i don't get why people expect these ranges to be so tight or last so long. just cuz it happened one time, at $6k?
that, but also because it always takes time to change trend from the downtrend that lasted over 14 months to an uptrend that would be new and in opposite direction.
naturally. i'm just confused as to why people would think the first short term consolidation after a crash = definitive of a long term range. based on how bitcoin historically acts, this area is just one stop on the overall trajectory. the bottom range that hopefully forms over 2019 should have a much bigger spread than $1000.
even the $6k bottom was much more volatile than that, bouncing from $6k nearly to $12k when first establishing the range.
it's as if people expect bitcoin's volatility to die. why? is it just recency bias?
i think we're still firmly in a bear market
so no i definitely don't think we are ranging between $3-4k, especially since we just went to $4300 a few days ago
ah, give it more than 3 days.
we only had one try at the $4200 level yet and that rejection was totally expected due to the previous top there
You make pretty contradictory statements
At first you say that we are still in a bear market (which I tend to agree with), then you proceed to claim what can be interpreted that we are no longer in a bear market. A bear market assumes we are going down (or at least continue to move in that tight range). How come? Yes, I understand that we can see if the market turned to bull only in hindsight but it does't make your words less contradictory
no, you just have no sense of time frames. you apparently have trouble conceiving that bear markets don't go down in a straight line. for some reason, any time i expect the price to go up
over the short term, you take it as a pronouncement that the bear market is over.
here's the word of the day:
bull trap and if the $3k bottom was the start of an accumulation range, i fully expect it to be a much wider range than $1000. based on the 2015 bottom range, i'd expect at least 3x wider than that.