Bounty Rewards- Stakes based or fixed tokens allocation based

[wxganz]

Participation in the bounty program has changed a lot. Projects have become much more demanding and very often do not go to the listing on the stock exchange. Yes, the developers are trying to popularize the bounty program but it has degraded.

[Patrix_1]

I think that stakes bounties could bring you much more tokens for the done work. Almost all bounties with a fixed token allocation are offering maximum 10 bucks per week for a legendary member in signature campaign and it is simply silly.

[kindbtc]

I do like stake system as this way total reward tokens alloted for the campaign are distributed among the participants while in fixed allocation system hardly 10 to 20 percent of tokens are given away because generally allocation is very small for each task so a big no to fixed tokens.

[Olayinka225]

Thanks for heads up, I don't think have met so familiar bounty before. But if I do, I don't think am gonna participate why because I think it's a way to cheat on bounty hunters because a particular campaign should be percentage token fixed and not weekly token fixed.

[yarelydiaz]

The stake based system is good only for bounty campaigns in which a small number of hunters took part, in fact, we get sometimes a super uneven distribution of tokens, and this is not good. There is another aspect. When the bounty is extremely long and without limiting the number of participants. The stake based system becomes hell, and the size of rewards tends to zero.
p.s. I prefer a fixed tokens allocation per action.

[Bttzed03]

Instead of making an issue of the bounty rules, why not just work with the reward system? Just increase your social media followings to as many as you can to receive maximum possible reward whether it's fixed or stake system.

[belli4388]

the reward system  fixed is good only if we are paid in btc or eth, instead for the various token the stakes system are preferable

[marjil]

Fixed amount is better than unfixed. At first this helps you decide on participation. In others, a new revolution began to reduce the bounty reward. I know that the fixed amount is often small, but better than unknown and changeable reward.

It depends on more than this. Sometimes unfixed is better, even if it based on a stakes system. At least with that system its fair for everyone because the bounties are allocated on a proportional method.

[defoman]

I think this system is more fair. Usually we get more bets for high rank on the forum, but people with lower ranks perform exactly the same actions. Is that fair? When you get fixed rates, you can calculate the possible profit in advance and decide whether to spend time participating in this campaign.

[Saisher]

I prefer stakes based I have not yet worked on fixed token allocation I saw some campaign that is fixed token allocation and the allocation is not that big, not attractive especially in a signature campaign for low-rank members but if the project is really that good then why not.

[various]

If the rewards are high, fixed reward will be fine. But if the prizes are low, they are not very attractive for bounty hunters and this will affect the promotion of the project. I think the stake system makes more sense.

[SistaFista]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

Well, for the hunter's point of view, it will be more profitable to gaining with stake based than fixed token.
From my opinion, it is better to running with the stake based reward because it means the reward pool is fixed.
If it running with fix token reward based, you won't know how much they allocate their token for bounty pool.

[baghdatis1990]

         When choosing a project that offers fixed stakes every week, choose the safe option. In a market where there are many SCAM projects, it is preferable during this period to choose the projects that offer such a payment distribution method. Thus, we will be sure that our work will be rewarded. Even if small amounts are offered, at least we have the guarantee that we will get something.

[zikabra]

I don't like that kind of rewarding system because it looks like bounty participants will receive less tokens than in system with shared pool.
I have seen one bounty with ridiculous low rewards and i don't know what is the reason for low rewards it's not like they have to pay money to bounty participants.

[Kimi80]

I don`t know what is better, to know what would be reward for your work or not and get surprised, pleasant or unpleasant. Personally, I love to know what would be amount that I deserved for my participation in some work or project than to think about it constantly what will be the result, how much I will receive. That way I could manage the potential profit. On the other hand, it`s always better to get more than less xexe, but the uncertainty really goes on my nerve 

[jt byte]

Fixed allocation is better in my opinion, you should have a reward for finding the ICO and the bounty earlier than someone else and your advantage is much worse with stakes based bounties.

[Marvell1]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

It's not that bad in comparison with the stakes policy, when bounty hunter can't get more than some max limit. I understand devs want to prevent token centralization, but it's not fair enough in my view.

[Nekoma2018]

Hallo everyone,

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?
Thanks.

I think the token allocation system for bounty campaigns isn't a bad idea... it's help limit the amount of tokens given to hunters... and same way.. if the token allocated to a daily task is worth a good amount of dollar... then I'm good with the project

[sssergy]

Several conditions for different ICOs like wemark token didn't reached hardcap so bounty reward is low but bidooh ready to release their 2nd bounty.

[StarofBTC]

Now a days I am seeing many projects are running their bounty program not with stakes based but with fixed tokens allocation for each campaign per week.
I see, from bounty Hunter's perspective not good reward system as we receive less tokens. Even though the number of participants are less, there is no chance to get higher rewards, which is possible with stakes based allocation.
What are your views on this?

Then I guess we need to imagine like we are participating in a campaign where more people are also competing with us. This way you never need to worry on fixed token allocation on weekly basis.

I guess every managers are having some unique idea to save better for their clients and this sounds like a latest innovations for not paying small group of bounty participants too the same allocated tokens. Seems a good idea as this may help heavy dumps from few investors.