onex_team (OP)
Copper Member
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 291
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 20, 2019, 05:04:50 AM |
|
🌞Dear all, 💥As you know, we just got our ONEX coin listed on CryptoBridge and launched marginal trade. However, this is just the first step. The next major feature we’ll add is mirror trading – meaning that users will be able to copy successful traders’ orders and maximize their profits without having to learn all the intricacies of trading. Mirror trading is great for successful traders, too, since they will receive a commission on the profits of all those users who follow them. 💥Of course, if you mirror a trader, you want to be sure that they are really good. So how will we form the initial list of top traders? Here comes the most interesting part. If you want to become a top OneExBit trader and earn a hefty commission, then you need to get busy right now by trading in the ONEX/BTC pair on CryptoBridge. The more active and successful you are in this initial period, the better your chances to be included on our champions list. Don’t miss this opportunity – start trading in ONEX on CryptoBridge right now! 🔗Official links: 🔹Website: https://oneexbit.com🔹MNO: https://masternodes.online/currencies/ONEX🔹Twitter: https://twitter.com/Oneexbit1🔹Telegram: https://t.me/oneexbit🔹Discord: https://discord.gg/4QtsXck🔹GitHub:https://github.com/oneexbit/oneexbit-release/ 🔹Whitepaper: https://oneexbit.com/whitepaper-onex.pdf🔹Medium: https://medium.com/@smmonex🔹Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/smmoneexbit🔹Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129693🔹YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXTH2La9LXL26asXsCQiJ9w🔹Wallet Download: https://github.com/oneexbit/onex-core/releases/tag/v2.2.1 |
|
|
|
|
John_Silver
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
|
|
May 20, 2019, 05:26:44 AM |
|
I think you are not completely right. Both EOS and ADA had technical part right on start. Maybe not fully covered, but whatever - they had something real.
ONEX has something real too, so that's at least one reason to be slightly optimistic about it
At the end of the ICO at the EOS, there was nothing. Mainnet, they have launched much later. Yes, my mistake, you are right. Still EOS whitepaper was solid enough in tech part, no? No, it was all very naughty. They positioned themselves as decentralized system, created high, and then it turned out, chtio all centralized with multiple vulnerabilities... Hmm. As far as I'm aware off - EOS's centralized nature became obvious only after start of mainnet. On whitepaper stage everything looked legit, no? )) That's right, before the launch of the mainnet, almost everyone considered EOS a very interesting project, and then its shortcomings became clear. |
|
|
|
|
A7373
Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 15
|
|
May 20, 2019, 07:23:03 AM |
|
EOS is good becouse we could make own smartcontracts in EOS blockchain, but anyway we need to talk about our topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Bugatti73
Member
Offline
Activity: 616
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2019, 10:36:06 AM |
|
I think you are not completely right. Both EOS and ADA had technical part right on start. Maybe not fully covered, but whatever - they had something real.
ONEX has something real too, so that's at least one reason to be slightly optimistic about it
At the end of the ICO at the EOS, there was nothing. Mainnet, they have launched much later. Yes, my mistake, you are right. Still EOS whitepaper was solid enough in tech part, no? No, it was all very naughty. They positioned themselves as decentralized system, created high, and then it turned out, chtio all centralized with multiple vulnerabilities... Hmm. As far as I'm aware off - EOS's centralized nature became obvious only after start of mainnet. On whitepaper stage everything looked legit, no? )) That's right, before the launch of the mainnet, almost everyone considered EOS a very interesting project, and then its shortcomings became clear. Nevertheless, the EOS does not leave its positions and to this day is highly rated in Coinmarketcup. This means that at any moment it can repeat the history of the BNB. |
|
|
|
|
John_Silver
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
|
|
May 20, 2019, 10:40:08 AM |
|
Nevertheless, the EOS does not leave its positions and to this day is highly rated in Coinmarketcup. This means that at any moment it can repeat the history of the BNB.
Personally I very much doubt it, the extremely dishonest project. Money just collected a lot of advertising and spend a lot. |
|
|
|
|
A7373
Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 15
|
|
May 20, 2019, 02:22:11 PM |
|
Nevertheless, the EOS does not leave its positions and to this day is highly rated in Coinmarketcup. This means that at any moment it can repeat the history of the BNB.
Personally I very much doubt it, the extremely dishonest project. Money just collected a lot of advertising and spend a lot. Well, you can talk like that about almost every cryptocurrency project. People have been waiting for a real product for years and they recieving constantly promised news. |
|
|
|
|
kolnides
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 1
|
|
May 20, 2019, 04:29:03 PM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
|
|
|
|
|
Bugatti73
Member
Offline
Activity: 616
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2019, 06:09:23 PM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. |
|
|
|
|
Retals49
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2019, 06:22:40 PM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. This is the eternal debate. For POS and masternodes need coins, and in case of failure they are sometimes impossible to sell at all or with significant losses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
starkovblue
|
|
May 20, 2019, 06:52:24 PM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. It is in fact, and many people recently understand this. At this stage, liquidity is most important. And it is better to mine something that is easy to sell on several exchanges than to buy a large amount for masternodes and find yourself with useless tokens. |
Crypto is a very unique industry, where the line between "deserves to be in jail" and "leading member of the community" is as thin as one-ply toilet paper.
|
|
|
a.kaetana
Member
Offline
Activity: 128
Merit: 12
|
|
May 20, 2019, 08:12:42 PM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. It is in fact, and many people recently understand this. At this stage, liquidity is most important. And it is better to mine something that is easy to sell on several exchanges than to buy a large amount for masternodes and find yourself with useless tokens. Liquidity is important, yes. But I don't see so much difference between masternodes and POW here. I mean - when shit really hits the fan it's too late to do anything in both cases, don't you think so? Either you have a bag of oversold coins you can sell only in loss or a bag of useless masternodes and tokens you can sell only in loss. In first case you may have a small chance to reactin time, but chances aren't really big. |
kotecu-murkotecu =^..^=
|
|
|
Retals49
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2019, 08:49:04 PM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. It is in fact, and many people recently understand this. At this stage, liquidity is most important. And it is better to mine something that is easy to sell on several exchanges than to buy a large amount for masternodes and find yourself with useless tokens. Liquidity is important, yes. But I don't see so much difference between masternodes and POW here. I mean - when shit really hits the fan it's too late to do anything in both cases, don't you think so? Either you have a bag of oversold coins you can sell only in loss or a bag of useless masternodes and tokens you can sell only in loss. In first case you may have a small chance to reactin time, but chances aren't really big. Again, we return to the idea that Any investment is a very high risk and you need to approach them responsibly) |
|
|
|
|
DatchRoem
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 184
Merit: 2
|
|
May 21, 2019, 04:15:25 AM |
|
EOS is good becouse we could make own smartcontracts in EOS blockchain, but anyway we need to talk about our topic.
Well, we can do it on ETH or XTZ too. Smartcontracts aren't EOS's monpoly, you know. It's mostly initial PR and gambling that keeps EOS still running. |
|
|
|
|
A7373
Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 15
|
|
May 21, 2019, 07:24:22 AM |
|
EOS is good becouse we could make own smartcontracts in EOS blockchain, but anyway we need to talk about our topic.
Well, we can do it on ETH or XTZ too. Smartcontracts aren't EOS's monpoly, you know. It's mostly initial PR and gambling that keeps EOS still running. Yes, you are right, in any case, we need to observe the situation and always take into account the interests of the community. |
|
|
|
|
Bugatti73
Member
Offline
Activity: 616
Merit: 10
|
|
May 21, 2019, 08:46:44 AM |
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. It is in fact, and many people recently understand this. At this stage, liquidity is most important. And it is better to mine something that is easy to sell on several exchanges than to buy a large amount for masternodes and find yourself with useless tokens. Liquidity is important, yes. But I don't see so much difference between masternodes and POW here. I mean - when shit really hits the fan it's too late to do anything in both cases, don't you think so? Either you have a bag of oversold coins you can sell only in loss or a bag of useless masternodes and tokens you can sell only in loss. In first case you may have a small chance to reactin time, but chances aren't really big. Again, we return to the idea that Any investment is a very high risk and you need to approach them responsibly) It would be very interesting to see the risk indicators for POW mining and Mastrenodes of the same coin with primary costs comparing . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
John_Silver
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
|
|
May 21, 2019, 01:17:55 PM |
|
EOS is good becouse we could make own smartcontracts in EOS blockchain, but anyway we need to talk about our topic.
Well, we can do it on ETH or XTZ too. Smartcontracts aren't EOS's monpoly, you know. It's mostly initial PR and gambling that keeps EOS still running. ETH for this is the most convenient and safe, although not the fastest. |
|
|
|
|
A7373
Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 15
|
|
May 21, 2019, 01:25:07 PM |
|
Please tell me why in your opinion the Midas coin has depreciated very much, while the rest of the market is in a good plus? |
|
|
|
|
kolnides
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 1
|
|
May 21, 2019, 01:39:47 PM |
|
EOS is good becouse we could make own smartcontracts in EOS blockchain, but anyway we need to talk about our topic.
Well, we can do it on ETH or XTZ too. Smartcontracts aren't EOS's monpoly, you know. It's mostly initial PR and gambling that keeps EOS still running. ETH for this is the most convenient and safe, although not the fastest. I think that Etherium is stable because it is very popular and most of the new projects are conducting ICO on its blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
|
