Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based

[ucok456]

Not all bounty programs provide prizes based on fixed token allocation. In fact, I see now that the bounty program gives prizes based on the stake gained. But yes, I do not agree with the bounty program that gives prizes based on fixed token allocations, because that will create injustice for bounty hunters who work harder.

[kolonel_x]

yes it is usually calculated from the total post or weekly. it is indeed less interesting because the number of prizes has been determined and is very influential on the participants. but that was their decision

[Ociwiw]

I also began to observe such rewards more often, but I still prefer to participate in the bounty where the calculation goes in rates!

[JeBro]

I think the best solution would be a system of stakes with a limited number of participants in bounty programs. This will allow bounty hunters to receive higher paying rewards. Sometimes the program lasts about a year and during this time several thousand participants join it. As a result, the reward is only a few dollars.

[Caladonian]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

stake based allocation is better than fixed. It is maximize your reward since the stake can provide you a good amount of tokens compared to fixed stake based whch you already know the amount of tokens you will receive. Plus there is thrill in stake based since you can be surprised with your rewards later on.

There's no other options but to accept the rules, with what is happening right now inside the ico market, bounty managers and the team behind the project are looking for new ways allocating their reserved funds for bounty hunters, I agree with stake based is much better as it can surprise you when the participants is not that much and the project succeed, the value can give you huge profits, while fixed rates upon joining and accepting the rules won't surprise you not unless the value pumped up or fall very deep.

Still bounty hunters freedom to choose between as there's a lots of available project around,  choose whatever you think that will benefits you after.    

[MendozaCharles]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

It will default your token every week and you don't care how many people are participating in that campaign. But I like bounty campaigns that are measured by stake per week, we will have a better chance of getting more tokens if there are fewer participants

[kiwoh123]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

I think we dont need to take part in that campaign, we don't need a project that doesn't even respect people who help them pay hunters with small feeit cant be forgiven. but maybe if we can negotiate with the bounty manager to turn it into stake based.

[sujonali1819]

At this moment bounty hunters is increasing day by day. For that bounty hunters will not get high rewards if allocation  is stake based. If allocation will fixed then people will get a exact amount for each week. Here the amount of hunters don't affect the bounty rewards. So I want to say fixed and stake based those methods are good if the main bounty pull is huge. Thanks

[judeafante]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

All the bounty campaign that I have participated in are stakes based I hate fixed token allocation one of my friends participate on token allocation campaign and only got $50 worth of token from their ICO price in 4 months campaign I rather get my signature blank than participate on that kind of rewards.

[Stakerist]

Betting is best, because if there are not enough participants and the bounty pool is not cut, then the payout will not be small!

[susila_bai]

Everything depends on the value of the coin after it get listed or when you get bounty coins, because what ever volume of coin/token you receive if it did not get decent price when we receive the bounty reward then it is worthless. Long back it was fixed bounty reward but the listing price of coin was good so the reward is also good. Today we care receiving in stakes but when we receive the bounty till then the price is very low that the value of the bounty is useless.

[malekbaba]

I prefer stakes of course.
Pros: When there are less participants , participant will get large sum of tokens.
Cons: Usual end result will not be good for the team. Cause some people will have enough tokens to hit the market (temporary though)

But if there are too many participants, then Fixed Reward is better. No matter how many people are joining, you will get your reward.

So if you want to get higher profit, try to join into a campaign with lower number of participants and pay by stakes. But never join into campaign which is not acceptable by mass people.

[RobotNIK]

I think that the bets look more interesting, if only for the very reason that if there are few participants in some kind of campaign, the profit will be correspondingly higher!

[beehimneff]

I like such bounty campaigns even more, because I know exactly how many tokens I will get for my work. With the stakes are not so simple, it all depends on the number of bounty hunters. The more participants, the less reward.

[anjohyx]

I don't join the bounty campaign which is fix token rewards, based on their ICO price and we just earn a few bucks in single campaign per week, I'm prefer stake based rewards because we able to earn more token with high stakes.

[Sebas.tian]

You earn less with campaigns that give fixed token rewards for a certain task. Stake based rewards are more profitable since most of the time, there is a large bounty pool involved. If by chance, less participants joined the campaign and the sale has been a success, the reward would be split to less people.

[lizarder]

for that problem, in my opinion, it doesn't have to be overly fussed, because it gives a choice to hunters, if I personally prefer those based on stakes, although sometimes at risk (the allocations are drastically reduced), the results obtained are satisfactory. following that it turned out that the token received was far from expectations (down from the rate)

[beeelzebub]

Most of the times, fixed token allocations tend to become super low so joining them is not profitable like stake based ones.

[bangkecol]

for the fair, stake based for a lot of participant. And token based for less participant.
So, bounty hunter will be more appreciated.

[kaito.]

i personaly didn't like fixed token allocation for bounty because in fact this will encourage hunter using multi account to gain more reward. because task was mostly simple and easy to do.
not that bounty using stakes would have less cheater but at least the reward would be better to split using stakes.
if token fixed allocation used in bounty they should limit their participant so the reward will most likely raised and also people who caught using multi account will get their entry removed.
i would agree if KYC was at the end of bounty so those that cheat using multi account will have their work gone in vain.