ALL Initial Coin Offerings are Trash

[Flezy]

I understand your point and pains but I still find it hard to believe all ICOs are trash. Yes there are mnay scam projects but in the same way there are little or minority of good ICOs.

[boltz]

ETH was an ICO aswell , it was trash ? I don't think so. Waves was ICO , did it was trash ? Not at all. Before you  make statements like this you should not make it general. New ICO's are dying and this is nothing new but from time to time, a shiny ICO or STO will come alive so this is the main reason of why you should always search for good ICO's.

[r_delossa]

ICOs are trash because people are blindly investing in any project with a hope to get at least some profit. It is a very long process of every investment decision and if you spend several hours by checking each project, you would invest in 1 from 20.

[gulshan1]

New ico are not giving any solid project and telling that they will deliver many new thing which is not giving by any another ico but ready to sell the coin and collecting money from investors. An after that they are not performing well according to the investors expectations because they not eligible to do that.  So all ico are losing faith of investors and trashing.

[Baimovic]

ICOs are trash because people are blindly investing in any project with a hope to get at least some profit. It is a very long process of every investment decision and if you spend several hours by checking each project, you would invest in 1 from 20.

now ICO is indeed very bad, making many people lazy to invest in the ICO and choose trade as a way to make more money because if investing in the ICO requires us to be very patient at least until the token has an exchange and has a high volume and price.

[vgk88]

I do not think that all ICOs are not trash. I think that some projects will become successful. If all the ICO fails, this will prove that public investment for non-professional investors is a bad idea.

[Landak]

I do not think that all ICOs are not trash. I think that some projects will become successful. If all the ICO fails, this will prove that public investment for non-professional investors is a bad idea.

I know if not all ICO is trash but if it is measured by number 10, the value is 8 out of 10. This means that currently there is more ICO are trash and the rest only little not a lot which is a real and legitimate project as you say. so I think that's true if ICO is trash.

[trade2winnn]

Most now,Yes, and plus this is a trend that's been going on,she adds Maslov agony,and it turns out that the project initially was normal,and happened then was either a Scam or bent in such a market,that so much action is happening now

[pixie85]

I do not think that all ICOs are not trash. I think that some projects will become successful. If all the ICO fails, this will prove that public investment for non-professional investors is a bad idea.

I know if not all ICO is trash but if it is measured by number 10, the value is 8 out of 10. This means that currently there is more ICO are trash and the rest only little not a lot which is a real and legitimate project as you say. so I think that's true if ICO is trash.

It's usually more than 8. 5 out of 10 are scams or projects intended to make money for devs and nothing else. Another 4 out of 10 are projects that are weak, bugged, get abandoned by devs somewhere along the way, get delisted because there's no interest. Only 10% ever get to stay in the space and even this doesn't mean they are going to be there next year.

[temilade200]

If ICOs are not going to work again, because they are being flooded by scam projects, I think we should give some trials to STO, perhaps that will birth a new era of trust.
One of he reasons I am drawn or attracted to STO, is because they bare back by laws, they are regulated and in a way, investors' interests are protected. Although, they should be for a true STO, which is why we need to do our own research.

[mirgo1791]

we are now working on beginning terms on initiation as investors from indonesia might wants to put with spares of reference on funds and gains on extensive with the following terms as attaining field of business with the ico market of the scheme with the initial token offering.

[reflector]

If ICOs are not going to work again, because they are being flooded by scam projects, I think we should give some trials to STO, perhaps that will birth a new era of trust.
One of he reasons I am drawn or attracted to STO, is because they bare back by laws, they are regulated and in a way, investors' interests are protected. Although, they should be for a true STO, which is why we need to do our own research.

Not like that, I will not consider all ICO projects are junk. Despite everything it relies upon the accomplishment as though they achieved their objective like atleast top. The hardest part today is that it is unpedictable in the event that it will succeed. I am hesitant to lose cash so I am not used to contribute on it.


I simply earned tokens that are not accessible on trade that is the reason I can say that, truly, some are alright however most are tricks.

[dosSantos]

At the moment, a lot of coins that are really useless. But we must learn to choose quality projects for investment. This is our main task.

[auntyjmary]

In my  opinion, I don't subscribe to the notion that "All ICOs are trash". When a careful  analysis is made on the market, you would realise that most of the altcoins that are doing very in terms of market value and dominance come out through successful initial Coin Offerings. At the end of the day, investors of successful projects always smile.

[daly896]

Yes, all ICOs are a bull shit. Most of them doesn't suggest something special. You know, token is something unpredictable and I bet you can easily lost money in ICO

[NEERAJ ANAND]

It is not correct to say that all ICO's are trash and many investors got decent returns from some ICO's but approx. 90% of it are trash or take investors’ money and gone. This is the main reason that now many ICO's are not able to achieve their targets and closing before its final launch.

[fallensky7]

What do you want! There are many scammers in the world who are attracted by big money, and for them it is easy money, especially since there is almost no risk of being caught.

[uniquark]

What do you want! There are many scammers in the world who are attracted by big money, and for them it is easy money, especially since there is almost no risk of being caught.

Of course, and greedy people prefer short-term investments but quickly bring them big money. That makes the scam projects more and more. But now I find that such scam ICOs cannot be successful, they are easily recognized as a scam project

[Perfect35]

I am beginning to see more reasons for research and more of it mist especially.
You do not just invest in a project by looking at it in a shallow way or because you see others investing in it.
So many projects are turning out to scam investors, which is why we need to device ways to identify the good ones.

[mirakal]

I am beginning to see more reasons for research and more of it mist especially.
You do not just invest in a project by looking at it in a shallow way or because you see others investing in it.
So many projects are turning out to scam investors, which is why we need to device ways to identify the good ones.

Identifying the good ones is not hard if we will just invest on the existing coins.
No to ICO this time, it's too risky, more scams will lead to less investors and even if you invested in good coins, it will not right away give good result.