REEEEE: PussyGate, a Collection of Trump Investigations

[TECSHARE]

"FISA Abuse & Michael Flynn Targeting: Timeline Revelations—Jeff Carlson | American Thought Leaders"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTwTPTMOAog

[Spendulus]

I'm drawing the conclusion that Paul Manafort, former Trump Campaign Chairman, has a felony conviction for conspiracy to defraud the United States.  

You really need to step back and take a wider view of these events.

This guy was a very short term hire on Trump's team, and that was several years back.

Nobody cares. Nobody SHOULD care.

[TwitchySeal]

Are you trying to draw conclusions about guilt based on charges that did not result in a conviction on that charge by the jury involved?

I'm drawing the conclusion that Paul Manafort, former Trump Campaign Chairman, has a felony conviction for conspiracy to defraud the United States.  

You really need to step back and take a wider view of these events.

This guy was a very short term hire on Trump's team, and that was several years back.

Nobody cares. Nobody SHOULD care.

Ahhh.  Just like Flynn.  We go through all the evidence, you and TEC go into Johnnie Cochran mode and when it's obvious there's really no defense, you decide not to care.

[Spendulus]

You really need to step back and take a wider view of these events.

This guy was a very short term hire on Trump's team, and that was several years back.

Nobody cares. Nobody SHOULD care.

Ahhh.  Just like Flynn.  We go through all the evidence, you and TEC go into Johnnie Cochran mode and when it's obvious there's really no defense, you decide not to care.

Not me. I'm simply asking you to take a wider view. I really don't care. Why should I?

Why should I care about some guy that was on Trump's team for a month or two years ago?

[TwitchySeal]

You really need to step back and take a wider view of these events.

This guy was a very short term hire on Trump's team, and that was several years back.

Nobody cares. Nobody SHOULD care.

Ahhh.  Just like Flynn.  We go through all the evidence, you and TEC go into Johnnie Cochran mode and when it's obvious there's really no defense, you decide not to care.

Not me. I'm simply asking you to take a wider view. I really don't care. Why should I?

Why should I care about some guy that was on Trump's team for a month or two years ago?

If you're only interested in pwning the libtards and being blindly loyal to Trump you definitely shouldn't care.  If the chairman of the Trump campaign actually was colluding with Russia (he was)...that would mean the Mueller report was justified (it was) and your whole world would be flipped upside down.
 
Definitely don't go read Pg 66 - 168: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And if you do, def skip the Paul Manafort section (129- 144).

No reason for you to care about any of that and risk getting TDS.

[TECSHARE]

You really need to step back and take a wider view of these events.

This guy was a very short term hire on Trump's team, and that was several years back.

Nobody cares. Nobody SHOULD care.

Ahhh.  Just like Flynn.  We go through all the evidence, you and TEC go into Johnnie Cochran mode and when it's obvious there's really no defense, you decide not to care.

Not me. I'm simply asking you to take a wider view. I really don't care. Why should I?

Why should I care about some guy that was on Trump's team for a month or two years ago?

If you're only interested in pwning the libtards and being blindly loyal to Trump you definitely shouldn't care.  If the chairman of the Trump campaign actually was colluding with Russia (he was)...that would mean the Mueller report was justified (it was) and your whole world would be flipped upside down.
 
Definitely don't go read Pg 66 - 168: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And if you do, def skip the Paul Manafort section (129- 144).

No reason for you to care about any of that and risk getting TDS.

That's not how due process or warrants work. Good try though.

[Spendulus]

You really need to step back and take a wider view of these events.

This guy was a very short term hire on Trump's team, and that was several years back.

Nobody cares. Nobody SHOULD care.

Ahhh.  Just like Flynn.  We go through all the evidence, you and TEC go into Johnnie Cochran mode and when it's obvious there's really no defense, you decide not to care.

Not me. I'm simply asking you to take a wider view. I really don't care. Why should I?

Why should I care about some guy that was on Trump's team for a month or two years ago?

If you're only interested in pwning the libtards and being blindly loyal to Trump you definitely shouldn't care.  If the chairman of the Trump campaign actually was colluding with Russia (he was)...that would mean the Mueller report was justified (it was) and your whole world would be flipped upside down.
 
Definitely don't go read Pg 66 - 168: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And if you do, def skip the Paul Manafort section (129- 144).

No reason for you to care about any of that and risk getting TDS.

You really do seem to be stuck in a belief in a fantasy that was concocted to destroy the presidency. That fantasy was purposefully created from nothing. It's now been well proven to be a fiction. Democrats invented it for, at the least, Democrats to believe it.

If someone had pulled that on me I'd be very, very angry.

[TECSHARE]

If someone had pulled that on me I'd be very, very angry.

Apparently most Democrats have never heard of the "sunk cost" fallacy, AKA "escalation of commitment".

[Spendulus]

If someone had pulled that on me I'd be very, very angry.

Apparently most Democrats have never heard of the "sunk cost" fallacy, AKA "escalation of commitment".

That's a good one. I had a buddy that bought a new car on a seven year loan, and a couple years in he wanted to set something different.

"I can't sell it! I'm underwater! I have to just keep paying!"

It may or may not be REEEE, but I'd like to see Twitch talk about what American values he holds primary, and how they reflect candidates that should be brought to the front. What one is FOR is more interesting than what one is AGAINST.

On the subject of REEEE, the vise tightens.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/499586-new-fbi-document-confirms-the-trump-campaign-was-investigated-without

[TECSHARE]

"Matthew Whitaker: Flynn “Improperly Targeted”; Obstruction of Justice Trap; Communist China Threat"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEi-g1vf3H4

[TECSHARE]

"Rosenstein Admits He Would Not Have Signed FISA Warrant If He Knew Of Exculpatory Evidence, Throws McCabe Under The Bus"

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rosenstein-admits-he-would-not-have-signed-fisa-warrant-if-he-knew-exculpatory-evidence

[TwitchySeal]

"The Flynn Calls: His Dismissal of Russian Interference and the Kremlin’s Savvy"

Newly declassified transcripts show the seeds of Russia’s overtures to the Trump administration as both sides sought to downplay Moscow’s election sabotage.

The discussions, declassified and released on Friday, illuminate not only the Trump administration’s dismissive attitude toward overwhelming evidence of the Russian sabotage effort, but also how the Kremlin worked to manipulate Mr. Trump’s advisers by convincing them that the president’s political enemies had concocted a “Russia hoax.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/us/politics/michael-flynn-kislyak-calls.html

[TECSHARE]

"The Flynn Calls: His Dismissal of Russian Interference and the Kremlin’s Savvy"

Newly declassified transcripts show the seeds of Russia’s overtures to the Trump administration as both sides sought to downplay Moscow’s election sabotage.

The discussions, declassified and released on Friday, illuminate not only the Trump administration’s dismissive attitude toward overwhelming evidence of the Russian sabotage effort, but also how the Kremlin worked to manipulate Mr. Trump’s advisers by convincing them that the president’s political enemies had concocted a “Russia hoax.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/us/politics/michael-flynn-kislyak-calls.html

Your pathetic attempts at infomanagement twattery are so transparent. For years you were crying about Russian collusion that never manifested, and this crusade destroyed the lives of good men, all so you could go after your personal Satan, Cheeto Hitler.

Yet after all of that, here you are still clinging to the corpse of that horse, whipping it harder and harder hoping it will spring to life and take you to a progressive utopia where everything is free and all of your political opponents occupy gulags.

I read the entire transcript, even though about a quarter of it is just a repeat of the beginning. You know what I saw? A diplomat doing his job, attempting to prevent war, and coordinate to deal with a common terrorist threat in the Middle East. The only thing even approaching controversial was his pleas with Russia to not escalate tensions over the Russian diplomats the Obama administration just expelled. What a traitor asking Russia not to retaliate against the US!

You have nothing. Your only hope here is that people won't bother to read a 27 page transcript to know that, and instead read that dogshit that you call news. Furthermore, it is well known all of these international calls are recorded and transcribed. Knowing this, what possible motivation would Flynn have to lie about their contents knowing everything that was said was already a matter of record?

None of your narrative makes sense, and you are desperate to maintain it at all costs. Even if it is at the cost of destroying the lives of good men, at the cost of the nation, and at the cost of war. As long as the bad orange man is gone, none of that matters. Flynn is not the traitor, you are the traitor.

[TwitchySeal]

"New Transcript Shows Trump Adviser Michael Flynn Colluding With Russia in 2016"

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/05/transcript-michael-flynn-trump-russia-ambassador-collusion-sanctions.html

[TECSHARE]

"New Transcript Shows Trump Adviser Michael Flynn Colluding With Russia in 2016"

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/05/transcript-michael-flynn-trump-russia-ambassador-collusion-sanctions.html

Yeah, you linked the transcripts already. OH THAT'S RIGHT! You are hoping that the made up tripe in the article will sway people because you know almost no one will read the 27 page transcript to see there is nothing of consequence in it! Keep firing off those turds, maybe one will stick.

[TwitchySeal]

"Newly Released Transcripts Show Michael Flynn Betrayed the United States"

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/newly-released-transcripts-show-michael-flynn-betrayed-the-united-states/

[Spendulus]

"Newly Released Transcripts Show Michael Flynn Betrayed the United States"

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/newly-released-transcripts-show-michael-flynn-betrayed-the-united-states/

Mother Jones now?

You must really be scraping the bottom of the barrel.

[TECSHARE]

"Declassifications Reveal Extensive Problems With Crossfire Hurricane Probe"

https://www.theepochtimes.com/infographic-declassifications-reveal-extensive-problems-with-crossfire-hurricane-probe_3377050.html

[Spendulus]

"Declassifications Reveal Extensive Problems With Crossfire Hurricane Probe"

https://www.theepochtimes.com/infographic-declassifications-reveal-extensive-problems-with-crossfire-hurricane-probe_3377050.html

I find it rather interesting the way the public is getting slowly metered declassifications of this data. As if it's intended to keep the story running.

Fine with me, but it has to be intentional.

[TwitchySeal]

buzzfeed FOIA request just got another page of the report unredacted.

Before and After.



Nothing that surprising, but it confirms that either:

A Trump has been lying all along about what he knew and when regarding the emails Russia hacked and ultimately leaked through Assange.
B Gates and Manafort lied to Mueller about knowing more than they did.
C They're all telling the truth and Trump was not in the loop regarding the email dump.


imo:
A - 96.8%
B - 0.2%
C -  4%