ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough?

[Zdraste16]

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

I want to say about the holding of IEO exchanges.  I had attempts to join Binance and Bittrex, everything went without me, as it is very difficult, if not impossible, to participate in them.  Something happened at Binance, interruptions due to the large influx of users.  On Bittrex, as soon as the time to start selling tokens came, the buy button did not even become active as a message appeared that everything was sold.  It is not clear for whom then if it is not possible to participate  Maybe in the future everything will be finalized, but for now, so.

[Chikitita2004]

True. ICO is a good way of raising money to fund projects and a lot are doing it but also no wonder why a lot of selfish scammers are using ICO as their front to scam people for their own personal interests. Simply because ICO has been known to be a popular way to raise money and a lot are falling into good promises written in whitepapers and later fail to accomplish what they've written.

[ataki]

It seems, that IEOs taking over the crowdfunding market from ICOs. They are very successful  this year while ICOs struggle a lot. IEOs are a game changer on the market and the recent market recovery is partially due to them.

[icalical]

I think both of them are efficient enough as a fundraising method for startup, however I believe both of them have it's own strength and weakness, and not to degrade ICO or anything, but IEO will have more trust from investors since IEO involve third party which is the Exchange, but as far as I know the main purpose and mission of Cryptocurrency is to eliminate all those kind of Third-Party involvement and service.

[upsidedown75]

I think both of them are efficient enough as a fundraising method for startup, however I believe both of them have it's own strength and weakness, and not to degrade ICO or anything, but IEO will have more trust from investors since IEO involve third party which is the Exchange, but as far as I know the main purpose and mission of Cryptocurrency is to eliminate all those kind of Third-Party involvement and service.

IEO is far more efficient and effective for now until further notice, IEO is faster in raising funds than ICO, IEO takes just less than a week to meet up with hardcap because of the number of investors trooping in to the platform based on the trust they have that they are investing in a verified project, while ICO takes almost 6 months sometimes in reaching Softcap or Hardcap.

IEO also eliminate the effect of full time scammers on crowd funding while we still have the presence of scammers using ICO to defraud people, the only thing I know both of them may share in common is bad projects, another thing is to raise fund and another thing is to be able to sustain such project.

[Mrsparks]

Well to answer your last question, I don't think it's a necessity to institute blockchain technology at the soul of a project funded with the ICO mechanisms. Yes the distributed currency will be on a blockchain but it's not a necessity that the platform utilizes every other function of the blockchain. In my opinion it's the prematurity of the crypto-currency that is giving IEOs such rave in due time I expect Security Token offering to be more notable than both ICOs and IEOs.

[Anc92]

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

IEO has become quite the hot item now. Amazing projects that already presented the practicability of their ideas to the public sold out their IEOs with relative ease.
I think IEOs stand a better chance at convincing investors in the crypto space to back projects.

[setialovers]

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

IEO has become quite the hot item now. Amazing projects that already presented the practicability of their ideas to the public sold out their IEOs with relative ease.
I think IEOs stand a better chance at convincing investors in the crypto space to back projects.

IEOs become trend right now. Its more eficient and effective for developers team because they dont have to spend a lot budget, all administered by exchangers. But to choose good IEO, we should choose IEO from big exchangers

[tsurpalglobe]

I believe that the most important question today is the question of choosing one or another ICO or IEO. And how do you usually choose the projects? Just following own evaluation?

[sarrpora]

I believe that the most important question today is the question of choosing one or another ICO or IEO. And how do you usually choose the projects? Just following own evaluation?

That's a great question. Well, from my point of view, in here we mostly talk about the valuable idea and prospects. But of course, impossible to be 100% objective without automatization in here

[tsurpalglobe]

That's a great question. Well, from my point of view, in here we mostly talk about the valuable idea and prospects. But of course, impossible to be 100% objective without automatization in here

Of course. However with Big Data analysis and advanced projects in here, it is possible to build an objective image on the market in general and any coin in particular. Have you heard of Vespucci platform?

[sarrpora]

Of course. However with Big Data analysis and advanced projects in here, it is possible to build an objective image on the market in general and any coin in particular. Have you heard of Vespucci platform?

To tell the truth, I haven't.. Are they helping to objectively evaluate the coin and the market in general?

[tsurpalglobe]

To tell the truth, I haven't.. Are they helping to objectively evaluate the coin and the market in general?

Yes, absolutely! Just Google Vespucci. They are a part of Volentix ecosystem. In few words, it is a platform that monitors the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrency markets and, by harnessing the power of cutting-edge AI and Machine Learning technology, delivers unbiased, robust and up-to-date rankings that represent the real value of a very wide spectrum of coins as well as their potential

[Koadharber]

I think IEO is more effective because when following the IEO investors will believe if the coin will be listed in the exchange that holds the IEO. I hate ico because they only do fund raising and don't quickly list their coins

Actually many investors now lost their trust in a ICO because of the large number of scam projects coming out,and their are some legit ICO but investors need to wait for a long time before they list it into the exchange because some developers don't have one words,IEO is the most effective investment these days because they list their coins directly the projects have already exchange partner but we must not confident on it and we need to be vigilant always.

[Nekoma2018]

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

I think ieo is more secure compared to ico.. this will help reduce the rate of fake projects in the industry which are claiming to have raised money... which infact theyve raised nothing

[sarrpora]

Yes, absolutely! Just Google Vespucci. They are a part of Volentix ecosystem. In few words, it is a platform that monitors the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrency markets and, by harnessing the power of cutting-edge AI and Machine Learning technology, delivers unbiased, robust and up-to-date rankings that represent the real value of a very wide spectrum of coins as well as their potential

Sounds great, will check out more shortly. But so far it seems that the product should make the atmosphere much more trustworthy and reliable. Attractive

[elitemobb]

See everything is very simple in the market full of promising projects that at one time held the ICO but did not collect the necessary amount for further development, but their potential is good. To this end, they submit applications to the exchange for an IEO to be collected for further development and I consider this a normal course for any project.

[silver23]

ICO is good step for start up is right, but we can see the scammers used ICO and making scam project frauded making imbestor loss.
IEO is the solution for now, because scam ICO is in a high number.
We need to be safe and if you want to choose ICO just look how it is right or not.

[Olatunjex]

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

Ico has an avenue of raining fund for startup has fade away, you don't have to be confused, IEO is the news means of fundraising for startups, at this moment IEO is more effective.

[carriagehoodlum]

Ico has an avenue of raining fund for startup has fade away, you don't have to be confused, IEO is the news means of fundraising for startups, at this moment IEO is more effective.

of course now many investors prefer to invest in projects that carry out the IEO with a big exchange compared to the ICO project. although there are now few investors at the ICO, but I think there are still a number of projects that make ICO sales and get decent funds. but we don't know the truth, we have to wait until the development has actually been done and entered the market.