Now Available Antminer Z11 Chipless Nitrous v1.5 Speeds of 159+ K/SOL Contact me for purchase details. Available NOW for 15. ZCASH read first post for details.
Oh boy.... can’t wait to see the user fallout from this.
-j
I have had enough request your opinion dont matter.
Fact: less than 36 hours ago you posted that you needed to test with more that one PSU. Now a few short hours later you want to sell/claim/whatever “159kSol+“ that requires more than one PSU.
At a minimum, your testing times suck as there is no way you can both state you need to test with more than one PSU and have the confidence to release something claiming to need it in less than 36 hours without only looking at very short term results.
FACT: I have been testing for a long time with multiple PSU systems.
FACT: 160k stable is doable, but it blows power efficiency out of the water negating all value add.
FACT: the maximum stable frequency is 825Mhz.
FACT: I have been able to test in a well ventilated environment and maintain chip temps under 85c at 825Mhz and the hash is not stable.
FACT: voltage and hw error rate have a positive relationship (let me know when you figure this statement out)
FACT: a voltage that works on one board will result in other boards going offline
FACT: hash rate is unstable over 150kSol. On long runs the average WILL return to the 150kSol or less.
FACT: these systems are highly voltage sensitive and something that runs on one will not run on another.
FACT: when pushing voltages you WILL have boards drop out and it make take hours or days, but it WILL happen
FACT: there is not a stable hash at the level you claim on these systems, barring any unicorn units.
I expect that the success rate of holding 160 (ignoring the fact power consumption goes shitty) is in the 2% range.... incidentally Z9 units holding >681mhz is also around 2% of the total statistical population.
FACT: there is no way, by your own statements, you hVs tested and validated anything to the point of deserving the confidence to sell a non refundable “159k+” variant.
FACT: my comments here have absolutely nothing to do with protecting myself... users are going to get screwed because you don’t even know why you don’t know.
FACT: you are ignoring feedback from users who report problems to you (its time they speak up in public).
FACT: you brick people’s machines with some regularity. Your “private”L3 image bricks machines... annoyingly I had someone contact me about your release just yesterday.you also released multiple mini images that bricked machines. This comment has nothing to do with bricking directly, but rather a point of reference to your generalized incompetence in precision and correctness when releasing work.
FACT: a request is not the same thing as a success.
FACT: I look forward to seeing the feedback from users.
This is going to be at least as good as your power thread where you plugged a battery charger into a battery to charge the battery.... which also is a great example of your generalized incompetence.
Good luck.
-j
