wobber
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 06, 2014, 08:05:02 PM |
|
We know that the real Satoshi reset the timestamps on his communication to +0 GMT as well as other things to stay hidden - why would such a person use his real name? Even a real name not used in 40 years would still be easily-ish trackable.
Do you have any other examples of Satoshi's measures to remain anonymous? |
If you hate me, you can spam me here: 19wdQNKjnATkgXvpzmSrkSYhJtuJWb8mKs
|
|
|
|
Omega0255
|
|
March 06, 2014, 08:27:55 PM |
|
i almost got a heart attack when i thought that Satoshi Nakamoto was an anagram for Nintendo, but thankfully it's NOT!! mario coins, bitcoins, connection??  ! Why hasn't there been a altcoin called "MarioCoins" yet?! |
|
|
|
|
|
greenlion
|
|
March 06, 2014, 09:19:51 PM |
|
The reporter was committed to a certain theory and narrative from the get-go and shoehorned everything possible to clumsily fit that story, culminating in a creepy delusionally-reported in-person confrontation.
|
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
March 06, 2014, 09:28:02 PM |
|
Simply put, no.
He isn't the only person in the world called Satoshi Nakamoto either.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
|
|
|
Light
|
|
March 07, 2014, 07:51:51 AM |
|
It doesn't necessarily prove or disprove anything. Pretend if he was for a moment the real Satoshi, anyone in their right mind would distance themselves from being Satoshi as the media will constantly on your tail if not people with more malicious motives. The best way to distance is to deny, both Dorian himself and using the P2P account to deny.
On the other hand, if he wasn't Satoshi the real Satoshi would also deny Dorian being the guy as a) his privacy will be destroyed b) people believing Dorian to be Satoshi would still come after him.
In both cases the most logical move is to deny so there is no proof or otherwise to the claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoPanda (OP)
|
|
March 07, 2014, 08:03:07 AM |
|
yes, completely agree
even if he is or isn't he will always say he isn't
but if he admitted that's him that would have proven the story, so far the story is just a speculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light
|
|
March 07, 2014, 08:10:43 AM |
|
Even if he claimed it, there is no proof yet to show it is true. I could just as easily claim to be Jesus but without proof it's just a speculative claim. Aside from an old account verifying it or a signed message fro one of his keys it is unconfirmable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoPanda (OP)
|
|
March 07, 2014, 08:12:42 AM |
|
yeah i meant if he said that from that old account
with pgp would be better of course, becasue I imagine the admin of the site could write from this acc as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light
|
|
March 07, 2014, 08:32:30 AM |
|
yeah i meant if he said that from that old account
with pgp would be better of course, becasue I imagine the admin of the site could write from this acc as well
With an old account there is always a possibility that someone hacked the account (although unlikely). However it would be next to impossible to steal a private key from Satoshi meaning that is the optimal means of proof. |
|
|
|
|
|
retrend
|
|
March 07, 2014, 08:57:34 AM |
|
Leah should have asked for his private key saying as he was so keen to give away secrets.
|
|
|
|
|
RobFordWotWot
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
time
|
|
March 07, 2014, 08:59:13 AM |
|
This is the real deal.
BTCeelieve
|
Horses in midstream.
|
|
|
MrPiggles
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 256
Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain
|
|
March 07, 2014, 09:09:17 AM |
|
I'd love to share the story of how i once set up a thing and left a trail pointing to someone who'd run a similar thing before.
But I can't.
Not surprised Satoshi did this, I hope he at least paid the guy though. I did it to screw someone royally (which I did) if he never paid this Dorian guy I feel for him.
|
|
|
|
|
rohnearner
|
|
March 07, 2014, 09:38:16 AM |
|
This was the result after I voted:
Yes - 22 (21.8%)
No - 79 (78.2%)
I just want to ask those 22people(21.8%) that what makes them think that he's real Satoshi Nakamoto ..! I'm not trying to prove anything but I want to know there perspective too..! Want to know how strong there claims are.! Because Most of the info i gathered is from this forum and everyone here is claiming he's not satoshi .. and i can understand they have enough substance in their claims. so I believe so , but want to know more , someones perspective who thinks he's real
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoPanda (OP)
|
|
March 07, 2014, 01:19:59 PM |
|
This was the result after I voted:
Yes - 22 (21.8%)
No - 79 (78.2%)
I just want to ask those 22people(21.8%) that what makes them think that he's real Satoshi Nakamoto ..! I'm not trying to prove anything but I want to know there perspective too..! Want to know how strong there claims are.! Because Most of the info i gathered is from this forum and everyone here is claiming he's not satoshi .. and i can understand they have enough substance in their claims. so I believe so , but want to know more , someones perspective who thinks he's real
None of them can say anything solid. To be honest it's better if we don't know who is he. Makes the hype bigger. |
|
|
|
|
|
vpitcher07
|
|
March 07, 2014, 01:24:39 PM |
|
Even though he denies it and even though the real satoshi made a comment on it, I'm still confident this is the guy. The consistencies far out weigh the inconsistencies. The fact that satoshi decides to come out of hiding the day this happens is just too coincidental. A man named satoshi nakamoto who just so happens to be a libertarian engineer who's worked on some top secret stuff is just too much evidence. Why are we assuming he worked alone? Perhaps he had someone translate his thoughts so it appeared he spoke perfect English. I'm still convinced this man his him.
|
Bitcoin: The currency of liberty
1HBJSf3Lm9i8KxjZ7fuoN9FJ8hniniFbv4
|
|
|
|
CryptoPanda (OP)
|
|
March 07, 2014, 01:27:12 PM |
|
Even though he denies it and even though the real satoshi made a comment on it, I'm still confident this is the guy. The consistencies far out weigh the inconsistencies. The fact that satoshi decides to come out of hiding the day this happens is just too coincidental. A man named satoshi nakamoto who just so happens to be a libertarian engineer who's worked on some top secret stuff is just too much evidence. Why are we assuming he worked alone? Perhaps he had someone translate his thoughts so it appeared he spoke perfect English. I'm still convinced this man his him.
OMG, it's not coincidence, it was consequence... |
|
|
|
|
coinage
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
March 07, 2014, 06:44:18 PM |
|
This man is an exact clone of Satoshi Nakamoto.
To protect himself, Satoshi made many copies, all different ages, and planted them around the world. Without secret technology, there is no feasible way to extract private keys from any of them.
The legend continues...
|
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
March 07, 2014, 06:52:19 PM |
|
no, i still think its a group of people. maybe he was a part of it, but i dont think so.
|
|
|
|
chinacoinbase
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
March 07, 2014, 06:53:13 PM |
|
I think he is Satoshi. just three reasons: 1. His background 2. The reporter use FBI support to get some data 3. the P2p statement use different Public key to deny that so how much do u want to bet???  I really don't buy any of this. Lets make a bet on any of the sites that support this and put the money where our mouth is.
Please if someone has created the bet post it.
I speculate that in the next several days something will be revealed that will exclude the Mr in the news from the potential founders of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
