Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 04:16:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Lauda Not Anymore in DT now | How does DT work?  (Read 914 times)
S_Therapist (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 277



View Profile
October 07, 2018, 11:46:05 AM
Merited by AdolfinWolf (1)
 #1

Seems like Lauda is not anymore in DT. Am I correct?

However, It's quite confusing for me. I found a thread from 2017 when he/she got off. How this DT works actually? Sorry, I know there are some more threads on it. But, I am asking about DT in general and the case about Lauda specifically.

Exchase
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
CRYPTO EXCHANGE  │  MARGIN TRADING  │  TOKEN LISTING
CRYPTO-WALLET  │  CRYPTO-GAMES  │  CRYPTO LOANS
SOCIAL TRADING  │  P2P EXCHANGE  │  OTC TRADING
MONEY TRANSFER SYSTEM  │  BINARY OPTIONS
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
1714925778
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714925778

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714925778
Reply with quote  #2

1714925778
Report to moderator
1714925778
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714925778

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714925778
Reply with quote  #2

1714925778
Report to moderator
1714925778
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714925778

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714925778
Reply with quote  #2

1714925778
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
AdolfinWolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 11:54:20 AM
Last edit: October 07, 2018, 12:09:05 PM by AdolfinWolf
 #2

Seems like Lauda is not anymore in DT. Am I correct?

However, It's quite confusing for me. I found a thread from 2017 when he/she got off. How this DT works actually? Sorry, I know there are some more threads on it. But, I am asking about DT in general and the case about Lauda specifically.
I'm pretty sure Lauda was on DT2 atleast since last week. (S)he must have been removed either today or earlier this week.

Basically my understanding of it is that someone who is on DT1+ can add you to his/her trust list, which makes you DT2. You can also exclude users from your trust list, but this is only visible for yourself?

I personally think it's pretty vague too, and would love to get a better understanding of it.

Quote
Pretty sure to become DT2 you need 3 DT1 members to add you.
Is there a source on this? How many people from DT1 need to exclude you to kick you off again? (Or does it not exactly work that way?) As i said i'm pretty curious to know.



Also, are there any other topics discussing why Lauda got kicked from DT2? seems pretty bad for the forum as a whole? (Hundreds and hundreds of accounts potentially being untagged?)

I'm assuming it has something to do with the feedback left by Rmcdermott927 that sparked some discussion? See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=101872


Steamtyme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 2036


Betnomi.com Sportsbook, Casino and Poker


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 11:54:27 AM
Last edit: October 07, 2018, 12:36:19 PM by Steamtyme
 #3

Looks like you are correct. I left my trust settings on default and Lauda does appear to have been excluded.

What would have happened is one of the dt1 level members that had added Lauda to their trust network must have removed Lauda. Pretty sure to become DT2 you need 3 DT1 members to add you.

That's my understanding anyways



Wondering how you noticed this so quickly, possibly an alt account that's no longer painted red?

Edit: Great explanation below, cleared it up for me a bit.


░░░░░▄▄██████▄▄
░░▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄
███▀░░░░░░░░░░▀█▀█
███░░░▄██████▄▄░░░██
░░░░░█████████░░░░██▌
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░░████████████████
███▄░░▀██████▀░░░███
█▀█▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄███
░░▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
░░░░░▀▀██████▀▀
Ripmixer
░░░░░▄▄██████▄▄
░░▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄
███▀░░░░░░░░░░▀█▀█
███░░░▄██████▄▄░░░██
░░░░░█████████░░░░██▌
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░░████████████████
███▄░░▀██████▀░░░███
█▀█▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄███
░░▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
░░░░░▀▀██████▀▀
subSTRATA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043


:^)


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 11:57:37 AM
Merited by Jet Cash (5), suchmoon (4), dbshck (4), LoyceV (2), SFR10 (1), AdolfinWolf (1)
 #4

short version: DT has 'depths,' which by default, is set to 2, although it is possible to see up to 4. Depth 1 is managed directly by the administration; only the admins can add or remove uses from this category. Depth 2 is managed by the individuals in depth 1 by adding or excluding them to their trust lists (the big text box on this page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust).
when a dt1 user decides to add a user to their trust list, that user becomes a part of dt2, and vice versa for depths 3 and 4 as well (although depths 3 and 4 are nearly irrelevant ). At this point, for a person to be removed from their dt2 position, 1 of 2 things can happen;

1. the dt1 member who added that user to their trust list removes them
2. the user is excluded by at least 2 other members in dt1 by entering ~<username> as opposed to just their username into the list

the second method serves to ensure that dt2 can be self - monitored to an extent without direct interference by the administration. If a member is taken off of dt2 through exclusion, their name will be 'slashed through' on the trust settings page as such: username.

Also, if you're wondering what the numbers next to their names mean, it denotes the number of dt1 users that have decided to either add or exclude a member from their trust lists. assuming the user is on 1 dt1 user's trust list (1), the exclusion of the member by 2 other users would put them at a (-1).

If you're curious, you can click the 'hierarchical view' link at the bottom of the page, and you will be able to see exactly which users have decided to include or exclude certain users from their trust lists.

In this case, it would seem Lauda has been excluded by 3 dt1 members: HostFat, OgNasty, and Tomatocage, while he is on the trust lists of 2 members: Blazed and hilariousandco.

theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
BitCoinDream
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1204

The revolution will be digital


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 12:21:25 PM
 #5

As per, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full, Lauda is...

Included by: Blazed & hilariousandco

Excluded by: HostFat, OgNasty & Tomatocage
 
Someone must have excluded him recently. Who is he?

coinlocket$
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512


#1 VIP Crypto Casino


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 01:01:04 PM
 #6

Rip, a lot of scammers now will cheat again with no redtrust Angry

.
.BITCASINO.. 
.
#1 VIP CRYPTO CASINO

▄██████████████▄
█▄████████████▄▀▄▄▄
█████████████████▄▄▄
█████▄▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▄
███████████████████████████████
████▀█████████████▄▄██████████
██████▀██████████████████████
████████████████▀██████▌████
███████████████▀▀▄█▄▀▀█████▀
███████████████████▀▀█████▀
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████████
          ▀▀▀████████
                ▀▀▀███

.
......PLAY......
InvoKing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1065


✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 01:27:10 PM
 #7

Someone must have excluded him recently. Who is he?

I didn't follow BTCtalk-drama channel from a while since I am busy lately but I assume HostFat is the third one (might be inaccurate).
Anyway, there should be a way / buttons to check and include all the trust list of another member or a part of it to your trust list directly without adding 999 members one by one...

PSPD:law and order enforcement!
Press Section Police Department!
BitCoinDream
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1204

The revolution will be digital


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 01:40:58 PM
 #8

I didn't follow BTCtalk-drama channel from a while since I am busy lately but I assume HostFat is the third one (might be inaccurate).
That's inaccurate. Its either OgNasty or Tomatocage.

Anyway, there should be a way / buttons to check and include all the trust list of another member or a part of it to your trust list directly without adding 999 members one by one...
There's already a way for that. Simply add Lauda to your trust list and you'll find all his tags as yours.

Steamtyme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 2036


Betnomi.com Sportsbook, Casino and Poker


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 01:54:01 PM
 #9

That's inaccurate. Its either OgNasty or Tomatocage.

I doubt it was OgNasty as they had both left each other negative feedback, Og's to Lauda being February 14 of this year.

Given that I can't imagine Lauda had remained on the Og's trust list up until now.


I noticed it too as I browse once again to this thread which OP has red trust but today after checking the thread OP doesn't have the negative trust anymore.  Some users in that thread warned the investors because OP has red trust. I guess that guy can now regain. I wonder what happen to why he was removed.

That makes sense, must have been tagged early.


░░░░░▄▄██████▄▄
░░▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄
███▀░░░░░░░░░░▀█▀█
███░░░▄██████▄▄░░░██
░░░░░█████████░░░░██▌
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░░████████████████
███▄░░▀██████▀░░░███
█▀█▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄███
░░▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
░░░░░▀▀██████▀▀
Ripmixer
░░░░░▄▄██████▄▄
░░▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄
███▀░░░░░░░░░░▀█▀█
███░░░▄██████▄▄░░░██
░░░░░█████████░░░░██▌
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░█████████████████
░░░░░████████████████
███▄░░▀██████▀░░░███
█▀█▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄███
░░▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
░░░░░▀▀██████▀▀
cabron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 598


https://www.betcoin.ag


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 01:57:57 PM
 #10

Looks like you are correct. I left my trust settings on default and Lauda does appear to have been excluded.

What would have happened is one of the dt1 level members that had added Lauda to their trust network must have removed Lauda. Pretty sure to become DT2 you need 3 DT1 members to add you.

That's my understanding anyways



Wondering how you noticed this so quickly, possibly an alt account that's no longer painted red?

Edit: Great explanation below, cleared it up for me a bit.

I noticed it too as I browse once again to this thread which OP has red trust but today after checking the thread OP doesn't have the negative trust anymore.  Some users in that thread warned the investors because OP has red trust. I guess that guy can now regain. I wonder what happen to why he was removed.


AdolfinWolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1427


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 02:02:36 PM
 #11

That's inaccurate. Its either OgNasty or Tomatocage.

I doubt it was OgNasty as they had both left each other negative feedback, Og's to Lauda being February 14 of this year.

Given that I can't imagine Lauda had remained on the Og's trust list up until now.

If it wasn't HostFat, and it wasn't Ognasty,

I was excluded by HostFat months ago due to my vocal disapproval of Bitcoin Unlimited which he strongly supports (talk about trust abuse?). Sometime yesterday OgNasty excluded Lutpin, Zepher and myself. I probably wouldn't have noticed it this quickly either, but people kept spamming me about it.


it has to be TomatoCage, right?

-- Well, Tomatocage hasn't been online for several months. --

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37522
Code:
Last Active: 	May 03, 2018, 11:46:06 PM

Could it be that someone instead removed Lauda from his trust list, as opposed to someone ~~~excluding him?

AOL
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 4


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 02:07:25 PM
 #12

Could it be that someone instead removed Lauda from his trust list, as opposed to someone ~~~excluding him?
Vod?
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 02:09:38 PM
 #13

SaltySpitoon apparently withdrew their inclusion at some unknown time (I use a custom list, thus can't tell these things quickly). No idea what's going on on this lovely Sunday.

There's an unusually low amount of drama due to a lack of Quickseller & alts' threads. Grin

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
AOL
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 4


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 02:12:42 PM
 #14

SaltySpitoon apparently withdrew their inclusion at some unknown time (I use a custom list, thus can't tell these things quickly). No idea what's going on on this lovely Sunday.

There's an unusually low amount of drama due to a lack of Quickseller & alts' threads. Grin
Your trust page is showing This user's email address was changed recently. Are you compromised?
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 02:14:04 PM
 #15

SaltySpitoon apparently withdrew their inclusion at some unknown time (I use a custom list, thus can't tell these things quickly). No idea what's going on on this lovely Sunday.

There's an unusually low amount of drama due to a lack of Quickseller & alts' threads. Grin
Your trust page is showing This user's email address was changed recently. Are you compromised?
Are you compromised? Cheesy Of course not; some random-script kiddies ain't getting to me.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826


Cashback 15%


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 03:17:17 PM
 #16

SaltySpitoon apparently withdrew their inclusion at some unknown time (I use a custom list, thus can't tell these things quickly). No idea what's going on on this lovely Sunday.

There's an unusually low amount of drama due to a lack of Quickseller & alts' threads. Grin
Surprised and sorry to hear this.  Any idea what this is about?  Is it because of that escrow scam accusation that was active in Meta recently?  I didn't read that close enough to understand exactly what happened, but it seemed like people were pretty divided on that one.

What newbies might not understand is that DT status can be precarious and that it's not some static list, although many who are currently on it have been for a long time.  And unfortunately there's a cost associated with someone like Lauda getting removed, i.e., everyone tagged by him/her is now untagged.

I'd like to hear the rationale on this one.  I didn't see anything else in Meta.

.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
Alone055
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 1050
Merit: 202



View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 03:29:58 PM
 #17

Well, I'm pretty sure that the ones reading this thread, who had any of their alts tagged by Lauda, must have started searching the databases of their forum accounts to find those accounts and bring them back to live since now their negative tags are removed.  Grin Unless their accounts had got tagged by someone else too.

Edit: #TrustRuinsLives  Grin

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3304
Merit: 16599


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2018, 04:46:50 PM
Last edit: October 07, 2018, 04:56:56 PM by LoyceV
 #18

Well, I'm pretty sure that the ones reading this thread, who had any of their alts tagged by Lauda, must have started searching the databases of their forum accounts to find those accounts and bring them back to live since now their negative tags are removed.
Good point! I'll compile a list of accounts tagged by Lauda, and sort them on their "Last Active" date. I don't think anyone is going to just copy 2000 red tags, so this should make it more manageable.


They're fast! ChrisLandin reactivated today. He stopped posting the moment Lauda tagged him (in June 2017), and made only one more post in December 2017. Now he's back.

Thekool1s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1218


Change is in your hands


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 04:56:00 PM
 #19

A blessed day for them for sure.

subSTRATA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043


:^)


View Profile
October 07, 2018, 04:56:49 PM
 #20

I don't think anyone is going to just copy 2000 red tags
ehhhhhhhh..... dunno about that. wouldn't count it out.

that aside, a lot of the accounts are still red from multiple dt tags, might be a better idea to prioritize those that are now neutral from lauda's removal from dt.

theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!