Successful ICO With No Buyback Mechanism

[Nivia1st]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

buyback is not the only way to stop a dump. as long as this project continues to grow, I'm sure the price will slowly rise. there are actually many ways to prevent token dumps when the initial listing is on the market. such as token listings to large exchanges, locking bounty tokens, distributing tokens gradually, and much more.

I think this method can be applied and without a buyback I think dump will stop.

[jacafbiz]

I don't see what hope is left for ICO in this space unless something drastic happens then that could be game over, people are talking about STO's now but I have yet to see one that is really making waves, Polymath to me is not ready to play the big boys. I would be happy to see if anyone would recommend any STO platform to me

[karmapala]

after bounty hunters work, he will get his rights, namely wages in the form of tokens or ico, but once the coin is successful for listing. sometimes the bounty hunter coins are logged when prices start falling logs opened.I am an act that is detrimental to the bounty hunter and is not fair and not sportif.

[levyashin]

I really can't understand why an ico don't buy their tokens after the meltdown. I mean if you raised 50m $ and your total supply worth 1m $ with the current price, with just a little bit of money, you can turn the table. But they are greedy and doesn't care anything besides themselves.

[Geenstijl]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

Actually the concept of STO implies that startup should have some collateral to be able to make fund raising. I hope that in this case these projects would have some kind of buyback mechanism or at least pay bounty rewards not in tokens, but in already existed crypto like ETH, TRX, NEO or whatever where the project will be based on.

[perla]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

I know this, because some of project that come from my country, developer said want to do buy back to make people believe tokens will pumped. I think buyback will used by project that dumped from ICO price because even devs wouldn't want to buy in their ICO price.

[bitcoinmar]

Buyback really doesn't make the value of ICO projects rise again. If you want a price increase project, please support that project if their team is still actively working, that's the only way.

[Freny250]

Buy back can  help increase liquidity for some time.  But the main way to improve token price is for the token to have real usecase qns be used to solve real life problems

[apitico]

It has long been an idea that projects should buy back their tokens from bounty hunters and investors who want to sell, as this will eliminate the decline in prices.

[Invigorated]

Projects don't necessarily need a buy back if throughly they have a working product or a means to actually effect their roadmaps. Unfortunately, these days, most projects are full of imaginary and theoretical explanations on their whitepapers and no real plan of execution. Such projects have no substance and will most definitely be unsustainable leading to massive dumps once listed. If a project truly has what it explains, then price stability can be sustained since no one will be willing to sell. Buy back however, has enormous benefits to the project such as build up of volume on the exchange, reinventing confidence amongst investors etc.

[kickdapa]

You are absolutely right on this. I asked in an ICO group that why you are not doing buyback to protect the price, they said it is not legal to buyback! I don't know if this real or not. Actually, I think, they do not care about investors money. They raised millions of dollars, that's mean they are rich. And, after listing on exchanges, some Presale investors dump the price! if they wish to buy back cheap orders then the price can be backed and strong, but they will not do that! They say this is not in our control, the market decides the price!

The crypto bearish market seems will not end so soon, and if ICO projects will keep this scheme continue then ICO market will come to end and yes bounty hunters are already suffering for it.

[KingScorpio]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

the problem of the market is that it think in US dollar

[kickdapa]

Buyback really doesn't make the value of ICO projects rise again. If you want a price increase project, please support that project if their team is still actively working, that's the only way.

I can give you proof that buyback is really helpful for the total community. Because if you buy back all the cheap sell orders, then your coin's price will be stable and more people will be interested to invest in your coins, and the community will be happy because the coin they own have a strong value and that is not a dumping-pumping coin. So, they will promote your project gladly, and if you continue works to develop the products by following the roadmap, then no doubt your project will hit a new milestone in the future.

[BoxerRobert]

Yes i agree a good ICO always will give good profit for investor So there is no buyback mechanism is needed .Few ico are not good they are always show this kind buyback method in this project .

[dirgayeah]

so many ICO I was Joined promise to buy back their token. but until today it not happen. buy back mechanism just for project which care about the future of their product. or maybe they just want to raise money and don't care anymore with the project.

[florac9]

Yes you are very right,every successful ICO must have a working product that will bring the token price up even if dumpers make the price crash ,as far as the token is a very good project it will get its feet back

[Bttzed03]

Not necessarily "over" if they can produce an effective product. But I get OP's point on the team buying back some tokens from funds gathered during the ICO then possibly burning them to limit the supply.

[beerlover]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

This is how they are supporting their early adopters. Other than this, it will imply like they are no more interested into their projects. Recently, one of my friend shared like he came across many very good white papers and high potential concepts but unfortunate most devs are losing their interest to continue their hard work after ICO. It means once they see some money, they just want to have vacation by forgetting their promises.

Not necessarily "over" if they can produce an effective product. But I get OP's point on the team buying back some tokens from funds gathered during the ICO then possibly burning them to limit the supply.

A good project must focus of product/solution. I do not have any argument on that. But, they must allocate some 5% to 10% for buy back of tokens and then after implementing their solution or after developing and after start profiting from the project they must focus on buy-back of tokens with up to 25% of their margin levels. It will be beneficial to them and for early investors too.

[ucok456]

Yes, I agree with you bro, the Buyback program is one way to stabilize the price of tokens at ICO prices. But investors who are supposed to do it, funds obtained from ICO are not for the buyback program but are used to develop the project. So the Buyback program should be done by investors.

[agusiska]

yes, this cycle always happen and less of ico project who dares to not adopted this way, if you sure with your product and your project, no need to buy back.