All altcoins without proof of work will be destroyed

[rachman mahesa]

Both algorithm and proof of work to ascertain level of hashrate isn't enough, leave all the shitcoins and the valuable coins to keep going, in the short or long run we will know who's is who and the fake coins will be sieved and the good ones will remain, the technology is not enough, Crypto itself will evolve and few digital currency will stand out like dollars and yuan are among the reserve currency because of its value

Maybe what you say is true too. Usually it is, if a project or coin that does not develop in the future will surely die too. And a really good project or coin will certainly survive with future developments. So it must be left alone.

[thaliaand]

This technology continues to evolve and developments continue. Every change will certainly produce a new one as well as a new consensus mechanism that will be born and overcome problems and shortcomings in the previous one. POW is still a preferred choice, but the current development of POS is also an option by considering various advantages and disadvantages of each. But it does not mean that altcoin with a mechanism other than POW will not survive, precisely with these changes and developments, the new consensus mechanism will try to overcome the shortcomings of the previous mechanism.

[Dennicex]

This technology continues to evolve and developments continue. Every change will certainly produce a new one as well as a new consensus mechanism that will be born and overcome problems and shortcomings in the previous one. POW is still a preferred choice, but the current development of POS is also an option by considering various advantages and disadvantages of each. But it does not mean that altcoin with a mechanism other than POW will not survive, precisely with these changes and developments, the new consensus mechanism will try to overcome the shortcomings of the previous mechanism.

surely you are right. POS-staking has been and remains one of the most reliable and affordable ways to generate passive income for most investors.

[lobat999]

the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

So the Proof of Stake big coin like DASH will be destroyed in the future ?
What are your opinion based on ? All coins without Proof of Work doesn't mean they have no place in the crypto sphere.
I don't think that gonna be happening, and more coins without proof of work will be created.

If I'm not mistaken, I think technically DASH is implementing a Proof of Work consensus algorithm with its X11 hashing algorithm and not Proof of Stake. Though its a little bit confusing, DASH also employs masternode technology to further improve its functions and services which oftentimes referred as POS but in reality, its not. And since DASH also employs POW and other useful features I think its very likely to survive long term. Imho.

[ahmia39]

I do not think that the coins on the PoW algorithm will be destroyed. The technology is developing and I think that they will come up with better solutions. I like the POS algorithm that ETH has switched to.

POW and POS algorithms are basically both good and have their own advantages and disadvantages, so their technology has indeed developed and has its own interests, if in my opinion both are good.

[george_hured]

It may be so, but I think that such tokens will be valued more today, because this protocol has really great prospects, namely, that the very idea of ​​the protocol is really transparent! And I think that everything will develop further.

[X-ray]

This technology continues to evolve and developments continue. Every change will certainly produce a new one as well as a new consensus mechanism that will be born and overcome problems and shortcomings in the previous one. POW is still a preferred choice, but the current development of POS is also an option by considering various advantages and disadvantages of each. But it does not mean that altcoin with a mechanism other than POW will not survive, precisely with these changes and developments, the new consensus mechanism will try to overcome the shortcomings of the previous mechanism.

surely you are right. POS-staking has been and remains one of the most reliable and affordable ways to generate passive income for most investors.

and remember while at the same time POW consumes a lot of energy and that gives a lot of contribution to the global warming. both are good system but it will be a perfect system when both getting implemented at the same time.
Not so many coins are interested in POW consider the asic miners.

[alevlaslo]

not confuse pow and pos

[Wintersoldier]

the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

Well, basically, hashrate also increases the security of a token or coin, in some sense, there are projects before that gets hacked because a huge hashrate volume is held by a just one entity miner, and that is risky for the project, I will not going to name that company since I know, many here know that well.

[alevlaslo]

the company controls the hashrate, the government controls the company, energy sellers control the government  

now the most interesting question is whether China will be able to ban mining, in which 80% of the bitcoin hashrate, I think that it can not, money is more expensive than the environment for energy sellers even for Communist China

an interesting coincidence: at coal in China is also 80% of power plants

[shiming]

Start arguing about the good or bad of POW and POS? I think this is still handed over to the time test. Both have their own shortcomings and advantages. Perhaps, more advanced algorithms will appear in the future.

[Vishnu.Reang]

I am not going in to an argument to prove PoW is better than PoS or vice-versa. But we have a decentralized, unbiased and free market, and the market conditions, demand and merit will decide which one of these coins will survive. Just because you don't like PoS, it is not fair to kill all such coins (which is not possible for you anyway).

[tsaroz]

the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

We should be able to accept every new experimentation and think out of the box if we really want cryptocurrency and blockchain tech to succeed.
Tokens can never replace mineable coin while they may serve a different purpose. We need to have ever diverse form of proving a transaction.
It's about talking whether a car is better than an airplane. Both serves different purpose.

[cahkalem]

the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

We should be able to accept every new experimentation and think out of the box if we really want cryptocurrency and blockchain tech to succeed.
Tokens can never replace mineable coin while they may serve a different purpose. We need to have ever diverse form of proving a transaction.
It's about talking whether a car is better than an airplane. Both serves different purpose.

yes, i agree with you,,
i believe non mineable cryptocurrencywith solid team and active development will survive in this industry,
because this is not about car, but this is about cryptocurrencies a digital assets my friend

[Script3d]

the world is ruled by energy sellers, coins threatening coins with proof of work will be destroyed like this car https://youtu.be/Jivb7lupDNU

The higher the hashrate (kilowatt to be exact) - the better the coin, the technology does not matter

We should be able to accept every new experimentation and think out of the box if we really want cryptocurrency and blockchain tech to succeed.
Tokens can never replace mineable coin while they may serve a different purpose. We need to have ever diverse form of proving a transaction.
It's about talking whether a car is better than an airplane. Both serves different purpose.

yes, i agree with you,,
i believe non mineable cryptocurrencywith solid team and active development will survive in this industry,
because this is not about car, but this is about cryptocurrencies a digital assets my friend

We already have a coin that can prove non mineable coins would be able to survive in cryptocurrency space, the coin is IOTA which is rank 16 in coinmarketcap.