Sr. Member	2 newbies
22)	Pmalek	Legendary	2 newbies
23)	Little Mouse	Legendary	2 newbies
24)	The Cryptovator	Legendary	2 newbies
25)	mikeywith	Legendary	2 newbies
26)	Bthd	Legendary	2 newbies
27)	coolcoinz	Hero Member	2 newbies
28)	nutildah	Legendary	2 newbies
29)	Welsh	Legendary	2 newbies
30)	Lucius	Legendary	2 newbies
31)	digaran	Hero Member	2 newbies
32)	nc50lc	Legendary	2 newbies
33)	OmegaStarScream	Legendary	2 newbies
34)	philipma1957	Legendary	2 newbies
35)	EFS	Legendary	2 newbies
36)	Mr__ZACK	Jr. Member	1 newbie
37)	SirJohnVonSlotty	Member	1 newbie
38)	Popkon6	Member	1 newbie
39)	MrMik	Member	1 newbie
40)	casinotester0001	Member	1 newbie
41)	Poika5	Jr. Member	1 newbie
42)	hZti	Hero Member	1 newbie
43)	Teletalk.org	Member	1 newbie
44)	PeakDK	Member	1 newbie
45)	alexandr1115	Hero Member	1 newbie
46)	n0nce	Legendary	1 newbie
47)	Bushdark	Full Member	1 newbie
48)	50promil	Member	1 newbie
49)	oryhp	Member	1 newbie
50)	BitProdigy	Full Member	1 newbie
51)	Lillominato89	Sr. Member	1 newbie
52)	BlackHatCoiner	Legendary	1 newbie
53)	Apocollapse	Hero Member	1 newbie
54)	AbuBhakar	Sr. Member	1 newbie
55)	internetional	Sr. Member	1 newbie
56)	FP91G	Hero Member	1 newbie
57)	Danydee	Legendary	1 newbie
58)	SatsLife	Sr. Member	1 newbie
59)	hosseinimr93	Legendary	1 newbie
60)	WhyFhy	Sr. Member	1 newbie
61)	MoparMiningLLC	Legendary	1 newbie
62)	rhomelmabini	Hero Member	1 newbie
63)	igor72	Legendary	1 newbie
64)	Carollzinha	Sr. Member	1 newbie
65)	fillippone	Legendary	1 newbie
66)	1miau	Legendary	1 newbie
67)	CryptopreneurBrainboss	Legendary	1 newbie
68)	BitcoinGirl.Club	Legendary	1 newbie
69)	Coinbaker_criptobakery	Jr. Member	1 newbie
70)	Husna QA	Legendary	1 newbie
71)	Royse777	Legendary	1 newbie
72)	suzanne5223	Hero Member	1 newbie
73)	fortunecrypto	Legendary	1 newbie
74)	willi9974	Legendary	1 newbie
75)	DroomieChikito	Legendary	1 newbie
76)	FutureBitcoin	Legendary	1 newbie
77)	serjent05	Legendary	1 newbie
78)	MarioV	Hero Member	1 newbie
79)	odolvlobo	Legendary	1 newbie
80)	bitbollo	Legendary	1 newbie
81)	NeuroticFish	Legendary	1 newbie
82)	Daltonik	Legendary	1 newbie
83)	bobita	Legendary	1 newbie
84)	examplens	Legendary	1 newbie
85)	babo	Legendary	1 newbie
86)	Betwrong	Legendary	1 newbie
87)	icopress	Legendary	1 newbie
88)	libert19	Hero Member	1 newbie
89)	neiros	Legendary	1 newbie
90)	hatshepsut93	Legendary	1 newbie
91)	Hueristic	Legendary	1 newbie
92)	TimeTeller	Hero Member	1 newbie
93)	DarkStar_	Legendary	1 newbie
94)	TryNinja	Legendary	1 newbie
95)	TheBeardedBaby	Legendary	1 newbie
96)	yahoo62278	Legendary	1 newbie
97)	Husires	Hero Member	1 newbie
98)	Cyrus	Legendary	1 newbie

Total supported in December 2022: 210 newbies (by 98 members)