Can't tell what lauda is, a bit of photoshop and it's gone.

[andulolika]

You either don't look for proof or you either just shown to me you part of the great shitcoin creator managing pumping and ofcourse dumping group of scammers that make 90% of the shitcoins.
I would love this post erased but you just ignoring my PM.
Your rating is TRUST i don't know what that has to do with a threat, which i however made after his claim.

So after rating him she just came and left that rating as a , well lets say shill but the word starts with w.

[suchmoon]

So you got drunk and fucked up. You might try apologizing and pointing out that death threats should be reported to moderators so that they could ban you. Not sure if that's a better outcome for you though.

Are you still drunk? Your post is barely comprehensible.

[andulolika]

So you got drunk and fucked up. You might try apologizing and pointing out that death threats should be reported to moderators so that they could ban you. Not sure if that's a better outcome for you though.

Are you still drunk? Your post is barely comprehensible.

I negative rated a manager of an obvious shitcoin, he LIED claiming i threaten him, thing i done right after, i has proof i havent done it before but he photoshoped the picture.
Then lauda comes out of nowhere and uses TRUST system for a threat, how do they know and why would a trusted member support a we all know how this will end clone coin .
Edit: im sober now i were just honest. All threats came AFTER his photoshop, i now trust no member to check my account message history
Edit2: was kinda trying to reach lauda since she ignores pm and well came in like a wrecking ball.

[Foxpup]

Your rating is TRUST i don't know what that has to do with a threat, which i however made after his claim.

It turns out most people (and cats; I can't tell what Lauda is either) don't trust people who threaten to kill them. Who knew?

[andulolika]

Your rating is TRUST i don't know what that has to do with a threat, which i however made after his claim.

It turns out most people (and cats; I can't tell what Lauda is either) don't trust people who threaten to kill them. Who knew?

I never threatened lauda it was that dude's trust rating she came to rescue i never actually told her anything, she was called and she obey.

[TMAN]

I dont trust you either, you should be banned for shit like this.

" I was drunk" isnt an excuse for anything you fucking retard

[Foxpup]

I never threatened lauda it was that dude's trust rating she came to rescue i never actually told her anything,

They also don't trust people who threaten other people, either.

she was called and she obey.

Unlikely. Cats don't come when called.

[Steamtyme]

I negative rated a manager of an obvious shitcoin, he LIED claiming i threaten him, thing i done right after, i has proof i havent done it before but he photoshoped the picture.
~snip~
Edit: im sober now i were just honest. All threats came AFTER his photoshop, i now trust no member to check my account message history

First off, you shouldn't be threatening anybody, before or after being slighted makes no difference.

I can't make out the timeline based on your posts but it seems like this:

You Neg Parodium

Parodium shows photoshopped PM - You claim this it has not been proven, PM could have been legitimate.

Laud Tags you for threats

You actually threaten People - Not sure but you make it sound like you did this in retaliation for falsely being accused of threatening people

Here we are now.

Edit: When has it ever been a good idea to send of that Drunk Message?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I never threatened lauda it was that dude's trust rating she came to rescue i never actually told her anything, she was called and she obey.

Let me be blunt: you are never going to successfully defend yourself with this level of writing.  Either you really are still drunk and are slurring your keyboard words (that's tough to do; I've written great stuff drunk in the past), or English just is not your thing.  Whichever it is, I can barely make out what you're trying to say, and I don't see any logic in what combinations of words that do make sense.

People do not take kindly to threats around here, and frankly if negative trust is all you get out of this you should be bouncing-off-the-walls happy about that, because threats are grounds for a permaban.  If you keep drawing attention to yourself, you might just find out one morning that your account is locked, never to be accessed again.

Also, apologies (even if you were making one here) don't usually get the expected results from Lauda.  Sometimes I step on my cat's tail by accident and try to say I'm sorry by scratching her cheeks, and she just gives me the claws or fangs.  Eventually my cat forgives me, but Lauda is a different breed of feline.

[TMAN]

Reported you for breaking rule 8.

Banhammer please mods

[andulolika]

Lol 6 years of bitcoin for this? No way real user base is going down

[TMAN]

Lol 6 years of bitcoin for this? No way real user base is going down

What? You threatened to kill someone and you are blaming others? Fucking entitled prick

[Foxpup]

No way real user base is going down

Archived, reported, and tagged.

[Flying Hellfish]

" I was drunk" isnt an excuse for anything you fucking retard

Well to be fair it's actually a pretty good excuse for a banging hangover  

[BitcoinSupremo]

Lol 6 years of bitcoin for this? No way real user base is going down

It means nothing to them 6, 60 or 600 years, it is them who rule bitcointalk, you have to get used to it, sorry for the red tag, probably can't do anything. Nevertheless the red tag should not stop you from posting freely on the forum, as for them, they are the main reason the forum is at the level we all know it is. If theymos judge that this is OK, I agree with him too.

[TMAN]

Lol 6 years of bitcoin for this? No way real user base is going down

It means nothing to them 6, 60 or 600 years, it is them who rule bitcointalk, you have to get used to it, sorry for the red tag, probably can't do anything. Nevertheless the red tag should not stop you from posting freely on the forum, as for them, they are the main reason the forum is at the level we all know it is. If theymos judge that this is OK, I agree with him too.

Have either of you fools even read the rules?

[BitcoinSupremo]

Lol 6 years of bitcoin for this? No way real user base is going down

It means nothing to them 6, 60 or 600 years, it is them who rule bitcointalk, you have to get used to it, sorry for the red tag, probably can't do anything. Nevertheless the red tag should not stop you from posting freely on the forum, as for them, they are the main reason the forum is at the level we all know it is. If theymos judge that this is OK, I agree with him too.

Have either of you fools even read the rules?

I have read the rules and in 2016 buying accounts was allowed and even now is allowed but it was only late 2017 that people on DT started tagging like crazy and they are right, what I don't think is right is that even after I have abandoned all other 3 accounts, (check their last login date and you will see I am not lying) people on DT are still hostile against me although I have not broken any rules, I have only this account and even on this account they are attacking me once I speak the truth that this forum is not decentralized anymore.

I have also one question for you, did you do at least 1 year in school or are this smart naturally  

[TMAN]

This is about death threats.... maybe you are the one who is struggling to read

[BoXXoB]

This isn't something I can overlook, whether he was drunk or not doesn't matter. I've removed him from the signature campaign.

EDIT: He's (andulolika) convincing me he's got something to prove but what I said stands.

[BitcoinSupremo]

This is about death threats.... maybe you are the one who is struggling to read

I saw that and I agree with all DT members decision on him, being drunk or not, death threats are intolerable, however you didn't answer to me. Maybe because you just got after your friend Lauda and left me a feedback soon after him without real reason.