Ok, well personal insults aside... In my opinion, you don't seem to be able to back up your claims.
I can see now, that after several attempts, this is going around in circles and there is no point asking you for any further evidence to substantiate the claims you are making... as you'll just call me ignorant, accuse me of not reading and then make the same claims again and still not provide any evidence to support them.
To anyone else following this thread, this is my summary of findings:
- Rambotnic claims he had a more detailed plan involving tricking scammers into revealing detail and/or using escrow
- Rambotnic claims "Gino" had "lack of interest" in paying him 0.1 btc for his services
- Rambotnic has provided no demonstrable proof of any "lack of interest" on behalf of "Gino".- Chatlogs actually show "Gino" stated that he was willing to pay Rambotnic for help on three separate occasions (and up to as much as 3 BTC for said services).
- Rambotnic told "Gino" he should talk to the "scammers" and offer to pay BTC to unlock account (but less than 5 BTC wanted)
- Gino said he wouldn't pay the "scammers" any more money
- Rambotnic never told "Gino" of his detailed plan of tricking scammers into revealing details or using Escrow.
NOTE: I make no judgement on the intentions of either Rambotnic or "Gino". I'm just stating facts based on the evidence provided.
