I was blackmailed

[cizatext]

With what you posted I think you have not committed any offence that will warrant your remover from the sportbet campaign and to even said you informed the manager earlier about someone trying to blackmail you and he advising you not to pay, this alone is enough to justify you personal comment on the manager person calling him a baby long ago.

[1714599286]

1714599286

[1714599286]

1714599286

[Hivalley]

Jeremypwr could actually be a baby after all,the more reason why the troll got to him and pissed the hell owta him months after it was made,and also considering he was aware when it was made.
I guess be was planning an epic sack letter for you from the campaign,well orchestrated I must say.
Definitely he owns the both accounts,no one would believe you'll be kicked out from the campaign if they report that.

[vlom]

jeremypwr muss feel so powerfull now. he has the power who is in the camp and he has the power to remove somebody because of the post linked in the OP. what an idiot.

[bbc.reporter]

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

[gentlemand]

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

Well, it's pretty comical watching people descend on the Chipmixer thread as soon as there's a sniff of space so I can imagine this type of behaviour will become increasingly prevalent. There seem to be more decent looking campaigns than there've been for a while but still not enough space. Are you keeping an eye on who applies for your space?

I don't think there's any way of telling who it was.

[marlboroza]

I still don't see what you did wrong. As I can see, jeremypwr responded to that post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3133481.msg33584411#msg33584411 accepted you and then kicked you later because of it? Doesn't make any sense.

Anyway, don't pay these criminals money, once you pay them they will keep coming for more and more until you won't have enough money to pay them and then they will tell what you did(or didn't do) anyway. Report PM to moderator.

[bones261]

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

I only tagged the perpetrator of the extortion. It's jeremypwr prerogative to not want to work with someone who he feels slighted by.

[jeremypwr]

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

Thank you for those kind words; you've been a helpful and consistent participant from the very beginning as well.  

As my PM mentioned, I probably overreacted a bit and impulsively removed you from the campaign.

It was somewhat childish, I will admit; and have already added you back for this week.

If anyone receives any PMs demanding money, don't pay and report/block.

[bitmover]

Hello people, I have a question about trust. It's a bit off topic, but is related to the case.

When I see Jeremy profile I can see coinlocket$ feedback in my trusted network. However he doesn't have any feedback from dt. Is it because he has more than 100 earned merit?

Does this mean that anyone with 100+ merit can now tag people?I mean, in the default trust network.


Edit:

Thank you for those kind words; you've been a helpful and consistent participant from the very beginning as well.  

As my PM mentioned, I probably overreacted a bit and impulsively removed you from the campaign.

It was somewhat childish, I will admit; and have already added you back for this week.

If anyone receives any PMs demanding money, don't pay and report/block.

Come-on guys. Putting he back in the campaign doesn't change anything.
Certain things cannot be undone.

He just kicked a guy for childish reasons, received a red tag and is now suddenly"seeing the light".

[S_Therapist]

Hello people, I have a question about trust. It's a bit off topic, but is related to the case.

When I see Jeremy profile I can see coinlocket$ feedback in my trusted network. However he doesn't have any feedback from dt. Is it because he has more than 100 earned merit?

Does this mean that anyone with 100+ merit can now tag people?I mean, in the default trust network.

Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk.
Also you have misunderstood the trust system.
check this one- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5072734.msg48081277#msg48081277

[bitmover]

Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk.
Also you have misunderstood the trust system.
check this one- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5072734.msg48081277#msg48081277

Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it.

Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT

[S_Therapist]

Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk.
Also you have misunderstood the trust system.
check this one- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5072734.msg48081277#msg48081277

Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it.

Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT

For being a DT member, you don't need to have a trusted feedback.
Feedback and DT are two speperate things. This may help you better understand the process- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095944.msg49176783#msg49176783

[The Cryptovator]

Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it.

Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT

There is no need any criteria or feedback to become DT2. Any DT member could add you on his trusted list and you will become DT2.

For example if I am on DT1, I can add you on DT2. It's simple.

To become DT1,
You need to be active and make your custom trust list with minimum 10 people's.
Then 10 peoples should add you on their custom trust list who have earned 10 merit.
Finally 2 peopels should add you on thier trust list who have earned 250 merit.
Then you will become DT1.

Hope you got the point.

[coinlocket$]

For being a DT member, you don't need to have a trusted feedback.
Feedback and DT are two speperate things. This may help you better understand the process- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095944.msg49176783#msg49176783

As said, trust and feedbacks are 2 different things.
One the previous DT network we got a DT2 with red trust, ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5080581.0

Also, my feedback on jeremypwr is neutral (not positive so his rep value will be the same) and suite the campaign where I am, Is a highlight for who join his signature expecting a regular weekly payment, without delay.