Why Mark Zuckerberg wants no privacy

[apex944]

https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36

According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.

thoughts? what does this mean for society?

[KingScorpio]

https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36

According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.

thoughts? what does this mean for society?

safeguarding privacy will cost him money, he will need expert and will have to fight a race with hackers, so he just doesnt want to fight it.

thats all

[Spendulus]

https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36

According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.

thoughts? what does this mean for society?

It means he is a liar.

[bornforfreedom]

Someone needs to replace his doing.... it's about damn time. Show us what true data protection is and honor humanity not money

[Rinso]

https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36

According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.

thoughts? what does this mean for society?

It means he is a liar.

what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?

[sheenshane]

It is always the best to read the terms and agreement before entering any platform to avoid these kinds of questions and to be aware of everything. Facebook and any social media platforms generate revenue from marketing, not spying. I'm very sure that you are familiar with the thing called KYC/AML.

There's a big difference between Marketing and Spying. But yes, we are so much free to stop using facebook and delete our accounts to avoid questioning them. I find the crypto startup guy as an envy tech person who couldn't accept that Mark Zuckerberg made facebook
as one of the best social media of all time.

[TECSHARE]

Facefuck = Lifelog = DARPA

[Spendulus]

....

There's a big difference between Marketing and Spying.....

Not after Spying became a necessary and profitable tool for Marketing.

[r1s2g3]

It is always the best to read the terms and agreement before entering any platform to avoid these kinds of questions and to be aware of everything. Facebook and any social media platforms generate revenue from marketing, not spying. I'm very sure that you are familiar with the thing called KYC/AML.

There's a big difference between Marketing and Spying. But yes, we are so much free to stop using facebook and delete our accounts to avoid questioning them. I find the crypto startup guy as an envy tech person who couldn't accept that Mark Zuckerberg made facebook
as one of the best social media of all time.

New technology emerged and new system are now available. Facebook/ Google etal are now using new technology that does not exist and unheard of when I accepted their TOS.

Aren't they are supposed to send me TOS every year, telling me how much processing power they have acquired and how much they are tracking my movements.

[Spendulus]

https://medium.com/elixxir/why-mark-zuckerberg-wants-no-privacy-why-he-wrote-his-letter-and-why-it-wont-help-him-c020e434ce36

According to a recent open letter on privacy, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to believehe can combine WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Instagram platforms with “end-to-end” encryption to create the ultimate privacy-protecting platform.

thoughts? what does this mean for society?

It means he is a liar.

what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?

It's pretty simple. Why in the world would you want to protect such a person?

[semobo]

Facebook is the biggest spy in the world and it has almost the details of every person in this world except new born babies but still they know that from others post.

SO it is not surprise that he never want us to be in privacy.

[BADecker]

Zuckerberg either wants more money, or more control, or more power, or his life has been threatened by others who have much greater power than he, that if he doesn't toe the line, they will make him suffer.

[Spendulus]

Facebook is the biggest spy in the world and it has almost the details of every person in this world except new born babies but still they know that from others post.

SO it is not surprise that he never want us to be in privacy.

That's pretty much totally correct.

There's zero reason to believe anything they say.

Just look at their history of data leaks and losses.

Then look at the things they have told us that turned out to totally not be true.

[Spendulus]

Should I post here the story of Whatsup creators again?
Don't understand why such naive questions are post out here on and on. There are so many really interesting topics that we could discuss.

Sure, post it again. Some things really should be repeated over and over.

Then they get totally boring. Like Facebook.

[semobo]

Should I post here the story of Whatsup creators again?
Don't understand why such naive questions are post out here on and on. There are so many really interesting topics that we could discuss.

Whatapp is still owned by Facebook as far as I know,so still the story repeats again with facebook,whatapp and instagram.

[poptok1]

what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?

Obviously it is all about metadata.
He admits that Facebook will still collect and store your data, of course only for "security" reasons.
That metadata will be accessible for Facebook, so it is just more of the same old, same old.
Collect meta, pack it and sell with huge profit to third party. Classic deception.

[kooboat]

It is very difficult to comprehend when we realise the amount of our private information that has been put out there simply because we want to make use of popular social platforms outlets like Facebook and WhatsApp. There is more to be done to ensure users are fully protected from any form of abuse so far as their private life is concerned.

[Spendulus]

....There is more to be done to ensure users are fully protected from any form of abuse so far as their private life is concerned.

It's a bit like asking the pedophiles to report on the children?

[Rinso]

what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?

Obviously it is all about metadata.
He admits that Facebook will still collect and store your data, of course only for "security" reasons.
That metadata will be accessible for Facebook, so it is just more of the same old, same old.
Collect meta, pack it and sell with huge profit to third party. Classic deception.

oh ok i understand now. I thought only the data of famous people who were sold was bought and sold. but is there anyone who wants to buy data from people who are not famous like many Facebook users?

[poptok1]

what you mean liar ? why can you say he is a liar ? do you have a reason sir ?

Obviously it is all about metadata.
He admits that Facebook will still collect and store your data, of course only for "security" reasons.
That metadata will be accessible for Facebook, so it is just more of the same old, same old.
Collect meta, pack it and sell with huge profit to third party. Classic deception.

oh ok i understand now. I thought only the data of famous people who were sold was bought and sold. but is there anyone who wants to buy data from people who are not famous like many Facebook users?

Most likely it will be the advertising companies. Those who serve profiled ads, need actual data on peoples online behaviour, in order to match products and services to users and maximise sell profits and advertising exposure.
I suspect it can also be various three letter government agencies, non-governmental organization (NGO) and as it is free market, anyone who's ready to pay. Data is the new oil, who owns it has power.