LFC_Bitcoin - Laudas Feltching Clown? total shit poster and scumbag..? poetry ..

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I think this thread has been exhausted now, probably best to lock it.

Lauda’s had me working very hard cum guzzling, I need a rest from all of this 

[The-One-Above-All]

@mikeywith


Your arguments as usual are paper thin and make you look either foolish or untrustworthy.


1. You claim you do not ever counter peoples tags. This means you are not suitable for DT.  If DT's that have observably lied and scammed are tagging whistle blowers for revealing this then you should be countering them. If you can not see that then why are you on DT?

2. You say you are NOT INTERESTED in what Lauda does? so this is like saying if lauda scams, if lauda extorts, if lauda does a shady escrow, if lauda leaves red trust to whistle blowers and therefore facilitating scammers you are not interested in that?  so you too are facilitating scammers then? I hope you have the capacity to understand that.

3. You are not bothered whether some DT's use double standards to tag account sellers in some instances but not account sellers that do so because by their own words it is EVIL and facilitates scammers? Double standards means there is corruption. If you have corruption then that is untrustworthy.

4. Our shit? we call out your observable selective "caring" about scammers because we see you searching around for other members untrustworthy actions ? this is an observable instance. There is no OUR OPINION you selectively avoid BEING INTERESTED in scams and untrustworthy actions of the gang because you are just as scared of them as LFC.

Life easier? how would it be any different? I mean depending on who you believe we are how does it make any difference? If we are CH he is already plastered in red, if we are QS he is already plastered in red?

The funny thing is about this is that EVEN IF we were another member we decided to ACTUALLY speak out and do something about it rather than PRETEND we are not interested in DT members bullying other to help them facilitate scamming. The entire reason some members may consider having to do that is because other DT members ARE NOT INTERESTED in making sure red trust is not used as a weapon to silence or destroy the accounts of whistleblowers. Get it now?

Have a think about all of that CHIPMIXER boy before you answer. You are digging your own hole.  Either you want to do the RIGHT THING in all cases or you just want to do the RIGHT THING with members you know do not have a gang behind them to ensure your account gets trashed and your CHIPMIXER sig removed. With them you are NOT INTERESTED in doing the right thing at all.

Just admit you're a bitch to the trust abusers and scammers like LFC bitcoin is. No point denying it when the your observable behavior demonstrates this is clearly the case.

Just remember mikeywith this is all being documented historically. In years to come these conversations will be read by millions and you don't want to appear a weak little weasel like the rest of DT. Well some are full on scamming dirt but the others are ass lickers and feltchers. Money is not everything.

You don't want to get on the wrong side of THEM either do you mikeywith?

[mikeywith]

The usual CH bullshit , if you don't agree with him then you are siding the other "group".

And if you really think "Millions" of people give a fuck about you and Lauda then you need to see a doctor, because in reality it's only 10 people at most who care about the trust system to this extent, you need to wake up and smell the coffee.

[The-One-Above-All]

The usual CH bullshit , if you don't agree with him then you are siding the other "group".

And if you really think "Millions" of people give a fuck about you and Lauda then you need to see a doctor, because in reality it's only 10 people at most who care about the trust system to this extent, you need to wake up and smell the coffee.

Calls bullshit but denies NOTHING of what we have just said BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to deny observable behaviors and instances.

Well done mikeywith you realized you have NO ANSWER to the observable instances we just pointed out.

Millions of people do not care about individuals, but millions of people will study the history of crypto currency and will use this board as historical research. Just hope they don't read the posts that demonstrate you side with scammers and liars over honest members. NOT INTERESTED....

Now either tackle the points we present or just run away, but don't feel you can call bullshit when we are presenting things anyone can research and validate for themselves.  You just look foolish or untrustworthy. We prefer to believe you are just scared and smart enough to realize you are better off sitting on the fence but shouting support at the current DT crowd. Well done mikeywith.

NOT INTERESTED.... good excuse. "myth"

[LFC_Bitcoin]

The usual CH bullshit , if you don't agree with him then you are siding the other "group".

And if you really think "Millions" of people give a fuck about you and Lauda then you need to see a doctor, because in reality it's only 10 people at most who care about the trust system to this extent, you need to wake up and smell the coffee.

I’ve got a feeling CH could be one of Quickseller’s personalities/alts. Not certain but think it’s possible.

The grammar this alt uses can sometimes be really poor with terrible punctuation etc.
Other times it’s perfect & seems like a pretty intelligent dude. I can’t be bothered to find examples right now but it’s a very similar writing style to QS sometimes.
They’e often caught in dialogue together too, hmmmm. Something to think about.

[AdolfinWolf]

The usual CH bullshit , if you don't agree with him then you are siding the other "group".

And if you really think "Millions" of people give a fuck about you and Lauda then you need to see a doctor, because in reality it's only 10 people at most who care about the trust system to this extent, you need to wake up and smell the coffee.

I’ve got a feeling CH could be one of Quickseller’s personalities/alts. Not certain but think it’s possible.

The grammar this alt uses can sometimes be really poor with terrible punctuation etc.
Other times it’s perfect & seems like a pretty intelligent dude. I can’t be bothered to find examples right now but it’s a very similar writing style to QS sometimes.
They’e often caught in dialogue together too, hmmmm. Something to think about.

I think the "effort" and walls of texts CH posts are something that even QS doesn't have the attention span for.

[The-One-Above-All]

The usual CH bullshit , if you don't agree with him then you are siding the other "group".

And if you really think "Millions" of people give a fuck about you and Lauda then you need to see a doctor, because in reality it's only 10 people at most who care about the trust system to this extent, you need to wake up and smell the coffee.

I’ve got a feeling CH could be one of Quickseller’s personalities/alts. Not certain but think it’s possible.

The grammar this alt uses can sometimes be really poor with terrible punctuation etc.
Other times it’s perfect & seems like a pretty intelligent dude. I can’t be bothered to find examples right now but it’s a very similar writing style to QS sometimes.
They’e often caught in dialogue together too, hmmmm. Something to think about.

Wouldn't QS be one of CH's alts?  since CH was here first?  although this new line of speculation and being entirely incorrect (as usual) is not relevant. Try to stick to the central points else I will need to delete you like that micgoosens noobs garbage that keeps repeating his stupid shit even though we made it clear his constant feltching of LFC with no rebuttal to our central points is merely clutter and needs to be removed.

I see you just ran from the last post we left on your other LFC rep thread? go back there and try to tackle them ...... this will be fun.

[mikeywith]

Your feelings are most likely wrong, i am certain they are two different people with completely different point of views, but the goal might be similar, i do respect both of them, after all  , they have every right to protest just as much as anybody else.

In the beginning of CH war against some certain points, i was on his side, it was me and him against suchmoon and a few other DT members ( against each other in opinion) we had a long argument on the subject ,  i still to this point believe the trust system is not being used the way it should be, CH however went to the extent of attacking individuals and repeating his words on every possible topic he could, this made a lot of members pissed and he got tagged which is very wrong IMO, because CH is a proven asshole but not a proven scammer, the reason no DT supports him despite agreeing/disagreeing with his points is the lousy disrespectful attitude.

I went to the extent of PMing some of those who tagged him in an attempt to give him a second chance and calm things down for everyone, but then he choses to call me "untrustworthy and pussy".

Can't say i am shocked tho.

TL;DT

The trust system is far from perfect, but it's not even quarter as bad as CH is trying to make it look , this is a free forum, you don't have to suck up to anybody but you have to show respect and fight for what you believe in reasonable manner ( don't say the same stuff 10 times a day for 6 months coz it is not going to work)

Good luck.

[The-One-Above-All]

@mikeywith

we will not keep going on about the fact you have not answered any of the points in our last post. WHY? because we do not wish to give you a hard time even though it clearly demonstrates you KNOW what we say is TRUE. CH mentioned a few times that you were one of the "better" ones. You came to this thread and called the entire premise a MYTH. When clearly VOD's posts (who was not influenced by ch) and LFC's PM clearly demonstrates there is a group of people here that will ruin your account if you present observable instances from their own past they want to remain hidden.

You are new and we think you do not grasp the systems of control do a lot of damage here. You demonstrated on CH's thread of the year you simply do not understand the implications.

Do you see us coming to find you and give you hassle? NO.

Also if you want to do some REAL research on CH's past here (if that is who you believe is behind this account) since finding meta he originally came to defend another noob who was being bullied by DT's. He was very civil and mild mannered with people here in meta THEY started attacking him first during the merit cycling threads.

You can not expect people to be RESPECTFUL to scammers they have busted personally themselves before who are now leaving red tags on their account for simply presenting observable instances.  The DT system is being corrupted to facilitate scamming. It is undeniable.

Now stop pretending for some reason you have been turned on by anyone. Nobody comes looking for you and giving you hassle, you can be found turning up trying to discredit the clear truth that is backed by observable instances calling it all a myth.

We understand you position but you are selectively interested in wrongdoing depending on who it is. This is wrong. It may currently be the smart play for you but still we will call you out on it if you come after us first. Stay out of our way unless you can refute our central point and we will stay out of yours. No point turning up calling myth and bullshit then not being able to back it up when called on it.

Now if you do not want to take our previous post and answer for those points that is up to you, but myth and bullshit remarks will be called out.

[xolxol]

I’m pretty sure nobody else has a problem with me though because I’ve always been polite & courteous to people.

This is the most stupid statement you ever had,most of your abuses are being watched by the people do you think the gang and yourself will get away from your shit abuses??
you are son of a dick,an ass licking toad who always do what his master says,a suckpuppet and a shit eating pig ..

[The-One-Above-All]

I’m pretty sure nobody else has a problem with me though because I’ve always been polite & courteous to people.

This is the most stupid statement you ever had,most of your abuses are being watched by the people do you think the gang and yourself will get away from your shit abuses??
you are son of a dick,an ass licking toad who always do what his master says,a suckpuppet and a shit eating pig ..

LFC does not have the capacity to understand that after confessing that he is laudas feltching clown and is scared of THEM it invalidates ANYTHING the dumb fool says now. You may as well just treat his account as LAUDAS or laudas gangs account. It is pointless to consider it as anything other than laudas proxy bitch account.

This is pretty much how you can assume MOST of DT accounts. These scared ass gimps are on DT and knowingly remain silent about laudas own lying and scamming and dare not counter or speak up against their abuse. That is nearly ALL of DT.

[The-One-Above-All]

This DT member and merit source has improved his post quality of late and has started to come clean about his own disturbing past .. We have no idea who he or what he is but what a damaged individual it clearly is.
Almost makes tman look normal and he has tourettes syndrome so that accounts for his general swearing and retarded behavior. LFC_bitcoin himself seems to be in far darker place.]

This likely explains his servile and spineless character.

Don’t post for a bit and come back to the usual... TAA why don’t you just fuck off if it’s so bad here? Your team of one is just so fucking boring now. Did your mother reject you at birth or were you just bullied at school?

It was an artificially inseminated baby, born gender fluid. The anger & bitterness resonates from being born with both male & female reproductive organs.

Its Mother committed suicide due to the shame of having to raise such an abomination of a human being. Its Father was in-prisoned after years of sexually abusing it, it was then put into the care system where it honed its trolling skills & became the master of disaster we now know.

 

Poor old guzzler still doing it's best to feltch and guzzler their way into the core group of dirty turds.

Just google dirty turds bitcointalk to find out more

This kind of thing is really too much lfc. Perhaps you require some help?  if you want to talk things over just let us know.

[The-One-Above-All]

LFC really has something about child sex abuse???  here he goes again poor soul. What was done to this person?

Bob’s been mining since about 2011 you spastic. He’s got more bitcoin’s than you’ve had rapings by your Uncle as a child (which is hundreds).

He doesn’t wear a sig & posts in here don’t count towards sig campaigns any way.

[truth or dare]

The usual CH bullshit , if you don't agree with him then you are siding the other "group".

And if you really think "Millions" of people give a fuck about you and Lauda then you need to see a doctor, because in reality it's only 10 people at most who care about the trust system to this extent, you need to wake up and smell the coffee.

I’ve got a feeling CH could be one of Quickseller’s personalities/alts. Not certain but think it’s possible.

The grammar this alt uses can sometimes be really poor with terrible punctuation etc.
Other times it’s perfect & seems like a pretty intelligent dude. I can’t be bothered to find examples right now but it’s a very similar writing style to QS sometimes.
They’e often caught in dialogue together too, hmmmm. Something to think about.

I have been considering this possibility. I would judge that to be very unlikely,  in view of recent events.  

You don't seek to deny the points made in the op. That seems to be acceptance on your part.

[El duderino_]

#LFC=a'coolDUDE

Met IRL, can know for sure 

Has a pretty lady.... own BTC, is a RL boss

cheers

[truth or dare]

#LFC=a'coolDUDE

Met IRL, can know for sure 

Has a pretty lady.... own BTC, is a RL boss

cheers

You sound like a credible character witness. Your highly dubious slobbering does absolutely nothing to clear evidence provided that is independently verifiable.

lfc bitcoin of bitcointalk is a

* one line shit poster for years
* had an obsession with child sex abuse
* is a bitch of lauda who commands him to back stab his friends ...which he does

Pathetic, disgusting and dirty little weasel.

[Bitcoin-Babe]

Having just looked into this individual I can certainly see why others may object to such a member being paid to post what is clearly disturbing and revolting filth.
There should be a line and child sex abuse claims should be grounds for a signature ban.

I wonder how his sponsor would feel to know they are paying for this hateful and disgusting nastiness?
Perhaps a thread to challenge them for doing so ?

[logfiles]

I wonder how his sponsor would feel to know they are paying for this hateful and disgusting nastiness?
Perhaps a thread to challenge them for doing so ?

Who else would think about the sponsor in any form of drama or ponder about opening a thread against the sponsor of a member he does not like other than the mighty Cryptohunter a.k.a bonesjonesreturns a.k.a The-One-Above-All?

[bonesjonesreturns]

I wonder how his sponsor would feel to know they are paying for this hateful and disgusting nastiness?
Perhaps a thread to challenge them for doing so ?

Who else would think about the sponsor in any form of drama or ponder about opening a thread against the sponsor of a member he does not like other than the mighty Cryptohunter a.k.a bonesjonesreturns a.k.a The-One-Above-All?

May be all those members that have observed others  correctly doing so.

Are you claiming it is wrong to ask if we should be paying people to slather child sex abuse filth over this forum?
Go eat scammer ass elsewhere fool.

Do not like?

Logfiles likes people slathering child sex abuse filth on this forum? Is that right?
Is bustadice aware of this?

I very much doubt CH would ask others to start such a thread he would do it at once I suspect.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

cryptohunter ran out of loony pills again by the looks of it.