Tracking the Trust System's Stupid Shit

[suchmoon]

I just agree with his opinion

Sending merits because you agree with his opinion? I hope you're not a merit source.

[Vod]

I just agree with his opinion

Sending merits because you agree with his opinion? I hope you're not a merit source.

I agree with that, and I was tempted to merit you, but that would mean I'm begging for trust, according to OG...

[Lesbian Cow]

I trust you with money, 100%.  I do not trust your judgement of others anymore.  You honestly feel it was ok for Quickseller to escrow, for a fee, trades involving one of his alt accounts.  That is messed up man, and you should know it. 

This is some messed up logic. Money changes everything. Friendships get destroyed because of money issues. Monetary trust is the highest form of trust. That's why sites with feedback systems sees this as a vital part of their service. Even Bitcointalk USED TO allude to monetary trust (Trade with caution red tag).

Theymos should remove that statement in the red tag. It's a lie. The Trust System has become "How I feel about this user." How Millennial.

You have not read anything.  I have no red tag on OgNasty.  I have never left them negative trust.

I have excluded them from my personal trust list as I do not trust their opinions of others as they support Quickseller who admittedly stole escrow fees from trusting customers.

[OgNasty]

So you learned how to fail and built your ponzi mining operation?  

Keep digging.



When will you be unveiling the new algorithm for BPIP?  I know you can't be happy as the #23 most recognized account.  Gotta cherrypick that data a little better.

I just agree with his opinion

Sending merits because you agree with his opinion? I hope you're not a merit source.

You're right, I should only merit posts with incorrect information from now on.   

[Vod]

When will you be unveiling the new algorithm for BPIP?  I know you can't be happy as the #23 most recognized account.  Gotta cherrypick that data a little better.

What do you suggest?  I could learn a thing or two about deception from you.

New algorithms coming start of June.  

[OgNasty]

When will you be unveiling the new algorithm for BPIP?  I know you can't be happy as the #23 most recognized account.  Gotta cherrypick that data a little better.

What do you suggest?  I could learn a thing or two about deception from you.

New algorithms coming start of June.  

Leaving fraudulent feedback for those rated above you while spreading lies about them is a bold move, let's see how it plays out for you.

[Vod]

When will you be unveiling the new algorithm for BPIP?  I know you can't be happy as the #23 most recognized account.  Gotta cherrypick that data a little better.

What do you suggest?  I could learn a thing or two about deception from you.

New algorithms coming start of June.  

Leaving fraudulent feedback for those rated above you is a bold move, let's see how it plays out for you.

Running a failing ponzi that is losing income and gaining mouths is a stupid move, let's see how it plays out for you. 

[suchmoon]

I just agree with his opinion

Sending merits because you agree with his opinion? I hope you're not a merit source.

You're right, I should only merit posts with incorrect information from now on.   

You're supposed to merit good posts, not because you agree with user's opinion. I'm sure Quickseller will support me on that, he is against "groupthink". Also:

I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

[Quickseller]

Quickseller at least refunded the users he wronged... 

No, he didn't.

That is an explicit, intentional lie.

You very clearly have no understanding what it means to have integrity -- you make excuses and provide cover for those who steal from others (but help you), and you lie about those who are critical of you.

You are a disgrace to Bitcoin and to this forum. 

[OgNasty]

You're supposed to merit good posts, not because you agree with user's opinion. I'm sure Quickseller will support me on that, he is against "groupthink". Also:

I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

It was a good post I felt was high quality, and I agreed with it.  Not just a post I agreed with.  Seems that fits theymos description exactly and you're trying to turn nothing into something.  I wonder why?  Are you really threatened by me being a Merit Source?

Running a failing ponzi that is losing income and gaining mouths is a stupid move, let's see how it plays out for you.  

Losing income?    Please explain how it's possible for NastyFans to lose income.  You wouldn't be telling lies that are impossible would you?  You are also aware that no new investors are needed to continue paying NastyFans members right?  I'm not sure if you're ignorant of what a Ponzi is, or ignorant of what NastyFans does.  Who are we kidding, you're just spouting lies to try and get me to give you a negative so you can have justification for your trust and cannot answer my questions proposed here without looking completely foolish.  I'd love to see you try though.  We'll just get another fingers in the ears crying child post though.  That's Vod.

Keep shoveling!  You're striking gold!

[Lesbian Cow]

Quickseller at least refunded the users he wronged... 

No, he didn't.

That is an explicit, intentional lie.

You very clearly have no understanding what it means to have integrity -- you make excuses and provide cover for those who steal from others (but help you), and you lie about those who are critical of you.

You are a disgrace to Bitcoin and to this forum. 

Quickseller, to be clear, you used your Quickseller account to escrow trades involving Panthers52, your alt account.  You collected fees for those trades.   How is that not a scam?

[Vod]

Running a failing ponzi that is losing income and gaining mouths is a stupid move, let's see how it plays out for you.  

Losing income?    Please explain how it's possible for NastyFans to lose income.

Every month profits go down bozo... your income is decreasing.

You are also aware that no new investors are needed to continue paying NastyFans members right?  

Of course.   You used value from your investors to build a small income that is decreasing.

Even if you recruit no new suckers, you still pay your old bills/debts from new money.

That's why you asked me how many shares it would take to get your ponzi logo on my site.    Remember when you told me your equipment badly needed maintenance?

That is a ponzi.   Yours is failing.  

[OgNasty]

Every month profits go down bozo... your income is decreasing.

Of course.   You used value from your investors to build a small income that is decreasing.

Even if you recruit no new suckers, you still pay your old bills/debts from new money.

That's why you asked me how many shares it would take to get your ponzi logo on my site.    Remember when you told me your equipment badly needed maintenance?

That is a ponzi.   Yours is failing.  

Funds donated to BPIP.org = 0.014 BTC
Funds donated to NastyFans = 729.38 BTC

Solar array, wind turbine, Tesla Powerwall, pedal generator, 84th/s in new miners, wow!  Our mining operation is stronger than ever and in a great position for future growth...  Just a reminder that I raised the initial investment for NastyMining on GLBSE with the promise I would provide 1mh/s per seat and I will soon be providing nearly 3GH/s per seat along with some altcoin mining hashrate, not to mention the coin sales!  All of the other GLBSE operations completely folded costing investors everything and when the S17 arrives I'll be providing nearly 3,000 times my promise plus additional benefits!  That's a success in my book.  By all means though, keep trying to spread your lies about the 1 organization that has survived the test of time.

[Vod]

Solar array, wind turbine, Tesla Powerwall, pedal generator,\

So you are using ponzi funds to improve your personal land...  :/

Funds donated to BPIP.org = 0.014 BTC
Funds donated to NastyFans = 729.38 BTC

BPIP.org OWES $0
NastyFans OWES $forever

I think I win.  

(Do you also believe you donate to the lottery, or do you expect some value from it?)

[actisstupidname]

You have not read anything.  I have no red tag on OgNasty.  I have never left them negative trust.

I never said you placed a red tag on OgNasty. I was speaking in generalities. I have no skin in this. For all I care, I should have probably stick in my neck of the woods in this forum.

I have excluded them from my personal trust list as I do not trust their opinions of others as they support Quickseller who admittedly stole escrow fees from trusting customers.

Precisely why the trust system is stupid. You actively excluded someone because of their opinions? Yet you trust him with money? You could just ignore him with neutrality, no positive/negative feedback or no inclusion/exclusion in trust lists. This really sounds like politics to me. Anyway, it's your privilege given by the forum's messed up trust system.

Let's call a spade a spade. This is all politics and propaganda.

[marcotheminer]

Quickseller at least refunded the users he wronged... 

No, he didn't.

That is an explicit, intentional lie.

You very clearly have no understanding what it means to have integrity -- you make excuses and provide cover for those who steal from others (but help you), and you lie about those who are critical of you.

You are a disgrace to Bitcoin and to this forum. 

Quickseller, to be clear, you used your Quickseller account to escrow trades involving Panthers52, your alt account.  You collected fees for those trades.   How is that not a scam?

I wouldn't call it a scam but it's extremely unethical and opens the door TO a scam, yes. Damn - I didn't know about this those - time to do some catch up on the year I missed. This place is always pumping out something new it seems.

[Vod]

Damn - I didn't know about this those

Well, why do you think so many profiles have left him negative feedback?

He'll have you believe it's a conspiracy, but he is just a digital con man. 

[OgNasty]

Funds donated to BPIP.org = 0.014 BTC
Funds donated to NastyFans = 729.38 BTC

BPIP.org OWES $0
NastyFans OWES $forever

I think I win. 

NastyFans is a proof of concept organization that displays the sort of transparency possible with Bitcoin while also offering innovative products and approaches to solving regulatory issues plaguing crypto organizations.

BPIP.org is a website with a rating system you manipulate to stroke your ego and provides no interaction with the blockchain or use of Bitcoin whatsoever.  

Clearly you win.  

I didn't realize we were in competition, but now your trust abuse makes more sense when viewed from your delusional perspective.

[marcotheminer]

Funds donated to BPIP.org = 0.014 BTC
Funds donated to NastyFans = 729.38 BTC

BPIP.org OWES $0
NastyFans OWES $forever

I think I win. 

NastyFans is a proof of concept organization that displays the sort of transparency possible with Bitcoin while also offering innovative products and approaches to solving regulatory issues plaguing crypto organizations.

BPIP.org is a website with a rating system you manipulate to stroke your ego and provides no interaction with the blockchain or use of Bitcoin whatsoever. 

Clearly you win. 

I didn't realize we were in competition, but now your trust abuse makes more sense when viewed from your delusional perspective.

Yeah, competitions... that's also another problem. We always want to "win" these arguments - lest we realise they are useless and we will never get a satisfactory outcome from it...

[Vod]

Yeah, competitions... that's also another problem. We always want to "win" these arguments - lest we realise they are useless and we will never get a satisfactory outcome from it...

True dat.   We are both calling each other the same names and going nowhere.

OG and I agree I won this argument.  I guess I should take the weekend off.