Stake allocation

[GREENch]

Let's be honest (at least with ourselves). We all want to get more tokens for our work. However, already in several telegram chats met people who say that it is easier to do a lot of Jr.Member and get more tokens due to the number of accounts than to have one Legendary and worry that something might happen to him(banned, painted, hacked).

[joshy23]

it matches their rank. I think it's fair that no one is harmed.
if you want to get a bigger stake, increase the rank of the account so that the stake can also be greater: D

No question about that i guess, the longer the stay the higher the experience they've have, the stake allocations is fair enough giving the high ranks account much better stake, that's how the system works and it's been embrace ever since, higher ranks accounts already have the capabilities to
join bitcoin paying campaigns but in some reasons they choose the bounty, same concept with bitcoin payment campaign where higher accounts
received much better pay rewards.

[Mianae]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

Higher stakes goes to those high ranking members to because of their ranks. It's normal even in office settings senior members gets higher salary than low ranking officers.

[StephenJH]

I also have some concerns regarding the stake allocation. The distribution process is cheated by bounty managers and teams. Stakes are given weekly to those who contribute to the forum in the signatire campaign.

[anobtc]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

In fact, I think a comment of a member with a higher rank will be more appreciated because of their experience shown at that member level.
In addition, each rank will have a different signature space, partly affecting the effectiveness of the signature.

[pragna]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

Yea, at present situation it is very hard to raised up rank in forum. So though Sr, Hero, Ligendary members vs Jr.member bounty working different is no more but before merit system it was ok. Because Sr. Hero, Ligendary members are more and more knowledgeable about forum and their guidance was followed by jr.member, member or newbie. So as merit system changed full forum i think moderator shout think more for lower rank participants.

[BitcoinCazh]

that make sense i think, Sr. member or higher is more experience already, so why that get stakes cause maybe some people believe to invest when he see project ico in high rank member, that is strategy to get investor, more peoples trust with high rank

[sandgluenick]

that make sense i think, Sr. member or higher is more experience already, so why that get stakes cause maybe some people believe to invest when he see project ico in high rank member, that is strategy to get investor, more peoples trust with high rank

Yes, if we understand it correctly, ranking is proof that we have to discuss here and have experienced everything that can provide good ideas to improve products in the Bounty project. Actually it is only a matter of knowledge and token income after the project is completed and the developer's view will definitely be more trusted.

[Bodarbala]

Higher rank members has high experience from the low rank members so stake allocation is high. I feel sorrow because twice equal stake allocation.

That is why we must upgrade our rank to double our quotas.This of course deserves more diligence
And good luck for all members

[boyz97]

that make sense i think, Sr. member or higher is more experience already, so why that get stakes cause maybe some people believe to invest when he see project ico in high rank member, that is strategy to get investor, more peoples trust with high rank

yep ,if high rank joining in bounty campaign it mean they already analize th projects and investors believe with high rank member analysis.so this is will attract more investors.

[stefany101]

We know that the works of low ranks are similar to those in high ranks but we must accept that stake allocation on bounty campaigns is based on the old system of this forum. The new system allows us to work on our best, so that we can have merits that can help us to increase our ranks.

[Pffrt]

Since they are here from a long time, they must be honored with some more. The real fact is, they can use more attractive signature which you can't. A jr member can only add text while member can add link too. Don't they deserve more than you?
Getting merit isn't hard if you use this forum non-financial purpose. It's tested and proved.

[april08]

Based on awarding of stakes in signature it is not really encouraging. To me, the margin is to high. On the other hand "Merit", it is as scarce as anything you can think of. You will see newbie with over 300 posts. when we joined, it was 30-40 posts, you will be promoted and people give out merits but now it is hard to get.

[pushups44]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

This just means you must earn more merits to catch up. However, I acknowledge that it's a lot harder now to rise through the ranks than before merits, but at least spam has been curtailed somewhat by the new system.

[adterna]

If what I see is the allocation that is shared with Sr. Members up more than Sr. Members down, maybe because they have dedicated their time to the forum and that indeed I mean to them, and I think it's fair that their prize allocation greater than the appeal underneath.

[sana54210]

We know that the works of low ranks are similar to those in high ranks but we must accept that stake allocation on bounty campaigns is based on the old system of this forum. The new system allows us to work on our best, so that we can have merits that can help us to increase our ranks.

I want to believe that we all have one head and not two heads, those senior members we see out there are same as newbie like you said but they have worked harder to get to where they are today, since we all believe that the work of low rank is similar to that of high rank, then we should have nothing to worry about in getting to the position too.

If they can do it, we can do it also, the same strategy they use in getting the ranks, we can deploy it too if we can be more active and more dedicated to our activities and responsibilities to this forum, this is not a monopolized system and it has been design for everyone, so the rank is in our hands to take.

[asus09]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I guess now is not the time to think about something like that, I don't care if my rank won't go up again without getting merit.
I am more focused on exploring other sciences such as learning technical analysis for trade
so I can benefit in any field without relying on bounty campaigns.

[bestpikka]

do not easily complain, just try to prove the quality you have if you work hard and have creativity, of course you will be easy in improving your account. because complaining won't change your situation. because this forum is increasingly growing, it is not surprising if the rules of the game are increased.

[Natalim]

do not easily complain, just try to prove the quality you have if you work hard and have creativity, of course you will be easy in improving your account. because complaining won't change your situation. because this forum is increasingly growing, it is not surprising if the rules of the game are increased.

He is referring to rank advantage where higher ranks receives higher stake, so he probably talking about signature campaign.
Working hard is not necessary anymore in signature campaign as the requirement is very simple, there is a minimum post required and make sure you don't spam then stakes will be credited.

In short, same effort for all accounts but higher accounts gets bigger stake.

[bajindul88]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

It's natural that human nature is almost like that, whether jr.member, member, full member or above I feel the same depends on the person behind it. but for the full member, most of them have experience and are able to play fairly not as spammers. I think it's fair if their stake can be large because their efforts are also more than those of us who are still full members down