From the wiki:
Eventually, the reward will decrease to zero, and the limit of 21 million bitcoins
and
In other words, bitcoin's inventor Nakamoto set a monetary policy based on artificial scarcity at bitcoin's inception that there would only ever be 21 million bitcoins in total
And my statement was that there will always be LESS than 21 million. So, how would you regard this as plagiarism?
Alright, i forgot one word in my post which makes the sentence somewhat weird to read. But that has nothing to do with plagiarism.
I don't understand the sense of your post, are you trying to make fun of me because i forgot one word or because it is 'plagiarism' ?
You do realize that i didn't use the same wording in my post and neither did i write the same information as stated on the wiki ?
Instead of letting your anger out here, forget about this forum. You have been caught copy/pasting low quality content and got banned.
If you would have read the rules of the forum, you'd have known that this is going to happen.
Ban evasion is not allowed, so just accept it and do something more useful with your lifetime than complaining about a ban you deserved.
