S17+ S9k/SE T17 S17/Pro DR5 B7 Others All Overclock per chip and Voltage Control

[mindtrip]

so efudd when do you plan on releasing your Z11 firmware? If you need anyone to do any validation testing I have a few units I could test them on with you if your interested. Your work on the Z9 Mini firmwares was great  

@mindtrip - the release is waiting on some "administration" stuff at the moment. It's been technically ready for a while now, but it is being released in partnership with one of top equihash pools to provide a more seamless integration between the hardware, software, and the mining pools. Additionally there will be no developer fee in conjuction with that pool and lower pool side fees as well. Simultaneous releases for Z9, Mini and Z11 are ready to go just as soon as we can get the joint release stuff completed.

Another way to look at it is if you are currently paying X percent for mining fees + dev fees (let's call it 6% if you are using antpool + my dev release), you'll be 1% or less combined with the new firmware and pool which is a good trade off for limited overclock and a win if there is good overclock.

From an expectations perspective, the Z11 firmware is not going to initially be a "big overclock" release like it was for the Z9. It'll be similar to the mini in terms of small improvements out the door.

The feature set between Z9/Mini/Z11 will be in sync...so if you have used and tuned on one, you can use and tune on another.

Soon(tm) although it doesn't help that I'm sick at the moment either though which is delaying things a bit.

thank you,

Jason

Thank you for the update I will follow this thread for the official release announcement

[1715135961]

1715135961

[chipless]

so efudd when do you plan on releasing your Z11 firmware? If you need anyone to do any validation testing I have a few units I could test them on with you if your interested. Your work on the Z9 Mini firmwares was great  

@mindtrip - the release is waiting on some "administration" stuff at the moment. It's been technically ready for a while now, but it is being released in partnership with one of top equihash pools to provide a more seamless integration between the hardware, software, and the mining pools. Additionally there will be no developer fee in conjuction with that pool and lower pool side fees as well. Simultaneous releases for Z9, Mini and Z11 are ready to go just as soon as we can get the joint release stuff completed.

Another way to look at it is if you are currently paying X percent for mining fees + dev fees (let's call it 6% if you are using antpool + my dev release), you'll be 1% or less combined with the new firmware and pool which is a good trade off for limited overclock and a win if there is good overclock.

From an expectations perspective, the Z11 firmware is not going to initially be a "big overclock" release like it was for the Z9. It'll be similar to the mini in terms of small improvements out the door.

The feature set between Z9/Mini/Z11 will be in sync...so if you have used and tuned on one, you can use and tune on another.

Soon(tm) although it doesn't help that I'm sick at the moment either though which is delaying things a bit.

thank you,

Jason

Thank you for the update I will follow this thread for the official release announcement

You can monitor his thread for his announcement. This thread is for non-epudd supported firmware.

Here is his thread 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5036968.0

[efudd]

so efudd when do you plan on releasing your Z11 firmware? If you need anyone to do any validation testing I have a few units I could test them on with you if your interested. Your work on the Z9 Mini firmwares was great  

@mindtrip - the release is waiting on some "administration" stuff at the moment. It's been technically ready for a while now, but it is being released in partnership with one of top equihash pools to provide a more seamless integration between the hardware, software, and the mining pools. Additionally there will be no developer fee in conjuction with that pool and lower pool side fees as well. Simultaneous releases for Z9, Mini and Z11 are ready to go just as soon as we can get the joint release stuff completed.

Another way to look at it is if you are currently paying X percent for mining fees + dev fees (let's call it 6% if you are using antpool + my dev release), you'll be 1% or less combined with the new firmware and pool which is a good trade off for limited overclock and a win if there is good overclock.

From an expectations perspective, the Z11 firmware is not going to initially be a "big overclock" release like it was for the Z9. It'll be similar to the mini in terms of small improvements out the door.

The feature set between Z9/Mini/Z11 will be in sync...so if you have used and tuned on one, you can use and tune on another.

Soon(tm) although it doesn't help that I'm sick at the moment either though which is delaying things a bit.

thank you,

Jason

Thank you for the update I will follow this thread for the official release announcement

You can monitor his thread for his announcement. This thread is for non-epudd supported firmware.

Here is his thread 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5036968.0

Yeah, I guess it is annoying when someone comes to your thread and incessantly quotes everything and posts references to their own content in it.

Shrug.

Wonder where that started.

-j

[chipless]

Not really.... If you werent talking shit about me I wouldnt do it but if your gonna talk shit then I will do whatever I dont care. I dont have to have other member stick up for me or get involved in something that is really none of their business.

[efudd]

Not really.... If you werent talking shit about me I wouldnt do it but if your gonna talk shit then I will do whatever I dont care. I dont have to have other member stick up for me or get involved in something that is really none of their business.

Lol. And I do? I can’t help whatever folk may do on their own.

-j

[chipless]

Z11 OC v1.0 Beta 3 is now released with speeds from 148-150+ k/sol

Please report any bugs and feedback

[efudd]

Z11 OC v1.0 Beta 3 is now released with speeds from 148-150+ k/sol

Please report any bugs and feedback

Ah congrats. You caught up with yourself!

How is this different than your previous update where you said you had speeds from 148-150+ k/sol?

Updated 04/30/2019 4:43am CST
The Z11 base firmware is the 03/12/2019 version from Bitmain,the scan frequency and default frequencies have been updated and the
voltage was increased from 840/870mV to 900mV. After about 10 minutes of running the machine will scan the frequencies every
2 minutes or so. I have increased the speed on my 2 Z11's by about 8k/sol each bringing my speed up to 148-150+ k/sol per machine
SSH is enabled as well as malware protection against current known Antminer malware. The hash increase in about +3% increase over
the factory firmware. I may be able to squeeze a little more out of them with some more tweaking. This is time consuming and I do lose
profits from the miner during the coding time so if you find this helpful please make a donation and I can work more on the tweaks.

-j

[chipless]

Z11 OC v1.0 Beta 3 is now released with speeds from 148-150+ k/sol

Please report any bugs and feedback

Ah congrats. You caught up with yourself!

How is this different than your previous update where you said you had speeds from 148-150+ k/sol?

Updated 04/30/2019 4:43am CST
The Z11 base firmware is the 03/12/2019 version from Bitmain,the scan frequency and default frequencies have been updated and the
voltage was increased from 840/870mV to 900mV. After about 10 minutes of running the machine will scan the frequencies every
2 minutes or so. I have increased the speed on my 2 Z11's by about 8k/sol each bringing my speed up to 148-150+ k/sol per machine
SSH is enabled as well as malware protection against current known Antminer malware. The hash increase in about +3% increase over
the factory firmware. I may be able to squeeze a little more out of them with some more tweaking. This is time consuming and I do lose
profits from the miner during the coding time so if you find this helpful please make a donation and I can work more on the tweaks.

-j

Why do you even ask you know you are going to look at it anyways. Last I was told you cant get it to hold a speed and still have the throttle down after so long.

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
2h0m28s   159.56             150.15

edit......
I bet thats what your doing now....LOL

[efudd]

Z11 OC v1.0 Beta 3 is now released with speeds from 148-150+ k/sol

Please report any bugs and feedback

Ah congrats. You caught up with yourself!

How is this different than your previous update where you said you had speeds from 148-150+ k/sol?

Updated 04/30/2019 4:43am CST
The Z11 base firmware is the 03/12/2019 version from Bitmain,the scan frequency and default frequencies have been updated and the
voltage was increased from 840/870mV to 900mV. After about 10 minutes of running the machine will scan the frequencies every
2 minutes or so. I have increased the speed on my 2 Z11's by about 8k/sol each bringing my speed up to 148-150+ k/sol per machine
SSH is enabled as well as malware protection against current known Antminer malware. The hash increase in about +3% increase over
the factory firmware. I may be able to squeeze a little more out of them with some more tweaking. This is time consuming and I do lose
profits from the miner during the coding time so if you find this helpful please make a donation and I can work more on the tweaks.

-j

Why do you even ask you know you are going to look at it anyways. Last I was told you cant get it to hold a speed and still have the throttle down after so long.

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
2h0m28s   159.56             150.15

edit......
I bet thats what your doing now....LOL

No, I'm watching a video on someone watching their car with a foam cannon. It is more interesting. But thank you for inquiring as to my interests-- it really was thoughtful of you. I didn't know you cared!

But really, your previous statement is the same as your current statement in terms of "148-150".. so inquiring minds, how is it different? Which one is the truth?

And in your other thread, you stated your combined hashrate across all of your machines was around 455k between a couple of Z11s, Z9s and 4 minis... and in doing the math being conservative on the Mini/Z9 overclocks, the remaining hash rate out of the 455k for the 2x Z11s was.... 284k .. or 142k/sol each.

So which one of those is truth?

It's really hard to tell.

-j

[chipless]

No, I'm watching a video on someone watching their car with a foam cannon. It is more interesting. But thank you for inquiring as to my interests-- it really was thoughtful of you. I didn't know you cared!

But really, your previous statement is the same as your current statement in terms of "148-150".. so inquiring minds, how is it different? Which one is the truth?

And in your other thread, you stated your combined hashrate across all of your machines was around 455k between a couple of Z11s, Z9s and 4 minis... and in doing the math being conservative on the Mini/Z9 overclocks, the remaining hash rate out of the 455k for the 2x Z11s was.... 284k .. or 142k/sol each.

So which one of those is truth?

It's really hard to tell.

-j

The truth is the speed I post wtf dont you understand about that...At least I dont tell people I am dropping my dev fee lower then never do or tell them you will get voltage on z9 and dont. You are the one who hasnt followed thru with many things you say, I try to be as accurate as possible and may sometimes not get it right, I am only human

I am not going to debate shit with you about it your only trying to be an asshole and you know it. If you wonder then look at it yourself or try it out. my machines are as follows

4 minis get over 16k each
2 z9 full get 55+ each
2 z11 get 150 each

Now do the math ... all my machines now report on machine 474 k and flypool reports it as 473 currently....
I didnt know I had to always report exact up to the minute information on my full rig. But here is the stats as I type for you machine and then flypool

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
2h29m38s   151.36   150.48

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
12m10s   156.44   151.3


145.2 KH/s   5446 (100%)   0 (0%)   6 minutes ago just loaded beta 3 12 min ago
151.0 KH/s   5661 (100%)   0 (0%)   6 minutes ago


Hashrate

473.4 KH/s

[efudd]

No, I'm watching a video on someone watching their car with a foam cannon. It is more interesting. But thank you for inquiring as to my interests-- it really was thoughtful of you. I didn't know you cared!

But really, your previous statement is the same as your current statement in terms of "148-150".. so inquiring minds, how is it different? Which one is the truth?

And in your other thread, you stated your combined hashrate across all of your machines was around 455k between a couple of Z11s, Z9s and 4 minis... and in doing the math being conservative on the Mini/Z9 overclocks, the remaining hash rate out of the 455k for the 2x Z11s was.... 284k .. or 142k/sol each.

So which one of those is truth?

It's really hard to tell.

-j

The truth is the speed I post wtf dont you understand about that...At least I dont tell people I am dropping my dev fee lower then never do or tell then you will get voltage on z9 and dont. Your the one who hasnt followed thru with many things you say, I try to be as accurate as possible and may sometimes not get it right, I am only human

I am not going to debate shit with you about it your only trying to be an asshole and you know it. If you wonder then look at it yourself or try it out. my machines are as follows

4 minis get over 16k each
2 z9 full get 55+ each
2 z11 get 150 each

Now do the math ... all my machines now report on machine 474 k and flypool reports it as 473 currently....
I didnt know I had to always report exact up to the minute information on my full rig. But here is the stats as I type for you machine and then flypool

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
2h29m38s   151.36   150.48

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
12m10s   156.44   151.3


145.2 KH/s   5446 (100%)   0 (0%)   6 minutes ago just loaded beta 3 12 min ago
151.0 KH/s   5661 (100%)   0 (0%)   6 minutes ago


Hashrate

473.4 KH/s

Here is a good video about the 2019 Ram 2500HD you might enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I-T58QO43o

-j

[chipless]

I dont dodge or chrysler products sorry I prefer GM


oh look here my other machine i just loaded

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
48m55s   162.01           151.83



17.1 KH/s   642 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.9 KH/s   633 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
15.8 KH/s   594 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.1 KH/s   604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
55.4 KH/s   2079 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
54.5 KH/s   2045 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
149.4 KH/s 5604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
150.3 KH/s 5637 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago


edit...... I will update you again on the last one I loaded
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h19m42s   153.33           151.95

most recent flypool also for the rigs above
Hashrate

479.8 KH/s


another edit......the last one loaded is still climbing
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h35m57s   152.35             152.13


After 2 hrs this is where it will settle in at
Elapsed    KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h54m16s    147.43              151.97

[nordmann666]

I dont dodge or chrysler products sorry I prefer GM


oh look here my other machine i just loaded

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
48m55s   162.01           151.83



17.1 KH/s   642 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.9 KH/s   633 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
15.8 KH/s   594 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.1 KH/s   604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
55.4 KH/s   2079 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
54.5 KH/s   2045 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
149.4 KH/s 5604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
150.3 KH/s 5637 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago


edit...... I will update you again on the last one I loaded
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h19m42s   153.33           151.95

most recent flypool also for the rigs above
Hashrate

479.8 KH/s


another edit......the last one loaded is still climbing
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h35m57s   152.35             152.13


After 2 hrs this is where it will settle in at
Elapsed    KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h54m16s    147.43              151.97

power consumption?

[chipless]

I dont dodge or chrysler products sorry I prefer GM


oh look here my other machine i just loaded

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
48m55s   162.01           151.83



17.1 KH/s   642 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.9 KH/s   633 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
15.8 KH/s   594 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.1 KH/s   604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
55.4 KH/s   2079 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
54.5 KH/s   2045 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
149.4 KH/s 5604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
150.3 KH/s 5637 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago


edit...... I will update you again on the last one I loaded
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h19m42s   153.33           151.95

most recent flypool also for the rigs above
Hashrate

479.8 KH/s


another edit......the last one loaded is still climbing
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h35m57s   152.35             152.13


After 2 hrs this is where it will settle in at
Elapsed    KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h54m16s    147.43              151.97

power consumption?

I am not sure I would say about 20-50 watts more with the little increase in voltage. It was increased by from 880 mV max to 920 mV and is locked there by me, the frequency is set to 793 which so far from members I have testing there have been no complaints. I am currently finishing up a faster release that will be available for a 1 time fee. The details are on the first post of the thread.

If someone does have the ability to let me know the power consumption that would be nice, mine is on a 220 ac line and I dont have anything to really test it with. I am drawing about 7500 watts with all my miner then another 750 for an air conditioner to keep the room cooler

This is where 1 machine settled at....The other machine is up and down as I tweak it some more.

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
4h30m1s   154.48            151.56

[efudd]

I dont dodge or chrysler products sorry I prefer GM


oh look here my other machine i just loaded

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)   FoundBlocks   LocalWork   Utility   WU   BestShare
48m55s   162.01           151.83



17.1 KH/s   642 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.9 KH/s   633 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
15.8 KH/s   594 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
16.1 KH/s   604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
55.4 KH/s   2079 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
54.5 KH/s   2045 (100%)   1 (0%)   7 minutes ago
149.4 KH/s 5604 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago
150.3 KH/s 5637 (100%)   0 (0%)   7 minutes ago


edit...... I will update you again on the last one I loaded
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h19m42s   153.33           151.95

most recent flypool also for the rigs above
Hashrate

479.8 KH/s


another edit......the last one loaded is still climbing
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h35m57s   152.35             152.13


After 2 hrs this is where it will settle in at
Elapsed    KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h54m16s    147.43              151.97

power consumption?

I am not sure I would say about 20-50 watts more with the little increase in voltage. It was increased by from 880 mV max to 920 mV and is locked there by me, the frequency is set to 793 which so far from members I have testing there have been no complaints. I am currently finishing up a faster release that will be available for a 1 time fee. The details are on the first post of the thread.

If someone does have the ability to let me know the power consumption that would be nice, mine is on a 220 ac line and I dont have anything to really test it with. I am drawing about 7500 watts with all my miner then another 750 for an air conditioner to keep the room cooler

This is where 1 machine settled at....The other machine is up and down as I tweak it some more.

Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
4h30m1s   154.48            151.56

Ahh, I see you finally listened to me when I told you that voltage was not actually limited and all you had to do was get rid of one check. Good job!

Although, I do have a question.

In your updated first post you showed an example of the capabilities as part of offering 'custom' images for a one time fee of $100, it showed 154kSol at 16minutes elapsed.

** Latest Speed Update  5/3/2019 8:59 CST ***
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
16m40s   154.48             154.05

I've tested that image on a Z11 and as close to 16m40s as I could sample, I see the following result. It appears to be the same as all of the other results. Chip temperatures increased by 7C over what this machine was running before.

16m42s   152.68   149.06

Also, I see constant "scan frequency" messages.
Can you please explain what is going on here? What would paying $100 get me when I can't get the results you already claim for free?

-j

[chipless]

Ahh, I see you finally listened to me when I told you that voltage was not actually limited and all you had to do was get rid of one check. Good job!

Although, I do have a question.

In your updated first post you showed an example of the capabilities as part of offering 'custom' images for a one time fee of $100, it showed 154kSol at 16minutes elapsed.

** Latest Speed Update  5/3/2019 8:59 CST ***
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
16m40s   154.48             154.05

I've tested that image on a Z11 and as close to 16m40s as I could sample, I see the following result. It appears to be the same as all of the other results. Chip temperatures increased by 7C over what this machine was running before.

16m42s   152.68   149.06

Also, I see constant "scan frequency" messages.
Can you please explain what is going on here? What would paying $100 get me when I can't get the results you already claim for free?

-j

Actually the power area yes I missed 1 spot during my going thru it. No big deal, then you are not reading it right because there was never any speed posted for the upgraded images. That speed was a example of what the machines can and are getting and so on. But the data was from a machine.

I suppose you are going to find every little word to comment on about this image. As far as heat of course there is going to be heat, anytime you start to clock up a machine over factory it has more heat. There are still tweaks to be done but it works and its free. THe scan message will get fixed also soon it is not a big deal and doesnt seem to bother the speed any.

I dont understand the excuse you gave people about your release. You dont have to wait for the pool admin crap or whatever. As I been told you were still stuck at the throttle down but other parts were ok.

In the end for free it works pretty dam good.

I also had 1 report the Beta 3 is drawing around 1800 watts time to tweak it a little I guess.


After running for 10 hrs

Elapsed         KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
10h36m31s   146.45   151.56

[efudd]

Ahh, I see you finally listened to me when I told you that voltage was not actually limited and all you had to do was get rid of one check. Good job!

Although, I do have a question.

In your updated first post you showed an example of the capabilities as part of offering 'custom' images for a one time fee of $100, it showed 154kSol at 16minutes elapsed.

** Latest Speed Update  5/3/2019 8:59 CST ***
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
16m40s   154.48             154.05

I've tested that image on a Z11 and as close to 16m40s as I could sample, I see the following result. It appears to be the same as all of the other results. Chip temperatures increased by 7C over what this machine was running before.

16m42s   152.68   149.06

Also, I see constant "scan frequency" messages.
Can you please explain what is going on here? What would paying $100 get me when I can't get the results you already claim for free?

-j

Actually the power area yes I missed 1 spot during my going thru it. No big deal, then you are not reading it right because there was never any speed posted for the upgraded images. That speed was a example of what the machines can and are getting and so on. But the data was from a machine.

I suppose you are going to find every little word to comment on about this image. As far as heat of course there is going to be heat, anytime you start to clock up a machine over factory it has more heat. There are still tweaks to be done but it works and its free. THe scan message will get fixed also soon it is not a big deal and doesnt seem to bother the speed any.

I dont understand the excuse you gave people about your release. You dont have to wait for the pool admin crap or whatever. As I been told you were still stuck at the throttle down but other parts were ok.

In the end for free it works pretty dam good.

I also had 1 report the Beta 3 is drawing around 1800 watts time to tweak it a little I guess.

Ignoring all the noise in that response, it doesn’t seem to be working as you describe. I posted the measured results at the same time period you posted results from and I am not seeing any improvements. Trying to understand what is going wrong.

Literally running this to test and seeing different results.

Can you assist?

-j

[chipless]

epudd, I dont know what to tell you others are reporting to me that everything is working well. I guess if it is broken then fix it.So lets not sit here to rry to discredit the firmware because you know as well as I do it was valid stuff I asked you about your non-disclosed control. This firmware is nothing more then a modded binary and free to try or use. Why dont you go back to fixing your own problem and let people give it a try without all your bullshit child games.

[efudd]

epudd, I dont know what to tell you others are reporting to me that everything is working well. I guess if it is broken then fix it.So lets not sit here to rry to discredit the firmware because you know as well as I do it was valid stuff I asked you about your non-disclosed control. This firmware is nothing more then a modded binary and free to try or use. Why dont you go back to fixing your own problem and let people give it a try without all your bullshit child games.

Seriously not trying to discredit. Honestly asking. You asked for feedback and I am providing some on behalf of another individual.

He will happily pay 100 if you can give him 175k sol... so trying to see if what you have released is working for him.. and it has left a question as to why the same results are not being achieved.

Sometimes you have to read between the lines and realize not everything is an attack or troll. Nuance is a skill.

-j

[chipless]

epudd, I dont know what to tell you others are reporting to me that everything is working well. I guess if it is broken then fix it.So lets not sit here to rry to discredit the firmware because you know as well as I do it was valid stuff I asked you about your non-disclosed control. This firmware is nothing more then a modded binary and free to try or use. Why dont you go back to fixing your own problem and let people give it a try without all your bullshit child games.

Seriously not trying to discredit. Honestly asking. You asked for feedback and I am providing some on behalf of another individual.

He will happily pay 100 if you can give him 175k sol... so trying to see if what you have released is working for him.. and it has left a question as to why the same results are not being achieved.

Sometimes you have to read between the lines and realize not everything is an attack or troll. Nuance is a skill.

-j

I do not know why you are getting bad results I do know it take 1-2 hours for these to max out. The heat is due to overclocking and increased voltage. From some of my testing you cant get higher speeds without having some extra power to go with it. I am working on faster speeds as we speak trying a few different things I have found that no matter what you arent getting the next speed range without more power. But I may be missing something.

This is what 1 machine is reporting and you should have similar results
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
11h47m20s   156.28   151.62

I need to update the base to the 4/23/19 release this base is the first bitmain image release

Latest test after tweaking some more
Elapsed   KSol/S(RT)   KSol/S(avg)
1h4m32s   158.41             153.34