Buy back ICO tokens after ICO

[sorrros]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

[1714874521]

1714874521

[1714874521]

1714874521

[1714874521]

1714874521

[1714874521]

1714874521

[vv181]

Collected fund gathered from ICO are used for the development and expansion of the project, it depends on the company decision though what they are going to do with funds, I'm sure the company already made a statement about the percentage usage of the fund.

[burky155]

I think this would be most profitable think in the cryptocurrency World. It is so simple today, after ICO finishes and hit the markets, the bounty hunters are selling their free coins just like "0"! Last year i always followed that situation and everytime it happened the same way. For ex. ICO price is $1, you can buy it like $0.05 in first days. Thats what i will try to do in this new year..

[Strotman]

It is so simple today, after ICO finishes and hit the markets, the bounty hunters are selling their free coins just like "0"!

The price of the cryptocurrency collapses to a greater extent early investors and advisors, and bounty hunter just a little help.

[Emperor of Man]

Some ICOs promise buy walls at ICO price in exchanges, and this idea has its own advantages (like reassuring people that they at least don't lose money by taking part in ICO, hence more buyers.)

The disadvantage is, like people said, that a part of team's resources may be wasted to buy from bounty hunters (if they exist). That resources are extremely important in a good project (and that's the main reason why some serious projects don't have bounty campaigns.)

[jaywizzy]

I don't see point in buying back from from bounty hunter after they have make their profit. If they need to buy token they would have buy when ICO was going on.

[IVEXO]

Most icos are greedy and self centered , which is a reason why there are so many failed projects with miserable prices across the globe

But a buy back itself does not help every project
It it just a good risk

[rangnatht]

Buy back ico tokens after ico for keep the price of Token stable is a good idea. But in the most cases it's already described in the most ico project if they have a plan for buy back in the future or not. Also most ico had offer that are are going to buy back token from their profits which is good idea. But as we know last year is bad for ico project so many ico failed in their profits. But this is really a good idea. Also strong projects don't need buy back.

[CryptoAssasin]

Buying back their tokens is not actually a wise choice specially at a time of bearish market just like what happened last year. Dumpers are in greater number than the buyers nowadays so if the company decided to buy back their token, there will be a minor pump but a massive sell is still on the line which may cause more panic selling. There are also a group of market manipulator so there will be a chance that the buyer which is the company will be abused which will lead to greater losses.

[batang_bitcoin]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?

Do you think they still have a reason to do that?

Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?

Maybe they already spent it somewhere.

Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

Each project does have their own technique to promote, to pump and dump their tokens.

[YuginKadoya]

Buying back their tokens is not actually a wise choice specially at a time of bearish market just like what happened last year. Dumpers are in greater number than the buyers nowadays so if the company decided to buy back their token, there will be a minor pump but a massive sell is still on the line which may cause more panic selling. There are also a group of market manipulator so there will be a chance that the buyer which is the company will be abused which will lead to greater losses.

But there are still chance that an ICO might get some unexpected pump We can never know if the whales would help that certain ICO that you would have a chance to buy, But just like you said there is some risk involved in buying in a bearish market, But just as I have said there are still risk takers that will sure take some risk in making big income in investing with ICO if the project will be promising.

Well, I think bounty hunter will have a chance with the tokens that they have got, It might come in handy in the future because that certain token that they have hold might pump in the future when the market recovers.

[cokroalif]

I am very much in agreement with you, because now there are many ICO that when the market list is cheaper than when selling tokens, maybe it's an interesting idea for ICO project developers

[trash321]

This is a very cool idea, because in this way today we will be able to organize normal projects that will have guarantees for projects. I can confidently say that today it would be great if you understand that such projects will definitely be appreciated.

[ribowo76]

I think, it will not give much influence. More important is the development of the project, if it goes well and in accordance with their roadmap, it will automatically give a lot of influence to the price of their tokens

[ibrahim160994]

each project has a strategy to raise the price of their utility tokens, but what is happening now, many projects are reluctant to repurchase before their platforms work and produce ...

[nlaara12]

It depends on the plan of the people behind the project,some choose to buy back why some after burning they don't buy back,some would have probably buy back but because of the level of dump,they may see it as a waste buying back.

[smyslov]

There are other ICO that included this to their roadmap, so better check all the ICO that you are involving, it is good if they have like that, it can stabilize the price of the coin and at the same time, they will be compelled to complete their platform because of this buy back features.

[jahepahit]

because the money collected from ico is used for project development, so there's no way they will buy back when the price is cheap (this is I'm talking about if ico only reaches the softcap)
but if the project reaches hardcap it should do what you say because the funds raised are very large (but the team won't do that stupid thing) it's better they hold the funds until market grows again

[bitgolden]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

You forgot the case of when they are not raising enough money from ICO. Another appropriate reason must be they themselves not believing into their own project. Buying back is a common practice even in corporate levels hence when some ICO is efusing to buy back when their tokens are available for cheaper then that will smell fishy.

As far as I have seen most ICO devs are not ready to work on the welfare its early contributors. They just want to secure what they have collected so that they can achieve what they have actually planned for.

[hongus]

Because they do not understand this. The initial task of many projects is to make money on the project. Of course, if they did this they would improve the economy of their projects. Let's say for example hunters. Why admins can not redeem hunters tokens for half the price. After all, we will gladly sell them at such a cost.