ALL Initial Coin Offerings are Trash

[naruto7676]

Based on your calculation all ico are not scammed there are lot of ico right now is good and for long-term legit for sure it will take advance in the future as well.

[dobolspeed3]

Based on your calculation all ico are not scammed there are lot of ico right now is good and for long-term legit for sure it will take advance in the future as well.

I also want to say that not all ico seem bad. What you say is true, there are still many good ico and I see for myself how good ico works. So we can't say that all ico are junk. You can analyze and judge for yourself.

[aundroid]

A LOT OF ICOs are garbage, that's right, but definitely not ALL.
As others have already said, in the cmc Top 100 you will also find many projects that started with an ICO.

ICOs are still a common way to raise funds. Don't think that's gonna change in the near future.

[harrypotpot]

There's a lot of posts in this section "ICOs will come back", "Some ICOs are scams", "Should I do ICOs". These all contain the implication that Initial Coin Offerings are fine and dandy.

What type of information do you need to know that Initial Coin Offerings are trash the majority of the time? 80% of ICOs in 2017 were scams. To put that into respective, that's 4 out of every 5. The odds are terrible. Going by the rules of probability, you're going to be apart of the four of five. Why wouldn't you be?

The ideas I've seen with Initial Coin Offerings are just as bad. Why do these companies need $80 million in the first place? Let's be realistic, most things don't need to be on the blockchain. Satoshi didn't need to do an Initial Coin Offering to make Bitcoin into a bustling success. He started off putting in his own money. What do ICOs actually have to bring to the table?

The people that are making these threads with a positive implication are probably apart of the scams, or they're risking their money with the odds stacked entirely against them.

It's possible to have original ideas offered for free. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin. Some people are simply blinded by their greed and short-term to try speculate on the worthless. No wonder bubbles are so rampant within this ecosystem.

Resources:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/new-study-says-80-percent-of-icos-conducted-in-2017-were-scams

In this case, I wanted much the old school bounty program which are paying weekly cryptocurrency. Rathen than choosing ICO which just tease people and hunters but pays nothing.

[Pithaxz]

if all Initial Coin Offerings are trash how did some projects get financing and roll out their products? not all are scams there are many good projects.

maybe it's true but it's really thin that only a few of them might be able to produce but it's just a lie if ico is successful but there is no price in the market, the current market situation is not supportive for the ico project. need patience in facing current market conditions

[defoman]

Fortunately, now there is a new trend in the ICO market, large exchanges are opening their sites for crowdsales. Against the background of the success of ICO from Binance, I believe that investors and trust in projects will return to the market, as the exchanges are independently engaged in the selection of ICO.

[Dreamchaser21]

A LOT OF ICOs are garbage, that's right, but definitely not ALL.
As others have already said, in the cmc Top 100 you will also find many projects that started with an ICO.

ICOs are still a common way to raise funds. Don't think that's gonna change in the near future.

There are some ICO right now that are talking about the bright future with their project and yet they are still not listed on any exchange, and no value at all so this is the reason why investors losses their trust. Not all are trash but for sure some of them experience a hard time to collect money, so they failed and become a scam project later on. Some good project succeeds, i hope they stay long in this market.

[elbimbo012]

Not all ICO is s a trash even majority are, we can't generalized and categorized them all as a trash remember Bittorent is an ICO which facilitated by binance and it is successful in just only few minutes it was completed so  i think its just on how you find a good ICO  to invest though majority is a trash there are still few that stand and profitable.

[TronTonn]

Not all of them are, there are some very good ones out there but because a lot of icos have scammed people it gives all icos a bad name.

[mrdeposit]

The bear market is the first reason why ICOs fail and OP calls them trash. Treating reliable projects along with really trash ICOs is not pleasant. Worthless tokens have no real-life use case and making token sale have on purpose: Make more money.

[ariyzt]

its not about ICO all trash
you just can't find the right one, even the right one is just like 1:100 ICO out of there
but then there is potential ico out of there

[aprilnot]

not all shit. but on average it's not quality. but I'm still sure, even though only 1% must have a good project right now, so keep on believing.

[bohboh]

I won't agree with that statement that all ICO are dam shit.
Although, most of all ico offering are scam but they're still some than successful at the end. What you need to do is to make your research on any project you wanted to buy it's ICO.

[Gary Levanevskii]

I think new projects are not so bad. Now there are many interesting projects that should soon enter the market. I think that spring 2019 will be very interesting.

[dark08]

I think new projects are not so bad. Now there are many interesting projects that should soon enter the market. I think that spring 2019 will be very interesting.

We cannot blame people to thinking ico as a trash because everyday more and more icos project are being launch in the market and its difficult to find a legit project, let say its legit in the beggining but how abiut in the future?
And yes there still few icos that have a potential to shone in the market but its a small percentage.

[Ayiranorea]

Well right now I could say that most of the ICO isn't worth it,
Only few are good to invest in but they are so hard to find,
Investing and joining bounty campaign isn't profitable anymore.
So if you want to invest in crypto go with the ones who already made a name in the industry go with the top crypto's.

Even by the days of 2017 ico's weren't worth it. It was little better than the present market situation, and the bull market gave a good profit through these ico's. As cyclic process repeats, can expect similar growth as the market in 2017. Even now worth projects with good utility have been getting into the market. Investing on those in the right way gets the best out of the same long term.

[viananda2525]

Well right now I could say that most of the ICO isn't worth it,
Only few are good to invest in but they are so hard to find,
Investing and joining bounty campaign isn't profitable anymore.
So if you want to invest in crypto go with the ones who already made a name in the industry go with the top crypto's.

Even by the days of 2017 ico's weren't worth it. It was little better than the present market situation, and the bull market gave a good profit through these ico's. As cyclic process repeats, can expect similar growth as the market in 2017. Even now worth projects with good utility have been getting into the market. Investing on those in the right way gets the best out of the same long term.

ico didnt profitable anymore since too much beginer investors and beginer bounty hunter.their attitude in market make another people panic moreover while token price dropped alot in market.maybe someday there is no one support ico and only existing coins could survive in this market.

[mirakal]

ico didnt profitable anymore since too much beginer investors and beginer bounty hunter.their attitude in market make another people panic moreover while token price dropped alot in market.maybe someday there is no one support ico and only existing coins could survive in this market.

It's bad to blame bounty about the failure of ICO.
Most investors are not aware of the bounty hunters, maybe they only know it as a advertising expense in general, with that
the team needs to pay for the advertising, and bounty hunters may anytime sell their reward.

Their reward were reduced when the market is bad, so they are also affected.

[miklesm]

I do not think it is correct to name all ICOs as trash - of course, there are too many scam ICOs today, but there are still worthy projects which will reach top 100 CMC in the future.

[bebekangsoo]

I do not think it is correct to name all ICOs as trash - of course, there are too many scam ICOs today, but there are still worthy projects which will reach top 100 CMC in the future.

not everything is bad so don't consider it bad and unprofitable.
we must check first so that we understand and be confident so that in the end we can get good results.
not all ICOs are garbage so you don't despair or fear participating in the ICO.
for more details, you know first before choosing it.