Is banning weapons such a good thing?

[F3L1X]

Banning weapons wouldnt mean almost zero murder rates, remember when a terrorist in Paris ran over people with a van?

[BADecker]

The only way you might be able to completely ban weapons, is to place every person into a strait jacket, and let the robots spoon feed him and wipe his but.

[BADecker]

Banning guns does just the opposite of lowering the murder rate. Making and enforcing a law that requires all people to wear at leas a 38 cal. pistol when in public, would reduce all kinds of crime. Why? Because a crook would be too scared to use his gun, not knowing how prepared his victim might be. The simple show of a gun would scare the bejeebies out of him.

[Spendulus]

Considering the current events I'm beginning to question the ban of weapons in the population...
I'm not talking about a country where there are weapons and you ban them, cause that doesn't work (bad guys don't just hand out their weapons) but about a country where weapons are banned and could be unbanned.

Here are the pros and cons I see in a country with ban on weapons:....

There's only one eventual outcome of people banning weapons, and that is as the weapons get smart, and decide to ban people.

[SCheek]

It also worth noting how the murder rate would increase during the time period where guns were banned. Also worth noting that banning guns doesn't get rid of guns. Just the guns that law abiding citizens hold.

[Artemis3]

My country has weapons banned. Its also the country with the highest violent (by guns) death rate per capita of the hemisphere. Only state armed forces are legally allowed to have weapons (it used to be possible to obtain a permit for civilians a couple of decades ago, now void).

Where do criminals get weapons and ammo now? From the black market and... said state forces either by corruption or by killing them.

I'm not going to say anyone should be allowed to buy guns, but banning them altogether doesn't appear to be the answer either, neither forcing everyone to wear one (that's absurd from all points of view).

Currently criminals have it easy: the civilians can't defend themselves. And the police has it worse, the criminals often outgun them, so they resort to bully tactics such as confront a gang of 10 with 500... (while tragically leaving half the city undefended in the process, where the other gangs take opportunity to act). You can imagine the collateral...

As the saying goes: "When weapons are outlawed, only outlaws wear weapons". There is also a lot of crime committed by members of state forces. Remember the corruption part? That doesn't make the situation any easier...

[CoinCube]

My country has weapons banned. Its also the country with the highest violent (by guns) death rate per capita of the hemisphere. Only state armed forces are legally allowed to have weapons (it used to be possible to obtain a permit for civilians a couple of decades ago, now void).

Where do criminals get weapons and ammo now? From the black market and... said state forces either by corruption or by killing them.

...

My sympathies to your and your unfortunate countrymen.

Disarming the population leaves it helpless against government tyranny.
Those who support such things are either useful idiots or groups who wish to force their "vision" on others without worrying about the possibility of revolt.

The following article should be is required reading for the useful idiots.

Venezuelans regret gun ban, 'a declaration of war against an unarmed population'
https://www.foxnews.com/world/venezuelans-regret-gun-prohibition-we-could-have-defended-ourselves.amp

[BADecker]

There is no such thing as banning weapons. Having weapons is natural in the world the way it exists.

Consider the USA. Most average people want peace. Few want real confrontation. Sure, they like to go to football games and other sports where there is competition. But nobody wants to go around bloodying his neighbor or getting bloodied by his neighbor. And it is like this for the average people of all countries, until... their leaders stir them up so that they go to war. Just watch some of Hitler's speeches on Youtube.

Along with freedom of speech in the USA, freedom of religion and freedom to own weapons are two of the biggest freedoms we have. Hear is what is really happening regarding weapons. The war-minded leaders in the previous paragraph, are turning some people into weapons by talking them into laying down their weapons, and fighting against people who won't lay down their weapons.

Why do they do this? So they don't have any resistance when they send their armies in to take over the people of their own country to make slaves of them.

Take a look at what the 2nd Amendment really means:
Reality Check Rewind: The True Meaning of the Second Amendment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhC9DcKM0hc

[squatz1]

You can`t ban guns completely, there is always black market - is a person wants to get a gun, he or she will manage to do it regardless.
More measures shall be implemented to regulate it, for example improved and regular psychological testing.
But even if it is effective, more and more people will raise to protest: it is a threat to their freedom, they won`t be consent with more regulations.

Harping back on an old thread here, but yes this is true -- you can't ban ALL weapons. Stopping criminals is always the end goal though, and getting guns out of the hands of people that shouldn't have them -- such as people who have a mental illness, prior felony convictions, domestic violence charges, etc -- is something that both sides of the aisle can agree on.

At least I would hope so.

[TECSHARE]

You can`t ban guns completely, there is always black market - is a person wants to get a gun, he or she will manage to do it regardless.
More measures shall be implemented to regulate it, for example improved and regular psychological testing.
But even if it is effective, more and more people will raise to protest: it is a threat to their freedom, they won`t be consent with more regulations.

Harping back on an old thread here, but yes this is true -- you can't ban ALL weapons. Stopping criminals is always the end goal though, and getting guns out of the hands of people that shouldn't have them -- such as people who have a mental illness, prior felony convictions, domestic violence charges, etc -- is something that both sides of the aisle can agree on.

At least I would hope so.

The problem is who gets to decide who gets rights? Oh the government? What could go wrong

[BADecker]

The real reason for weapons is to "Shoot The Shit About American Politics." This is one great reason not to ban weapons.

[MoonCrypt]

The Gun banning issue has been going on and on, let me ask has banning of cocaine reduced the distribution of the substance?
or it has become another political plug?

In the world today you can only control the use of arms. Having guns distributed responsible help in a way reduce sect arising they know for sure they will have to be ready for a gunfight.

all I can say guns are emotional subject to government and banning it won't be a better option for them

[BADecker]

Banning anything is called control of it. Banning guns is called "gun control."

When any person or any group bans something for some other people, they are not controlling the thing they banned. Rather, they are controlling the people. It's called slavery.

[MoonCrypt]

Banning anything is called control of it. Banning guns is called "gun control."

When any person or any group bans something for some other people, they are not controlling the thing they banned. Rather, they are controlling the people. It's called slavery.

with your propose logic of baning = control, it then defines cocaine is not banned but controlled and the country that spends so much to fight it still remains one of the highest users.

[BADecker]

Banning anything is called control of it. Banning guns is called "gun control."

When any person or any group bans something for some other people, they are not controlling the thing they banned. Rather, they are controlling the people. It's called slavery.

with your propose logic of baning = control, it then defines cocaine is not banned but controlled and the country that spends so much to fight it still remains one of the highest users.

First, banning is people control, not substance control. The substance grows wild in many places in the banned country(ies).

Since the substance grows wild, the "banners" who are trying to control the people, will never be able to control it. They have long ago figure out how to make money off the people's substance use, without necessarily promoting the sale or use of the banned substance. That is all you are seeing - some people controlled (prison), with a massive number of people left to control. In other words, lots of ways to make more money. All it needs more creative thinking to do it.

However, why would America be loosening their bans on the substance... a thing that they are doing? Might it be that they know they will be able to control the people in the future through 5G microwave broadcasting?

Consider. The chemtrails being sprayed, are tons of nano aluminum oxide and barium... into the atmosphere. This is being consumed in the food it contaminates, and being breathed in by the people. It gets into their brains, and makes them susceptible to microwave radiation. Soon, zombie control of the people by the "banners," via 5G cellphone radiation. Loosening the substance bans is simply another way to keep the people from focusing on the far greater 5G removal of their freedom.

[MoonCrypt]

Banning anything is called control of it. Banning guns is called "gun control."

When any person or any group bans something for some other people, they are not controlling the thing they banned. Rather, they are controlling the people. It's called slavery.

with your propose logic of baning = control, it then defines cocaine is not banned but controlled and the country that spends so much to fight it still remains one of the highest users.

First, banning is people control, not substance control. The substance grows wild in many places in the banned country(ies).

Since the substance grows wild, the "banners" who are trying to control the people, will never be able to control it. They have long ago figure out how to make money off the people's substance use, without necessarily promoting the sale or use of the banned substance. That is all you are seeing - some people controlled (prison), with a massive number of people left to control. In other words, lots of ways to make more money. All it needs more creative thinking to do it.

However, why would America be loosening their bans on the substance... a thing that they are doing? Might it be that they know they will be able to control the people in the future through 5G microwave broadcasting?

Consider. The chemtrails being sprayed, are tons of nano aluminum oxide and barium... into the atmosphere. This is being consumed in the food it contaminates, and being breathed in by the people. It gets into their brains, and makes them susceptible to microwave radiation. Soon, zombie control of the people by the "banners," via 5G cellphone radiation. Loosening the substance bans is simply another way to keep the people from focusing on the far greater 5G removal of their freedom.

this is another interesting insight you have shared!! now let the people feed on the habit and give us the power in the future!! so are you saying laws won't protect the people anymore?

[Adegbem]

The intention is what really counts, but banning may not be the best way to curtail the havoc that it poses. Since weapon have there own advantages in that it helps in defending  one's self. It can't be totally ban, there should be a way around it.

[Spendulus]

The intention is what really counts, but banning may not be the best way to curtail the havoc that it poses. Since weapon have there own advantages in that it helps in defending  one's self. It can't be totally ban, there should be a way around it.

I always thought that along with a weapon, one should have perhaps a thousand rounds of ammo for it.

How about we compromise, and ban ammo beyond five hundred rounds per pistol or rifle?

[BADecker]

First, banning is people control, not substance control. The substance grows wild in many places in the banned country(ies).

Since the substance grows wild, the "banners" who are trying to control the people, will never be able to control it. They have long ago figure out how to make money off the people's substance use, without necessarily promoting the sale or use of the banned substance. That is all you are seeing - some people controlled (prison), with a massive number of people left to control. In other words, lots of ways to make more money. All it needs more creative thinking to do it.

However, why would America be loosening their bans on the substance... a thing that they are doing? Might it be that they know they will be able to control the people in the future through 5G microwave broadcasting?

Consider. The chemtrails being sprayed, are tons of nano aluminum oxide and barium... into the atmosphere. This is being consumed in the food it contaminates, and being breathed in by the people. It gets into their brains, and makes them susceptible to microwave radiation. Soon, zombie control of the people by the "banners," via 5G cellphone radiation. Loosening the substance bans is simply another way to keep the people from focusing on the far greater 5G removal of their freedom.

this is another interesting insight you have shared!! now let the people feed on the habit and give us the power in the future!! so are you saying laws won't protect the people anymore?

Physical laws of metal contaminated brains being bombarded by controlled microwave radiation will protect the people as slaves for the microwave controllers. I mean, what good are you by yourself? Think of all the work you would have to do in nature if you lived alone. You would have to build your own house, plant your own garden, make your own clothes, hand-dig your own well, etc.

Masters protect their slaves while keeping them in slavery... so that the slaves can do the heavy worked for them.

What laws are protecting the people? Microwave/nano-metal physical laws are enslaving the people.

Here's a business to get into. Activate your cellphone so that it is lit up, and so that you can see how many bars of connectivity it has. Then, while the screen is lit up, stick your cellphone into your microwave oven. ABSOLUTELY DON'T TURN THE MICROWAVE ON! Look through the oven door window. Watch the connectivity bars go down, and the cellphone turn itself off, or enter a low-power mode, because of no connectivity.

The business is to design microwave window sheathing for houses, and microwave-proof clothing for people... suits they can wear like "spacesuits," but a lot less clumsy, to protect people from microwaves. Later, your business can grow into protection for gardens and fields so that crops can grow without all that microwave energy affecting them.

I mean, the current cubesats that they are sending up are only the tip of the iceberg regarding the future. The whole earth will be bathed in microwave radiation, a thousand times greater than what exists now. Check the studies on the Net for how dangerous some people have found microwaves to be.

[MoonCrypt]

First, banning is people control, not substance control. The substance grows wild in many places in the banned country(ies).

Since the substance grows wild, the "banners" who are trying to control the people, will never be able to control it. They have long ago figure out how to make money off the people's substance use, without necessarily promoting the sale or use of the banned substance. That is all you are seeing - some people controlled (prison), with a massive number of people left to control. In other words, lots of ways to make more money. All it needs more creative thinking to do it.

However, why would America be loosening their bans on the substance... a thing that they are doing? Might it be that they know they will be able to control the people in the future through 5G microwave broadcasting?

Consider. The chemtrails being sprayed, are tons of nano aluminum oxide and barium... into the atmosphere. This is being consumed in the food it contaminates, and being breathed in by the people. It gets into their brains, and makes them susceptible to microwave radiation. Soon, zombie control of the people by the "banners," via 5G cellphone radiation. Loosening the substance bans is simply another way to keep the people from focusing on the far greater 5G removal of their freedom.

this is another interesting insight you have shared!! now let the people feed on the habit and give us the power in the future!! so are you saying laws won't protect the people anymore?

Physical laws of metal contaminated brains being bombarded by controlled microwave radiation will protect the people as slaves for the microwave controllers. I mean, what good are you by yourself? Think of all the work you would have to do in nature if you lived alone. You would have to build your own house, plant your own garden, make your own clothes, hand-dig your own well, etc.

Masters protect their slaves while keeping them in slavery... so that the slaves can do the heavy worked for them.

What laws are protecting the people? Microwave/nano-metal physical laws are enslaving the people.

Here's a business to get into. Activate your cellphone so that it is lit up, and so that you can see how many bars of connectivity it has. Then, while the screen is lit up, stick your cellphone into your microwave oven. ABSOLUTELY DON'T TURN THE MICROWAVE ON! Look through the oven door window. Watch the connectivity bars go down, and the cellphone turn itself off, or enter a low-power mode, because of no connectivity.

The business is to design microwave window sheathing for houses, and microwave-proof clothing for people... suits they can wear like "spacesuits," but a lot less clumsy, to protect people from microwaves. Later, your business can grow into protection for gardens and fields so that crops can grow without all that microwave energy affecting them.

I mean, the current cubesats that they are sending up are only the tip of the iceberg regarding the future. The whole earth will be bathed in microwave radiation, a thousand times greater than what exists now. Check the studies on the Net for how dangerous some people have found microwaves to be.

now you making the future to be over thought now by me!! i will just move away from any enabled 5G country to an underdeveloped region don't want to be living in fear