Good ICOs should be protected from dump

[maculeth]

ico team also must anticipate the occurrence of dumps by holding down the distribution process, for listings to be carried out as quickly as possible. the token distribution for bounty hunters can be held to wait for the price to be high enough and after investors get the profit, the bounty hunter can be paid, it will be fair to many parties.

[Sephire]

The real good ICOs should not be affected by any short-term dumps. Those will bounce back stronger over time. Carefully planned lockup periods can mitigate some of the dumping.

[makishart]

The real good ICOs should not be affected by any short-term dumps. Those will bounce back stronger over time. Carefully planned lockup periods can mitigate some of the dumping.

We have a lot of examples about good ico which not get any dump but they were getting a huge increase after listed on the exchange site. We must see that about where that will be going. Basically a good ico means a big demand to protect it from the dump

[imsotiredofmoviereboots]

After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:

1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.

2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced

3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.

4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.

5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.

6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.

Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.

These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.

News Flash! It don't! I have experienced a bounty previously where they lockup the team's token and bounties also and it did not completely protect the coin's price from dumping. Some has even dropped below 10x their ICO price before listing and it was that investors doings. I only see things change when the ICO listed in exchanges that has high liquidity like Binance.

[Absolutep]

Protecting good ICO should be the concern of everyone of us because this is our world and will should do everything to protect our interest.I just hope something can be done to protect good ICO.

[Duzter]

The real good ICOs should not be affected by any short-term dumps. Those will bounce back stronger over time. Carefully planned lockup periods can mitigate some of the dumping.

We have a lot of examples about good ico which not get any dump but they were getting a huge increase after listed on the exchange site. We must see that about where that will be going. Basically a good ico means a big demand to protect it from the dump

This is not happening with each and every project, there are good projects that progress good when it's been launched for the usage. Once after getting listed, due to the lack of trade support there won't be expected trading volume on the exchange. The big demand of projects were seen when there is at least a mvp. Good ico's truly recover even when there is a dump in between.

[covfefe_]

The only way to stop a token form being dumped is to freeze/not to distribute the tokens till the project starts making profit from the product and hence be able to provide dividend to the token holders. Though this should be predictable and be carried out in a fixed time frame.

[DarkIT]

The only way to stop a token form being dumped is to freeze/not to distribute the tokens till the project starts making profit from the product and hence be able to provide dividend to the token holders. Though this should be predictable and be carried out in a fixed time frame.

I think it's very unlikely to make the price of ICO tokens survive a dump. even when they pay them with bitcoin, or ETH. there is no guarantee that investors who get a big bonus will not sell the bonus tokens they get. well, this can be avoided when a project really develops the project they are making.

[Joshapat]

In my opinion ICO must be used as additional money for the project, devs. must have large capital before making a project so that when a dump occurs they can control it.

[GREENch]

now in the crypto industry is a period when good projects are lower than projects with a dubious reputation.

[dipeco]

The whole problem could be solved by paying hunters with other crypto currencies. Everybody would be happy, but the most projects do not want to share their profits and want to share their tokens that are worth nothing right now.