Why does the cosmos exist at all?

[nutildah]

^^^ This is where religion steps in. Science isn't close to answering things like these.

Religion does a worse job of explaining things than science.

If religion is the answer, _which_ religion is it? There's hundreds or even thousands of incompatible religions out there. To believe that your religion is the correct one and all the others are wrong is sheer arrogance. It's more likely that they are all wrong.

Much of science theory is a made up story, just like religion often seems. Science fact doesn't explain much of anything.

Technology runs on science. If it wasn't correct, we wouldn't have things like the internet, planes, refrigerators, or even a printing press to make new bibles. The last thing science is is "a made up story." The scientific method prevents this from happening.

[BADecker]

^^^ This is where religion steps in. Science isn't close to answering things like these.

Religion does a worse job of explaining things than science.

If religion is the answer, _which_ religion is it? There's hundreds or even thousands of incompatible religions out there. To believe that your religion is the correct one and all the others are wrong is sheer arrogance. It's more likely that they are all wrong.

Much of science theory is a made up story, just like religion often seems. Science fact doesn't explain much of anything.

Technology runs on science. If it wasn't correct, we wouldn't have things like the internet, planes, refrigerators, or even a printing press to make new bibles. The last thing science is is "a made up story." The scientific method prevents this from happening.

Wrong!

Technology runs on engineering. Science might have some ideas, but most of the time the engineers have to correct the science ideas to make them work.

[af_newbie]

^^^ This is where religion steps in. Science isn't close to answering things like these.

Religion does a worse job of explaining things than science.

If religion is the answer, _which_ religion is it? There's hundreds or even thousands of incompatible religions out there. To believe that your religion is the correct one and all the others are wrong is sheer arrogance. It's more likely that they are all wrong.

Much of science theory is a made up story, just like religion often seems. Science fact doesn't explain much of anything.

Technology runs on science. If it wasn't correct, we wouldn't have things like the internet, planes, refrigerators, or even a printing press to make new bibles. The last thing science is is "a made up story." The scientific method prevents this from happening.

Wrong!

Technology runs on engineering. Science might have some ideas, but most of the time the engineers have to correct the science ideas to make them work.

C'mon you cannot be that uneducated.  Without science, there would be no engineering.

What do (ALL) engineers study first, before they study engineering?  Physics, Chemistry, and Math!!!!

Trust me, I know a thing or two about engineering.

Without science, there would be no transistors, no computer chips, no Internet and no bitcoin forum.

Science made it all happen, not your God with his detailed instructions on who to fuck, who to enslave and who to kill.

[BADecker]

^^^ This is where religion steps in. Science isn't close to answering things like these.

Religion does a worse job of explaining things than science.

If religion is the answer, _which_ religion is it? There's hundreds or even thousands of incompatible religions out there. To believe that your religion is the correct one and all the others are wrong is sheer arrogance. It's more likely that they are all wrong.

Much of science theory is a made up story, just like religion often seems. Science fact doesn't explain much of anything.

Technology runs on science. If it wasn't correct, we wouldn't have things like the internet, planes, refrigerators, or even a printing press to make new bibles. The last thing science is is "a made up story." The scientific method prevents this from happening.

Wrong!

Technology runs on engineering. Science might have some ideas, but most of the time the engineers have to correct the science ideas to make them work.

C'mon you cannot be that uneducated.  Without science, there would be no engineering.

What do (ALL) engineers study first, before they study engineering?  Physics, Chemistry, and Math!!!!

Trust me, I know a thing or two about engineering.

Without science, there would be no transistors, no computer chips, no Internet and no bitcoin forum.

Science made it all happen, not your God with his detailed instructions on who to fuck, who to enslave and who to kill.

Without God there would be no science... or anything else, for that matter.

Without engineering, science would have died out long ago.

[nutildah]

Without God there would be no science... or anything else, for that matter.

Without engineering, science would have died out long ago.

A. Whose version of god? Yours? How are you certain your god is the "real god"? Seems a bit pompous.

B. Yet both still exist and the evolution of knowledge could not have proceeded in any other way.

 

[BADecker]

Without God there would be no science... or anything else, for that matter.

Without engineering, science would have died out long ago.

A. Whose version of god? Yours? How are you certain your god is the "real god"? Seems a bit pompous.

B. Yet both still exist and the evolution of knowledge could not have proceeded in any other way.

 

The version of God that nature and the universe shows. Without a lot of thought, nature isn't clear about anything other than the power and knowledge of God. See Scientific proof that God exists? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0.

Most of today's scientists wouldn't call even alchemy science... much less simple investigation and discovery.

[nutildah]

Without God there would be no science... or anything else, for that matter.

Without engineering, science would have died out long ago.

A. Whose version of god? Yours? How are you certain your god is the "real god"? Seems a bit pompous.

B. Yet both still exist and the evolution of knowledge could not have proceeded in any other way.

 

The version of God that nature and the universe shows. Without a lot of thought, nature isn't clear about anything other than the power and knowledge of God. See Scientific proof that God exists? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0.

Most of today's scientists wouldn't call even alchemy science... much less simple investigation and discovery.

A. That's your opinion of what "god" entails. Its not based in anything other than your opinion.

B. Alchemy isn't a science because you can't turn lead into gold.

 

[BADecker]

Without God there would be no science... or anything else, for that matter.

Without engineering, science would have died out long ago.

A. Whose version of god? Yours? How are you certain your god is the "real god"? Seems a bit pompous.

B. Yet both still exist and the evolution of knowledge could not have proceeded in any other way.

 

The version of God that nature and the universe shows. Without a lot of thought, nature isn't clear about anything other than the power and knowledge of God. See Scientific proof that God exists? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0.

Most of today's scientists wouldn't call even alchemy science... much less simple investigation and discovery.

A. That's your opinion of what "god" entails. Its not based in anything other than your opinion.

B. Alchemy isn't a science because you can't turn lead into gold.

 

No, that's your opinion of what "god" doesn't entail. Science shows that God exists. Politics allows people to not accept anything that they don't want to accept, including science, if they don't want it.

There was a time that the science of nuclear fission didn't make the A-bomb work, because it was faulty. That didn't make it not a science.

[nutildah]

Without God there would be no science... or anything else, for that matter.

Without engineering, science would have died out long ago.

A. Whose version of god? Yours? How are you certain your god is the "real god"? Seems a bit pompous.

B. Yet both still exist and the evolution of knowledge could not have proceeded in any other way.

 

The version of God that nature and the universe shows. Without a lot of thought, nature isn't clear about anything other than the power and knowledge of God. See Scientific proof that God exists? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0.

Most of today's scientists wouldn't call even alchemy science... much less simple investigation and discovery.

A. That's your opinion of what "god" entails. Its not based in anything other than your opinion.

B. Alchemy isn't a science because you can't turn lead into gold.

 

No, that's your opinion of what "god" doesn't entail. Science shows that God exists. Politics allows people to not accept anything that they don't want to accept, including science, if they don't want it.

There was a time that the science of nuclear fission didn't make the A-bomb work, because it was faulty. That didn't make it not a science.

A. Science has not shown god exists. Again, that's your opinion.

B. Science eventually did make the A-bomb work, but its never changed lead into gold.

 

[BADecker]

A. Science has not shown god exists. Again, that's your opinion.

B. Science eventually did make the A-bomb work, but its never changed lead into gold.

 

See Scientific proof that God exists? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0 - in detail to see how science proves that God exists. It might be your opinion that the thread doesn't scientifically prove that God exists.

Before science made the A-bomb work, the A-bomb attempts included science. Atomic fission can change lead into gold - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-lead-can-be-turned-into-gold/.