Successful ICO With No Buyback Mechanism

[Atang Sulaeman]

very agree if an ico is successful and for ico developers to have to buy back tokens sold by investors and bounty hunters,
chances are that the upcoming ico will definitely succeed again, because investors' trust will definitely be obtained in the future.

[Fammosh82]

Cryptocurrency tokens are created to have a fixed supply and had been released on a decentralized ledger, which ensures that value is assigned accordingly based on how the market speculates on the price of the token.

However, the existence of tokens don’t always benefit blockchain companies and can work to undermine the progress of the business if the tokens have no proper utility, or the market chooses not to associate the business achievements with the price of the token.

[bittick]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

That is right, the ICO should using some of their raised funds to support their token price in the market.
Im afraid if they don't prevent dump on their token price, it won't be able to recover the value of their token in the future.

If the project have too much people dumping their coin, keeping the coin price would take all the resources they have also it's very risky for the project's financial. To prevent dumping is only by making a good token supported by strong project.
i know that even a strong buyback mechanism will have a hard time keeping their coin from dumpers

[EnormousCoin101]

It is a good idea if all successful ICO has a buyback program to avoid the price dumping although they still need to have a working product to realize the true value of their coin. Buyback + Burning program will be great if all project has it.

[NeelMariaWarner]

The buyback is indeed a good way to ensure investors and bounty hunters get decent coins, because at least they will not suffer heavy losses
but I think there are only a few developers who agree to do that because their initial purpose of holding an ICO is because they need money so they will not be able to buyback especially for ICOs who only get softcap

[powerman24]

There should be a demand for the product as that is the proof that it is useful. Beyond that, buyback mechanisms could
boost the price as they are reducing the supply and the supporting the price. Many successful projects using that model.

[djuragan]

I'm not really sure about what really the cause of the drop on the coin price when it got listed in the market, but what i think, that would be because there are people who sell their coins in a lower price compared to the price when it firstly introduced during the ICO or something like that. because those people wanted to have quick money from the coins that they had. That is what i'm thinking of.

[bangdol]

I'm not really sure about what really the cause of the drop on the coin price when it got listed in the market, but what i think, that would be because there are people who sell their coins in a lower price compared to the price when it firstly introduced during the ICO or something like that. because those people wanted to have quick money from the coins that they had. That is what i'm thinking of.

that's because the coin market has not yet been formed. most are people who come from the coin community. and they all want to sell to earn money. the disadvantage for the new project are listed, it is because the team has not been prepared or not growing the trader to make a strong buying power in the market. When the response of the market is still less then that happens those who sell will surely lower the selling price.

[Mighty_crypt]

I agree with you on these ,buying back method is the only way to fix liquidity and dumping in price too so project teams are the ones I wish reading this right now ,the only way for ICO projects to succeed in this bearish market is all in the teams hand unless ICO is cancelled and all projects move to IEO ,I'm not sure if this will affect bounty hunters

[setialovers]

I agree with you on these ,buying back method is the only way to fix liquidity and dumping in price too so project teams are the ones I wish reading this right now ,the only way for ICO projects to succeed in this bearish market is all in the teams hand unless ICO is cancelled and all projects move to IEO ,I'm not sure if this will affect bounty hunters

I think its good but its hard to implemented in crypto market or others market. If we know stocks market, sometimes the stocks price below IPO and company not issuing buyback mechanism. Its happen not only in crypto but as far i know, its happen to most investment market. Maybe its because its pure speculation

[Supercrypt]

I'm not really sure about what really the cause of the drop on the coin price when it got listed in the market, but what i think, that would be because there are people who sell their coins in a lower price compared to the price when it firstly introduced during the ICO or something like that. because those people wanted to have quick money from the coins that they had. That is what i'm thinking of.

Sometimes, I do believe that it is also some of the mechanism put in place by the project developers too to avoid the coin being dumped by the general holdlers, since they own the larger part of the coins, what they do is to first of all dump the coin themselves so the price can crash a bit and discourage the investor or bounty hunter in further dumping as the price won’t be a favorable ones for them pending the time the market picks up or pending when they have a working products because I have heard countless times that some of these ICO succeeded in raising funds without working products till after the ICO before they use the fund available to them to decide on one.

[Leonardo7]

A responsible team will do a buyback in other to keep their project from over dumping. A very good project with a great team and good market liquidity may need not to buy back as the natural forces of trade will stabilize the token according to the market conditions. Bounty hunters are really running their precious time and facilities in losses these days because of failing projects.

[jessyj48]

It doenst mean that projects that use the buyback mechanism are bad projects infact its a very good way to keep a coin price at bay and it only shows how dedicated the teams are ,I like the buyback trick it works perfectly and can make the coin or token increase in price

[Peruvyn]

It is a common occurrence this days to see token dumped after its initial listing or else if the solid get much hype. At times, the token will take months before it can fully recover and this is the reason why I always buy token during its initial listing.

[pamsugas]

but it's hard to find ico like that
but you have to try IEO like ICO
in February 2019 there were many IEOs such as TOP, BTT, CELER, their sales were successful and when the market entry price was above the initial sale

[trudovik]

I would like to say that you and I need a platform or service that today could really make our cryptocurrency life much more profitable than, for example, with ICO or even with IEO

[Ridwan Fauzi]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

That is right, the ICO should using some of their raised funds to support their token price in the market.
Im afraid if they don't prevent dump on their token price, it won't be able to recover the value of their token in the future.

I look ICO is the dangerous place for an investment, you can imagine when funds has been achieved and the token has been released in the exchange then the price token will be drop drastically, I'm sure with that. Some investors will not look how the potential project it is in the future they just need a profit, moreover with the instant profit. So as they will consider many times to join it again and even for some of them will give up after they feel a huge loses. We can't see the future of a project although we feel the project/token really has a potential, because we don't know the future cryptocurrency will be accept by all countries, so for now may many people uses cryptocurrency especially an ICO project for instant profit only.

[BitDane]

It is nice to see a project to have a buy back system but I would rather see them use their fund to deliver their project plan.  I am a bounty hunter myself but I love to see a project completing its roadmap than setting an initial buyback right after their crowdfunding.  More success of the project means more value to our holdings.  And it is one of the risk (our token reward may have worth or worthless) as bounty reward.  If we cannot take this risk then it is better to just leave being a bounty hunter.

[fuer44]

that's what makes ico finally die, no matter how successful ico is if after launching tokens and listings on the market exchange, if there is no repurchase, then ico will become a dead project.

[capcaypro]

Investors and bounty hunters are the one losing here, lots of projects that accumulated millions of dollars are worthless when they hit the market, no volume and price is down by 1000% if those coming ICO will not do buyback and the market continues to be bearish then it's all over for ICO and bounty hunters..

Your thoughts on this.?

That is right, the ICO should using some of their raised funds to support their token price in the market.
Im afraid if they don't prevent dump on their token price, it won't be able to recover the value of their token in the future.

So is the repurchase needed to stabilize the price of the token? Well, indeed there are some ICOs that plan, so if the price goes down, then the buyback will be done so that the token stays in motion.