What do you think about Post-ICO Bounty?

[F.Developers]

I started a thread here last Month, November https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5070456.msg47962086#msg47962086

One of our major strength will be the Post-ICO Bounty system.



How it will work:

The project can still continue to pay in Token or in cash even after the official Bounty has been completed. This will make it possible for project owners to promote their project easily using the same method in which funds were raised.


 


We will like to hear from you!

After raising funds via ICO, you would just prefer to advertise your project or would you still love to promote your project using the Bounty method?





EDIT: We successfully launched a platform that can handle post-ICO bounties https://teambounty.com | Contact me via Telegram for listing guide @FATechnologies

[1714995001]

1714995001

[1714995001]

1714995001

[1714995001]

1714995001

[drwhobox]

We will like to hear from you!

If the project pays then why not. I guess post bounties will have more attraction than the regular bounty. People will already know about the market value of the token/coin.

[Bttzed03]

You should edit your title and change it to "Post-ICO Bounty"

I have no problem with post-ICO bounties as long as there is an allocated fund already. If there is an escrow, then the better it is. It will be more attractive for hunters I think.

[F.Developers]

You should edit your title and change it to "Post-ICO Bounty"

I have no problem with post-ICO bounties as long as there is an allocated fund already. If there is an escrow, then the better it is. It will be more attractive for hunters I think.

Thanks

[AgentZero23]

I started a thread here last Month, November https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5070456.msg47962086#msg47962086

One of our major strength will be the Post-ICO Bounty system.



How it will work:

The project can still continue to pay in Token or in cash even after the official Bounty has been completed. This will make it possible for project owners to promote their project easily using the same method in which funds were raised.


 


We will like to hear from you!

After raising funds via ICO, you would just prefer to advertise your project or would you still love to promote your project using the Bounty method?

Post ICO bounty is good and i have promoted FuzeX and now Darico. The is really good strategy to raise awareness of their products and to reach more investors. Many post ICO's are now using ambassador program to really promote the project and its products. And they will pay you with their own tokens and they already have value in the market which is good.

[iconoclast]

Far too frequently sites will stop any sort of promotion once the project has completed its fundraising. I fully support the idea that you should continue to make people aware of the projects progress and if you want to use a bounty campaign instead of paid advertising that is perfectly legitimate. I think most bounty hunters will not care if it is pre or post ICO as long as they get paid.

[tycsols]

Uptill now i have seen only a handful of post ico bounties and to be honest all of them have been launched with a very low budget and bounty hunters have not shown interest in such campaigns due to small expected reward so to make post ico bounty successful and viral budget should be increased to decent levels.

[10BTCaDay]

I think after the funds for development are collected at the sales stage, then after this bounty campaign will not be needed. then everything will depend on how the team will work on the project

[confreslamp]

This is a great decision, because the most projects think that the marketing stage is over after reaching the fundraising goals. They need to make people buy their coins on exchanges and create enough hype around their coin.

[CryptoCoinArbitrage]

It depend on the project itself  where they have to focus: on the product development or on building up a loyal community or
mass adoption of the product or selling the product etc. In most of the cases advertising is necessary and bounties could
help in promoting the project in after ICO phase too.

[jekainvestor]

it is not the bounty campaign it is looks like the irdrop more when the ICO is over but the team decide to attract attention to the project and its development, or to attract the attention of the society to their product.

[murphydropkick]

I think they are a great way to market a future token, regardless if the ICO has finished or not.

It is less risk for the bounty hunters because they know the token value, and for the startup they are still spreading the knowledge of their token. You can use bounties for other things that just liking pages, but to maybe help get on exchanges, spread their content etc.

[makadaka]

It seems to me that it is absolutely meaningless because if this strategy is applied to one project, it will be effective but not to the entire market. There are people who specifically do this.

[edmundo]

These kinds of bounties present the best form of bounties. This is because, these are already listed projects with stability. It could mean that bounty hunters have a chance of cashing in on tradeable tokens at current market rates. Also these bounties could mean that there is a better marketing conversions due to the fact that, the bounties will be presenting the project in its working and effective state.

[Lisa110386]

I think it's a good idea with Post ICO bounty. I participated in a similar campaign , it was the OAX campaign and I still hold these tokens. Payments were not very large, but monthly, the token was traded on exchanges, including the Binance.

[IgorShumilo]

This is a very interesting idea and I like it. After all, the bounty program is simple marketing, which is needed not only in the initial stage of the project, but also after. I think stupid tweet, retweet or like a person with 10,000 subscribers (90 percent of which are bots) is not effective marketing. And if you make a bounty program after the sale of tokens, then you need to think with your head what kind of marketing is needed at the moment.

[cryptolove.143]

Hype dies down during the long development period. So I really don't mind post ICO bounties to kickstart a platform. Provided the bounty task are targeted to the right audience.

[gowobonyok]

if so, it doesn't matter to always help with promotions, and it doesn't matter to keep posting if ico still pays when ico is finished.

[Nasonn]

Post ICO bounties are the best especially when the token/coin is listed on an exchange. Bounty hunters will know that their work will be rewarded at the end of the campaign.

[Warkop]

In my opinion, by any method, as long as they are still paying, it will not be a problem, because making an ICO without promotion will not run until it's finished. so basically whatever method they give all the bounty hunters are ready to do it.