🔥 EarnBet.io | No KYC Casino | 62.5% Rakeback • Highest Rebate 💎

[hd49728]

Argentina vs Cape Verde and Colombia vs Ghana are played on 4 July. That's why it's not part of the promo of other matches played on 3 July. Argentina is, of course, a big favorite to win and the team has been very efficient so far in the tournament. If it becomes difficult, FIFA will do everything possible to help Messi and co to go through. He brings in views and that brings in money. They will give a hand to Cristiano and him with the VAR if they have to. For some, VAR is there to help them. For others, like Iran, the VAR is there to make them stumble and punish them due to politics.

Colombia will struggle with Ghana but Argentina will complete their match with Cape Verde quite easily. With available players for this World Cup, Colombia still relies too much on James Rodriguez and it can be their weakness in a match against a very physical strong team like Ghana. I guess the match between Argentina and Cape Verde will finish after 90 minutes while Colombia and Ghana will pull it to 120 minutes and even penalty shootouts.

None of Colombia and Ghana want to go home after this match while they don't have too many players who can decide this match, so playing carefully will bring them to another penalty shootouts for World Cup 2026, after Netherlands vs Morocco, Germany vs Paraguay.

[knuckey]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Money laundering is just some excuse most casinos use to ensure that you at least play in the casino and not just take out your money after depositing. Tell me why exchanges that are mostly used would let you withdraw the money you just deposited, minus any trading activity, without any issues. Wouldn't they force you to at least make a 1x trade before you withdraw your funds?
Why is it referred to as money laundering in casinos but not referred to as money laundering when it comes to crypto exchanges?

[julerz12]

Wimbledon is as big as it gets when it comes to tennis. There is no bigger tennis tournament in the calendar.

I see, so it makes it even more unfortunate that EarnBet didn't at least put out a specific promo for it.
They could have made any special promo, blasted the announcement on their social media channels, so the Tennis fans and bettors might flock to their platform.

It's only unfortunate for it that it's taking place during the football world cup and therefore isn't getting the spotlight it normally would.

I guess this would be part of the cause of what I've mentioned above. Everyone is so focused on the World Cup that the EarnBet team just didn't bother to promote the tennis event any further, since well, no one would pay attention to it. lol
Some guy on their official Telegram chat also seems upset about the lack of promo codes on the newsletters recently. Do any of you still receive such newsletters from EarnBet?

[Pmalek]

Colombia will struggle with Ghana but Argentina will complete their match with Cape Verde quite easily. With available players for this World Cup, Colombia still relies too much on James Rodriguez and it can be their weakness in a match against a very physical strong team like Ghana. I guess the match between Argentina and Cape Verde will finish after 90 minutes while Colombia and Ghana will pull it to 120 minutes and even penalty shootouts.

It turned out to be the opposite. The Argentina match went into extra time and Cape Verde again surprised everyone. They are out of the tournament but the team hasn't lost any match in the regular 90 minutes. Colombia, on the other hand, defeated Ghana in regular time.

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

The terms and conditions paint a different picture. It says that deposits must be wagered at least once and that withdrawals won't be processed before the money is wagered.
Did you try to withdraw funds from your account without wagering and it worked or did you read about it somewhere?

Here are the points in EarnBet's T&Cs that discuss this topic:

As a prevention of money laundering, a deposit must be wagered at least once before a withdrawal can be made. Please note that if wagering requirements are in place, the wagering requirement needs to be respected before a withdrawal is requested.

A withdrawal request will not be processed until all wagering requirements have been met.

https://earnbet.io/terms

[DPHOR]

Wimbledon is as big as it gets when it comes to tennis. There is no bigger tennis tournament in the calendar.

I see, so it makes it even more unfortunate that EarnBet didn't at least put out a specific promo for it.
They could have made any special promo, blasted the announcement on their social media channels, so the Tennis fans and bettors might flock to their platform.

It's only unfortunate for it that it's taking place during the football world cup and therefore isn't getting the spotlight it normally would.

I guess this would be part of the cause of what I've mentioned above. Everyone is so focused on the World Cup that the EarnBet team just didn't bother to promote the tennis event any further, since well, no one would pay attention to it. lol
Some guy on their official Telegram chat also seems upset about the lack of promo codes on the newsletters recently. Do any of you still receive such newsletters from EarnBet?

What you must know is that not all gambling site that would be that willing to such offer bonuses based on this Nation world cup. Of course such bonuses they  mentioned shou that having their requirements so that people wouldn't be that jumping to the site to deferent casino with the aim of trying to unlock a better bonuses.
People shouldn't be that entirely relying on bonus because I know that bonuses are something that quickly lured people into missing their track line, bonuses are mostly issued by new gambling site just attract more gambler to their site.

[Fortify]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Money laundering is just some excuse most casinos use to ensure that you at least play in the casino and not just take out your money after depositing. Tell me why exchanges that are mostly used would let you withdraw the money you just deposited, minus any trading activity, without any issues. Wouldn't they force you to at least make a 1x trade before you withdraw your funds?
Why is it referred to as money laundering in casinos but not referred to as money laundering when it comes to crypto exchanges?

It depends if they are receiving funds to a single address and only allowing withdrawals to the same or a specifically defined wallet, otherwise it could in theory be abused but no more than sending on funds to a different wallet that you have control over. Requiring 1x wager from a a casino is not necessarily a high barrier to someone trying to launder money and if you did it with a sports book you could bake in a certain margin - around 5% to achieve the same effect with matched betting. I'm not sure that making an analogy to trading platforms is very useful as I doubt many of the bit platforms require any sort of minimum trading because it would annoy customers who might change their minds and then have their funds held hostage.

[mitchr4]

...

It depends if they are receiving funds to a single address and only allowing withdrawals to the same or a specifically defined wallet, otherwise it could in theory be abused but no more than sending on funds to a different wallet that you have control over. Requiring 1x wager from a a casino is not necessarily a high barrier to someone trying to launder money and if you did it with a sports book you could bake in a certain margin - around 5% to achieve the same effect with matched betting. I'm not sure that making an analogy to trading platforms is very useful as I doubt many of the bit platforms require any sort of minimum trading because it would annoy customers who might change their minds and then have their funds held hostage.

I think the wager rule that most casinos use is more like a business strategy to keep players playing for some time, not really a full protection against money laundering. Some casinos also make the wager rule harder or easier depending on the type of game being played, such as Slot, Original games, and Sportsbook. If someone really wants to misuse the system, there is still a way to get around the 1x wager rule, especially through matched betting on a sportsbook.

[Strongkored]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

It is standard practice to require a 1x rollover on deposits, did you really manage to make a withdrawal without completing the rollover first? After all, withdrawing without fulfilling the rollover requirement is highly unusual. I’m going to try it out to verify this.

[Pmalek]

It is standard practice to require a 1x rollover on deposits, did you really manage to make a withdrawal without completing the rollover first? After all, withdrawing without fulfilling the rollover requirement is highly unusual. I’m going to try it out to verify this.

If it's a small and insignificant amount, perhaps the person who was assigned to process the withdrawal didn't bother to check how it was wagered or if it was wagered at all. And that's how it got processed without ever being wagered. I doubt anyone would succeed in doing that will a big sum. We know that many crypto casinos like to claim that they have instant withdrawals, but very few do. In many cases they are processed and sent out following manual verification.

[Mahdirakib]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Casinos occasionally process the withdrawal of an old user without the deposit rollover requirement if the user makes the withdrawal to a previously used address. I believe this is the reason for receiving the withdrawal successfully without completing the 1× deposit rollover requirement. But you shouldn't expect the same thing always. Earnbet also follows the AML law.

[TopTort777]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Have you figured it out with new account or with old account? I used to think that casino I gambled in previously also did not have a wagering requirement on deposits, but it turned out that I have wagered enough already during years of gambling and they probably count that towards new deposit. So if you have wagered previously, I guess your deposit-withdrawal could go without 1x wagering requirement. Or, they could have done your address check when you deposit, and when you withdraw on same address, they allow you not to do 1x wager.