Is banning weapons such a good thing?

[Artemis3]

now you making the future to be over thought now by me!! i will just move away from any enabled 5G country to an underdeveloped region don't want to be living in fear

5G is only the first harmonic of water resonance, the true terror lies in 2.4G 

Wait, are we talking about microwave weapons now?

[1715438264]

1715438264

[1715438264]

1715438264

[1715438264]

1715438264

[1715438264]

1715438264

[MoonCrypt]

now you making the future to be over thought now by me!! i will just move away from any enabled 5G country to an underdeveloped region don't want to be living in fear

5G is only the first harmonic of water resonance, the true terror lies in 2.4G 

Wait, are we talking about microwave weapons now?

that is what it looks like it because the wave can be used to fire up individual if used in a certain way the directional wave can burn the individuals its set on!! so it can be weaponized

[BADecker]

Banning weapons would make them all gooey.



 

[emilanea56]

Banning weapons is a good thing at all. We can reduce rate of volution, murder politics, and the high fund for them,... Peaceful is life.

[BADecker]

^^^ Banning all weapons is a good thing. But why is this idea not realistic? Because nobody can ban all the weapons.

If someone has weapons, he will use them. If he can use a few, he will make more. If he makes enough, how can you stop him from harming you if you don't have any?

Not having weapons is an idealistic dream that will make you into a slave.

If you and some others legislate weapons bans, will that make the weapons go away?

Homemade Slam Fire 12 gauge shotgun EP: 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOGoHBOKEVI

You can't stop people from making weapons without making them slaves.

After you watch the video, look in the sidebar for more like it.

Note that, if you make one of these guns, you better be careful. Why? Because if you restrict the barrel opening in any way, the shell will explode the pipes. The shrapnel from the explosion will blind you.

[Johnzky]

First i wanna clarify that when we mention ‘weapon’ it wasnt just a Gun because Bladed weapon also considered as weapon same as thoe arrows etc,so the Pros are questioned

But in totality i believe that weapons are part of the human lives since politics had been created and this is a sign of power and strength so for me banning weapon is not a good thing

[mayo2u]

One thing you need to account for is that there where far more guns in the US (percent of population) 60 years ago - and less crime and far fewer mass murders and school shootings.  So, we know it's not the guns. It's something else.

So, what happened? Why the change.

Second there are more guns in the US now than 20 years ago but fewer murders. Why?

There is more involved here than the weapon itself.

[drumamat]

My opinion to carry weapons to civilians prohibited.I'm just sure that by issuing a permit for carrying a weapon, the person receiving it passes a superficial check.And in fact, you need to undergo an individual more thorough testing.I am an ordinary civilian and I would not want the passage of the game GTA on the streets of my city.

[mayo2u]

Are you referring only to carrying on the street? If so, I agree that different local jurisdictions can limit conceal (or open) carry.

But the role of having firearms is to be able to defend yourself from criminals and from an over reaching government.

Look at the evil done by governments against unarmed populations over the last 100 years. The  millions dead by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and others.

[BADecker]

Arizona and some other States have conceal carry without a license. AZ also has unlimited open carry.

At the same time, Arizona has some of the strictest laws regarding punishment for dangerous use of a weapon. If you are attacked, and you have a gun but the other guy doesn't, you dare not use your gun except if you can prove that it really was a life threatening situation. If you can't prove it, shoot him dead without any witnesses, get away from the scene fast, and melt the gun down so there isn't any evidence.

[Rizqi]

I agreed on the use of weapons to protect myself and my family and relatives, but we must understand that weapons are tools and can be used by anyone, thus the potential for misuse by some people is abandoned without rules.
indeed life is free with freedom but the freedom we have does not interfere and take one's freedom. then we as good citizens already have armed rules, with specifications that are in accordance with the state.
we have been given a tool to protect ourselves so do not hurt and carelessly put the tool, because from some cases dangerous tools are made for games and this is very dangerous with other residents.

[Chikitita2004]

Well, there is always good and bad side in both. Allowing weapons can somehow be good to the person holding it, it gives feeling of security for them but sometimes problems arise when other people holding them are not responsible enough which also cause problem to other people. The abuse of use is often the problem that arise from this situation.

[emulsifryer]

Well, there is always good and bad side in both. Allowing weapons can somehow be good to the person holding it, it gives feeling of security for them but sometimes problems arise when other people holding them are not responsible enough which also cause problem to other people. The abuse of use is often the problem that arise from this situation.

Having a gun is not actually a problem for as long as the owner has its own license and not abusing having an authority of using the gun. The purpose of a gun is for security protection but many of us are being irresponsible about it because they are using it for evil intentions and causing a problem to other people especially when they got drunk.

[Pagoda.to]

Like others say, always a good and bad side, and it will always be abused. I guess that can be said about the crypto world, as much good as it can be used for, the bad will always be the first thing people think of first. Having both extremes will help our case.

[BADecker]

What about the weapons that our bodies use naturally, to kill off microbes? I mean, how mean can we get? Maybe we should commit suicide en masse so that we truly lay down all our weapons.

[mayo2u]

Why would we want to regulate them even more. You do realize that places where guns are de facto illegal (Chicago) crime is higher than in places where guns are readily available.

If guns were the cause of violence then more guns would equal more violence - and yet the numbers don't bear that out.

[mayo2u]

Banning weapons is a good thing at all. We can reduce rate of volution, murder politics, and the high fund for them,... Peaceful is life.

Why is banning weapons a good idea?

How would a 120 pound woman defend herself against a 200 pound man?

As the saying goes: "God created man but Sam Colt made them equal."

[BADecker]

You can't ban weapons. Even if you try, the regulators who enforce the ban need weapons to do the enforcing.

If you are the kind of person who would trust the enforcers, you can trust me with your $10,000 just to prove your trust, right? I'd like it in Bitcoin. Ask me for my Bitcoin address where to send it.

[700G]

Banning weapons is a good thing at all. We can reduce rate of volution, murder politics, and the high fund for them,... Peaceful is life.

Why is banning weapons a good idea?

How would a 120 pound woman defend herself against a 200 pound man?

As the saying goes: "God created man but Sam Colt made them equal."

Exactly, brutes and gangs of criminals would love to see total gun control because they do not need guns to commit crime. They will always prey on the weak and will always make sure they have the greater strength or greater numbers.
Gun restrictions only hurt the innocent. Why so many people cannot understand this is beyond me.

[BADecker]

It makes them dangerous.


Easy Rider - Freedom spoken by Jack Nicholson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACUCVTH6f0g