FortuneJack Casino Refuses to Pay 20 BTC Won From Jackpot!

[Lauda]

Btw since you just released my information without my approval you don't really get to make any other choices for your company. I'll let them know what you did here. You really don't know how to act professionally do you. Thanks for that.

P.S. Don't bother trying to edit this information I'm letting your support be aware of your violation of privacy right now.

You really can't be anymore ignorant right now. I'm sorry but, your not gonna get past this one so easily. I'll make sure of it.

Privacy violation?

Sorry for the link issue, the link in response has now been updated and bets are now public and can be viewed on this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iLLzeap4MdHwMeVyun3lHA2JxUkPG8lg/view?usp=sharing

Without bugged wins, was it possible for player to place plinko bet and all other bets before they played plinko?

If answer is no, case closed. If answer is yes, you own them 20BTC, it is simple as that.

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing. Demanding money like this afterwards is in fact illegal.

[verusfides]

Btw since you just released my information without my approval you don't really get to make any other choices for your company. I'll let them know what you did here. You really don't know how to act professionally do you. Thanks for that.

P.S. Don't bother trying to edit this information I'm letting your support be aware of your violation of privacy right now.

You really can't be anymore ignorant right now. I'm sorry but, your not gonna get past this one so easily. I'll make sure of it.

Privacy violation?

Sorry for the link issue, the link in response has now been updated and bets are now public and can be viewed on this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iLLzeap4MdHwMeVyun3lHA2JxUkPG8lg/view?usp=sharing

Without bugged wins, was it possible for player to place plinko bet and all other bets before they played plinko?

If answer is no, case closed. If answer is yes, you own them 20BTC, it is simple as that.

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing. Demanding money like this afterwards is in fact illegal.

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

[Lauda]

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

Doesn't matter if they tell you 100 times that it is only what they can give, once you accept any compensation you lose legal ground for anything.

[verusfides]

Btw since you just released my information without my approval you don't really get to make any other choices for your company. I'll let them know what you did here. You really don't know how to act professionally do you. Thanks for that.

P.S. Don't bother trying to edit this information I'm letting your support be aware of your violation of privacy right now.

You really can't be anymore ignorant right now. I'm sorry but, your not gonna get past this one so easily. I'll make sure of it.

Privacy violation?

Sorry for the link issue, the link in response has now been updated and bets are now public and can be viewed on this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iLLzeap4MdHwMeVyun3lHA2JxUkPG8lg/view?usp=sharing

Without bugged wins, was it possible for player to place plinko bet and all other bets before they played plinko?

If answer is no, case closed. If answer is yes, you own them 20BTC, it is simple as that.

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing. Demanding money like this afterwards is in fact illegal.

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

I reported the photo that was there, but I have the screenshot. He released my Discord SN along with the photo of myself I had in it without my knowledge or my consent. Can't really look at this guy too professionally after that.

[verusfides]

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

Doesn't matter if they tell you 100 times that it is only what they can give, once you accept any compensation you lose legal ground for anything.

That'd be true if they didn't forcibly change the amount that was in my account to begin with. Also let's not jump to conclusions you don't know what Curacao's jurisdiction will say.

[Lauda]

I reported the photo that was there, but I have the screenshot. He released my Discord SN along with the photo of myself I had in it without my knowledge or my consent. Can't really look at this guy too professionally after that.

You could argue that leaking the connection to this user account and an exact discord username was a mistake. However, the photo thing is nonsense. I literally see your photo right now, as does anyone else who is on at least one discord server as you. That is in no way private information.

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

Doesn't matter if they tell you 100 times that it is only what they can give, once you accept any compensation you lose legal ground for anything.

That'd be true if they didn't forcibly change the amount that was in my account to begin with.

Not really. You can look up similar cases and any lawyer is going to advise you not to take any kind of compensation in any form (gift cards, items, balances, whatever). I think you can find some information in certain subreddits if you don't feel like reading verdicts.

Also let's not jump to conclusions you don't know what Curacao's jurisdiction will say.

They'll probably shrug it off. There's a reason certain types of businesses settle in Curacao.

[verusfides]

I reported the photo that was there, but I have the screenshot. He released my Discord SN along with the photo of myself I had in it without my knowledge or my consent. Can't really look at this guy too professionally after that.

You could argue that leaking the connection to this user account and an exact discord username was a mistake. However, the photo thing is nonsense. I literally see your photo right now, as does anyone else who is on at least one discord server as you. That is in no way private information.

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

Doesn't matter if they tell you 100 times that it is only what they can give, once you accept any compensation you lose legal ground for anything.

That'd be true if they didn't forcibly change the amount that was in my account to begin with.

Not really. You can look up similar cases and any lawyer is going to advise you not to take any kind of compensation in any form (gift cards, items, balances, whatever). I think you can find some information in certain subreddits if you don't feel like reading verdicts.

Also let's not jump to conclusions you don't know what Curacao's jurisdiction will say.

They'll probably shrug it off. There's a reason certain types of businesses settle in Curacao.

Private information is who I choose to disclose the information to. So if it is a discord group I disclose that I am ok with all the members seeing my information I amd allowing them to view my profile and my username. See the point I'm trying to make whether it's a picture of my face from 20 feet away or from 5 feet away. He's not allowed to disclose anything without asking first or taking time to crop out the information to prevent other users from seeing.

[Lauda]

Private information is who I choose to disclose the information to. So if it is a discord group I disclose that I am ok with all the members seeing my information I amd allowing them to view my profile and my username. See the point I'm trying to make whether it's a picture of my face from 20 feet away or from 5 feet away. He's not allowed to disclose anything without asking first or taking time to crop out the information to prevent other users from seeing.

Yeah, yeah. Go ahead and sue him for "disclosing private information" that anyone can access at any given time. Great arguments you are making here.

[verusfides]

Private information is who I choose to disclose the information to. So if it is a discord group I disclose that I am ok with all the members seeing my information I amd allowing them to view my profile and my username. See the point I'm trying to make whether it's a picture of my face from 20 feet away or from 5 feet away. He's not allowed to disclose anything without asking first or taking time to crop out the information to prevent other users from seeing.

Yeah, yeah. Go ahead and sue him for "disclosing private information" that anyone can access at any given time. Great arguments you are making here.

What? Who said I'm gonna sue him? People attempt those things? From nearly opposite ends of the world? It is valid enough information to prevent him from being able to partake any further in this case. Or maybe fire him altogether. Haven't seen lots of companies willing to keep people who can't seem to follow basic privacy acts.

[Lauda]

Private information is who I choose to disclose the information to. So if it is a discord group I disclose that I am ok with all the members seeing my information I amd allowing them to view my profile and my username. See the point I'm trying to make whether it's a picture of my face from 20 feet away or from 5 feet away. He's not allowed to disclose anything without asking first or taking time to crop out the information to prevent other users from seeing.

Yeah, yeah. Go ahead and sue him for "disclosing private information" that anyone can access at any given time. Great arguments you are making here.

What? Who said I'm gonna sue him? People attempt those things? From nearly opposite ends of the world? It is valid enough information to prevent him from being able to partake any further in this case.

No it is not.

Or maybe fire him altogether. Haven't seen lots of companies willing to keep people who can't seem to follow basic privacy acts.

Then complain to FJ administration directly not to the forum's community.

[OgNasty]

Last time a casino didn't make a payout for reasons that were beyond their control, they were labeled as scammers and everyone wearing a signature advertisement for them was harassed until they removed the signature.

Now that Lauda is the one advertising for a company that has fallen victim to their own poor operation and refusing to make payouts, it will be interesting to watch the double standard unfold.

Obviously if the player played by the rules and won, they are due the jackpot.  I'm sure FortuneJack isn't going to find all the people negatively effected by the bug and give them their money back...

[Lauda]

Last time a casino didn't make a payout for reasons that were beyond their control, they were labeled as scammers and everyone wearing a signature advertisement for them was harassed until they removed the signature.

Source?[1] Not all "reasons beyond their control" fall into the same bag.

Now that Lauda is the one advertising for a company that has fallen victim to their own poor operation and refusing to make payouts, it will be interesting to watch the double standard unfold.

This is not double standard, this is how it is usually done nowadays. If you accept something as a compensation, then it is over for you from a legal perspective (a notable case where people were advised not to accept anything was recent Bethesda's shenanigans). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[1] Betcoin maybe? Not even remotely similar.

[verusfides]

I reported the photo that was there, but I have the screenshot. He released my Discord SN along with the photo of myself I had in it without my knowledge or my consent. Can't really look at this guy too professionally after that.

You could argue that leaking the connection to this user account and an exact discord username was a mistake. However, the photo thing is nonsense. I literally see your photo right now, as does anyone else who is on at least one discord server as you. That is in no way private information.

Forced upon me. Not given. Only agreed when they made it seem like I had no choice. So again not doing anything illegal.

Doesn't matter if they tell you 100 times that it is only what they can give, once you accept any compensation you lose legal ground for anything.

That'd be true if they didn't forcibly change the amount that was in my account to begin with.

Not really. You can look up similar cases and any lawyer is going to advise you not to take any kind of compensation in any form (gift cards, items, balances, whatever). I think you can find some information in certain subreddits if you don't feel like reading verdicts.

Yet for some reason people still do, but then again they do and they still somehow win. Wonder why that is. Maybe because the legal ramifications in which the problem at hand clearly outweighed the compensation that was received. Idk guess some people look at things many ways and some people look at things like there's no way at all. Just depends how they respond to the lies they just tried to spread about how I procured those winnings.

[verusfides]

Last time a casino didn't make a payout for reasons that were beyond their control, they were labeled as scammers and everyone wearing a signature advertisement for them was harassed until they removed the signature.

Now that Lauda is the one advertising for a company that has fallen victim to their own poor operation and refusing to make payouts, it will be interesting to watch the double standard unfold.

Obviously if the player played by the rules and won, they are due the jackpot.  I'm sure FortuneJack isn't going to find all the people negatively effected by the bug and give them their money back...

Actually I'm asking for the logs of every player that played Adrenaline that night and see how many accounts they had reversed by the end of the night using the bug as an excuse. Don't you guys find it funny that they didn't even need to have the live deposits available for that game. If they did mean to release the game in order for players to find bugs. Wouldn't they have just let players use FJC(freeplay currency on its website) only. Kind makes you wonder was this really just some kind of unknown freak accident or was it really indeed a premeditated incident.

[Lauda]

Not really. You can look up similar cases and any lawyer is going to advise you not to take any kind of compensation in any form (gift cards, items, balances, whatever). I think you can find some information in certain subreddits if you don't feel like reading verdicts.

Yet for some reason people still do, but then again they do and they still somehow win. Wonder why that is. Maybe because the legal ramifications in which the problem at hand clearly outweighed the compensation that was received. Idk guess some people look at things many ways and some people look at things like there's no way at all. Just depends how they respond to the lies they just tried to spread about how I procured those winnings.

If you think that you can win, then nobody is preventing you from suing them. A 'might-be-right-might-be-wrong' case on this forum (depending on who sees the case and how) won't bring you back any money.

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.

This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that.

[OgNasty]

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.

This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that.

Of course it is...  Considering it is the exact opposite response you would and have had if/when you weren't wearing their signature.  Funny how your ethics depend on whether or not you're paid by the offender.  Your word is meaningless and your opinions clouded by greed.  This is yet another example of why you belong nowhere near any sort of position of trust.

[verusfides]

Not really. You can look up similar cases and any lawyer is going to advise you not to take any kind of compensation in any form (gift cards, items, balances, whatever). I think you can find some information in certain subreddits if you don't feel like reading verdicts.

Yet for some reason people still do, but then again they do and they still somehow win. Wonder why that is. Maybe because the legal ramifications in which the problem at hand clearly outweighed the compensation that was received. Idk guess some people look at things many ways and some people look at things like there's no way at all. Just depends how they respond to the lies they just tried to spread about how I procured those winnings.

If you think that you can win, then nobody is preventing you from suing them. A 'might-be-right-might-be-wrong' case on this forum (depending on who sees the case and how) won't bring you back any money.

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.

This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that.

Yeah. That'd be true if I thought I might be wrong or might right, but I'm 100% sure I'm right and 200% sure they're wrong. After all David seemed really flustered when I started mentioning why they wouldn't release a bugged game to be only playable with FJC and not real deposits. Started declaring war on me and here we are now. Guys tryna find proof of my wrong doing when his own support can't even give him the right information. Yet he has his FortuneJackals come once in awhile to try and fan the flames, yet when I tell them they either have to be stupid or physically blind to be unable to see the evidence in case that I have shown in response to his evidence. They just dissipate and come back once more when they're summoned like zombies being mind controlled by one slightly smarter zombie.

[Lauda]

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.

This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that.

Of course it is...  Considering it is the exact opposite response you would and have had if/when you weren't wearing their signature.  Funny how your ethics depend on whether or not you're paid by the offender.  Your word is meaningless and your opinions clouded by greed.  This is yet another example of why you belong nowhere near any sort of position of trust.

You really need to stop spreading unecessary lies and derailing the thread. Thanks.

A 'might-be-right-might-be-wrong' case on this forum (depending on who sees the case and how) won't bring you back any money.

Yeah. That'd be true if I thought I might be wrong or might right, but I'm 100% sure I'm right and 200% sure they're wrong.

Here I was referring to how the forum members will react to this thread, some might side with you others might not. Recent legal precedence does not (as I've mentioned), but that doesn't necessarily mean you'd lose if you actually sued them.

[verusfides]

Also btw, I'm pretty sure he's asking the people with signatures to respond to the forums. I haven't asked anyone to defend or represent me. The people that are defending me are just random passerbys who obviously see the poor state in which you guys are assuming your position so I have a majority favor of unbiased people who don't agree with FortuneJack, where as FortuneJack has... it's affiliates. Really looking good there boys. Keep it up.

[OgNasty]

If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.

This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that.

Of course it is...  Considering it is the exact opposite response you would and have had if/when you weren't wearing their signature.  Funny how your ethics depend on whether or not you're paid by the offender.  Your word is meaningless and your opinions clouded by greed.  This is yet another example of why you belong nowhere near any sort of position of trust.

You really need to stop spreading unecessary lies and derailing the thread. Thanks.

You really need to stop being tied to scams.  Literally everything you touch turns into a scam.  ICOs you escrow, signatures you wear, somehow people always end up having their money stolen, and it always seems to not be your fault, then it happens again.