Need 0.04 BTC for 2 weeks.

[2double0]

Loan Amount: BTC0.04
Loan Purpose: Trading
Loan Repay Amount: BTC0.045
Loan Repay Date: 20.04.2019 or earlier
Type of Collateral: None as I'm enrolled in a campaign currently
BTC Address: 1J4YGjWGyWSQ1U8VCTUeXn3XqMxiUhheZ7


I can't sign a message because the address is from blockchain.com's wallet, but I can prove that this address had been in use since 2016, but I've sent some coins recently to one of the potential lenders through my address. Txid: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/0881498648d03ac7a2fca6dc23f154dee9c345420267bf6b7051c6c7be214255

Hope this ends everyone's confusion.

1. Solar DAO campaign:

My application

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2049677.msg20532227#msg20532227

Proof of acceptance

http://bit.ly/2uFtl83 (Spreadsheet link)


2. Narbonne signature campaign:

My application

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2177290.msg21877407#msg21877407

Proof of acceptance

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E_FZ0pZWxMATscsN-0qUGzWyWsHJUL7Q-xF1QDjL2KM/edit#gid=0


3. Bazista signature campaign:

My application

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2258785.msg22936090#msg22936090

Proof of acceptance

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOeAE8tq1C2FvEM_r38zbDDjTjRQUBdZKrdS-Onv2U8/

[1714885475]

1714885475

[2double0]

I know that I came after long time as I had health issues for which my doctor suggested to keep distance from things like smartphones and laptops as the rays were not suitable for me. I'm here after I completely recovered from my problems, trauma had stopped and I can use these things back again.

[Patatas]

I know that I came after long time as I had health issues for which my doctor suggested to keep distance from things like smartphones and laptops as the rays were not suitable for me. I'm here after I completely recovered from my problems, trauma had stopped and I can use these things back again.

Proving that you were previously accepted in signature campaigns barely stands as a proof that your account is of high quality since the advent of merits. You've earned 0 merits at the moment and with that logic, your account isn't as valuable as you think it is. Having said that, taking accounts as collateral should be avoided anyway. This request is unlikely to get filled unless you're selling your account.

[VINSIN]

its more than a proof idiots, he tried ....

[bones261]

its more than a proof idiots, he tried ....

Well, if you feel his proof is adequate, go ahead and give him a loan. After all, if he defaults, you would have a fair quality legendary account to add to your inventory. One that has a post history of being a bounty manager. 

[VINSIN]

its more than a proof idiots, he tried ....

Well, if you feel his proof is adequate, go ahead and give him a loan. After all, if he defaults, you would have a fair quality legendary account to add to your inventory. One that has a post history of being a bounty manager. 

actually as fact, you being idiot, please quote for refference, a bounty manager is winning just on 1 campaign more than you will ever win a month of work.

so stop being idiot, even if the icos he has mentioned are useless, the user tried to show that he is worth it

[bones261]

its more than a proof idiots, he tried ....

Well, if you feel his proof is adequate, go ahead and give him a loan. After all, if he defaults, you would have a fair quality legendary account to add to your inventory. One that has a post history of being a bounty manager. 

actually as fact, you being idiot, please quote for refference, a bounty manager is winning just on 1 campaign more than you will ever win a month of work.

so stop being idiot, even if the icos he has mentioned are useless, the user tried to show that he is worth it

How am I being an idiot? I suggested that you go ahead and give him the loan.  Sorry, but my broke ass doesn't have .06 BTC to spare ATM. (Besides, as you can tell from the red tag that I gave you, the commerce of bitcointalk accounts aint exactly my bag.)

[shasan]

How am I being an idiot?

Anyone can be marked as an idiot if s/he go against VINSIN. I have been marked as an idiot on the telegram, A little up of your post someone marked as an idiot. I think VINSIN is a great person who can call anyone as an idiot. So, don't be a worry for being called as an idiot by VINSIN.

[marcotheminer]

Open loan with me. Do not lend unless sufficient collateral is secured.

[AB de Royse777]

Open loan with me. Do not lend unless sufficient collateral is secured.

You mean there is an outstanding loan with you? Is the repayment date over yet?

I can't sign a message because the address is from blockchain.com's wallet, but I can prove that this address had been in use since 2016.

I guess you can if you still have the access of the wallet.

Get the seeds and recover the account using a desktop wallet then sign the address. It should work.

[DireWolfM14]

I know that I came after long time as I had health issues for which my doctor suggested to keep distance from things like smartphones and laptops as the rays were not suitable for me. I'm here after I completely recovered from my problems, trauma had stopped and I can use these things back again.

I'm not saying this is an attempted scam, but damn, that line I bolded sounds like a pile of fly-infested horse shit!  On the other hand, Bpip doesn't show a change of email or password, so it's unlikely the account has changed hands.  Not impossible, but unlikely.

[marcotheminer]

Waiting on repayment, all good otherwise.

[shasan]

Waiting on repayment, all good otherwise.

You are too much reputed and you are a higher ranked and also old member than me. But you gave a loan and you have not given any trust rating why? The op has no proof that you gave a loan. In this case, any lender may consider op as fresh and then allow loan and this way by taking multi-loan op can do scam. Please always try to give neutral trust once you give a loan to any person and on this way you can save yourself as well as other community members.

[marcotheminer]

Waiting on repayment, all good otherwise.

You are too much reputed and you are a higher ranked and also old member than me. But you gave a loan and you have not given any trust rating why? The op has no proof that you gave a loan. In this case, any lender may consider op as fresh and then allow loan and this way by taking multi-loan op can do scam. Please always try to give neutral trust once you give a loan to any person and on this way you can save yourself as well as other community members.

Fair enough - I will add some trust. The loan is from a while ago.

[DireWolfM14]

Fair enough - I will add some trust. The loan is from a while ago.

Are you saying the OP already has an outstanding loan with you and is here asking for another?

[shasan]

Fair enough - I will add some trust. The loan is from a while ago.

Are you saying the OP already has an outstanding loan with you and is here asking for another?

You are right and I am sure Op is trying to scam. I will give an update regarding the scam attempt in less than an hour.

[nutildah]

I know that I came after long time as I had health issues for which my doctor suggested to keep distance from things like smartphones and laptops as the rays were not suitable for me. I'm here after I completely recovered from my problems, trauma had stopped and I can use these things back again.

I'm genuinely curious... Would you mind telling us what sort of health issue would prevent this? I know that radiation and electromagnetic waves from these devices aren't good in general, but I'm just wondering what condition(s) would be particularly aggravated by them. Thanks.

[shasan]

What happened: OP is trying to scam!
Why I am thinking that?:
Before your judgment please read my full post where I will provide several reasons behind my thinking.
1. Op has an open loan. See prof from archive link: https://archive.fo/AYRXG#selection-6175.0-6293.66
2. Op has taken a loan but there is no proof on his posts: https://archive.fo/qPdr0
3. There is a long gap according to op it is for his health issue. See archive: https://archive.fo/qPdr0#selection-513.0-513.297 But I do not think it is correct I think OP is lying. Why do I think so? Let me describe: Op received negative trust on 2016-09-21 but then game-protect was not a DT so op continued to use bitcointalk forum. But later game-protect became DT so op marked as a scammer and stopped to use bitcointalk forum by this profile. And recently game-protect excluded from DT so O again active and trying to take a loan and then flew away. Where already an open active loan which already told and still trying to take a loan. There might have more reason I will update more once I find them.
4. Op has no staked BTC address or removed those and as a result OP cant proof ownership by signing bitcoin signature.
5. After a long gap, Op started posting and all post to take loan.
6. Op is trying to take a loan by giving the account as collateral or without collateral.

[marcotheminer]

What happened: OP is trying to scam!
Why I am thinking that?:
Before your judgment please read my full post where I will provide several reasons behind my thinking.
1. Op has an open loan. See prof from archive link: https://archive.fo/AYRXG#selection-6175.0-6293.66
2. Op has taken a loan but there is no proof on his posts: https://archive.fo/qPdr0
3. There is a long gap according to op it is for his health issue. See archive: https://archive.fo/qPdr0#selection-513.0-513.297 But I do not think it is correct I think OP is lying. Why do I think so? Let me describe: Op received negative trust on 2016-09-21 but then game-protect was not a DT so op continued to use bitcointalk forum. But later game-protect became DT so op marked as a scammer and stopped to use bitcointalk forum by this profile. And recently game-protect excluded from DT so O again active and trying to take a loan and then flew away. Where already an open active loan which already told and still trying to take a loan. There might have more reason I will update more once I find them.
4. Op has no staked BTC address or removed those and as a result OP cant proof ownership by signing bitcoin signature.
5. After a long gap, Op started posting and all post to take loan.
6. Op is trying to take a loan by giving the account as collateral or without collateral.

OP is who he claims to be, I am in contact with him. I don't think he is wanting to scam. That said, he would find it hard to get a loan now.

[shasan]

OP is who he claims to be, I am in contact with him. I don't think he is wanting to scam. That said, he would find it hard to get a loan now.

Okay, then can you please tell why you have no proof of the current active loan? Why there is no post or no trust rating on OP's profile.