the new model of fundrising is IEO

[dfktynby1004]

You can't trust this new scheme. Yes now it shows very good results but it will not last forever. Now enterprising people will understand all the nuances and will sell wrappers that will lose their prices immediately after purchase at IEO. So I advise you not to be greedy and constantly follow the news.

[1715075232]

1715075232

[1715075232]

1715075232

[1715075232]

1715075232

[1715075232]

1715075232

[mirgo1791]

the use with customs helps as the release of token on returns to gives with chance on field as owners to manage with use on modest as segregated to follows with returns of work from different developer and collects on decision as expending use with spares on possession of resource with the authorization.

[makerst]

IEO is a profitable business for our world, but I think that cryptocurrency will still generally have a good benefit only in order to raise funds. I hope that the scammers still will not find opportunities for normal life and they will not continue to deceive people.

[acholagi]

Yes, I am fed up with ICO now, almost all of them have not succeeded in the exchange market, they dropped the price so deeply that my capital did not return from the ICO project. I hope the IEO is a big success from the ICO.

The IEO is still new and there is still much debate about the IEO, especially regarding transparency that is not so clear because in seconds sales can be completed and sold out

[shinratensei_]

It is not about the form, no matter if it is ICO, IEO or STO. People lose their patient and they are not more interested in investing in something what only promises without delivering the real solution. So many scams made this industry dead. 

Not at all and have you seen how most of IEO that run on the binance? The only problem that investors are looking for fast profit and it can't be got easily. Beside of the scam and short term players will become the next problem.

[m0Ray]

I think in IEO hidden their problems. They are that you can buy absolutely unpromising coin with which it will be impossible to work in the future. Yes, it is the best tool for speculation. But IEO does not improve the blockchain system but makes the community speculate a lot and do not pay attention to more important details of the market and industry.

[biznes35]

It's progressing. But in this case, we see how the ICO market ends its life. Since ICO is not believed now. IEO saves investors but does not improve the product.

[CleverOracle]

As long as the IEO is conducted on a popular exchange then it could be safe for investors but recently I found some new exchanges offering the same service which is not recommended since they are not known in crypto space.

[TooDumbForBitcoin]

It's progressing. But in this case, we see how the ICO market ends its life. Since ICO is not believed now. IEO saves investors but does not improve the product.

IEO's is much more worthless then ICO's on a smart contracts basis. It is a step down in the technology development. Greedy exchanges just want more money to their hands.

[Rtalk]

As long as the IEO is conducted on a popular exchange then it could be safe for investors but recently I found some new exchanges offering the same service which is not recommended since they are not known in crypto space.

Just today it is a new trend and all exchanges are trying to repeat this success,because it attracts investors.
Perhaps when the IEO is held on a well-known major exchange - it is safe,but does not guarantee the success of the coin. Recently, the VBK coin demonstrated this on the Bittrex exchange.

[aervin11]

IEO has the hype. You can't say that IEO is more secure because crypto ain't regulated, are you sure that all investors who'd buy on IEO are insured with their investments? What if it's a sh*tcoin who's just riding the hype? It's a brand new name for ICO but has the same sh*t inside.

IEO's is much more worthless then ICO's on a smart contracts basis. It is a step down in the technology development. Greedy exchanges just want more money to their hands.

I strongly agree!!!

[guoyu78]

The IEO aims to raise funds in a safer way than ICO. By following the IEO, investors will be safer because Exchanger has already sorted out, which projects are good and projects that are not good for IEO on their exchanger.

Indeed, its already guaranted will be listed in exchanger and mostly the price surge after start trade in market. Right now, IEO is more attractive and more profitable than ICOs and many investor trauma with ICOs condition in 2018

May I ask you a question? Who are the Investors? Are we strictly looking at those that have big money to invest as investors? You and I are also investors but how many of those IEO project can you say you have successfully participated in during and after ICO, I bet none, so who are then the IEO projects for? For the exchanges or the whales?

The IEO concept is a very good and promising one, but personal interest that has been put ahead of other people’s interest will make the ICO have negative reputations, because the only good news I hear about IEO is that they get sold out, but I have not heard of any ordinary investor hear successfully invest in the projects.

[d1ceplayer]

Of course, an IEO is a huge step forward compared to ICO, where investors are given much more guarantees. However, this type of tokensale appeared quite recently, which is why it is too early to draw conclusions about its effectiveness. I think it should take at least a year to see all the strengths and weaknesses of the IEO.

IEO under Binance is quite very effective and I don’t doubt its future effectiveness under Binance, I cannot say much about other exchanges IEO, a copy version can never be as real as the original, I know we should not create a monopolized system.

So, if I say only Binance IEO should be recognized would be unreasonable, but it has to be limited to few top and reliable exchanges, I wish these exchanges can also be under a control too to out their activities to check, but it will be possible to do so under this decentralized system, so IEO to me will be more effective than ICO if done under these reliable exchanges, otherwise, IEO will end up being exactly like ICO.

[genset88]

In 2018, more than 67% of investment in ICO failed. That is why this form is no longer attractive to investors. Therefore, the IEO was born with many new forms, attracting many investors to make them safer.IEO is becoming the new trend of this year because it is very prestigious and always selects good projects for the investors.

[harrypotpot]

The only problem I see is that MultiVac was sold in 7 seconds. Well, who the hell bought it and how come it was that fast? Maybe is was a bot or something, but we can't really discount that there could still be manipulations from behind. I guess EIO model should have put something in place to check and prevent this kind of manipulation.

What if there an instance of a big whale just scoop up the entire MuiltiVac? It was very easy if the advertisement and marketing is really good, there is no reason for us doubt the project and in that case, it can somehow increase the reputation that IEOs has just started. More partnerships to come, I will going to look further on this.

[Rtalk]

Many people now perceive IEO as a new kind of ICO,but the reality is that not everyone can participate in this.
Here, the main income are the major players,the people who use scripts.
When investors ' interest in IEO starts to disappear,then exchanges will start to struggle with algorithms and make participation more transparent for everyone.

[Whosdaddy]

It is not about the form, no matter if it is ICO, IEO or STO. People lose their patient and they are not more interested in investing in something what only promises without delivering the real solution. So many scams made this industry dead. 

I think that IEO is capable of addressing majority of the issues that were there is case of ICO. Scams have been on the peak when it was ICOs time and I think that is the reason why would people not pay attention but surprisingly people are paying attention. You need to check out the success of the IEOs held so far. Binance Launchpad has been a huge success so far. No place for scams and instant token selling. You should check it out.

[pinoycash]

Many people now perceive IEO as a new kind of ICO,but the reality is that not everyone can participate in this.
Here, the main income are the major players,the people who use scripts.
When investors ' interest in IEO starts to disappear,then exchanges will start to struggle with algorithms and make participation more transparent for everyone.

Its just a added a new flavor in doing ICO projects.,

Only Binance Launchpads has strict guidelines before anyone can participate and buy in an IEO projects.,

[irixo10]

Yes it is and the reason for this is to reduce scams which might be achieved if more improvement is done. At least now before a project is listed for IEO or plans to conduct IEO the exchange will verify them to ensure they are reliable and trustworthy.

[Perfect35]

Most ICOs these days do not masks much sakes as IEOs do. This is why project that were formerly running ICO now result into going for the fast means of sales, which is IEO.

I am not surprised that IEO is succeeding now and investors are fast opting for it, because through it, they can quickly make their profits. Past IEO models have proven to be effective.