One merited post>15 shit post

[Cacheof]

In my opinion bounty managers/campaigns contributed immensely to the influx of same old spammy thread all the time,they dished out tasks to hunters and didn't even care what was posted
  I think if the rules where 1 merited post per week,instead of 15 shit posts,it would have been a whole lot better
  Or 1 merit earned to be eligible for signature campaign.

[Dilireba]

It depends on each specific bounty manager and how they run their campaign. If interested you can discuss, raise your idea with the bounty manager.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

 I think if the rules where 1 merited post per week,instead of 15 shit posts,

What you have regurgitated here makes no sense. I think you are another one trying to get merit for this post. For the moment, what you have achieved is a place in my ignore list.

[hoangtujuda]

This is not related to them, Some spammers do not comment on the right topic. Managers have made clear rules, if you have any contributions you can contact directly with the project manager you join, I think it will be more useful.

[Talk merit]

One quality post is better for the forum than 100 no-value spam posts. Unfortunatelu, bounty managers are not interested in the welfare of the forum, and I suspect that they consider the exposure from 100 spam posts to be 100 times better than a single quality post.

[siddartha1492]

For project devs, the quality of posts is not really important. Their main focus is to circulate their project name, token name, symbol etc. to maximum people possible. And for that the more posts carrying their signatures the better. So in that respect 1 merited post is certainly not greater than 15 spam posts. But yes, if you talk about click rates, then maybe merited posts have higher click rates than spam posts.
 
The better solution is to allow only those members to participate in bounties who have a earned a certain amount of merits. I am seeing more and more bounty managers adding that requirement which has obviously reduced spam by Bitcoin bounty participants. The major spam comes from altcoin bounties. So if the bounty managers in that section also add this requirement to their bounties, then I am sure spam won't remain an issue on BTT.

**I'm not sure why are you suggesting this requirement. You yourself haven't got any merits till now!!

[Cacheof]

For project devs, the quality of posts is not really important. Their main focus is to circulate their project name, token name, symbol etc. to maximum people possible. And for that the more posts carrying their signatures the better. So in that respect 1 merited post is certainly not greater than 15 spam posts. But yes, if you talk about click rates, then maybe merited posts have higher click rates than spam posts.
 
The better solution is to allow only those members to participate in bounties who have a earned a certain amount of merits. I am seeing more and more bounty managers adding that requirement which has obviously reduced spam by Bitcoin bounty participants. The major spam comes from altcoin bounties. So if the bounty managers in that section also add this requirement to their bounties, then I am sure spam won't remain an issue on BTT.

**I'm not sure why are you suggesting this requirement. You yourself haven't got any merits till now!!

To get one
  What do you think

[kawetsriyanto]

Personally, I won't judge the bounty manager as the factor of shit posts. 15 posts is not too much if you do it regularly every day. You can count it, if the total 15 posts a week, you just need to post 3 times a day. 3 posts a day will be more than enough. Is It difficult for you? Totally, not difficult for me. 

[Talk merit]

15 posts is not too much if you do it regularly every day.  Is It difficult for you? Totally, not difficult for me. 

With well over 400 posts, and only six merits, it would appear that making posts of reasonable quality and of benefit to the forum is quite difficult for you in fact.