[OPEN] ★☆★ 777Coin Signature Campaign ★☆★ (Member-Hero Accepted) (New)

[qiwoman2]

User: qiwoman2
Position to Apply: Legendary
Posts Start: 9775
Address: 1FPkpgo5a2fMJhakY4Tu4F2bN8P7G8yowF

[1714936814]

1714936814

[dannybrown]

User:dannybrown
Position to Apply: Hero Member
Posts Start: 2742
Address: 3GrEc7bHxVZ83ps2iH6RMH8mtwgUJGoRN6


Thank you.

I confirm that my details in the spreadsheet are correct.
Thank you.

[FatFork]

User: FatFork
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 92
Address: 1Mtr3ie28nS9VXdhQvDq7QtAMRWzkBpjRG

Signature and personal text updated. Thanks.

EDIT: As there are no free slots for Member positions, I'm now moving my application to the Bitvest campaign.

[Ailurophile]

User: Ailurophile
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 93
Address: 38gE3SQ1LPqb2nJQd1o6X5X5zB1NQcfVEX

[Ailurophile]

Confirming that I accept the appointment and the details on the spreadsheet is correct.

[HartmaniA]

User: HartmaniA
Position to Apply: Hero
Posts Start: 944
Address: 13Wd9cDVAhHDoWyq4mt8raGY6peczhzvZ1

[nelson4lov]

I'm applying for a slot.


User: nelson4lov
Position to Apply: Sr member
Posts Start: 2883
Address: 13HNoX8iXjcps2XjgmAWnw6hpziijXaFbq

I will change the signature if accepted.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Two weeks with CryptopreneurBrainBoss and what we got?:

- he managed to fully fill the empty slots from tier D, which were empty for months. I'm not saying here that his standards are too low, while Hhampuz's were too high (not at all, since he already warned users for low quality topics or he even denied way more posts than Hhampuz for low quality); I'm just stating that he managed in 2 weeks to fill all the slots of this campaign which were empty for a long time;

- he already raised participants attention by not counting a big amount of posts, fact which didn't happen before, showing he is not strict, by very strict with quality; I myself had 9 denied posts in his 1st week, while I was aware only about 4 or 5, which were "bump" posts;

- he warned users for low quality posts, fact which also, AFAIK, didn't happen before;

- when he was in error he admitted and he solved the error (also my case);

- he ranked up in upper tiers or on their corresponding rank users which were waiting this for a long time (see nakamura's case);

- he answers; and he answers fast, but, most important - he answers PMs (at least mine).

Once again: I'm not comparing here the actual manager with the previous one! I'm sure Hhampuz did his best here and also I'm sure about his good intentions. Different managers, different approaches though. I'm stating just CryptopreneurBrainBoss took over from where Hhampuz left and tried to improve in all possible ways Hhampuz's great work.

Gg Hhampuz! Gg CryptopreneurBrainBoss!

[nakamura12]

Two weeks with CryptopreneurBrainBoss and what we got?:

Well, your not the only one that CryptopreneurBrainBoss replied in PM. I have been sending PMs to our new CM regarding the spreadsheet. Take a look at rdluffy which is full member already before I ranked up to full member on july 2019 and cm fixed it right away. It was during round 59 where I am in Tier B which I'm supposed to be in tier c even though I joined 777coin campaign first before rdluffy joined as full member. I am glad that cm have done a great work with just two weeks.

[UserU]

Finally I had my first warning after all these while, scary man 😱

But like what Gazeta mentioned, no doubt CB has effectively managed the vacant spots. I always wondered when they'd be filled up.

And the PM thing @ Hhampuz, it's true to a certain extent. Out of 2 PMs sent, only 1 got replied to.

P/S: Hope Hham doesn't see this :p

[$crypto$]

- he answers; and he answers fast, but, most important - he answers PMs (at least mine).

@CryptopreneurBrainBoss did its best work for 2 weeks running. What I like is answering complaints from participants quickly, so that's why I feel CryptopreneurBrainBoss is better than Hhampuz
But Hhampuz is a professional CM.

[MarioV]

Hi signature friends, I have not yet received the reward for the "round 60" week. Have you received the bounty?

[Botnake]

Hi signature friends, I have not yet received the reward for the "round 60" week. Have you received the bounty?

As a member of the campaign, you should follow the update of the manager all the time, it seems like the payment has not been made yet.

his latest post. sorry for interrupting your thread manager.

Spreadsheet for Round 60 has been turned in to lightlord for payment:

Inquires & complain should be directed to my PM for quick response, available slots will be announced once payment for this round has been made.

The words in bold text are the answers.

[peter0425]

Hi signature friends, I have not yet received the reward for the "round 60" week. Have you received the bounty?

                                ~snip~

in addition to that,Lightlord will update once he had sent the Payments like what he did Last week

Round 59 Payments has been sent!   
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/d5c01fb54b50deafb20030916ad301bd82514dbbbe53e083fc0bc2746f92d678

maybe tomorrow or later today Lightlord will send the payments because according to the Op if you still not read the Update

   

Payouts will be Sent every week - (Monday-Wednesday)

this is what it says,hope it is clear by Now Mate.

[Artemis3]

Two weeks with CryptopreneurBrainBoss and what we got?:

- he managed to fully fill the empty slots from tier D, which were empty for months. I'm not saying here that his standards are too low, while Hhampuz's were too high (not at all, since he already warned users for low quality topics or he even denied way more posts than Hhampuz for low quality); I'm just stating that he managed in 2 weeks to fill all the slots of this campaign which were empty for a long time;

- he already raised participants attention by not counting a big amount of posts, fact which didn't happen before, showing he is not strict, by very strict with quality; I myself had 9 denied posts in his 1st week, while I was aware only about 4 or 5, which were "bump" posts;

- he warned users for low quality posts, fact which also, AFAIK, didn't happen before;

- when he was in error he admitted and he solved the error (also my case);

- he ranked up in upper tiers or on their corresponding rank users which were waiting this for a long time (see nakamura's case);

- he answers; and he answers fast, but, most important - he answers PMs (at least mine).

Once again: I'm not comparing here the actual manager with the previous one! I'm sure Hhampuz did his best here and also I'm sure about his good intentions. Different managers, different approaches though. I'm stating just CryptopreneurBrainBoss took over from where Hhampuz left and tried to improve in all possible ways Hhampuz's great work.

Gg Hhampuz! Gg CryptopreneurBrainBoss!

In Hhampuz defense, i sent PMs before which were promptly replied to, i even changed my payment address multiple times, and had no issues whatsoever. Hhampuz also issued warnings in the google document, in the comments column (was to the right, next to payment), i guess this was a bit hidden for some people to see (might need scrolling).

Hhampuz was lately busy or unavailable, which might be the reason the former campaign manager wanted to quit in the first place, and in the transition no new applicants were being accepted. But a year ago this was moving perfectly, you can see for yourself in this thread, just look at the earlier pages and also look at the old google document. Slots were being filled and upper tiers could not be available if people from higher tiers didn't leave or failed twice in a row the 15 message requirement per week.

Someone here on this thread even mentioned my name at some point, but you have to consider that if ranking user level meant lower payment (because only a lower tier slot was available in the higher user rank category) then it was the correct decision not to move the user unless explicitly requested (some did, but i didn't).

A reason I decided to move campaigns was to release the full member tier b slot i was occupying here which made little sense with my current user rank, so i wanted to give a chance to the full members who had been waiting too.

In the end I also think both managers do a good job. No complaints.

[MarioV]

Hi signature friends, I have not yet received the reward for the "round 60" week. Have you received the bounty?

What I know is that payments are always made on Wednesday so for the 60th round maybe tomorrow we will receive the reward.
Be patient, you will definitely receive it in a timely manner and this is a long-term campaign so no need to worry about that.

Thanks for your clarifications: actually last week I had not reached the minimum number of posts and therefore still I was not "timed" on the moment of payment.

[nakamura12]

In Hhampuz defense, i sent PMs before which were promptly replied to, i even changed my payment address multiple times, and had no issues whatsoever. Hhampuz also issued warnings in the google document, in the comments column (was to the right, next to payment), i guess this was a bit hidden for some people to see (might need scrolling).

Hhampuz was lately busy or unavailable, which might be the reason the former campaign manager wanted to quit in the first place, and in the transition no new applicants were being accepted. But a year ago this was moving perfectly, you can see for yourself in this thread, just look at the earlier pages and also look at the old google document. Slots were being filled and upper tiers could not be available if people from higher tiers didn't leave or failed twice in a row the 15 message requirement per week.

Someone here on this thread even mentioned my name at some point, but you have to consider that if ranking user level meant lower payment (because only a lower tier slot was available in the higher user rank category) then it was the correct decision not to move the user unless explicitly requested (some did, but i didn't).

A reason I decided to move campaigns was to release the full member tier b slot i was occupying here which made little sense with my current user rank, so i wanted to give a chance to the full members who had been waiting too.

In the end I also think both managers do a good job. No complaints.

It is true, Hhampuz did reply to PMs earlier but as the campaign goes on Hhampuz didn't reply to me in pm at all. It may be because of Hhampuz being busy as mentiones above why Hhampuz didn't have the time to replied to my PMs. I have seen the warning that the previous campaign manager did like "Don't post burst".

[lightlord]

Round 60 Payments has been sent!   
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/c2d31d41c2ab19557f295df08677b0ea2de50b125729b1eb440af25b79de45fe

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

777coin Round 60 payment has been made.

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/c2d31d41c2ab19557f295df08677b0ea2de50b125729b1eb440af25b79de45fe

★ All complains and inquiry should be directed to my PM for quicker response and to avoid congesting the thread.

★ Spreadsheet will be used effectively to communicate with participants of this campaign, always verify your status to improve on yourself.

★ 2nd straight warning (in a row) = demotion in tier & removal for users in the last tier, both for inactivity and post quality.

NO MORE OPEN SLOTS:
Thread title getting edited soon.

[peter0425]

Spreadsheet for Round 61 has been submitted to lightlord for payment.

My DM is always open for any questions and complains. Open slots will be announced once payment has been made

you have cheated us,Because you have Finished counting the posts very early today as i have checked it first thing in the morning..Joke lol(you are very functional manager @CryptoBrainboss and doing your Job almost ahead of time)

this will surely make us working for another yearor years like what we had under @Hhampuz management,very smooth and attentive managers.

@lightlord you made a perfect choice having @CryptoBrainboss after @Hhampuz.


Cheers...!!!