Stake allocation

[No One]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

[eagleman]

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks. When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.

[shinratensei_]

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks. When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.

That caused by you need more effort to make or increase your rank from the newbie to the legendary. The history of stake created by the old system of BTT that gave you 14 weekly activity and you need a certain amount of your activity point to make you able to increase your rank. That's why there was a stake allocation based on level.

[Samboo]

I do not know much about merit system. But I agree with you to some extent on this point. Stake allocations should be fair I think. But it is based on the terms and condition set by a project. I have also seen many projects allocating stakes not much far in volumes between all members. But one thing is true that at present, gaining merits are very much hard for newbies.

[ivaf]

I think this is a fair system. If you are a useful member of the forum, then you deserve merits, and, accordingly, you deserve an increase in rank.

[KingDome]

It's due to they was intended to grow up their account so hardly so you will get more rewards as a legendary member, even if their quality post's very shit.

[Jpt]

What is the point for more allocation of stakes for senior members maybe to recognize their hard labours. Senior members hardly earn merits which is just a basis for their seniority. I think a new project has its own rules determining stakes for bounty hunters. So the stake allocation maybe a part of their rule. The only way to get more stakes is just labour to acquire merits by posting impressive and valuable posts. Only then your problem will get resolved.

[Cnut237]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I think the distribution where higher ranks get greater stakes is fair. This reflects the fact that a higher ranked account is generally considered more influential. Also as it has to have been built up by many posts over many years, it means the poster is an established and influential member of the forum - so they should get more stakes than say someone who has just joined. Higher stakes for higher ranks also goes some way towards addressing multi-accounting and spamming. This is similar to people with more social media followers getting higher stakes for Twitter/Facebook bounties.
The issue of whether merit is fair or not is a different question. It may be imperfect, but it is currently the best solution we have to  solve the issue of people ranking up just by spamming meaningless posts. I myself have been partly lucky (because I got to Full Member before merit came in) and partly unlucky (because this means I'll never become Senior). I do feel for newcomers and those with really low ranks, but until someone comes up with something better, then the merit system is the best we have. It may have its flaws, but it is certainly a sensible and well-thought-out system.

[eagleman]

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks. When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.

That caused by you need more effort to make or increase your rank from the newbie to the legendary. The history of stake created by the old system of BTT that gave you 14 weekly activity and you need a certain amount of your activity point to make you able to increase your rank. That's why there was a stake allocation based on level.

The thing you mentioned is about the old activity and rank upgrade.I can't see the relation of it from why advertisers pays higher stake for higher ranks. And my explanation is likely to be the reason why they pay for good for higher ranks, due to the signature space and color, characters that it can provide.

[mrdeposit]

Do you think jr members are the same as the others who spent many years in this forum? Also, if you look well, you can see a lot of accounts increased from 0 to 100 and more.

[Andrey13101991]

I think the distribution of stakes is usually fair. in the bounty campaigns, most of the tokens of those participants are allocated - the posts of which are the most valuable on the forum. High members are always more influential

[boazsalosa]

I think the distribution of stakes is usually fair. in the bounty campaigns, most of the tokens of those participants are allocated - the posts of which are the most valuable on the forum. High members are always more influential

Yes it's true because higher rankings are considered more senior and more knowledgeable than Member ranks up, so this is also fair what you say.

[Loedong]

I don't think it's on my side, I don't care about that and I'm grateful for what's right for each forum user. the most important thing for me is that the market can recover soon and with regard to the top ranking or distribution of prizes that are far different from the top ranking in this forum, I don't think about that.

[qazgroup]

I know your frustration and i can feel it as i personally feel the same sometimes, i wish the old system of the forum willbe implemented back where only activity is required for rank advancement but currently the merit system is implemented by the forum so we have no option other than to follow this system for now.

[jpoker272727]

The time they spent here before is much longer than lower ranks.
They can also put avatar that juniors can't
also the signature is much better for higher ranks.

[Brainnin]

In my own view, allocating high stakes for Senior member is good, they have the experience and they are much influencial in this forum which means their post we be valued more than that of Junior Member.

[TIDOVEE]

You are right, thank God im even at this rank, because I also use to imagine such difference, I know very soon I will also be an hero member. Although the upgrade is good it will make it last longer,because after legendary stage I don't think there is any other higher cadre,so its too but not favourable to many, Inspite my rank I still consider the gap wide.

[De_nis]

I think this is now a minor issue, because the majority of the project is simply deceiving us, we need to fight the free exploitation of bounty hunters!

[rosezionjohn]

But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.

I wonder what's your basis in assessing the performance of most higher ranked members. Do you have anything that can back up your claim/assumption?

The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members.

As it should be. This is one way to reward the contributions of those who supported this forum way before you even knew this.

Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

I've read a lot of similar topics/complaints already since the rule was implemented. While it may be true that there are those who abuse the merit system, there are also many who look for quality topics or comments. You should try to visit the Meta board. Anyway, if you believe your comments/posts are of top quality but they're not being rewarded, I remember there's a thread where you can post your post/comment link and they'll review if it's worthy of a merit. Sorry I did not save that link.

[okala]

Stake allocation is calculated base on the signature code space and also there is no way you can compare the reward for sr member/ hero member to that of Jr member, and on the merit giving it has made the forum so centralized and receiving merit base on quality post is now almost impossible.