Regat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 5
|
|
May 06, 2019, 10:15:39 AM |
|
^^^ Perhaps you are one of those who is a real scientist who has done the studies. If you are, have you considered all the implications of the observations you have made, from every angle? If you aren't, why are you relying on some studies, and not the others? How do you know that some studies are accurate and others aren't? Get out there and take a look at the cold winters the northern part of the USA has been having for the last couple years. That's just one simple observation that shows that if there is any global warming at all, it's on the decline. But if you say that the Sahara was exceptionally hot the last couple of years, have you really balanced all the reports to see what is happening around the world? I can't understand if you're trolling. I'm just saying that every observation that you make in science must be shared with studies that prove it, all other observations are just meaningless. In science you have to prove your findings. When you say a number, you have to prove the calculation behind that number. You can't just say a number and wait for others to prove that the calculation behind it is wrong, that's completely crazy. You can tell if a certain study is accurate and others aren't because of whether the majority of the scientific community agrees on it or not, that's how it works. You don't ask people on the street if a study is accurate. LOL So, again, if you're trolling you're not funny, but if you go out of your house looking at the mountains and try to compare your observations with those of people that studied for their whole lives and are actually proving something with scientific studies, I'm afraid we're talking about bigger problems than not being funny, sorry. I can't tell if you are just being silly or what? Anybody can print out studies. Anybody can get cohorts to say the studies are real. Nobody can tell if the studies are real except if he does them himself... or at least participates. But if he is honest, or if his studies matter, let him get on the stand under oath and testify, with penalties and imprisonment if he is lying. In the case of global warming, there are so many studies that suggest the opposite, that GW isn't known to be factual, and that G-cooling seems more logical. Hope you're 12, really, for everybody. Goodbye
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
KennyR
|
|
May 06, 2019, 02:06:25 PM |
|
Global warming maybe a scam and may not be, but it is our responsibility to preserve nature. Scientifically there were more articles stating about the global warming happening around, and some describe it is true politics. Now with the term global warming we can expect more business to emerge if it is a political play from top powers of the world.
|
.SUGAR. | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | ███████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ▄████▀ ██████ ██████▄▄▄███▀ ▄█ ██████ ██████████▀ ▄███ ██████ ████████▀ ▄█████▄▄▄██████ ██████▀ ▄███████▀▀▀██████ ██████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████ ██████ ██████ ███████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ | . Backed By ZetaChain | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | |
|
|
|
newbie0506
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 233
Merit: 1
|
|
May 06, 2019, 07:08:52 PM |
|
Did the government or "world's elite" cause the terrible hurricanes or extreme heat? The oceans dying? If they are magicians or have a technology the same as the movie Geostorm, then sure, Global Warming is a scam. If the answer is no, then global warming is real. No world's elite can keep that from happening.
I perfectly agree. I assume TS' mind is somewhat mixed with cryptocurrency issues, isn't it? Global Warming is real. Many people feel it.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
May 06, 2019, 07:57:49 PM |
|
^^^ Even in Phoenix, where it gets cold in the air conditioning. Often the Eskimos ride their dog sleds with their parkas open in the front, because it gets so warm.
|
|
|
|
KimJongUnCoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 82
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
May 06, 2019, 08:01:45 PM Merited by TillKoeln (50) |
|
what does trump says about it ? but hey ^^ who cares, me you and i will die early enough. so we doesnt need to take care about it
|
|
|
|
oneblagobl
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 1
|
|
May 06, 2019, 11:46:45 PM |
|
Global warming does not apply to this theory
|
|
|
|
Alpinat
|
|
May 07, 2019, 05:03:15 PM |
|
We do affect the climate. That's why the climate is changing and also why do you think scientist will warn us about making a fire and about the smoke that comes in our vehicles. It is simply because they can't control all of us. Global warming is really happening and don't wait for it to be a serious problem.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
May 07, 2019, 06:00:46 PM |
|
What will happen is this. We will use chemtrails and whatever we can think of to reduce global warming. It will seem to work for a while. Then nature will set about doing what nature does, and things will get so hot that we won't have any chance to cool her down. We will barely be able to remain alive in the great heat that nature will bring, just to thwart out global cooling attempts.
|
|
|
|
LUCKMCFLY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1848
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
May 11, 2019, 02:44:21 AM |
|
What will happen is this. We will use chemtrails and whatever we can think of to reduce global warming. It will seem to work for a while. Then nature will set about doing what nature does, and things will get so hot that we won't have any chance to cool her down. We will barely be able to remain alive in the great heat that nature will bring, just to thwart out global cooling attempts. You are absolutely right, the worrying thing is that the money destined to fight global warming is not the one that was previously destined. This can have consequences, they will not be seen right now, you can start to see in about 5 to 10 years, when the impat is more devastating, what happens is that nature has a lot of devastating force, but we must try to help nature , and if there are resources that we can devote to that approach, why not do it? We live in an ecosystem where if one part is damaged in some way or another it will be transmitted. The gases, the toxic wastes, the fact that all that pollution arises directly an effect to the total melting of the poles would bring great world floods, and all this can be avoided with the controls that must be applied.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
bonker
|
|
May 12, 2019, 12:14:59 AM |
|
The more fear the general public has, the more control the world's elite has over them.
Do you think that the global warming/climate change controversy is one of these instances?
I think it is arrogant to think we can affect climate change. The earth goes through various cycles which alter conditions. We do have some affect on what happens, but I the extent of our contribution is likely very limited.
I'm not saying something it's something that we shouldn't worry about. We have to come up with alternate living solutions to minimize deaths and other catastrophes, but I don't think it's all our fault.
Thoughts?
it is all about our fault so we need to think about this for solving this very quickly then only the future will be peaceful without any problem otherwise it will affect everything for our future to get struggled.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
June 12, 2019, 02:26:18 PM |
|
Yes, global warming is a scam. Not because it isn't happening (barely), but because of the way it is presented.
25 Simple Bullet Points Proving CO2 Does Not Cause Global Warming‘Bullet points’ proving CO2’s innocence.
Geologists know climate change unrelated to atmospheric CO2 occurred throughout Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Yet the IPCC has no geologists among the hundreds of appointed authors of its Fifth Assessment Report of 2014 and its Sixth Report due in 2022. Thus IPCC incredibly lacks both geological input and long-term perspective. – Geologist Dr. Roger Higgs ___________________
25 simple bullet points proving CO2 does not cause global warming: by a geologist for a change
Dr Roger Higgs, Geoclastica Ltd, Technical Note 2019-11, 6th April 2019, on ResearchGate Not by Fire but by Ice... Robert W. Felix Best Price: $12.95 Buy New $89.71 (as of 09:15 EDT - Details)
We urgently need to expose the ‘CO2 = pollutant’ fallacy being forced upon your children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces by schools, universities, governments and mainstream media worldwide, and to denounce it in scrupulously truthful terms easily understood by the public, including those youngsters themselves.
Here are the 25 bullet points proving CO2’s innocence:
1) Geologists know climate change unrelated to atmospheric CO2 occurred throughout Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Yet the IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has no geologists among the hundreds of appointed authors of its Fifth Assessment Report of 2014 and its Sixth Report due in 2022 (see my Technical Note 2019-10). Thus IPCC incredibly lacks both geological input and long-term perspective.
2) IPCC’s very existence relies on public belief in manmade or ‘anthropogenic’ global warming (AGW) by CO2 emissions. Moreover its appointed authors, mostly government and university researchers, are nearly all biased by strong vested interests in AGW, i.e. reputations (publications, lectures) & continuance of salaries & research grants. Similarly, major universities have abandoned their scientific impartiality & integrity by hosting research institutes mandated to confirm & act on AGW, e.g. Grantham Institute (Imperial College), Tyndall Centre.
3) The often-repeated ‘97% consensus among scientists that global warming is man’s fault’ (CO2 emissions) is untrue. It refers in fact to surveys of just a relatively small group of ‘climate scientists’ (a fairly new type of scientist, with strong incentives for bias; see Bullets 2 & 15), moreover only those who are ‘actively publishing’.
4) ‘Climate change denier’ & ‘global warming denier’ are despicable & dishonest terms for ‘AGW doubters’. No educated person disputes global warming, as thermometers measured 1°C rise from 1850 to 2016 (with pauses).
5) The ‘Greenhouse Hypothesis’, on which IPCC’s belief in AGW is based, is that atmospheric gases trap heat. But this old (19th century) notion is merely an idea, not a hypothesis, because it is untestable, impossible to prove in a laboratory as no experimental container can imitate Earth’s uncontained, well-mixed atmosphere.
6) IPCC computer models are so full of assumptions as to be extremely unreliable, e.g. forecast warming for 1995 to 2015 turned out to be 2-3 times too high ! A likely reason is that the greenhouse idea is nonsense, as explained in recent publications by several scientists. See Bullet 19 for an equally drastic failure of IPCC models. See also here and here. Check article for the rest of the 25, and for the links that back it all up.
|
|
|
|
HobbitMud
Member
Offline
Activity: 230
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2019, 07:27:42 PM |
|
Well said, friend.
|
|
|
|
Leh-Meh
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
|
|
June 13, 2019, 07:37:25 AM |
|
What do see where you live or go ?? What is the climate and temperature where you live and travel ?? Those MBAs and CAs are scammers.
|
|
|
|
lh-crypto.com
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 0
|
|
July 06, 2019, 02:29:40 PM |
|
Our nature is so fragile that the slightest change can cause a tsunami of change
|
|
|
|
Vanjoe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2019, 07:31:05 PM |
|
Humans are dying, climate change is real and this will destroy human life. damage to nature occurs in almost all parts of the earth, due to human greed. God will punish us all !!!!
|
|
|
|
Kriptonian1661
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
|
|
July 07, 2019, 07:59:23 PM |
|
4 Letters : NOPE
It definitely is not a scam, it was a plan to melt the arctic ice for more oil etc. but the whole idea backfired..
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
July 07, 2019, 08:22:58 PM |
|
4 Letters : NOPE
It definitely is not a scam, it was a plan to melt the arctic ice for more oil etc. but the whole idea backfired..
Global warming of any significance, or that humanity can or should do anything about, is a complete and absolute scam. Remember the harsh winter the American Midwest had this last winter and spring? Now look.
90-degree heat stifles Anchorage for first time in its history as sweltering heat wave grips AlaskaThe previous record of 85 degrees Fahrenheit was set in 1969. It also shattered the daily record of 77 degrees for the Fouth of July, which had stood since 1999. Records in Anchorage date back to 1952.
Several other places in Alaska set all-time or daily records on Thursday.
While it was well above normal in Anchorage, the 90-degree temperature is not a first for the state of Alaska.
According to records kept by the National Weather Service (NWS), Alaska is no stranger to the 90s. In fact, way back on July 28, 1919, Fairbanks made a run at 100 when the mercury topped out at 99. Fairbanks has experienced 90-degree heat on several other occasions, most recently on Aug. 5, 1994, when it recorded a 93-degree temperature. Check the links in the article. And consider that with all the chemtrail spraying being done to fight global warming, you can expect nature to push back like in the article, above. I just hope we haven't messed with nature so badly, that in the resulting push-back she destroys us all with heat way beyond our A/C control. Of course, the one-worlders want to reduce the population, anyway.
|
|
|
|
LMBDA
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
|
|
July 19, 2019, 07:52:35 AM |
|
The more fear the general public has, the more control the world's elite has over them.
Do you think that the global warming/climate change controversy is one of these instances?
I think it is arrogant to think we can affect climate change. The earth goes through various cycles which alter conditions. We do have some affect on what happens, but I the extent of our contribution is likely very limited.
I'm not saying something it's something that we shouldn't worry about. We have to come up with alternate living solutions to minimize deaths and other catastrophes, but I don't think it's all our fault.
Thoughts?
What do you mean its not all our fault, even it its not you the occurrence of global is still man-made which is our own species. Their fault, our fault.
|
|
|
|
KimJongUnCoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 82
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
July 19, 2019, 10:36:52 AM |
|
how can it be scam ^^ ?
did the earth promise you anything and delivered something different .. so it can be a scam ?
|
|
|
|
viceking1
|
|
July 19, 2019, 07:21:44 PM |
|
It's very much a scam. We can actually do something about it too but global warming scammers won't talk about nuclear power
|
|
|
|
|