The Real Solution to Dumping

[Stanlo]

Devs should stop blaming bounty hunters for dumping ,they work hard to promote your projects and they have every right to do what they like with the tokens if this is really what you don't want then

Don't pay bounty hunters in your tokens ,pay them in USD ,USDC or ETHEREUM to avoid dumping your tokens and that will have positive impact on your tokens ,dumping will always happen and if the project is a strong one then it will quickly recover

[1714975242]

1714975242

[1714975242]

1714975242

[1714975242]

1714975242

[prasad87]

The work of a bounty hunter is not worth the USD value of tokens they receive - hence projects will most likely not start paying in USD, or if they do, the payout would be lower than the payout in tokens.
A cleaner solution will be locking BH tokens and unlocking some percentage every month.

[peter0425]

Just pay them in Bitcoin or USD then it will solved their problem. The thing is they doesn't want to shell out money, then all wanted to reached their goal of raising millions of dollars and yet when bounty hunters wanted to sell to get their rewards then they start complaining. Fix the payment not in their tokens then everything will be solved.

[el kaka22]

Don't pay bounty hunters in your tokens ,pay them in USD ,USDC or ETHEREUM to avoid dumping your tokens and that will have positive impact on your tokens ,dumping will always happen and if the project is a strong one then it will quickly recover

I guess this is not necessary when they have confident about the potential of their concepts and hence the success of their project. When you are running your project with the real-time applications then you never need to bother about paying bounty rewards in your own tokens/coins and then about getting dumping out. Because, there will be enough adopters and investors to bump over the times. Only condition is, your project must remain attractive.

Fix the payment not in their tokens then everything will be solved.

This will definitely solve, I agree. But, it may prevent the chances of other investors who usually look for buying at dips. I am a kind of investor who take time to analyze hence I never rush for ICO contributions but I will buy in open market if a project is convincing me. At those times, I wait for bounty hunters to dump.

[BADBITCH]

The work of a bounty hunter is not worth the USD value of tokens they receive - hence projects will most likely not start paying in USD, or if they do, the payout would be lower than the payout in tokens.
A cleaner solution will be locking BH tokens and unlocking some percentage every month.

Your cleaner solution can not be applied because it will be mere cheat
Bounty hunters invested time, data and their intelligence

Why should they have tokens locked ?? When investors have their 100% to dunped at a go ??

Best way is to have a good working product

[Barabulya]

Devs should stop blaming bounty hunters for dumping ,they work hard to promote your projects and they have every right to do what they like with the tokens if this is really what you don't want then

Don't pay bounty hunters in your tokens ,pay them in USD ,USDC or ETHEREUM to avoid dumping your tokens and that will have positive impact on your tokens ,dumping will always happen and if the project is a strong one then it will quickly recover

I fully share the opinion of the author of the topic. Moreover, I believe that bounty hunters need to be given a choice of currency as a reward for a job well done. This choice should consist of at least two options, such as usd and the coin of the advertised project.

[Jating]

I guess there's not a working solution right now. Yes, they could offer fix payment rates, but this market is open, I mean everyone wanted to take advantage of every dip, so as investors, it maybe consider fraudulent, but dumping by bounty hunters are what we're waiting for, so that we can buy it cheap.

So it's really hard to come out with a solution that will solve this problem. And there's nothing to blame here since everything is a free-for-all market.

[maiiyeuvo]

If they can pay by BTC, ETH or USDT, the results are amazing. Apparently they no longer have to fear the bounty hunter dumping their tokens. Haha!

[justspare]

Only condition is, your project must remain attractive.

In recent times, devs are working in different manner. They are not focusing on their concepts nor on real life application development but they are focusing only on listing their coin/broken into highly reputed exchange and then keep bumping it to make it attractive enough. This way they are getting continuous investors and traders to pump and dump their coin and then they are making lots of money out of it.

From this kind of devs, how we can expect they are bothering about taking measurements for preventing their coins from getting dumped. I believe this kind of devs just focus on making their coin/token to be attractive and that is not based on concepts and real success of their project but attractive as a trading asset.

[darewaller]

Only condition is, your project must remain attractive.

In recent times, devs are working in different manner. They are not focusing on their concepts nor on real life application development but they are focusing only on listing their coin/broken into highly reputed exchange and then keep bumping it to make it attractive enough. This way they are getting continuous investors and traders to pump and dump their coin and then they are making lots of money out of it.

From this kind of devs, how we can expect they are bothering about taking measurements for preventing their coins from getting dumped. I believe this kind of devs just focus on making their coin/token to be attractive and that is not based on concepts and real success of their project but attractive as a trading asset.

But, I believe they cannot sustain for long time without having actual progress with their projects only in short term they may manage making their project attractive but in long run people will never get failed to analyse what are the progress is going on with their project.

I am also looking for high volume coins for short-term trading. In this case I may choose a coin like you have mentioned but for long term holding definitely I will look for fundamentals in those times they cannot make up a project like it is being attractive without having actual developments. Hence, they may get failed over the time.

[Kolikalex55]

Devs should stop blaming bounty hunters for dumping ,they work hard to promote your projects and they have every right to do what they like with the tokens if this is really what you don't want then

Don't pay bounty hunters in your tokens ,pay them in USD ,USDC or ETHEREUM to avoid dumping your tokens and that will have positive impact on your tokens ,dumping will always happen and if the project is a strong one then it will quickly recover

I think that this will not happen, I Think that the easiest way to distribute tokens is within three months after the end of the ICO. For example, a month to pay 25 percent in two months 25 and the third month of trade should be good trading volumes, then you can send people a large pool of 50 percent. I think that this approach will bring stability to the coin !)

[NavI_027]

Don't pay bounty hunters in your tokens ,pay them in USD ,USDC or ETHEREUM to avoid dumping your tokens and that will have positive impact on your tokens

Why not? There is nothing wrong of paying them with tokens. If the devs are scared of huge volume of dumping right after the coin was listed on exchanges then they can't do anything to stop it. They don't hav3 the right to control the will of their holders.

On the other side, if they choose to give eth or usd to their bounty hunters as a for of payment then how they will increase the demand for their coin and are they prepared to spent more for eth funds despite the fact that their project is not yet starting? For me, it was a good idea in a sense that you can easily attract bounty applicants but not really helpful for the project itself.

[poptok1]

Why not? There is nothing wrong of paying them with tokens.

You are right, there is nothing wrong with that. However there is no other way. Method of rewarding promoters with token they are promoting got terminated, used up. Most of us are already tired with the idea. Scheme of things stayed unchanged for way to many years, people finally starting to realise that nothing of value will come out of such projects because of initial dump. It discourages late investors. Sooner devs will start to spend some usable cash on their project promotion, the better.
There are so many ways of doing this, not even worth to count the possibility's, it can also be done quite cheaply.
All its required is a devs will for taking at least some risk.

[Levyathan]

Even if your opinion got replied from most of the developer here, USDC and USDT and USDS can be dumped too if all of the bounty users selling it right away after get paid

[livingfree]

Devs should stop blaming bounty hunters for dumping ,they work hard to promote your projects and they have every right to do what they like with the tokens if this is really what you don't want then

IMHO, devs aren't really the ones that blames the bounty hunters but it is those investors that seem to be faithful to that project and decided to go long term with their coin. But in the progress, when they see the coin starts to be dumped the first suspect that comes to their minds are the bounty hunters. How much was the allocated tokens for those bounty hunters? 1%? 2%?

A single digit of allocation for the whole circulation of that token economy won't really affect the market. Well can't also blame them for thinking that way because most of the bounty hunters are known to dump their tokens quickly for quick buck.

[ataki]

There is no solution for dumping  as investors are also dumping their coins and not only the hunters do. People are jumping into  investments without proper research  and they are not patient enough and expecting quick profit. When it does not happen they dump.

[absurde]

I agree with you, that's what i have really thoght before, the project should give stable token or tether instead of their project, so you can set the dump of your project.

[sujonali1819]

I don't think  only bounty hunters is the reason of dumping price of a project. It depends on the project movement and the liquidity  of any exchange where the token/coin listed. Most of the project are now deferent before ico and after ico. If a project team work hard and keep their promise  after finishing ico then the  price of token will not be acffected more by bounty hunters.  Thanks

[ivaf]

And what an interesting idea! After all, on the ICO, the project team collects funds on the Ether. They could really pay bounty hunters in it.
True, in practice I had only 3 such projects. And it was great (it was not necessary to wait for the token to go to the exchange, to engage in the exchange).

[Ridwan Fauzi]

Devs should stop blaming bounty hunters for dumping ,they work hard to promote your projects and they have every right to do what they like with the tokens if this is really what you don't want then

Is that true ? Any link to see that information?
That would be a wrong way if they really blame the promoters because the price dumped. I was just surprised, because there weren't many bounty hunters who complained because they didn't get the profit they wanted.

Don't pay bounty hunters in your tokens ,pay them in USD ,USDC or ETHEREUM to avoid dumping your tokens and that will have positive impact on your tokens ,dumping will always happen and if the project is a strong one then it will quickly recover

That will be a contradiction, when the ICO project is used to look for initial capital so that their projects get success. But when the Devs ICO project pays for each participant with altcoin such as ETH or USDT, they have to find more capital to pay for the budget. Indeed, that is a good choice when bounty hunters are paid with ETH or USDT but they must have a large amount of capital at least.