@suchmoon could you provide info on this

[Thule]

As a healthcare professional, please PM me your method of diagnosing both physical and mental health issues based only on a picture. I'll offer you a 30% cut once I've completely dominated the entire global healthcare market.

Once you send me your legal papers calling yourself a healthcare professional i will forward you my diagnosis method.

[Lauda]

It is time to drop this and/or any other threads.

[suchmoon]

You seem to have some mental crackdown ?
First you claim on orginal thread that its not your info.After that you start attacking me and quickseller for posting your personal info even we didn't since i only posted a postal code .Now you claim again its not your personal info......

However that was not my question.My question was do i have your permission since i never broke any forum rules and i need your permission to post it.
If you are sure its not you on that picture i guess you have no issues giving me here permission so i can add that picture to that thread so people can judge themself.

Jesus. Fucking. Christ. Go to the Investigations board and post it there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0

Make sure to add pictures of my house, extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too. There is literally nothing I can do to stop you, only hope that you're actually dumb enough to do it. Make my day, asshole.

[mikeywith]

extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

The dog is going to be the most difficult part.

[suchmoon]

extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

The dog is going to be the most difficult part.

I'm sure there are pictures of some random people with dogs on the internet.

It's not like we're aiming for accuracy here with the scarlet idiot who is either dumb enough to believe random PMs or dumb enough to doctor PMs thinking others will believe it.

[Thule]

Make sure to add pictures of my house, extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

Does it mean i have your permission to post the picture ?
Please provide a clear yes or no

[suchmoon]

Make sure to add pictures of my house, extra bonus if you can post my kids and the dog too.

Does it mean i have your permission to post the picture ?
Please provide a clear yes or no

No.

[Thule]

I guess we both know why you said no......don't we ?


Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.


A nice find i just made

Doctored screenshots sent by your sockpuppets don't count.

So now i'm the sockpuppet of cryptohunter who doctored screenshots?


You are lucky theymos denied else you were long time banned from this forum.





Would be posting an URL where a picture is publicly hosted be against forum rules ?
I guess not since i don't publish private information but just a link to an existing website.


Am i wrong with that assumption ?

[suchmoon]

I guess we both know why you said no......don't we ?

I said "no" because you're an utter moron. I'm happy to hear that we agree on that.

Would be posting an URL where a picture is publicly hosted be against forum rules ?
I guess not since i don't publish private information but just a link to an existing website.


Am i wrong with that assumption ?

LOL. Once again...

But I do like your insistence on proving time and time again that my feedback for you was very much on point. You're a fucking lunatic and no one should engage in any deals with you. Seeing what you're doing here it's not hard to imagine the damage you'd be able to inflict with someone's real info.

There is literally nothing I can do to stop you, only hope that you're actually dumb enough to do it. Make my day, asshole.

[Thule]

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

[suchmoon]

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

So... you obey the rules but you don't know the rules? Also evidenced by your multiposting above.

[Thule]

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

So... you obey the rules but you don't know the rules? Also evidenced by your multiposting above.

I know the rules perfectly and i know for a fact it wouldn't break any forum rule.
The question is more directed to DT members who have their own to public unknown rules they always claim to execute.

[suchmoon]

Funny i the so called scammer obey the forum rules where you abuse them.

I just checked my local laws and i can't be held responsible for the content of a website where i link.

Now the question is would it be against forum rules ?

So... you obey the rules but you don't know the rules? Also evidenced by your multiposting above.

I know the rules perfectly and i know for a fact it wouldn't break any forum rule.
The question is more directed to DT members who have their own to public unknown rules they always claim to execute.

Which is it?

You're so red that you certainly have nothing to worry about regarding DT.

[Thule]

I will ask some buddies arround maybe someone is going to post that link from their newbie account.

[Thule]

[bones261]

archived

[actmyname]

How is this thread still on-going?

Here are the facts, objectively.

We are looking at a case of hearsay.
Thule may or may not be lying: that is not the issue at-hand.

If Thule is lying, then the evidence is clearly false. Assume that Thule is not lying.
We then have another user that has PM'd Thule a screenshot of a PM.

Text can be doctored easily and we have no way of verifying the message.

Any proof that Thule provides is pointless because this is still hearsay. Thule's received PM can be legitimate, but the screenshot provided thereof may be illegitimate.
The only way to prove the screenshots are legitimate are for the original sender to verify them. Since they apparently do not want to, there is insufficient evidence regarding this case.

Thus, this fails to disprove the null hypothesis. We can pragmatically claim that the private messages to the unknown party are fake.

[khaled0111]

Any one who was following this thread from the beginning can conclude that who PMed Thule is a liar.

He refused to reveal his identity because he was afraid of retaliation. But now there is nothing to be afraid of after being red tagged as he claimed!?

[bones261]

Any one who was following this thread from the beginning can conclude that who PMed Thule is a liar.

He refused to reveal his identity because he was afraid of retaliation. But now there is nothing to be afraid of after being red tagged as he claimed!?

Well, not everyone. ito-marketing and Thule seem to believe volodia2.

[actmyname]

He refused to reveal his identity because he was afraid of retaliation. But now there is nothing to be afraid of after being red tagged as he claimed!?

It's questionable to think that someone would be afraid of red trust from a member who would be ousted were the information true.

Quite dubious indeed.