HOW TO ACHIEVE HIGHER BOUNTY REWARDS

[heritage35]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

The bounty manager of a project or the CEO will be glad to have so many participants, because the more the number of participants, the easier the project will be disseminated and the wider the coverage or the reach. So they are not concerned if their bounty hunters would receive enough each. In fact, it will be their joy, if it's not enough, because they believe bounty hunters always dump.

[kawetsriyanto]

Yes, it is a good idea to limit the number of participants for every campaigns in bounty program. But it should be adjusted with the promotion target of an ICO project. Limit the number of participants may lessen the possibility to attract investors. However, It can be fixed by improving the requirements for participants to have more quality of campaigns.

[ityandsyn]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

      That is very complicated since bounty managers wants many bounty hunters as part of the advertisement and the only thing we have to much higher reward is you must have a higher rank like Senyor member to Legendary .

[Jamboo30]

But the bounty manager does not think like you. The purpose of the bounty is to advertise their ICO project, the more participants as possible, the more popular the project will be and buy ICO. I see very few projects restricting participants to secure income. Therefore, low rewards are a common problem for bounty projects

[jinnyjinny]

The problem is managers don't care about bounty hunter earnings. The more people involved, the better for them. A limited number of participants in campaigns is a rarity, but the rewards are much greater. But if all campaigns will impose the restriction, the honest hunter will be hard to get into them , there will be bots , multiaccounts and other.

[rafa_uefa3]

fully agree, if campaigns will be limited to 300 participants, rewards will be 1.5-2 times higher, but as it said often "these are our problems",
another great way to participate in signature, less people and usually higher reward than in socials (about 40% bounty pool), so the rewards
also good

[Olatunjex]

Your suggestion is sensible overcrowding of bounty campaign affect reward each bounty participants earn, it's rare to find bounty manager who put limited on number of participants, it is free for all.

[Pa1n]

People usually says luck but its not luck i think. You need to read and research very deeply and find good bounties. Usually its very rare that we cant find good bounties.

[Perfect35]

The problem is not always with the bounty allocation, neither is it always with the number of participants, but you should be more concerned on the service you can offer, that would fetch you more reward, no matter how small the allocation is.
Also, there are some people who receive higher rewards yet, when it is listed, they sell at ridiculous price. While someone with little can hold and still sell at higher price.

[kier010]

your suggestion is only good to bounty hunters but it is not good to ICOs. the more participants the more publicity is made to ICOs and the more investors will notice and get interested in it. what ICOs needs is publicity but if there is few participants it won't get that much attention and possibly it will fail.

[lelou]

Some bounty managers do set limitations for number of participants for their bounty campaigns, you just have to find those mnagers and follow them when they post new bounty campaign.

[Gembul0705]

With your suggestion like that there are some bounty manager has did but a lot of CEO ICO need to promoted as much as they can about their project. But there was many way to get huge reward for bounty you can join signature campaign but you have high rank or you just joind article,translation but don't joined social media because there too many partcipant

[Ramtapsbtc]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

I think it is not possible for bounty managers to limit their participants in a bounty campaign. Participants in a campaign are the advertisers of the project so if the more participants the bigger chance that the ICO would be successful as there are many advertisers on board to promote the project. I think they should increase the allocated funds for bounty if the project is successful after the campaign.

[Ribbitforum]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

Me im looking for a fix amount like 1 billion to be shared equally to the work of participants

[cryptoman1ac]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

Higher bounty rewards means more responsibility. If you are ready for that responsibility then maybe it's time that you earn bigger rewards. But then if you are ready for responsibility but never happen to prepare, all your ambitions for higher rewards will just remain a dream. So make your ambition a reality by starting to take action.

[sudeshkumar]

I agree to receive Higher Bounty Rewards number of participants be restricted to certain limit by the Bounty Managers , but it will defeat the purpose of the bounty to be more popularise and enhancement of the value of the coin at later stage.

[askmecrypto]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

This happens in a lot many bounty campaigns, specially the ones who are paying directly in BTC.
However, for low bounties this is never going to happen, more the participants more the promotion of the project, why would some project or bounty manager think to reduce the number of participants?
By keeping a fixed reward function, he can attain more promotion with more participants.
I understand this looks negative on the bounty hunters part, but thinking of business and promotion, the more participants they get is the more target they will acheive.

[Mega Sardines]

To achieve a higher bounty rewards I think you must join many campaigns which you are able to complete. Basically you would have to prepare yourself in a much more labor of work.

[glasbren]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

I believe there are that kind of rules in some campaign, i saw that kind of rules often in bounty portal. most of project that are manage by bounty portal has that kind of limitation. And I also agree if it applied to all available campaign

[darmin]

with a limited number of participants could certainly be the best solution to increase the amount of the fee. look at the amount of allocation certainly also to watch out for. even increase your rank account to join the signature is certainly an effective way and this will be a real class get paid high enough.