Bitcoin Forum
September 21, 2019, 03:48:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Updated April 22] Personal Full Trust Depth viewer for all users  (Read 677 times)
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
March 25, 2019, 03:08:36 PM
Last edit: April 22, 2019, 08:58:40 AM by LoyceV
Merited by Welsh (10), TMAN (10), redsn0w (7), Foxpup (6), dbshck (4), bones261 (2), DdmrDdmr (2), TECSHARE (1), Daniel91 (1), LFC_Bitcoin (1), Coin-1 (1), DireWolfM14 (1)
 #1

I encourage anyone to create their own custom Trust list!


Custom Trust lists have large recursive implications because the users you trust directly (Depth 0) make you trust the ones they trust (Depth 1), and the users they trust (Depth 2) (edited selfquote from DireWolfM14's thread, which is the reason I created this topic). This is assuming your Trust depth is set to the default value 2.
Distrust has no recursive implications: if you exclude someone, you distrust his Trust list and it doesn't further affect your own Trust list. However, if someone on your Trust list distrusts someone, you distrust that user on the next Depth level.

So, who do you trust?
I already made a Trust list viewer, but that only shows who has who on Depth 0.
Today, I add a Trust Depth viewer.

The forum's Trust settings show each user in all Depths. To keep the list readable, I show each user only once, on the highest Depth level he's in.
These lists only show the custom parts, I haven't included DefaultTrust. For your own list, you can see the same on Trust settings if you remove DefaultTrust. For anyone else, you can use my list. I've produced data up to Trust Depth 4, based on last Saturday's trust data dump.

Disclaimer
I hope I used the right assumption on how to calculate Depth 2 and deeper. From what I've checked, it should be correct, but please let me know if I made a mistake.
If it's useful, I'll do weekly updates. If nobody uses it, I'll abandon this project. I turned theymos' 150 kB file into 1.8 GB of data, and it grows exponentially when someone trusts more users.

Limited Trust Depth
For most users, the number of users trusted expands as the Trust Depth goes deeper. For others, such as raj13, it ends at Depth 2.

Sample
See: my own Trust Depth list, which includes many users I don't recognize.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1569037734
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569037734

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569037734
Reply with quote  #2

1569037734
Report to moderator
1569037734
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569037734

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569037734
Reply with quote  #2

1569037734
Report to moderator
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1745



View Profile WWW
March 25, 2019, 03:18:55 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #2

I looked at your list and there are a lot of distrusts, even on level one. I am not sure if this is a good or bad thing. I also noticed there are a lot of people with zero merit and it may be a good idea to investigate if you want these people in your trust network and why they are in your trust network and if you want the people including these people in your trust network.

I am not sure how difficult this would be, however it might be useful to include trust ratings either via DT or via a custom trust list. The rating could be as of a certain point in time so that your VPS (I presume) is not consistently scraping the same information.

Find the fire hydrant in my Avatar for a prize.
o_e_l_e_o
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 2746



View Profile
March 25, 2019, 03:40:15 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #3

This makes a great argument for setting your depth to no more than 1 if you have a custom trust list. Even on depth 1, there are a few names I am unfamiliar with and have had no interaction with, but by level 2, a quick scan and I would estimate around 75% of names are users I do not know, including many who have been inactive for months or even years and a fair few who are red trusted themselves.

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
March 25, 2019, 03:42:12 PM
 #4

I looked at your list and there are a lot of distrusts, even on level one.
Note that those aren't my own direct choices: I only distrust 9 users (explained here), but on Depth 1 I distrust 175 users through the users I trust on Depth 0.

Quote
I also noticed there are a lot of people with zero merit and it may be a good idea to investigate if you want these people in your trust network and why they are in your trust network and if you want the people including these people in your trust network.
I looked at a few, and they're older accounts, some of them inactive, included by older accounts (now DT1) years ago. I see no reason to exclude them, but I will if a reason pops up.

Quote
I am not sure how difficult this would be, however it might be useful to include trust ratings either via DT or via a custom trust list. The rating could be as of a certain point in time so that your VPS (I presume) is not consistently scraping the same information.
I can't scrape trust ratings, it needs an account to be logged in. I could get it from Vod's BPIP, it's actually not that bad to scrape 10,000 accounts per week and add the rating to the "Trust feedback" link text. It will still be slightly delayed that way. I like it!

I'm still not using a VPS, just old fashioned data uploads Cheesy



This makes a great argument for setting your depth to no more than 1 if you have a custom trust list. Even on depth 1, there are a few names I am unfamiliar with and have had no interaction with
What I would really want, is to have DefaultTrust up to Depth 2, and my own Trust list up to Depth 1. Unfortunately, that's not possible.

Quote
by level 2, a quick scan and I would estimate around 75% of names are users I do not know, including many who have been inactive for months or even years and a fair few who are red trusted themselves.
So the users you trust are trusting users who trust the wrong users Tongue Let me highlight the "large recursive implications" in the OP Smiley
The red trust would be a good reason to add QuickSeller's suggestion to my list. I've sent Vod a PM asking if I can do weekly scraping from BPIP.

Joel_Jantsen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1234


Can I merit you with some Flags? 🚩


View Profile
March 25, 2019, 05:38:31 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #5

Wonder how did I end up in your Distrusts-List. I don't recollect having any bad experiences with you. I'd like to know if you are willing to share otherwise it's alright.  Smiley

.BitDice.               ▄▄███▄▄
           ▄▄██▀▀ ▄ ▀▀██▄▄
      ▄▄█ ▀▀  ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▀ █▄▄
  ▄▄██▀▀     ▀▀ █████ ▀▀     ▀▀██▄▄
██▀▀ ▄▄██▀      ▀███▀      ▀██▄▄ ▀▀██
██  ████▄▄       ███       ▄▄████  ██
██  █▀▀████▄▄  ▄█████▄  ▄▄████▀▀█  ██
██  ▀     ▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀     ▀  ██
             ███████████
██  ▄     ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄     ▄  ██
██  █▄▄████▀▀  ▀█████▀  ▀▀████▄▄█  ██
██  ████▀▀       ███       ▀▀████  ██
██▄▄ ▀▀██▄      ▄███▄      ▄██▀▀ ▄▄██
  ▀▀██▄▄     ▄▄ █████ ▄▄     ▄▄██▀▀
      ▀▀█ ▄▄  ▀▀█████▀▀  ▄▄ █▀▀
           ▀▀██▄▄ ▀ ▄▄██▀▀
               ▀▀███▀▀
        ▄▄███████▄▄
     ▄███████████████▄
    ████▀▀       ▀▀████
   ████▀           ▀████
   ████             ████
   ████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████
▄█████████████████████████▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████▄                 ▄████
████████▄▄▄     ▄▄▄████████
  ▀▀▀█████████████████▀▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
▄▄████████████████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
██████████████████▀▀███ ██          ██
 ████████████████▄  ▄██ ██          ██
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██          ██
             ██████████ ██          ██
           ▄███████████ ██████▀▀██████
          █████████████  ▀████▄▄████▀
[/]
The Pharmacist
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1638
Merit: 3092



View Profile
March 25, 2019, 05:43:57 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #6

This makes a great argument for setting your depth to no more than 1 if you have a custom trust list. <snip>
Thank you for stating that.  I had to go and check to see what depth I had my settings at, and thankfully I did set the depth at 1.  For some reason I thought I had it at 3, but I think I changed it at some point.

Wonder how did I end up in your Distrusts-List. I don't recollect having any bad experiences with you. I'd like to know if you are willing to share otherwise it's alright.  Smiley
Hmm.  I'm curious about that too, but I do recall you having it out with at least one DT member not too long ago.  Can't remember what it was about for the life of me, though.  I've always thought you were pretty trustworthy.


LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
March 25, 2019, 06:23:42 PM
Last edit: March 25, 2019, 07:07:38 PM by LoyceV
 #7

Wonder how did I end up in your Distrusts-List. I don't recollect having any bad experiences with you. I'd like to know if you are willing to share otherwise it's alright.  Smiley
You're not on my distrust-list. I only distrust these users directly:
Quote
Trust list for: LoyceV (DT1! (42) 2230 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-03-23_Sat_05.36h)
Back to index

LoyceV Distrusts:
1. ~peloso (74 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~cryptohunter (124 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~BiPolarBob (52 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~Gleb Gamow (118 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~BetKing.io (9 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~gamerfan (1 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~IdiotCoder (13 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~SmartPayMINT (9 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~LoyceValenzuela (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

However, the recursive implications make that I have you excluded on my Depth 2. That means one of the users I trust:
Quote
LoyceV Trusts:
1. dooglus (126 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. gmaxwell (DT1! (21) 1093 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Vod (DT1! (35) 1050 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. SaltySpitoon (562 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. mprep (DT1! (16) 320 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. philipma1957 (DT1! (13) 603 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Cyrus (DT1! (19) 100 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. guitarplinker (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. NLNico (202 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Blazed (93 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. hilariousandco (DT1! (37) 449 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. cryptodevil (DT1! (12) 97 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. suchmoon (DT1! (38) 1768 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. actmyname (DT1! (23) 430 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. The Pharmacist (DT1! (31) 1609 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. DarkStar_ (DT1! (24) 646 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. marlboroza (710 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. coinlocket$ (DT1! (18) 791 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
.. Must have someone on his trust list who distrusts you:
Quote
Trust list for: Joel_Jantsen (192 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-03-23_Sat_05.36h)
Back to index

~Joel_Jantsen is Distrusted by:
1. Anduck (33 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Operatr (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. leancuisine (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. gysca (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. owlcatz (DT1! (20) 192 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. txbtc (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. P4ndoraBox7 (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. james.lent (1 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. CanadaBits (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Miyslovenic (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Funny (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. PrivacyLock (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. vCardVideo (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. tennozer (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. sardasa (2 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
There could be more than one connection, I found at least owlcatz: he's trusted by suchmoon, The Pharmacist and DarkStar_, and distrusts you. That puts owlcatz on my Depth 1, which excludes you on my Depth 2.

Only 2 users have included you:
Quote
Joel_Jantsen is Trusted by:
1. shameonscams (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. CryptoGamblingSites (19 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
That means you don't stand a chance against the exclusions.

To show how strong the recursive effect is: 2053 out of 3895 users with a custom trust list have you excluded up to Depth 4.
Per Depth level:
Depth 0: 14 users
Depth 1: 106 users
Depth 2: 546 users
Depth 3: 919 users
Depth 4: 468 users

Update: at Depth 0 you should have 15 exclusions. I turns out I ignored the users who only distrust others without trusting anyone. I don't think this matters much for the end result. I'll fix this in the next update.



I do recall you having it out with at least one DT member not too long ago.
Was it owlcatz?

r1s2g3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 387


I am alive but in hibernation.


View Profile
March 26, 2019, 02:31:16 PM
 #8

Do you think Distrust depth will be working on the same way as trust depth?
Because I see couple of DT1 in your distrust depth 1 and I do not think their feedback will be displayed as untrusted feedback to you.

Edit: I am confused, Fuzzstone is DT1 but still his feedback are untrusted? It is due to my custom trust list?

.
Game that
pays for
Playing











A
blockchain
based game
Ask me anything
about the game
in Bitcointalk.











A game
that recognize
your ownership
Join the
exciting game
of splinterlands











              ▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▄▄▄▄▄▄
          ▄▄██████████████████████▄▄
        ███████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████
     ████████▌    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▐████████
   ▄██████████▌  █████ ▀ ▀███  ▐██████████▄
  ▐███████████▌ ████▄▄ ██ ▐███ ▐███████████▌
  ████████████▌▐█████     ████▌▐████████████
 █████████████▌ ███▄▄ ██ ▐████ ▐█████████████
 █████████████▌  ███    ▄████  ▐█████████████
██████████████▌    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    ▐██████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
▀████████████████████████████████████████████▀
   ▐██████████████████████████████████████▌
   ▐█████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████████████▌
    ▀▀██████▀▀                  ▀▀██████▀▀
o_e_l_e_o
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 2746



View Profile
March 26, 2019, 02:49:42 PM
 #9

Do you think Distrust depth will be working on the same way as trust depth?
It does. If I distrust a user, but someone I trust trusts the same user, the higher level exclusion overrules the lower level inclusion, and their feedback will appear untrusted to me.


Edit: I am confused, Fuzzstone is DT1 but still his feedback are untrusted? It is due to my custom trust list?
The Default Trust list is essentially meaningless to you if you have your own custom trust list. Even adding a single person to your custom trust list will remove Default Trust for you, and so their feedback becomes untrusted unless you manually add them to your own list. See below from theymos:

If your trust list is totally empty, you trust "DefaultTrust", which includes some trustworthy people that I'll select. But if you add anyone to your trust list, even if they don't trust anyone, DefaultTrust will no longer be considered part of your trust list.

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
March 26, 2019, 02:58:48 PM
Merited by o_e_l_e_o (1)
 #10

Do you think Distrust depth will be working on the same way as trust depth?
I'm not sure what you're asking.
Distrust ends at the user you distrust, his Trust list doesn't influence yours any deeper after that.

Quote
Because I see couple of DT1 in your distrust depth 1 and I do not think their feedback will be displayed as untrusted feedback to you.
OgNasty, vizique, BitcoinPenny and TheFuzzStone are the only DT1s on my Depth 1 distrust list.
When I look at my Trust list including DefaultTrust, OgNasty is at (-1) (which means he's excluded), while vizique, BitcoinPenny and TheFuzzStone are all at (0) (which means they're included).
I still haven't decided what to do with this information Tongue

Quote
[Edit: I am confused, Fuzzstone is DT1 but still his feedback are untrusted? It is due to my custom trust list?
Your personal Trust Depth excludes TheFuzzStone on Depth 1. If you also trust DefaultTrust, your Depth 1 competes directly with DT1, and if there are more exclusions than inclusions, TheFuzzStone is untrusted to you.



The Default Trust list is essentially meaningless to you if you have your own custom trust list. Even adding a single person to your custom trust list will remove Default Trust for you, and so their feedback becomes untrusted unless you manually add them to your own list. See below from theymos:

If your trust list is totally empty, you trust "DefaultTrust", which includes some trustworthy people that I'll select. But if you add anyone to your trust list, even if they don't trust anyone, DefaultTrust will no longer be considered part of your trust list.
I don't think this is still correct, and I've just tested it: as long as you add "DefaultTrust" to your Trust list, it's included on your Depth 0, which means all DT1-members are included on your Depth 1, and all DT2-members are included on your Depth 2.
If you don't want this, you can just remove "DefaultTrust".

o_e_l_e_o
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 2746



View Profile
March 26, 2019, 03:37:41 PM
 #11

The Default Trust list is essentially meaningless to you if you have your own custom trust list. Even adding a single person to your custom trust list will remove Default Trust for you, and so their feedback becomes untrusted unless you manually add them to your own list.
I don't think this is still correct, and I've just tested it: as long as you add "DefaultTrust" to your Trust list, it's included on your Depth 0, which means all DT1-members are included on your Depth 1, and all DT2-members are included on your Depth 2.
Apologies, I've phrased this a bit ambiguously. I had meant unless you manually add "DefaultTrust" as an entity back on to your own trust list, but reading it back I can see that it seems like I'm referring to individual users rather than DefaultTrust as a whole. Your explanation makes it clearer. I was mistaken in thinking Default Trust had a space in it, though. Cheesy

Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1745



View Profile WWW
March 29, 2019, 06:39:51 AM
 #12

I looked at your list and there are a lot of distrusts, even on level one.
Note that those aren't my own direct choices: I only distrust 9 users (explained here), but on Depth 1 I distrust 175 users through the users I trust on Depth 0.
Right, the majority of these are not something you specifically did.

I believe the large number of exclusions means two things:
*Using a fairly small custom trust list will result in many people being in your trust network, many of whom you would not normally trust their ratings, or otherwise.
*There is a very large premium to having those on your trust list with good trust lists.

IIRC, there were only a handful of exclusions on DT under the old system, and on your level one, there are more exclusions than inclusions. I would draw the conclusion that many on your level2 depth do not have good trust lists, to the extent that those on your level1 are needing to "fix" these "mistakes" by excluding many people they don't want in their trust network.

This is not a new thing as a result to recent DT changes. I had used a custom trust list for years, and had to exclude many people. I would sometimes investigate why all these people I don't want in my trust network were appearing, but ultimately it was hard to correct the root causes of having untrustworthy people in my trust network. 



Quote
I am not sure how difficult this would be, however it might be useful to include trust ratings either via DT or via a custom trust list. The rating could be as of a certain point in time so that your VPS (I presume) is not consistently scraping the same information.
I can't scrape trust ratings, it needs an account to be logged in. I could get it from Vod's BPIP, it's actually not that bad to scrape 10,000 accounts per week and add the rating to the "Trust feedback" link text. It will still be slightly delayed that way. I like it!
You could create an account called "LoyceBot" that theymos would presumably be willing to whitelist for you that could scrape trust ratings on a periodic basis. He might even be willing to allow it to see the investigations board if you have a good reason to be scraping posts from there.


Find the fire hydrant in my Avatar for a prize.
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2019, 07:02:52 AM
 #13

IIRC, there were only a handful of exclusions on DT under the old system
It's a result of more users creating their own custom trust list. I had only one exclusion before theymos changed the DefaultTrust system, because there was no need for it earlier.

Quote
You could create an account called "LoyceBot" that theymos would presumably be willing to whitelist for you that could scrape trust ratings on a periodic basis. He might even be willing to allow it to see the investigations board if you have a good reason to be scraping posts from there.
I created LoyceBot 2 years ago Cheesy I looked into it after your post, and it turned out to be pretty easy to feed the login cookie.txt to my scraper.
I haven't adjusted my script yet, I'm hoping to make some time for it today.

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
March 31, 2019, 08:46:28 PM
Last edit: March 31, 2019, 09:00:57 PM by LoyceV
 #14

I am not sure how difficult this would be, however it might be useful to include trust ratings either via DT or via a custom trust list.
Done: I've added trust scores to all users, based on DefaultTrust DT2. I have some red trusted users on my Depth 2, but don't really want to add them all to my distrust list just to remove them from my Depth 2. That's DT3 to the rest of the forum.

Updated
Trust Depth viewer

Joel_Jantsen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1234


Can I merit you with some Flags? 🚩


View Profile
March 31, 2019, 11:03:15 PM
 #15

Sorry for replying late here folks

Hmm.  I'm curious about that too, but I do recall you having it out with at least one DT member not too long ago.  Can't remember what it was about for the life of me, though.  I've always thought you were pretty trustworthy.
Thanks for stating that! Oh, and I had an argument with @allyouracid who was recently added as a DT member. But we're cool since he removed the feedback after realizing it was irrelevant.

Was it owlcatz?
Thanks for explaining it in a detailed way man! The new system seems quite decentralized then. And yes, I do recollect stating that I don't quite agree with owlcatz on certain cases where I felt their feedback was not appropriate. It's alright if that behavior of mine is considered as "untrustworthy". 

.BitDice.               ▄▄███▄▄
           ▄▄██▀▀ ▄ ▀▀██▄▄
      ▄▄█ ▀▀  ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▀ █▄▄
  ▄▄██▀▀     ▀▀ █████ ▀▀     ▀▀██▄▄
██▀▀ ▄▄██▀      ▀███▀      ▀██▄▄ ▀▀██
██  ████▄▄       ███       ▄▄████  ██
██  █▀▀████▄▄  ▄█████▄  ▄▄████▀▀█  ██
██  ▀     ▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀     ▀  ██
             ███████████
██  ▄     ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄     ▄  ██
██  █▄▄████▀▀  ▀█████▀  ▀▀████▄▄█  ██
██  ████▀▀       ███       ▀▀████  ██
██▄▄ ▀▀██▄      ▄███▄      ▄██▀▀ ▄▄██
  ▀▀██▄▄     ▄▄ █████ ▄▄     ▄▄██▀▀
      ▀▀█ ▄▄  ▀▀█████▀▀  ▄▄ █▀▀
           ▀▀██▄▄ ▀ ▄▄██▀▀
               ▀▀███▀▀
        ▄▄███████▄▄
     ▄███████████████▄
    ████▀▀       ▀▀████
   ████▀           ▀████
   ████             ████
   ████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████
▄█████████████████████████▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████▄                 ▄████
████████▄▄▄     ▄▄▄████████
  ▀▀▀█████████████████▀▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
▄▄████████████████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
██████████████████▀▀███ ██          ██
 ████████████████▄  ▄██ ██          ██
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██          ██
             ██████████ ██          ██
           ▄███████████ ██████▀▀██████
          █████████████  ▀████▄▄████▀
[/]
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
April 22, 2019, 08:59:24 AM
 #16

Updated with last Saturday's trust data dump.
This is the last update for a while, unless someone requests an update. It's a lot of data for weekly updates.

LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 4641


Largest Merit Circle on BPIP!


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2019, 11:19:56 AM
 #17

I haven't bumped this thread in months. Would anyone be interested in an update?

matthewgs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2019, 09:56:21 PM
 #18

This is really awesome, very helpful for those who want to do some research. Please do not drop this project !! Wink Cheesy
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!