Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 30, 2019, 03:40:31 PM |
|
.... Maybe I should clarify, encryption is not enough ....
Let's assume that those on this forum are quite knowledgable about encryption. That's fair. So this is a decent place to discuss the subject. I'm willing to post a simple encrypted message, and to the first that breaks it, ....1 bitcoin. Must pay 0.001 BTC in advance entry fee and notice they will try. All out in the open and public. If you read here you will see why in the end the encryption won't stop surveillance. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126073.0While I wouldn't go as far as to say it requires a state level actor to access, it certainly requires advanced technical skills. That said, a lot of individuals and groups are more than capable. Frankly, my offer stops the argument that "encryption isn't enough." I'll leave it open until 4-15-19. No, it doesn't, but have fun with that. Yes, it does, and my point's been made. Encryption is enough. While I wouldn't go as far as to say it requires a state level actor to access, it certainly requires advanced technical skills. That said, a lot of individuals and groups are more than capable.I've posed a reward that is 100% unwinnable. But any are welcome to try and win > $4000 at current rates. 1 BTC to decode a message. This is a near-cryptography forum, you can't bullshit people on this subject here. Well, er, you can't bullshit some of us.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 30, 2019, 04:28:26 PM |
|
You might want to double check on that, because over the past few years I have seen several vulnerabilities come to light which allow the bypassing of local encryption. These vulnerabilities are 100% real, but you enjoy your comfortable lies if you want.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 30, 2019, 04:36:45 PM |
|
You might want to double check on that, because over the past few years I have seen several vulnerabilities come to light which allow the bypassing of local encryption. These vulnerabilities are 100% real, but you enjoy your comfortable lies if you want.
I'm fairly well aware of several, and have suspicions about numerous others. However, my offer of a reward is firm. For any and all takers.
|
|
|
|
LUCKMCFLY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1872
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 31, 2019, 03:13:16 AM |
|
I think it is very risky, but taking into account that it is Mark Zuckerberg it will be very easy for him to do so, he has the best programmers in the world, he has the money to carry it out, I think he can achieve it, in fact, he has always been a pioneer in terms of social networks. In addition, everything that represents progress in my case I support, because everything must be routed there, in innovation and be more advanced. Besides, as he is, I imagine that he will supervise each code himself.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 31, 2019, 05:39:22 PM |
|
I think it is very risky, but taking into account that it is Mark Zuckerberg it will be very easy for him to do so, he has the best programmers in the world, he has the money to carry it out, I think he can achieve it, in fact, he has always been a pioneer in terms of social networks. In addition, everything that represents progress in my case I support, because everything must be routed there, in innovation and be more advanced. Besides, as he is, I imagine that he will supervise each code himself. So then there would be no privacy with his "end-to-end" encryption, for which the promise was privacy.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 31, 2019, 08:27:53 PM |
|
I think it is very risky, but taking into account that it is Mark Zuckerberg it will be very easy for him to do so, he has the best programmers in the world, he has the money to carry it out, I think he can achieve it, in fact, he has always been a pioneer in terms of social networks. In addition, everything that represents progress in my case I support, because everything must be routed there, in innovation and be more advanced. Besides, as he is, I imagine that he will supervise each code himself. So then there would be no privacy with his "end-to-end" encryption, for which the promise was privacy. And Mark Zuckerberg's promises are worth something are they?
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 31, 2019, 08:52:20 PM Last edit: March 31, 2019, 09:07:33 PM by Spendulus |
|
.... And Mark Zuckerberg's promises are worth something are they?
No. Security through encryption is mathematical. It is not based on "promises." Realistically, security through encryption cannot be something that might change with every update that a FF sends down to a person's device. security through encryption must be personal. Then we can take about how an individual might plug into something like FF, through layered anonymizers if he chose. But it is not possible to consider FF providing the encryption. That's madness.
|
|
|
|
teddyelwyn
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 268
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 02, 2019, 12:11:07 AM |
|
I was just reading today that he is going to announce how the news feed is created that seems like a load of BS
|
|
|
|
navneet kaur
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 02, 2019, 04:33:04 AM |
|
i think, he doesn't want to feel anything like privacy, because he knows but After his open letter on privacy, is Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg serious about privacy issues surrounding users of the social network.
|
|
|
|
|
jdarren
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 296
Merit: 12
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2019, 05:31:26 PM |
|
Does anyone else find it crazy that David Chaum actually reached out to Mark Zuck to help with privacy for FB? Granted I doubt they will take on anyone who is a pretty prominent figure in both cryptography and privacy.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2019, 08:46:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
darylalban
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 184
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2019, 09:31:02 PM |
|
It doesn't fail, does it lol
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 04, 2019, 12:28:36 AM Last edit: April 04, 2019, 02:09:01 AM by Spendulus |
|
It doesn't fail, does it lol Zuckd again by Failbook? And the lies by the lying liars march on. https://www.thedailybeast.com/beyond-sketchy-facebook-demanding-some-new-users-email-passwords
Just two weeks after admitting it stored hundreds of millions of its users’ own passwords insecurely, Facebook is demanding some users fork over the password for their outside email account as the price of admission to the social network.
Facebook users are being interrupted by an interstitial demanding they provide the password for the email account they gave to Facebook when signing up. “To continue using Facebook, you’ll need to confirm your email,” the message demands. “Since you signed up with [email address], you can do that automatically …”
A form below the message asked for the users’ “email password.”
“That’s beyond sketchy,” security consultant Jake Williams told the Daily Beast. “They should not be taking your password or handling your password in the background. If that’s what’s required to sign up with Facebook, you’re better off not being on Facebook.”
In a statement emailed to The Daily Beast after this story published, Facebook reiterated its claim it doesn’t store the email passwords.I've bolded an example of the sort of assertion made that's not to be believed.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 04, 2019, 12:09:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2019, 05:34:45 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
jjbanks994
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 255
Merit: 3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2019, 11:21:15 PM |
|
waiting for that Dbook to come out aka decentralized facebook
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2019, 11:41:50 PM |
|
You mean they got caught storing the contacts without permission, so they had to admit to that, but they have not been caught storing the passwords, so they have not admitted to storing them?
|
|
|
|
Isalrzky03
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 06, 2019, 12:16:08 AM |
|
In my opinion, this is only a natural phenomenon from humans, which is a mistake.
In a post on his Facebook page, Zuckerberg announced, "the future of communication will focus on data protection services, so people will be more confident and feel safe, because messages and content will no longer be stored forever".
|
|
|
|
|