[FUN] Is DdmrDdmr even human?

[cygan]

✂️
What is happening to me?

i ask myself the same thing
what has happened that you have not been rewarded by @DdmrDdrmr for any of your great posts/topics - you are really slipping...

[fillippone]

✂️
What is happening to me?

i ask myself the same thing
what has happened that you have not been rewarded by @DdmrDdrmr for any of your great posts/topics - you are really slipping...

First, I hit a hard bump at 534 (if you get the reference, you get it), and now I am slowly drifting toward irrelevancy.
 
But rest assured  I will fight my way back to the right path.
And sooner or later,  I will top one of those charts, even beating @d5000!

[JayJuanGee]

Wow, look like I missed that one!
I didn’t get any merit in these runs, that’s why I didn’t notice.
Apparently, I have to work improving the quality of my posts.

Me neither... didn't get nuttin.
 
not that I am begging.. that would be funny

If I am getting it right then FYI it takes 7 seconds to scroll down and see number of merits you got in last 120 days.  

Well, the context of my specific assertion about "not getting nuttin" was that I was attempting to refer to DdmrDdmr's latest merit sending spree that would have had been in the last 24 hours (at the time of this post)...

So if I follow your suggestion, and I look at my received merits in the past 120 days, if I am reading this correctly, then I can see that the last time that DdmrDdmr had sent me any merits was on December 8, 2023.. and sure.. not that I am complaining or even begging for that matter..... ... .yet..   See Exhibit A

>>>>>December 08, 2023, 12:02:34: 1 from DdmrDdmr for JJG's Bitcoin Investment Ideas (Sustainable Withdrawal / Portfolio Maintenance)
December 08, 2023, 11:44:15: 2 from DdmrDdmr for Re: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits<<<<<

As far as DdmrDdmr's recently sent merits (from yesterday), it appears that he sent several hundred merits (280 according to fillippone, which fillippone more or less characterized as whimpy, without using such word.. no wonder fillippone is not receiving any smerits from DdmrDdmr, #nohomo) in a relatively short period of time in a couple of bursts, and the user name of this here cat is not contained within that.  See Exhibit B.

>>>>February 16, 2024, 13:32:26: 1 to Lannakosa for Re: [ЛOГ] Пoльзoвaтeли, пoвыcившиe cвoй paнг - Пoздpaвлeния!
February 16, 2024, 13:32:25: 1 to bitmover for Re: Mempool Observer Topic
February 16, 2024, 13:32:24: 1 to bitmover for Re: Mempool Observer Topic
February 16, 2024, 13:32:23: 1 to dkbit98 for

Multicoin Open Source Wallets
February 16, 2024, 13:32:22: 1 to icopress for Re: Where do we draw a line? Signature campaigns or shilling campaigns
February 16, 2024, 13:32:22: 1 to dkbit98 for Aqua wallet - Bitcoin, Lightning, Liquid
February 16, 2024, 13:32:21: 1 to icopress for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
February 16, 2024, 13:32:20: 1 to CLS63 for cls63 Merit Source Application
February 16, 2024, 13:32:19: 1 to CLS63 for Re: 🚀-Sportsbet.io-🚀 Official Partner of Newcastle United Football Club
February 16, 2024, 13:32:18: 1 to Pulsar77 for Mesaj kalitesini geliştirme amaçlı kampanyalar
February 16, 2024, 13:32:17: 1 to Pulsar77 for Sagiv Jehezkel'in Gözaltına Alınması
February 16, 2024, 13:32:16: 1 to Unknown01 for Gewinnspiel: Welcher Coin in den Top 200…
February 16, 2024, 13:32:15: 1 to gagux123 for Campanha para Melhorar a Qualidade das Postagens na Aba Local
February 16, 2024, 13:32:14: 1 to hosseinimr93 for Re: How do nodes confirm transactions and determine if a block is valid or not
February 16, 2024, 13:32:14: 1 to gagux123 for

[Guia] Fatores a serem considerados antes de participar em campanhas de assinatu
February 16, 2024, 13:32:13: 1 to Porfirii for Campaña para la mejora de los posts en las secciones locales
February 16, 2024, 13:32:12: 1 to Forsyth Jones for História da Carteira Electrum e da diferença do padrão BIP39
February 16, 2024, 13:32:11: 1 to Distraction for Avustralya Açık 2024
February 16, 2024, 13:32:10: 1 to Distraction for Re: Türkçe Bölümü Aylık Merit ve Mesaj İstatistikleri
February 16, 2024, 13:32:09: 1 to internetional for Re: Пoтpeбитeльcкиe cвoйcтвa биткoинa
February 16, 2024, 13:32:08: 1 to ChiBitCTy for Bitcoin Penny Company Issues- Undelivered work/Money owed/Lack of updates
February 16, 2024, 13:32:07: 1 to Hhampuz for Re: Farewell
February 16, 2024, 13:32:07: 1 to Bobrox for Re: [LOG] List Rank Up Member Indonesia (Member - Legendary)
February 16, 2024, 13:32:06: 1 to sportsbet.io for Re: 🚀-Sportsbet.io-🚀 Official Partner of Newcastle United Football Club
February 16, 2024, 13:32:05: 1 to holydarkness for

Scam Accusation Cases Against Betting Platform on The Forum
February 16, 2024, 13:32:04: 1 to TryNinja for Re: Ask LoyceV: Backup up PMs
February 16, 2024, 13:32:03: 1 to Lucius for Re: @Lucius accusations: is there hope for all newbies?
February 16, 2024, 13:32:02: 1 to LoyceV for Re: Ask Ninja: Backup up PMs
February 16, 2024, 13:32:01: 1 to pooya87 for Re: Scalable paper wallet
February 16, 2024, 13:32:01: 1 to Real-Duke for Re:

[Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ...
February 16, 2024, 13:32:00: 1 to pooya87 for Re: Expect the Orginals game to get even bigger - actual games
February 16, 2024, 13:31:59: 1 to pooya87 for Re: Hypothetical ETF disaster hardfork
February 16, 2024, 13:31:58: 1 to ABCbits for Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board
February 16, 2024, 13:31:57: 1 to yahoo62278 for Re: Where do we draw a line? Signature campaigns or shilling campaigns
February 16, 2024, 13:31:56: 1 to ranochigo for Re: What to know of Nodes and Running a Node
February 16, 2024, 13:31:55: 1 to nutildah for Re: The effect the mixer ban has had on the forum.
February 16, 2024, 13:31:54: 1 to achow101 for Re: How to import an xpriv to a descriptor wallet in bitcoin core?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:54: 1 to BVeyron for Re: Пoльзoвaтeли лoкaлa (aктyaльный cпиcoк)
February 16, 2024, 13:31:53: 1 to Pierre 2 for Çikolata ihracatında dünya 11. siyiz
February 16, 2024, 13:31:52: 1 to jeremypwr for Sportsbet.io 🏈 Super Bowl 58: Prop Party 🏈 [30 mBTC in prizes + Europe Trip]
February 16, 2024, 13:31:51: 1 to Mitchell for Re: Why High Demand for Bitcoin Testnet Coins?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:50: 1 to Pmalek for The US Government wants your Bitcoin Miners!?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:49: 1 to Pmalek for Trezor's 3rd-Party Support Portal was Hacked
February 16, 2024, 13:31:48: 1 to Abdussamad for Re: [Bounty Inside] Restoring an electrum seed phrase into another wallet
February 16, 2024, 13:31:47: 1 to odolvlobo for Re: A Personal Computer Mined How Many Bitcoin Per Day In 2009? 100? 250? 1700?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:47: 1 to franky1 for Re: Mempool Observer Topic
February 16, 2024, 13:31:46: 1 to Vod for Re: Farewell
February 16, 2024, 13:31:45: 1 to cygan for The bitaxeSupra: Open source Bitcoin miner based on the BM1368 ASIC
February 16, 2024, 13:31:44: 1 to cygan for Bitcoin commercials
February 16, 2024, 13:31:43: 1 to cygan for Re: Hodlonaut Trial
February 16, 2024, 13:31:42: 1 to OgNasty for 100 Push-Ups A Day Until Bitcoin Is $100K Challenge
February 16, 2024, 13:31:41: 1 to theymos for Re: My account was changed email
February 16, 2024, 13:31:40: 1 to LesLie_0300dbdd1b for Introducing a version field to BIP39 Mnemonic Phrases.
February 16, 2024, 13:31:40: 1 to ludo_ for Presentazione e due considerazioni su Bitcoin
February 16, 2024, 13:31:39: 1 to cmpeq for L2O - solving ordinal spam with ordinals
February 16, 2024, 13:31:38: 1 to HideYourKeys for Re: Securing Your Seed Phrase with Washers
February 16, 2024, 13:31:37: 1 to kayirigi for Re: Scammer lead developer resigns from honeypot Wasabi Wallet
February 16, 2024, 13:31:36: 1 to Su-asa for Can this be the start?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:35: 1 to Abdulzuruku01 for How do nodes confirm transactions and determine if a block is valid or not
February 16, 2024, 13:31:35: 1 to Makus for Newbies make una stop those off topic posts ASAP
February 16, 2024, 13:31:34: 1 to Agbamoni for Re: Is school really a scam?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:33: 1 to PytagoraZ for Re: [LOG] List Rank Up Member Indonesia (Member - Legendary)
February 16, 2024, 13:31:32: 1 to Ambatman for Social engineering a risk to security
February 16, 2024, 13:31:31: 1 to Hatchy for Re: Using QR codes as Bitcoin address protection
February 16, 2024, 13:31:30: 1 to Primo-bit for Re: WTB- Chinese Digital Yuan Card
February 16, 2024, 13:31:29: 1 to mrust_mobile for Re: The effect the mixer ban has had on the forum.
February 16, 2024, 13:31:29: 1 to mrust_mobile for [Rehber] Ödemeli imza kampanyasına katılmadan önce dikkat etmeniz gerekenler
February 16, 2024, 13:31:28: 1 to apogio for A simple BASH paper wallet generator
February 16, 2024, 13:31:27: 1 to Cheema02 for Re: Pakistan
February 16, 2024, 13:31:26: 1 to Volgastallion for 🏈🏈🏈🏈NFL FINALS - SUPER BOWL CONTEST 🏈🏈🏈🏈 [BTC PRIZE]
February 16, 2024, 13:31:25: 1 to Volgastallion for 🚀💰HALV-SEASON COMPETITION ⚽SPORTS⚽ + HALVING 🚀💰[PRIZEPOOL IN BTC] 🎉🎉🎉
February 16, 2024, 13:31:24: 1 to Turbartuluk for Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ...
February 16, 2024, 13:31:23: 1 to Humblevirus for Re: Buy the DIP, and HODL!
February 16, 2024, 13:31:23: 1 to Humblevirus for Re: Life is precious
February 16, 2024, 13:31:22: 1 to SirJohnVonSlotty for AMA: I Operate an Online Casino
February 16, 2024, 13:31:21: 1 to virginorange for Wie viel Bitcoin soll ich als deutscher Privatanleger kaufen?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:20: 1 to DYING_S0UL for [ভোটিং ২০২৩] বিটকয়েনটক কমিউনিটি এওয়ার্ড 🏆
February 16, 2024, 13:31:19: 1 to Learn Bitcoin for পোস্ট কোয়ালিটি ভালো করার ক্যাম্পেইন
February 16, 2024, 13:31:18: 1 to Gencecikmen for Tüm Zamanların En Çok Satan Telefonları
February 16, 2024, 13:31:17: 1 to paid2 for Bitcoin : vie privée et anonymat
February 16, 2024, 13:31:17: 1 to Gencecikmen for Şehirlerin Vergi Dağılımı 2023
February 16, 2024, 13:31:16: 1 to paid2 for Someone just sent 26 BTC to genesis block address
February 16, 2024, 13:31:15: 1 to Moreno233 for Re: You must have a source
February 16, 2024, 13:31:14: 1 to PrivacyG for To Leo and all who support Privacy & the original purpose of Bitcoin. Thank you
February 16, 2024, 13:31:13: 1 to Cricktor for Re: How is data integrity ensured on the bitcoin network
February 16, 2024, 13:31:12: 1 to ConcordeSST for Re: WTB- Chinese Digital Yuan Card
February 16, 2024, 13:31:11: 1 to W Jr. for Re: Türkçe Bölümü Aylık Merit ve Mesaj İstatistikleri
February 16, 2024, 13:31:11: 1 to CARIBBEAN_TREASURES for [FREE RAFFLE] CLOSED! Caribbean Treasures RARE Graded TEST STRIKE Giveaway!
February 16, 2024, 13:31:10: 1 to BlackHatCoiner for Re: Why do 95% of node runners refuse to undate their software?
February 16, 2024, 13:31:09: 1 to Peanutswar for [Translation] Bakit kailangan gamitin ng mamamayan ang SegWit addresses
February 16, 2024, 13:31:08: 1 to NotATether for DO NOT plug random cables and sticks into your device.
February 16, 2024, 13:31:07: 1 to Rikafip for Re: Godisnji pregled aktivnosti domaceg podforuma
February 16, 2024, 13:31:06: 1 to mandown for Pi Hole: Evinizde kullandığınız cihazlardaki reklamları engeller
February 16, 2024, 13:31:05: 1 to 1miau for [unterstützt von BC.Game] Gewinnspiel: Bundesliga-Tabellenspitze + Bitcoin-Preis
February 16, 2024, 13:31:05: 1 to CinErik for Re: BTC/USD ve BTC/TRY Fiyat Takibi, Spekülasyon, Tartışma Alanı
February 16, 2024, 13:31:04: 1 to 1miau for Re: [In Memoriam] Guess BTC price contest
February 16, 2024, 13:31:03: 1 to 1miau for Re: Bitcoin vs. Alts 2023
February 16, 2024, 13:31:02: 1 to mikeywith for Re: Hypothetical ETF disaster hardfork
February 16, 2024, 13:31:01: 1 to punk.zink for [Edukasi] Proses Transaksi & Block di Jaringan Blockchain Bitcoin
February 16, 2024, 13:31:00: 1 to Husna QA for Mengapa harus menggunakan alamat SegWit (Segregated Witness)
February 16, 2024, 13:31:00: 1 to Bthd for Re: Türkçe Bölümü Aylık Merit ve Mesaj İstatistikleri
February 16, 2024, 13:30:59: 1 to Husna QA for [Merit] Bitcoin Address Sign Message
February 16, 2024, 13:13:38: 2 to SFR10 for Re: Verifying a supposed Crypto site
February 16, 2024, 13:13:38: 2 to Xal0lex for Re: Lista no oficial de reglas (sí oficiales) del foro. Guías. FAQ.
February 16, 2024, 13:13:37: 2 to franky1 for Re: Craig Wight is not Satoshi Nakamoto, said the real Satoshi Nakamoto in Twitter
February 16, 2024, 13:13:36: 2 to SmartGold01 for Preventive measures not to lose your btc
February 16, 2024, 13:13:35: 2 to Hispo for Re: UK–se precisa aprobar un cuestionario para poder operar en Exchanges con cripto
February 16, 2024, 13:13:34: 2 to Don Pedro Dinero for Re: Elche - ayúdame con la entrega de flores (pago en bitcoins).
February 16, 2024, 13:13:33: 2 to Z_MBFM for Re: How to Download Bitcoin core with 60GB storage
February 16, 2024, 13:13:32: 2 to Dunamisx for Re: Hello Im new here and i can help you with privacy matters
February 16, 2024, 13:13:31: 2 to Mia Chloe for Re: Hello Im new here and i can help you with privacy matters
February 16, 2024, 13:13:31: 2 to Frankolala for Re: Hello Im new here and i can help you with privacy matters
February 16, 2024, 13:13:30: 2 to d5000 for Re: Discutamos sobre Nodos y Mineros
February 16, 2024, 13:13:29: 2 to seoincorporation for Discutamos sobre Nodos y Mineros
February 16, 2024, 13:13:28: 2 to Hispo for Re: Blockchain será la tendencia
February 16, 2024, 13:13:27: 2 to seoincorporation for Re: Blockchain será la tendencia
February 16, 2024, 13:13:26: 2 to Wapfika for [SOLVED]My account was changed email
February 16, 2024, 13:13:25: 2 to hilariousetc for Re: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial
February 16, 2024, 13:13:24: 2 to hilariousetc for Re: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial
February 16, 2024, 13:13:24: 2 to hilariousetc for Re: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial
February 16, 2024, 13:13:23: 2 to hilariousetc for Re: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial
February 16, 2024, 13:13:22: 2 to hilariousetc for Re: Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial
February 16, 2024, 13:13:21: 2 to hilariousetc for Updates from the COPA v Craig Wright trial
February 16, 2024, 13:13:20: 2 to BALIK for Newbies be aware, don't fall into the trap of getting high ROI in Bull Market
February 16, 2024, 13:13:19: 2 to OmegaStarScream for Re: Can't Find The Seed Phrase of My Atomic Wallet
February 16, 2024, 13:13:19: 2 to Cantsay for Re: Anybody around here who is a frequent user of bitlet.net?
February 16, 2024, 13:13:18: 2 to Stalker22 for Re: Bitcointalk is Broken for me and I have No idea how to fix it
February 16, 2024, 13:13:17: 2 to paddy_exchange for Re: Qué exchanges se recomiendan en España
February 16, 2024, 13:13:16: 2 to Nalain420 for تقرير النشاط السنوي وأيضًا مقارنة بين أنش
February 16, 2024, 13:13:15: 2 to Jating for [Warning] USB Malware that targets crypto wallets
February 16, 2024, 13:13:14: 2 to Shawshank for Re: Ayer conocimos que 50K BTCs fueron incautados, hoy conocemos otro caso: 61K BTCs
February 16, 2024, 13:13:13: 2 to Jating for [Warning] AllaKore RAT Targets Mexican Banks and Cryptocurrency Platforms
February 16, 2024, 13:13:13: 2 to hosseinimr93 for Re: Logged out and Logged in on my bitcointalk acct
February 16, 2024, 13:13:12: 2 to nc50lc for Re: Which wallets support 32 word seed phrases
February 16, 2024, 13:13:11: 2 to d5000 for El "dip" de comienzos de la semana: posibles explicaciones
February 16, 2024, 13:13:10: 2 to darxiaomi for Re: Una encuesta del Deutsche Bank indica que hay pesimismo en el horizonte
February 16, 2024, 13:13:09: 2 to ScamViruS for [Warning] Trezor users are receiving fake emails with phishing links.
February 16, 2024, 13:13:08: 2 to Despairo for Re: Coinbase block information
February 16, 2024, 13:13:07: 2 to Porfirii for Re: España – más de 17.000 afectados por estafas con criptomonedas
February 16, 2024, 13:13:06: 2 to Jating for Phemedrone Stealer targeting crypto wallets, do not click URL shorteners
February 16, 2024, 13:13:06: 2 to Hispo for Re: España – más de 17.000 afectados por estafas con criptomonedas
February 16, 2024, 13:13:05: 2 to o_e_l_e_o for Farewell
February 16, 2024, 13:13:04: 2 to JeromeTash for Re: I'm New To Crypto - Been Scammed - What Do You Think Of This Crypto Recovery Ser
February 16, 2024, 13:13:03: 2 to Jennifer000 for Re: I'm New To Crypto - Been Scammed - What Do You Think Of This Crypto Recovery Ser
February 16, 2024, 13:13:02: 2 to dzungmobile for Re: Question about images.
February 16, 2024, 13:13:01: 2 to cafter for Newbies be aware of this "exchange" type of scam.
February 16, 2024, 13:13:00: 2 to d5000 for Re: El precio del bitcoin de 1,5 millones de dólares significa el colapso de la econ
February 16, 2024, 13:12:59: 2 to BitMaxz for Re: BTC transactions unconfirmed for nearly 2 months. Can't find help.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:59: 2 to Porfirii for Re: El precio del bitcoin de 1,5 millones de dólares significa el colapso de la econ
February 16, 2024, 13:12:58: 2 to Yamane_Keto for Re: BTC transactions unconfirmed for nearly 2 months. Can't find help.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:57: 2 to Sploochy for BTC transactions unconfirmed for nearly 2 months. Can't find help.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:56: 2 to Don Pedro Dinero for Re: Os cuento cómo van las cosas por el otro foro.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:55: 2 to Porfirii for Re: Os cuento cómo van las cosas por el otro foro.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:54: 2 to darxiaomi for Re: Google y Twitter publicitan webs de phishing, con casi 60M $ drenados en cripto
February 16, 2024, 13:12:53: 2 to Hispo for Re: Un hacker intenta vender un (supuesto) acceso privilegiado a Binance
February 16, 2024, 13:12:53: 2 to seoincorporation for Re: Google y Twitter publicitan webs de phishing, con casi 60M $ drenados en cripto
February 16, 2024, 13:12:52: 2 to Porfirii for Re: ¿Alguien confía en buen grado en el Sistema de Confianza (Trust) del foro?
February 16, 2024, 13:12:51: 2 to Don Pedro Dinero for Re: ¿Alguien confía en buen grado en el Sistema de Confianza (Trust) del foro?
February 16, 2024, 13:12:50: 2 to darbitmobilerecovery for Re: Javier Milei y Criptos, lo que se viene.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:49: 2 to Silberman for Re: Javier Milei y Criptos, lo que se viene.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:48: 2 to Hispo for Re: Javier Milei y Criptos, lo que se viene.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:47: 2 to darbitmobilerecovery for Re: Javier Milei y Criptos, lo que se viene.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:47: 2 to d5000 for Re: Javier Milei y Criptos, lo que se viene.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:46: 2 to d5000 for Re: VACA MUERTA MINERIA TRADICIONAL Y MINERIA CRYPTO
February 16, 2024, 13:12:45: 2 to Shawshank for Re: Generacion Billeteras Frías / Cold Wallet
February 16, 2024, 13:12:44: 2 to albert0bsd for Re: Generacion Billeteras Frías / Cold Wallet
February 16, 2024, 13:12:43: 2 to Hispo for Re: Invertir y operar con inteligencia artificial (AI)
February 16, 2024, 13:12:42: 2 to joker_josue for Re: TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk
February 16, 2024, 13:12:41: 2 to Porfirii for Re: La Hacienda de España añade foco en los criptoactivos susceptibles de embargo
February 16, 2024, 13:12:40: 2 to d5000 for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:39: 2 to Hispo for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:38: 2 to d5000 for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:37: 2 to d5000 for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:37: 2 to d5000 for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:36: 2 to d5000 for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:35: 2 to d5000 for Re: Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ...
February 16, 2024, 13:12:34: 2 to d5000 for Re: ¿Podrían los mineros de BTC tener problemas de graves tras el próximo halving?
February 16, 2024, 13:12:33: 2 to Hispo for Re: Sim swapping – lo oímos menos últimamente, pero sigue existiendo
February 16, 2024, 13:12:32: 2 to d5000 for Re: ¿Cuántos usuarios tiene Bitcoin? Estimaciones actualizadas
February 16, 2024, 13:12:31: 2 to d5000 for Re: [2024|Se Avecina... Halving
February 16, 2024, 13:12:31: 2 to famososMuertos for Re: [Diciembre 2023|Se Avecina... el 20(24): Regalo de Navidad, ATH ✨👀🎁
February 16, 2024, 13:12:30: 2 to famososMuertos for Re: Atascado! no, ¿atascado? si, no confirmado.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:29: 2 to darbitmobilerecovery for Re: Atascado! no, ¿atascado? si, no confirmado.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:28: 2 to darbitmobilerecovery for Re: Atascado! no, ¿atascado? si, no confirmado.
February 16, 2024, 13:12:27: 2 to famososMuertos for Re: [LISTA] Campañas de firmas que permiten postear aquí
February 16, 2024, 13:12:26: 2 to famososMuertos for Re: El número de ballenas Bitcoin está aumentando, y eso es bueno para BTC
February 16, 2024, 13:12:25: 3 to Rikafip for Re: [CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity
February 16, 2024, 13:12:25: 3 to Rikafip for Re: [CHARTS] Brief monthly overview of the local boards activity
February 16, 2024, 13:12:24: 2 to Rikafip for Re: Merit source observations
February 16, 2024, 13:12:23: 2 to Coin-1 for Re: [TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks!
February 16, 2024, 12:59:35: 2 to BitCam24 for Re: Verifying a supposed Crypto site
February 16, 2024, 12:53:39: 2 to nakamura12 for Re: Can't log into freebitco.in is it ok?
February 16, 2024, 12:53:06: 2 to OmegaStarScream for Re: Can't log into freebitco.in is it ok?<<<<

I will work hard to be admitted back into the @ddmrddmr merit spree and be more proactive next time!

If you are successful in your endeavor to be received back into DdmrDdmr's embraces, you might need to start a thread entitled something like:  "Everything that you wanted to know about 'How to successfully kiss butt with enthusiasm' but were afraid to ask."

 

[/list][/list]

[Lucius]

Wow, this was by far the spree I am reporting with more delay.
Long gone were the days when I started updating the spree while it was still ongoing.
The reason for this is because of the 280 merits our mutual friend distributed. Not a single one landed on your truly meritband, so it went unnoticed.
My bad; I have to improve my post quality, apparently.

It seems that this also had to happen once, and now at least you know how those who mostly get nothing in merit rains like this feel. I got 1, just enough to avoid category zero - but obviously we will have to try much harder in the future

As the great Torrente would say ¡A trabajar, vagos!

[fillippone]

<Usual JJG Wall of Text>

That escalated quickly.

If you are successful in your endeavor to be received back into DdmrDdmr's embraces, you might need to start a thread entitled something like:  "Everything that you wanted to know about 'How to successfully kiss butt with enthusiasm' but were afraid to ask."

 

[/list][/list]

Ouch.
Savage.

It seems that this also had to happen once, and now at least you know how those who mostly get nothing in merit rains like this feel. I got 1, just enough to avoid category zero - but obviously we will have to try much harder in the future

As the great Torrente would say ¡A trabajar, vagos!

Rest assured I appreciate and I care of every single merit I receive.

[WatChe]

Well, the context of my specific assertion about "not getting nuttin" was that I was attempting to refer to DdmrDdmr's latest merit sending spree that would have had been in the last 24 hours (at the time of this post)...

So if I follow your suggestion, and I look at my received merits in the past 120 days, if I am reading this correctly, then I can see that the last time that DdmrDdmr had sent me any merits was on December 8, 2023.. and sure.. not that I am complaining or even begging for that matter..... ... .yet..   See Exhibit A

>>>>>December 08, 2023, 12:02:34: 1 from DdmrDdmr for JJG's Bitcoin Investment Ideas (Sustainable Withdrawal / Portfolio Maintenance)
December 08, 2023, 11:44:15: 2 from DdmrDdmr for Re: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits<<<<<

As far as DdmrDdmr's recently sent merits (from yesterday), it appears that he sent several hundred merits (280 according to fillippone, which fillippone more or less characterized as whimpy, without using such word.. no wonder fillippone is not receiving any smerits from DdmrDdmr, #nohomo) in a relatively short period of time in a couple of bursts, and the user name of this here cat is not contained within that.

My bad for not understanding the context correctly. It's true that DdmrDdmr is not generous when it comes to sending merits to JayJuanGee. But you do have a lengthy list of Merits that you received in last 120 days and soon you will be member of club that have 10k merits.

Yesterday, DdmrDdmr did 197 transactions related to merits sending that lasted for 39 minutes approximately.

Between how DdmrDdmr send so many merits in shot span of time? He do that manually or he has some script that do that job.

[JayJuanGee]

Well, the context of my specific assertion about "not getting nuttin" was that I was attempting to refer to DdmrDdmr's latest merit sending spree that would have had been in the last 24 hours (at the time of this post)...

So if I follow your suggestion, and I look at my received merits in the past 120 days, if I am reading this correctly, then I can see that the last time that DdmrDdmr had sent me any merits was on December 8, 2023.. and sure.. not that I am complaining or even begging for that matter..... ... .yet..   See Exhibit A
>>>>>December 08, 2023, 12:02:34: 1 from DdmrDdmr for JJG's Bitcoin Investment Ideas (Sustainable Withdrawal / Portfolio Maintenance)
December 08, 2023, 11:44:15: 2 from DdmrDdmr for Re: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits<<<<<

As far as DdmrDdmr's recently sent merits (from yesterday), it appears that he sent several hundred merits (280 according to fillippone, which fillippone more or less characterized as whimpy, without using such word.. no wonder fillippone is not receiving any smerits from DdmrDdmr, #nohomo) in a relatively short period of time in a couple of bursts, and the user name of this here cat is not contained within that.

My bad for not understanding the context correctly. It's true that DdmrDdmr is not generous when it comes to sending merits to JayJuanGee.

I am surely not complaining about not receiving merits from DdmrDdmr.. He is number 7 in my top 10 list of members who sent merits to my historical posts.. . and so therefore he is recommended by 7 out of 10 dentists (that was a slogan for a chewing gum commercial)....


https://bpip.org/Profile?p=JayJuanGee

But you do have a lengthy list of Merits that you received in last 120 days and soon you will be member of club that have 10k merits.

I can't complain about that, either.

Yesterday, DdmrDdmr did 197 transactions related to merits sending that lasted for 39 minutes approximately.

Between how DdmrDdmr send so many merits in shot span of time? He do that manually or he has some script that do that job.

I am pretty sure that he has described his process as the use of some kind of script, and yeah there could be some manual components in terms of setting it up and various ways to tweak and/or to prescreen.. but sometimes it might not be good for our health to ask too many questions regarding the secret sauces involved in terms of details about how the sausage is made.

[Lucius]

~snip~
Rest assured I appreciate and I care of every single merit I receive.

Me too, because I'm not MS and every received merit means a lot to me because I'll be able to reward someone for a good post, so I try to always have a few sMerits. I hope that your merit band will report a lot of good news in the future

[WatChe]

I am surely not complaining about not receiving merits from DdmrDdmr.. He is number 7 in my top 10 list of members who sent merits to my historical posts.. . and so therefore he is recommended by 7 out of 10 dentists (that was a slogan for a chewing gum commercial)....


https://bpip.org/Profile?p=JayJuanGee

Overall he is generous on you but lost that kindness in last 120 days. You can check why it is so

I am pretty sure that he has described his process as the use of some kind of script, and yeah there could be some manual components in terms of setting it up and various ways to tweak and/or to prescreen.. but sometimes it might not be good for our health to ask too many questions regarding the secret sauces involved in terms of details about how the sausage is made.

It's fine as long as he is doing that himself. We have a bot in the form of ChartBuddy and it's best that we restrict bots numbers to one only.

[Upgrade00]

Rest assured I appreciate and I care of every single merit I receive.

I generally thought that after hitting legendary rank one would stop checking or getting excited when they receive a merit, but that's not the case at all, at least not for me. It also helps that it allows one merit others.

I am surely not complaining about not receiving merits from DdmrDdmr.. He is number 7 in my top 10 list of members who sent merits to my historical posts.. . and so therefore he is recommended by 7 out of 10 dentists (that was a slogan for a chewing gum commercial)....

I thought it was 9 out of 10?

[skarais]

Rest assured I appreciate and I care of every single merit I receive.

I generally thought that after hitting legendary rank one would stop checking or getting excited when they receive a merit, but that's not the case at all, at least not for me. It also helps that it allows one merit others.

That's right. Some Legendaries may no longer maintain their quality because merit no longer matters to them. I have a different mindset, I care about the merit system and I want to contribute to many users (especially to my local board users) and help them rank up. That's why I try my best to maintain my quality and contribution even though lately I lack the sMerit to help them much.

Some users have a strange mindset in my opinion. They rarely send merit to Legendary because they think Legendary doesn't need merit. I often remind my local board users about this and I expect them to send merit to anyone regardless of rank and of course on quality posts.

[Upgrade00]

Some users have a strange mindset in my opinion. They rarely send merit to Legendary because they think Legendary doesn't need merit. I often remind my local board users about this and I expect them to send merit to anyone regardless of rank and of course on quality posts.

That would be just a small percentage of the forum, cause in my observation, legendary members gets a higher percentage of merits even though they make up the lowest number by ranks.

[JayJuanGee]

I am surely not complaining about not receiving merits from DdmrDdmr.. He is number 7 in my top 10 list of members who sent merits to my historical posts.. . and so therefore he is recommended by 7 out of 10 dentists (that was a slogan for a chewing gum commercial)....

I thought it was 9 out if 10?

You are right.  I am probably not remembering very well..

And here is a funny variation of the commercial from 2006.. and in that commercial they are saying 4 out of 5 dentists... so that 4 out of 5 might have had been the historical claim of the commercial... another funny thing is that it is a compromise position between the two of us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMatKgI9hCs

[Upgrade00]

<snip>

I just assume the final dentist is there to maintain balance and heep the companies on their toes to keep improving. Then when I overthink it, I think it's a gimmick; they expect the public to call their bluff if they say all dentists recommend it, so they say 9 out of 10, which has a ring to it.

[JayJuanGee]

<snip>

I just assume the final dentist is there to maintain balance and heep the companies on their toes to keep improving. Then when I overthink it, I think it's a gimmick; they expect the public to call their bluff if they say all dentists recommend it, so they say 9 out of 10, which has a ring to it.

We are lied to in a lot of ways including very essential facts that do not add up with actual math and actual science.

Today on Saifedean Ammous's podcast, I was listening to a scientist (Dr. Willie Soon) talk about his frustrations with mainstream science that frequently is not backed up by actual numbers.

[fillippone]

I am lagging even more than the last time.
I am on the lazy side of the event. There have been many times when I rushed to the forum station only to update this report.
Last time, I wasn't involved in the sprees; this time, I was barely scratched, yet I had to find a time slot to analyse this all.
I promise to be more reactive next time.
First things first!

Official @ddmrddmr thread



First, the usual the usual spreadsheet, where you see the two last sprees:



As you can see, the addition of the total merits per in the paired TICK-TOCK sprees has already underlined a new record: this is the smallest merit-circulating spree since launch.
As this last one is by far the smallest on record, either @ddmrddmr has become more efficient at distributing merits the traditional ways, or he's saving merits for later!

Merit Spree #51 by @ddmrddrmr

Official Description:

Version 51 - 25/03/2024  (76 posts merited (by me) in just over 1 minute) -> 154 sMerits
Remerited all my merited posts since my last spree (+ some backlogged pending ones), for non-banned users (up until last friday ).

My review:


TICK: This is an almost perfect reply of merit spree #50. Small-sized double-meriting spree.
Textbook TICK Spree.

Here's the TOP10:

Code:

1.  d5000                 24	
2.  Hispo                 16	
3.  hilariousetc          10	
4.  darbitmobilerecovery  10	
5.  Don Pedro Dinero      8	
6.  Porfirii              6	
7.  mocacinno             4	
7.  GreenInk              4	
7.  franky1               4	
7.  famososMuertos        4	
7.  dominguero            4	
7.  Amphenomenon          4	

Compared to Merit Spree #47, the numbers to enter the TOP10 are higher, which is quite usual. Only 4 merits to enter the chart, topped yet another time by @d5000, with 24 merits, getting just shy of his record of 30 in merits spree #47. Shall I start taking note of who's topping this chart more often?

That's all folks for Merits Spree 51!

Merit Spree #52 by @ddmrddrmr

Official description:

Version 52 - 25/03/2024 96 posts merited (by me) in just under 2 minutes) -> 96 sMerits
Merited all posts that:
- I have not merited before.
- Have received merits from at least five different people since february 2024.
- Are not in Services nor in WO nor in off-topic.
- Are not in thread IDs: 5253221, 5156376, 5445913, 5485091, 5485659, 5485801, 5486754
The goal is to merit post I have either ignored or not come across in boards I do not visit, and that others seem to deem merit worthy, allowing me to unload a bunch of sMerits in the process.

My review:

TOCK This second spree was by far the smallest of the bunch: roughly half the size of merit spree 48 and similar, yet smaller than 50. It was a small-sized single merit spree. As I said, maybe it is difficult to find a post satisfying the criteria, or maybe @ddmrddmr is saving merit for later, so I tend to lean toward this one.

Here's the TOP10:

Code:

1.  paid2           3	
1.  nutildah        3	
3.  Moreno233       3	
4.  DannyHamilton   3	
5.  promise444c5    2	
5.  PowerGlove      2	
5.  Pmalek          2	
5.  LoyceV          2	
5.  Humblevirus     2	
5.  Gencecikmen     2	
5.  Etranger        2	
5.  cygan           2	
5.  BlackHatCoiner  2	
5.  apogio          2	
5.  $weetne$$       2	

Being a single merits spree, numbers are lower: 3 merits to top the chart and 2 to enter the TOP10.
I will start getting merit statistics for a single merits spree! So 11 merits are the highest on record for a single merits spree! (merit spree 44!), and these 3 merits are the lowest required on the record, together with spree #44, #46 and #48: wen two?

Time to call it a day!

I will work hard to be admitted back into the @ddmrddmr merit spree and be more proactive next time!
I must admit that the 50 merit spree is quite an extensive effort by our Spanish entity.

See you at the next merit spree!

[fillippone]

Oh, here he comes!



This time I saw the spree as it happened.
I am smiling on the crowd, again.

[JiiBs]

Oh, here he comes!

This time I saw the spree as it happened.
I am smiling on the crowd, again.

That’s some fun image, lol… I suppose that’s you in the corner with a unicorn corn on your head, observing all the fun while on your device. I could really be that at times, just before I choose to get in on the party and go gaga but,

Will you tell them what’s going on, naaahhh, don’t crash the party!

Is that your device even or your cup of the Italian special Amaretto.

[fillippone]

Even if I caught the spree in real time, I am lagging as I am not an AI and I had something carbon-based to care about.
But I enjoyed the fact I was able to intercept the spree even before it stopped dumping merits on me!

Official @ddmrddmr thread



First, the usual the usual spreadsheet, where you see the two last sprees:



According to the total merits per pair of TICK-TOCK sprees, this is the new (lower) record since its inception.

As I said last month, @ddmrddmr has become more efficient at distributing merits in the traditional way, or he's saving merits for later! I honestly am rooting for the first option!

Merit Spree #53 by @ddmrddrmr

Official Description:

Version 53 - 04/05/2024  (76 posts merited (by me) in just over 1 minute) -> 156 sMerits
Remerited all my merited posts since my last spree (+ some backlogged pending ones), for non-banned users (up until last Friday ).

My review:


TICK: This is an almost perfect reply of merit spree #52. Smaller-sized double-meriting spree.
Textbook TICK Spree.
Smallest on record, the machinery is well perfectioned, with sheer efficiency.

Here's the TOP10:

Code:

1.  d5000                 24	
2.  Hispo                 14	
3.  famososMuertos        14	
4.  darbitmobilerecovery  10	
5.  Don Pedro Dinero      8	
6.  Rikafip               6	
6.  Porfirii              6	
6.  fillippone            6	
9.  Unknown Op            4	
9.  seoincorporation      4	
9.  PX-Z                  4	
9.  nc50lc                4	
9.  Amphenomenon          4		

Compared to Merit Spree #51, the numbers to enter the TOP10 are higher, which is quite usual. Only 4 merits to enter the chart, topped yet another time by @d5000, once more time topping the chart with the usual 24 merits, getting just shy of his record of 30 in merits spree #47. Shall I start taking note of who's topping this chart more often?

That's all folks for Merits Spree 53!

Merit Spree #54 by @ddmrddrmr

Official description:

Version 54 - 04/05/2024 78 posts merited (by me) in just over 1 minute) -> 78 sMerits
Merited all posts that:
- I have not merited before.
- Have received merits from at least five different people since april 2024.
- Are not in Services nor in WO nor in off-topic.
- Are not in thread IDs: 5253221, 5156376, 5445913, 5485091, 5485659, 5485801, 5486754
The goal is to merit post I have either ignored or not come across in boards I do not visit, and that others seem to deem merit worthy, allowing me to unload a bunch of sMerits in the process.

My review:

TOCK This second spree was again the smallest of the bunch, right smaller than #52. For the first time, the spree TICK and the spree TOCK had roughly the same number of TXs. This spree was a "single one", as you can see from the spreadsheet and the chart of the most merited users,

Here's the TOP10:

Code:

1.  paid2            7
2.  PowerGlove       3
3.  achow101         3
4.  TryNinja         2
5.  theymos          2
5.  gagux123         2
5.  BlackHatCoiner   2
5.  7juju            2
5.  _act_            2

Being a single merits spree, numbers are lower: 7 merits to top the chart and 2 to enter the TOP10.
Paid2 once again topped the chart; what is his secret for this consistency?
 
I will start getting merit statistics for a single merits spree! So 11 merits are the highest on record for a single merits spree! (merit spree 44!), and these 3 merits are the lowest required on the record, together with spree #44, #46 and #48: wen two?

Time to call it a day!


See you at the next merit spree!

[fillippone]

I am horrendously late reviewing this, but I will come with a couple of bonus on that.


Official @ddmrddmr thread



First, the usual the usual spreadsheet, where you see the two last sprees:



According to the total merits per pair of TICK-TOCK sprees, this is the new (lower) record since its inception, beating the already small number of last month.

I can definitely say that @ddmrddmr has become more efficient at distributing merits in the traditional way, so his "automated" runs are becoming smaller and smaller.

Merit Spree #55 by @ddmrddrmr

Official Description:

Version 55 - 09/06/2024  (39 posts merited (by me) in just under 1 minute) -> 80 sMerits
Remerited all my merited posts since my last spree (+ some backlogged pending ones), for non-banned users (up until last friday ).

My review:


TICK: An incredibly fast paced merit spree: 3.33 merits per secondo is definitely a record for the merit spree analysis, and I guess record overall.
The relatively small number of merits helped attaining  an high sustained rate, without getting blocked by proxies.

Smallest on record, sheer efficiency, ultra condensed beauty

Here's the TOP10:

Code:

1.  d5000             26	
2.  Porfirii          6	
3.  famososMuertos    6	
4.  Hispo             4	
5.  Rikafip           3	
5.  fillippone        3	
7.  Yaunfitda         2	
7.  Unknown Op        2	
7.  seoincorporation  2	
7.  Obim34            2	
7.  Nalain420         2	
7.  mocacinno         2	
7.  MA40              2	
7.  Jawhead999        2	
7.  icopress          2	
7.  Helena Yu         2	
7.  Don Pedro Dinero  2	
7.  Dave1             2	
7.  Crypto Library    2	
7.  Crypt0Gore        2	
7.  bitboy           2	
7.  Amphenomenon     2			

Compared to Merit Spree #53, the numbers to enter the TOP10 is quite low, given the number of merited profiles. Only 2 merits to enter the chart, topped yet another time by @d5000, once more time topping the chart with the 26 merits, getting just shy of his record of 30 in merits spree #47.

That's all folks for Merits Spree 55!

Merit Spree #56 by @ddmrddrmr

Official description:

Version 56 - 09/05/2024 105 posts merited (by me) in just under 2 minutes) -> 105 sMerits
Merited all posts that:
- I have not merited before.
- Have received merits from at least five different people since may 2024.
- Are not in Services nor in WO nor in off-topic.
- Are not in a bunch of threads I've discarded.
The goal is to merit post I have either ignored or not come across in boards I do not visit, and that others seem to deem merit worthy, allowing me to unload a bunch of sMerits in the process.

My review:

TOCK This second spree was again the smallest of the bunch, right smaller than #52. For the first time, the spree TICK and the spree TOCK had roughly the same number of TXs. This spree was a "single one", as you can see from the spreadsheet and the chart of the most merited users,

Here's the TOP10:

Code:

1.  theymos           3	
1.  cygan             3	
3.  Adiljutt156       3	
4.  vjudeu            2	
5.  Stablexcoin       2	
5.  sportsbet.io      2	
5.  Solosanz          2	
5.  RaltcoinsB        2	
5.  r_victory         2	
5.  lovesmayfamilis   2	
5.  JunaidAzizi       2	
5.  icopress          2	
5.  hosseinimr93      2	
5.  dkbit98           2	

Being a single merits spree, numbers are lower: 3 merits to top the chart and 2 to enter the TOP10.
Paid2 for once is not even in the top10, which is topped by Teymos, cyan and Adiljutt156.
 
I will start getting merit statistics for a single merits spree! So 11 merits are the highest on record for a single merits spree! (merit spree 44!), and these 3 merits are the lowest required on the record, together with spree #44, #46 and #48, #51: wen two?


Bonus number one:
I decided to thank ddmrddmr for his continuous effort in the merit distribution:
I will keep the number of merits awarded to his thread on par with the merit spree:



I have some room left!

During the pizza contest, two users showered merits on participants.
Here how their efforts compares to the one of our Spanish AI:




Loyce Merited 8 merits for the vast majority of users, with some exceptions, I won't report here not to influence anyone.
Same diet ABCBits.

You can clearly see how difficult is to efficiently perform a merit distribution...


Time to call it a day!

See you at the next merit spree!