Lol, It's indeed understood now why the place is how it is. Very few understood what was the logic of this thread. The thread was not created to defend the project or anything as such but was created to highlight how "BLIND" Feedback system works, where a person doesn't bother to CONFIRM things before leaving a feedback, and when asked the said part is that I will check later to review it.
So basically everything is correct, only the person who try to defend/respond is the BIGGEST criminal on the planet earth. But that's obvious because why will anyone prefer to change anything, when they have zero benefit from it? The only people who suffer by it is the ones who are lower rank, so cares about them.
I don't even want to reply to some of the ABOVE message, as it's time waste due to their already built mindset, you can't change mindset of certain class of people.
And also cheers to those PEOPLE who added "MERITS" within minutes of the thread getting opened.
Oh FFS, that has absolutely nothing to do with your issue, and the fact that some posts got merited doesn't mean people are tagging you or ganged up against you in order to earn merits. That's on you if you're outraged.
Have you never read any of the scam accusations against ICOs and their plagiarized whitepapers? Just take a look at the Scam Accusation section's first page, and I bet at least half of the threads are about this. It's that rampant, and lots of people are paying attention to it. Had you noticed this before putting together your whitepaper you probably would have taken a little more time to state concepts in your own words. But obviously you did not, and that also is on you.
Well, I never meant people are ganging up AGAINST me, I am pointing out that people added "MERITS", just based upon creation of thread.
Ok some here already said that it takes "EFFORT" to create such threads, but what about the "EFFORTS" one puts to create project (IF Genuine)?
And is there ANY system that can "REMOVE" Merits? What IF the case is proven "WRONG", how does that seems then? Shouldn't that person be "PUNISHED" for false accusation?
Majority here said that you should "TRY" and solve the issue instead of bringing it into notice, but ANYONE explain HOW?
THE OP of that thread did not "REPLIED" what his ACTUAL issue was with us. We asked him that was not having "REFERENCE" was his concern about our Whitepaper, but instead of responding to that, he was repeating same thing again and again, with such attitude and behavior, how exactly do we SOLVE the issue?
Hello everyone, as we know after recent changes by Bitcointalk forum, there is a new system, where a lot of people now got the facility to leave feedback.
So I like to ask the Admin in particular, and other members that is this system really working right and has made this community better?
What I am sharing is NOTHING to do with my issue that I am facing but I have simply opened because a lot of people like me might suffer at the hands of these people who claim that they make this place better, but that's far from it instead they are master at bullying newbies.
Here is the one example -
Avirunes -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=175302 Ariunes as his name! He left the Feedback just on the Basis of seeing the thread is created!
NOTE - the feedback was made within hours of the thread appearing, without even waiting for my response.
He basically had no time to review anything but HAD time to leave the feedback. And why not, who is going to listen to someone newbie like me?
So, I at no way has started this thread because of anger or anything. But I just want to honestly ask the Admin, is this place become BETTER? I know many will say I am Bias because I got feedback, but just check the thread and even other people with how the system is working not just in terms of feedback but people able to EASILY create scam accusation threads. It only take a minute or moment for these people to do it for their own sake and to have "MERITS" easily.
So it would great if Admin just take 1 minute to basically reply to tell whether he feels this is the way it has made this forum better.
Note - I am not asking anyone to give their views on the feedback on me or my problem, I am just asking the views on this SYSTEM whether you guys feel it's working or not.Well, its not really a new system, we started being able to leave each other feedback in 2013 or so? Your point on "could it be a problem if people are too hasty leaving feedback" would be more effective if you gave examples where it did occur. Before the feedback system, people still created scam accusation threads just as freely as now, the only difference was that then Theymos had to personally review each one and decide whether a person would get a scammer tag or not. If you are claiming that people can farm merits by opening scam accusations, I don't know that I'd agree with that. I generally do see valid scam accusations earn merits, but not so much the invalid ones. Its sort of hard to compare back then to now, because Bitcointalk was a fairly uniform discourse community at that point, so things were a bit different, but overall with the exception that people take feedback too seriously, I'd say that it works better than the old system.
I have already given example on the very start, where the person who left "NEGATIVE FEEDBACK" had no time to review anything, but just on the basis of the thread being creation, he was "HUNGRY" to leave FEEDBACK, and that genuine is called "Avirunes"
Some people say that it's "IMPORTANT" to leave feedback early to "HELP" people stop investing, but does that mean leaving "BLIND FEEDBACK"? And like I said many said that it's okay you can always "DELETE" Feedbacks, but how do we delete the damage on reputation? How do we recover the "TRUST" of people who might already sidelined us just because of accusation?
So according to the present situation, you are 99% scammer/fraud and all the terms used by some people above, regardless of everything else.
There are "SOME" threads, where people were able to add every possible document to finally get this of the issue, but when it happened? It happened weeks and weeks AFTER it, which meant there was "ALREADY" damage down to their reputation. And best part is that MOSTLY with such threads, the OP did not even care to write on top that it's solved or anything as such. It was just present on the Title while the whole content stayed the SAME till someone actually "SCROLL" down to understand that the situation was SOLVED.
So basically all efforts are made to ACCUSE someone, after that no one got "ENOUGH" time for anything else. And how can there be "ENOUGH" time, you get MERITS and Appreciation for ACCUSING, but IF you are given that your claim was wrong, you get "NOTHING" instead your reputation dips, so such threads are always tried to be put out of the way for sake of their OWN IMAGE!
Just a COMMON SENSE question, how anyone supports blind feedback? Ok I understand the thread getting opened, because the person checked, but HOW do people who left "MERIT", or leave feedback can give their decision so quickly? And let it be clear, when I say quickly, I mean within "FEW HOURS" not days!
