2 alts reporting at the same time

[Woshib]

kipipilam, hgareas

2 weekly reports made with a 6 min interval:
13 August: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44003227#msg44003227 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44003528#msg44003528 (http://archive.is/3dOiv)
22 August: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44493521#msg44493521 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44493743#msg44493743 (http://archive.is/7oslh)

[1714898282]

1714898282

[1714898282]

1714898282

[1714898282]

1714898282

[1714898282]

1714898282

[1714898282]

1714898282

[1714898282]

1714898282

[Jrashid]

Nice catch, indeed, one of the best.
But I doubt whether DT will paint them or not. Cause there is no solid evidence which really can prove their connection. We can assume only, isn't it?

[k0er]

This erroneous post was the first. Which means it couldn't have been accidentally copied.

Bitcointalk Username: kipipillam
Telegram airdrop: YES
Twitter airdrop: YES
Facebook airdrop: YES
Reddit airdrop: NO
Medium airdrop: YES
Bitcointalk airdrop: YES

http://archive.li/o18No

Bitcointalk Username: kipipilam
Telegram airdrop: YES
Twitter airdrop: YES
Facebook airdrop: YES
Reddit airdrop: NO
Medium airdrop: YES
Bitcointalk airdrop: YES

http://archive.li/We3SR
Edition:

kipipilam, hgareas, denharun, Puyoli

From:  🔵🔵🔵[BOUNTY]🔵[25M EPR]🔵🔵🔵ETAINPOWER🔵Energy Ecosystem Powered By AI

https://etherscan.io/address/0xcacfb7e1cd6a8ffb81d16c45c03b3954bee53210#tokentxns


Related Addresses:
Collector

Code:

0xcacfb7e1cd6a8fFB81d16C45c03B3954bEE53210

Code:

0x16165157d2DAC095b870A6Ee2751E521d066A5b6
0xc4e5AAA04130f9B61Dd2Cf41ea703AE4e20CDc9b
0xf329D0cebdB93Acb4B54c460AEd3FF64B0a3C548
0x52Fb33d1dAfEBbBE6aCa6ACca2f1ECA989f51430

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Bitcointalk UserName: kipipilam
Telegram Username: @dendiharun
Participated Campaigns: Twitter and Telegram
Eth adresa: 0xc4e5AAA04130f9B61Dd2Cf41ea703AE4e20CDc9b

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Bitcointalk UserName: hgareas
Telegram Username: @naditaaqilla
Participated Campaigns: Telegram and Twitter
Eth adresa: 0x16165157d2DAC095b870A6Ee2751E521d066A5b6

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Bitcointalk UserName:denharun
Telegram Username:@sarahjulia12
Participated Campaigns:TELEGRAM TWITTER
Eth adresa: 0xf329D0cebdB93Acb4B54c460AEd3FF64B0a3C548

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Bitcointalk UserName: Puyoli
Telegram Username: @claraputri1
Participated Campaigns: TWITTER TELEGRAM CAMPAIGN
Eth adresa: 0x52Fb33d1dAfEBbBE6aCa6ACca2f1ECA989f51430

[husnanparebok]

Yes, When I do prof of aunthentication post, I always copy - paste the previous post then edit.
I always preview my post to prevent mis type and prevent from giving wrong ID. But I never make a mistake after copy paste previos comment. It's can happen to everyone who do not careful on his post or his abusing post

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Yes, When I do prof of aunthentication post, I always copy - paste the previous post then edit.
I always preview my post to prevent mis type and prevent from giving wrong ID. But I never make a mistake after copy paste previos comment. It's can happen to everyone who do not careful on his post or his abusing post

Yeah yeah yeah, but in this case he would have had to have a time machine in order to copy that post.  I didn't see it at first, (thanks k0er) but it's now obvious to me that they're alt accounts in the same bounty--and I tagged them appropriately.

Good catch on this one.

[merited]

kipipilam, hgareas

2 weekly reports made with a 6 min interval:
13 August: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44003227#msg44003227 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44003528#msg44003528 (http://archive.is/3dOiv)
22 August: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44493521#msg44493521 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4678695.msg44493743#msg44493743 (http://archive.is/7oslh)

Great to see that they are already tagged. I have a question to @op why you do not mention multi account not allow on the bounty post? According to your evidence and rule they should not be tagged. But according to proof of k0er they should be tagged. They used multi account while from both account used same username.