6 Reasons why IEO is better than ICO

[neonshium]

Ieo is very important for token sale for ico right now because they can buy for there tokens in different exchanges and they hopping they will list on that exchanges.

I think IEO has been able to reduce the concept of scam in ICO to a great extent. I am talking about IEOs conducted by the best exchanges like Binance and Bittrex. They have been able to conduct successful IEOs and this makes them the leading exchanges among so many which conduct IEOs. The fact that IEO prevents the scam in ICOs is very healthy for the startups that look for raising funds.

[1714998765]

1714998765

[1714998765]

1714998765

[1714998765]

1714998765

[Bagaji]

I wouldn't say i agree base on your analysis becasue the way IEOs are going about their hype was the same was in the early days of ICOs before they where be labelled as scam ICOs. Apart from some reputable exchanges, don't you think that, things will fall apart if some irresponsible exchange get into the world of IEOs? lets wait and watch before the conclusion of who is better than the other.   

[Little Mouse]

IEO is of course much better than ICO, but so few people can buy tokens from the IEO. A major problem with IEO is that their tokens are pushed too high and then dumped heavily

In fact, most of the coins are now manipulated, you have to admit on this. It's true that IEO can be more manipulated since only a few users can purchase it. This is where I hate this distribution system of IEO.

[GregH37]

Better or worse, it depends on which exchanges you choose to join their IEOs, and which companies you choose to join their ICOs. Joining good ones will results in good things (profits for your investments). In contrast, choosing bad ones will likely cause losses. There is no guarentee that invest into IEO is better and will lead to certain profits, whilst invest into ICOs is worse and will cause losses for investors. It is too objective to judge which one is better between ICOs and IEOs, without details of each pair of ICO and IEO use to compare.

Most IEO investors, especially the ones carried out on Binance has testified to the massive increase they get on their investment due to the supply that becomes limited once they hit an exchange, but the one challenge I see with it is that, the way they have first come first serve in participating in these IEO is the same way they will have firstcome first serve in taken profit, because there is no way all of them can take profit, as one investors takes, it will dump the price for others.

I don’t think IEO investors are really there to Hold the coin for long, they are just there to make profit, and so the problem of IEO majorly will be dumping, which I strongly advise before this one destroys IEO reputation again.

[FelippeHeinz]

The sale of tokens from an exchange is without doubt better. However, this does not exclude the risk of scam projects, but it can certainly reduce them dramatically.

[CryptoIyke]

I quite agree that there are varying degrees of risks when comparing IEO's to ICO's. IEO's are better owing to the fact that the coins get to be listed and trading commences as soon as sales are over and irrespective of whatever becomes the value after listing, one is sure of selling his tokens or coins. This will go a long way make or mar certain exchanges as a whole lot of exchanges and their reputation will be dependent on the type of IEO's they allowed launching

[mirakal]

I quite agree that there are varying degrees of risks when comparing IEO's to ICO's. IEO's are better owing to the fact that the coins get to be listed and trading commences as soon as sales are over and irrespective of whatever becomes the value after listing, one is sure of selling his tokens or coins. This will go a long way make or mar certain exchanges as a whole lot of exchanges and their reputation will be dependent on the type of IEO's they allowed launching

When its on IEO, it's guarantee that a certain project will be listed right after the sale.
Investors interest is to sell their coins at a higher value so they can have the profit, and there is a chance to rise if it's listed right away.

ICO is using the old style, but the market has matured and evolve, ICO needs to be improve, otherwise it will not gone in the market.


Investors will always look for a better one, and between the two, right now IEO is more popular.

[GodHatesFigs]

Personally, I prefer the usual ico on ethereum.  There is much more transparency.  And the advantage of ieo is only in the fast listing on the stock exchange.

[Wintersoldier]

I was very much interested in investing to such IEO. Thus, made me the urged to browse the internet and found some compelling informations. I found it very informative for some members here like me who are disoriented between IEO and ICO.

Here is the infographic that is worth to share.



Here is the SOURCE

It's better if you read the whole article to enlighten your confusions about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO).

What about if the exchange itself is not profitable? I mean, we know that the potential should be on the project itself, but it do really needs the help of the exchange for it to grow further, though that, we can say, exchange is one of the factor that will going to determine the success of the project, and in relation to the topic, we should choose the right project which is has an IEO on the right exchange.

[entebah]

For security reasons, IEO is very strict from ICO, because IEO has good security features, this is why I prefer IEO than ICO, for example IEOs on the Bittrex and Binance markets, this is undoubtedly about security for users. So that investors will get a sense of security when buying in the market.

[Distinctin]

Personally, I prefer the usual ico on ethereum.  There is much more transparency.  And the advantage of ieo is only in the fast listing on the stock exchange.

I can't agree with that, how can you explain the fact that more than half of the ICO projects are scams?
ICO is bad for new investors, they are not fully aware of the scams yet, at least in IEO, exchanges ensures they know about the project they accept for IEO.

[jak3]

No doubt that IEO is better than ICO. like many exchanges are thinking about it and even some average exchanges are trying to apply it like yobit.net (not promoting it). but we are taking it too much possessive like security and wrong transactions which are done by people are rare and does not gonna happen as long as people know what they are doing. and on the other hand, we have tokens which are already on the exchange so we can exchange them as soon as we get the interest.

[Coffeehot]

in my opinion. the most important thing is the project itself. Ico and IEO are both ways of fundraising for projects. if it is a quality project. i will invest in it even if it uses ICO. some air coins quickly depreciated within a few days after IEO. Not all IEOs are worth investing.

[lionheart78]

I agree that IEO is better than ICO in terms of verification of the  project developer.  It make easy for an investor in verifying the people behind the project since the exchange already done this stuff.  Unlike ICO that the responsibility of researching or verifying the team is on the investors alone.

[Papcio77]

I agree with that reasonings, my first choice was IEO is much secured than ICO. There are lots of risk buying token through direct send of payment to the given address. IEO gives high percentage that the token we trying to buy will be sent to our wallets. Our problem is just the price when it starts in trading

[bitsurfer2014]

Personally, I prefer the usual ico on ethereum.  There is much more transparency.  And the advantage of ieo is only in the fast listing on the stock exchange.

I agree with your point. Actually I believe IEO's are just sugarcoated ICO's designed to be more attractive to investors but don't get rid of the risks associated with ICO's. With that in my mind, I'm afraid IEO's will be used as a tool for projects with malicious goals to further scam investors since these exchanges will not guarantee successful product delivery for every IEO it will conduct and I hope the community should consider that idea before they take any investment action.

[Chomsy]

The only reason with much difference here is the last one. Yes, with ICO you will have to wait months for th project to list in an exchange while it's the opposite with IEO. What I do know is that it doesn't guarantee you will make gains as the hype of ICO stipulates now.

[luthvie]

nice and really like your info buddy, now im not scared anymore for invest my money on IEO rather than traditional ICO.

[Darkoth89]

I agree with your point. Actually I believe IEO's are just sugarcoated ICO's designed to be more attractive to investors but don't get rid of the risks associated with ICO's. With that in my mind, I'm afraid IEO's will be used as a tool for projects with malicious goals to further scam investors since these exchanges will not guarantee successful product delivery for every IEO it will conduct and I hope the community should consider that idea before they take any investment action.

This exactly! Sure, exchanges are doing an intensive check of each projects before it gets on their launchpads but even Binance cannot guarantee that a project delivers its promises. In the end the biggest difference between an ICO and an IEO, is just that an IEO guarantees the listing right after the sale.

[distr@yopmail.com]

This exactly! Sure, exchanges are doing an intensive check of each projects before it gets on their launchpads but even Binance cannot guarantee that a project delivers its promises. In the end the biggest difference between an ICO and an IEO, is just that an IEO guarantees the listing right after the sale.

but everything is still risky for investment. there is no guarantee that you will benefit from IEO investments. even though an exchange of binary is also certainly risky in carrying out the IEO. still be careful.