Creating standards for airdrop and bounty campaigns is a very timely and good idea. Recently, a huge number of incomprehensible projects have spawned, which gives the impression that even schoolchildren create ICOs.
I was already thinking about creating this, then when participating on a bounty, they wasn't respectful with bounty hunters, so I had sure those standards are a need: for both hunters and bounty campaigns.
This is good parameter for bounty and airdrop program and can be use to take the right choice. I'll wait the next step and see what happen and how good the progress. I believe we already have experience but none of us can take the real choice, scam and paused program still become the biggest risk we have. Keep going and good luck to you.
I need to release a new version of ABCS, but it will have lots of things, so I can't launch it now.
ABCS is open to receive suggestions.
I love your standards and i would wish in 2019 if these can be made and utilized by present upcoming and existing projects.
It protects both the interest of the participants and also the project owners.
But who knows what will happen to airdrop ? lets see if bounty managers take advantages of this post.
Its up to us to ask airdrops and bounty campaigns if they want to comply with ABCS.
If airdrop campaigns are made by this type of standard, maybe everyone would trust the project and nobody got scammed i think. Because scam projects doesn't do a whole lot of things will make their project looks better. So thanks for this type of thread. It's kind of beneficial to us.
The problem is not only scam; and any standard can't prevent 100% against scam, as there is not 100% security on everything but a satisfy limit and layers. There is also the possibility that the project doesn't succeed, what doesn't means that is a scam. How to guess it?
ABCS isn't created to solve airdrops' and bounty campaigns' problems, but to do a big help on pointing how they can be better and to protect both campaign/manager and participants.
If a project haves an official seal of ABCS (verified by the URL), that doesn't means the project is secure and we need to be blind investors, but that the project is using an additional layer for security
no offense
Is the bounty the most important element in an ICO event?
the success of an ICO is from investors, how many investors are interested in the project, and also how much money is earned when ICO is held
bounty hunters only do publications and also the formation of communities,
ICO without investors will not succeed, but ICOs who are qualified even without a bounty hunter, will definitely succeed
for issues of publication, teams and developers can use the Google Ads feature, or Fb Ads, so that organic communities will be formed and not paid communities
Your point is very good, about organic engagement on advertising. It really makes us ask:
Is the bounty the most important element in an ICO event?
Personally I think the majority of bounty hunters receives their tokens and wants to sell immediately after the coin gets a increase on value; and not to really support a project. So, the part of bounty can be sold on the ICO, openning the crowdsale to receive more investors. And organic advertising is better than bounty.
But there yet will come lots of good projects that haves airdrops and bounty campaigns, and for that reason I'd created ABCS.
This one is better but you cannot prevent most of the abuses from the users here. They can create thousand of accounts to apply in the bounty.
But it isn't created to act as a anti-spam/KYC system, but a guideline for airdrops and bounty campaigns.
So, not only their participants follow rules, but also the managers of campaigns.
in my opinion this is very cool, with this project we can see which projects are better. I want to see it again in the last few days. is it feasible to be made a recommendation to my friends.
Thanks. You could also recommend to airdrops and bounty campaigns you like.
Soon it will have a new version.